Skip to content
Lost In… Movies

Lost In… Movies

Movie Reviews, TV Show Reviews and more!

  • Movie Reviews
  • TV Show Reviews
  • Misc
  • About Me
  • Contact Me
  • Feel Lucky, Punk? Click Here!
  • Toggle search form
  • Don’t Look Up (2021) Review – What Does ‘Subtle’ Mean? Movie Reviews
  • The Player (1992) Review – Tim Robbins shines in otherwise average movie Movie Reviews
  • The Da Vinci Code (2006) Review – Really Entertaining Nonsense Movie Reviews
  • Dune (1984) Review – A Surprise on Many Levels Movie Reviews
  • The Lion King (2019) Review – Stunningly Soulless Movie Reviews
  • Pet Sematary (2019) Review – Sometimes, No Remake Is Better Movie Reviews
  • The Princess and the Frog (2009) Review – So Close to Perfection Movie Reviews
  • His Girl Friday (1940) Review – Sneaky Classic Movie Reviews

That Touch of Mink (1962) Review – An overlooked gem…?

Posted on 11. May, 202010. May, 2020 By Luke No Comments on That Touch of Mink (1962) Review – An overlooked gem…?

It can be hard sometimes to review these romantic comedies from 50’s, 60’s and 70’s, as so much has changed – the culture, the way we treat women, how women are portrayed in movies… This movie fascinated me in this regard, as this might be one of the few movies, that has these issues, but at the same time, is surprisingly feminist…?

That Touch of Mink is currently rated on IMDb 6.7/10 and I don’t understand that at all. This movie worked for me story-wise (didn’t feel bored) and comedy-wise (got a surprising amount of laughter while watching it). To me, that’s the “riskiest” thing about these old movies.

Plenty of times you are watching an old Hollywood comedy from “the golden days”, you know where you should laugh, but you barely chuckle, as unfortunately plenty of jokes will get “old”, or the way they constructed that particular line doesn’t work anymore, or it’s been done to death etc., which is strange blaming a movie for not being “future proof”, but at the same time, you know what works and what doesn’t. This movie worked for me.

You can tell Cary Grant was getting there when comes to age (he was almost 60), if he didn’t have the charm and charisma he unquestionably had, it would’ve played much sleazier. Doris Day was charming and her character was truly puzzling me for most of them movie – the main thing about this movie is the fact she’s fallen for Cary Grant, as you do, and she’s too keen on being “the good woman” for him, but at the same time, when he “rejects” her, she is insisting on paying him back, returning everything he’s purchased for her, making something out of herself, not wanting any for free…

That’s why this movie fascinated me – on one hand it’s definitely product of its time (where woman struggles with doing everything she can to please her man) but at the same time, she’s not submissive by any means, she wants and does fend for herself. Also, making Cary Grant being the most generous person ever, where he threatens his employees with pay rises, was a welcomed decision that added to the overall enjoyment of this movie.

Also, the subplot of Gig Young being on the verge of nervous breakdown, where he doesn’t have any worries at all, and that’s what worries him, is fairly hilarious. Plus the whole thing with his psychiatrist, where he sneaked out of his office to phone his broker, just to come back to misunderstanding about his patient being possibly gay (imagine, in 1962!)… let just say, it was funny to see it played out, but also shows you how much we’ve moved forward in the past almost 60 years now.

Overall, there might be a reason for that fairly low rating on IMDb, I know both of these acting giants probably have better movies on their resume, but I genuinely found this movie to be like a warm, cosy blanket where you are there to enjoy yourself. I sure have.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Movie Reviews Tags:1962, 4.5*

Post navigation

Previous Post: Extraction (2020) Review – Does one kick ass scene make for a great movie?
Next Post: Okja (2017) Review – Not everything is black & white

Related Posts

  • The Crow (1994) Review – Questions, Cocaine and One Unfortunate Death Movie Reviews
  • Pet Sematary (2019) Review – Sometimes, No Remake Is Better Movie Reviews
  • Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019) Review – The End of the (Skywalker) Saga Movie Reviews
  • Practical Magic (1998) Review – How to Fail at World Building Movie Reviews
  • Elizabethtown (2005) Review – Spectacular failure? Movie Reviews
  • Jumanji: The Next Level (2019) Review – Promising, But Falls Short Movie Reviews

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Quick Search:

1* 1.5* 2* 2.5* 3* 3.5* 4* 4.5* 5* 1928 1932 1937 1938 1940 1945 1946 1947 1950 1951 1953 1954 1955 1958 1962 1966 1967 1968 1974 1975 1976 1977 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 About Me James Bond MCU Non-English Not a Review NSFW PodcastReview Star Wars Think Piece

Previous Articles:

My Letterboxd Ratings:

  • Little Nicky, 2000 - ★★½
  • The Lost Boys, 1987 - ★★★
  • Red Notice, 2021 - ★★★
  • Obi-Wan Kenobi, 2022 - ★★★★½
  • Sun, Hay, Berries, 1983 - ★★★★½

Follow me on Twitter:

My Tweets
  • Don’t Look Up (2021) Review – What Does ‘Subtle’ Mean? Movie Reviews
  • The Player (1992) Review – Tim Robbins shines in otherwise average movie Movie Reviews
  • The Da Vinci Code (2006) Review – Really Entertaining Nonsense Movie Reviews
  • Dune (1984) Review – A Surprise on Many Levels Movie Reviews
  • The Lion King (2019) Review – Stunningly Soulless Movie Reviews
  • Pet Sematary (2019) Review – Sometimes, No Remake Is Better Movie Reviews
  • The Princess and the Frog (2009) Review – So Close to Perfection Movie Reviews
  • His Girl Friday (1940) Review – Sneaky Classic Movie Reviews
Advertisements

Copyright © 2022 Lost In… Movies.

Powered by PressBook News Dark theme

Go to mobile version