Tag Archives: 1989

Movies or shows released in 1989.

Pet Sematary (1989) Review – Sometimes, Dead Is Better… and Crazier

Advertisements

There is definitely something about horror movies from the ’70s or ’80s. Even though some elements can be dated today (in this film, it’s 100% the acting), they always tried to go for something. What I like about those films is because the CGI wasn’t as available/believable as it is now, they had to do so much with less. And even if the movie is sometimes balls to the walls crazy, I still manage to have fun with it as I can see, they were trying to do something new. Or, at the very least, they tried to entertain you.

Pet Sematary is a delightfully creepy film that consists of effectively two main storylines. The first one is the “A story”, about a family moving to a new home and then, catastrophe happens. The other story only concerns the mother and her trying to deal with her very traumatic past. And that will be the first thing I need to mention – that entire subplot was much creepier than what was happening in our “A story”. I wish they would have focused more on that because the flashbacks with the mum, dealing with her disfigured sister, were still effective.

As mentioned before, the biggest thing by far going against this film is the performances… well. One performance specifically. I hate calling out actors, but I don’t understand what Dale Midkiff was going for at all. He seems like he’s literally sleepwalking throughout the entire movie. I would have understood had he started as your “average Joe”, and as the film progressed and he must deal with more and more, then he would “snap” into that catatonic mode. But I swear his face was blank from pretty much the beginning of the film.

The other reason I love horror movies from the ’70s or ’80s is nowadays you couldn’t show half of this stuff anymore. This is where I will talk about the story in-depth, but that also means I have to go to the spoiler territory, so…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

I believe the story of this movie, based on Stephen King’s book, is one of the more famous ones, but still, for people who have never heard about it… The family moves into a new house. They quickly discover a “pet semetary” where the locals for decades have been burying their pets. And there is something behind it, a sacred “sour” ground, where you can’t bury anything under any circumstances. Unless it’s a pet that your young daughter can’t live without, then you go right ahead. But never a person! Because the animals don’t come back “normal”, let alone people. So yeah, after this warning, you might see where this is going.

The family loses their son, so what do they do right after the funeral? Stick together so they can be there for each other? Nah, mother and daughter take off to Chicago, leaving the dad all by himself. Because sure that seems sensible. Anyway, the dad, of course, digs out his son’s body and goes beyond the “semetary”, and lo and behold, the son has returned. Except he’s a strange cross between creepy makeup on a pretty tiny kid and a plastic doll. I understand why they had to use a doll for some shots, but that doesn’t make it any less laughable. What happens then? Somehow the daughter has a gift of seeing the present/future…? So she knows what’s up, so mom and her come back from Chicago. But the creepy son not only takes out their neighbour, but he kills the mom too. The movie must be over by now, right? There is no way the dad would take her body beyond the “semetary” at this point, right after what happened with his son, rig… Yep, he’s taking her there, so she could also come back.

I am not going to lie, the last ten minutes or so of this film went from creepy to straight wild as the mom comes back, dirty and scared, they start to kiss with her husband (yep), and we see her, taking a knife. That is the end. Yet again, crazy. And yet, I still had fun with this movie. Especially now, when I’ve had the… what’s the opposite of fortune? Oh yeah, the misfortune of seeing the Pet Semetary (2019) remake, which was… horrible. But it had much better actors. While I was watching that movie, I wished there was a way we could swap actors from the remake, so they could retrospectively appear in this version. As believe me, with better actors involved, I would have been all over this film.

The other thing that didn’t quite make sense to me – the roles should have been reversed. What I mean by that – it’s clearly stated that mum’s character has problems dealing with death due to what happened with her sister when she was young. So to me, it would make more sense if it was her, who goes crazy to the point of bringing the son back, ignoring all the warnings because she can’t deal with it, not the dad, who was the “logical” one about this death thing. Well, until his young son died. Just a thought.

Overall, Pet Semetary is one of those creepy 80’s horror films that mostly work. It’s not a masterpiece by any means. I wished they explored the “B story” with her sister a bit more. And the actors are definitely the weakest part of this film. But at least you can see, they were trying to do something unique. I wish I could say that about the remake (the review is coming soon).

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for today! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Back to the Future Part II (1989) Review – The One with All The Time Travel(s)

Advertisements

During my latest re-watch, something finally clicked with me and this trilogy – each film has its own thing. Back to the Future (1985, my review here) is the one that (unsurprisingly) sets everything in motion but also has (except the very end) self-contained story. Back to the Future Part II as we know, was filmed alongside Back to the Future Part III and therefore there are plenty of things that are setup in this movie, but truly pay off in the third one. But also there is another thing that strikes you, when you watch the Part II again – it really jumps from one place to another.

I don’t think it makes it confusing, but out of all three movies, this one feels more like a bridge between two movies with mostly singular stories, because this story takes you to plenty of places… in time, to be precise. Which can be great, especially now, where we live past the year 2015 to see how many things the people behind this trilogy got right and how many they got wrong. But since this movie is the bridge between two movies, it “suffers” from being almost “too full of information”, if that makes sense…?

Let me try to make it clear – I admire the level of planning and details they put into making these movies, especially shooting Part II & III back to back, that allowed them to play around with a variety of stuff, which is great. But they have fallen into a trap of making this movie to heavily reliant not only to Part III but also on the previous movie, since it’s literally picking up right from where we left off. That is what makes this movie the “least” favourite of main, but don’t get me wrong, it’s still up there, quality wise. It’s just you can’t really watch it on its own, the same way you could watch plenty of great “second movies” on their own – Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991), Aliens (1986), Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980, my review here) and more, these are all great second movies in their franchise, that you could watch on their own, more or less. Don’t get me wrong, you’d be better off watching their first movies prior, sure. But you wouldn’t be totally lost if you skipped them either, as all of these work on their own. And I think Back to the Future Part II doesn’t as much, compared to them.

That’s not to say it doesn’t work at all – it’s got plenty of good things, especially the jokes/predictions about what the year 2015 will be like (how fixated we will be on nostalgia, video chatting, plenty of sequels etc.) and the story makes sense, even though it can feel like it’s jumping from one time period to another one rather quickly. Another thing I liked, is the fact Biff in this movie is based on Donald Trump (no fake news, read it for yourself here) and given everything all of us have been through with him from the campaign starting 2015 to the end of his presidency in the early 2021, we can judge for ourselves how accurate (or not) his portrayal was.

As mentioned in my review for the first Back to the Future movie, I can’t rank any of these any lower than the full rating, as it’s hard for me to judge them on their own. I just love this trilogy with everything, warts and all. Realistically, this would “only” be 4* for me, but that’s still really, really high, because this movie is great and everything mostly holds up (where are the goddamn hoverboards!?) Personally, this is just not my favourite out of this bunch. But more on that on Friday 😉

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation (1989) Review – Christmas… Classic (?)

Advertisements

After The Griswolds went on a round trip around USA (National Lampoon’s Vacation (1983), my review here) and went to Europe a couple of years later (National Lampoon’s European Vacation (1985), my review here) it seems like the people behind these movies have asked themselves “Well, what else can they ruin?” and somebody said “I know! What about Christmas! People love Christmas movies, and we only have sappy ones, let’s give them a crazy one!” And that is what they have done. And to be honest, it’s definitely the best out of the National Lampoon’s films I have seen (I might come around to watching the Vegas Vacation (1997) eventually, it’s just not on my immediate list of things to watch) even though it’s still not as funny as comedy should be. But, it’s got a few other things going for it.

First of all, out of all of the previous ones, this film does have the best casting – as a trademark, the kids have been re-casted again, so this time, brace yourselves for Juliette Lewis as Audrey and Johnny Galecki as Rusty. And, just alongside for the ride, as a neighbour’s wife/girlfriend (?) Julia Louis-Dreyfus, who’s done probably the best she could with such a limited time (but then, it was just before Seinfeld (1989 – 1998), the TV show that made her the star we all know and love today). And if those three actors are not enough for you, may I interest you in another TV legends, Doris Roberts or Mae Questel, the original voice of Betty Boop AND Olive Oyl! All I am saying is with such a strong casting, they had much easier job to sell me on the actual movie, which had another thing going for it.

I actually “felt” the heart I was missing so desperately, especially in the first movie. Maybe it’s easier to “sell it” with Christmas movies, maybe it’s something to do with all the talented people involved, but somehow, towards the end, I actually felt sorry for Clark, for probably the first time. And I have also felt that all the people involved in this movie could actually be family. I know! All it took was 3 movies and third set of kids for me to appreciate it, to some level 🙂 I am still not on board with Randy Quaid‘s character and that particular side of his family “unit” and I will tell you why. They always (and by that I mean the first movie and this one) felt like the “low hanging fruit” that’s not so hard to reach for and make a joke out of. Which I found lazy in both movies. I know, he’s supposed to be the “idiot character with a golden heart”, I get it. But he’s too dumb and plenty of times too gross to sell it for me. I don’t think he’s ever in any of these movies had any “breakthrough” moment, where they would actually show him as human being, rather than the idiot.

I know that especially in USA, this movie is one those Christmas classics, that some families play every year and I get it, but I won’t be joining them. Yes, it might (finally!) have a heart and it does make you feel a bit fuzzy towards the end (when the big bad boss realises how big and bad he is being towards his employees, like that would ever happen) but I come to the same issue as with the other two previous movies – I didn’t really laugh all that much. So, it doesn’t work for me on the comedic level and when comes to the “Christmas movie” level, I have different favourites (Home Alone (1990), Home Alone 2: Lost in New York (1992) or new and recently seen animated movie, Klaus (2019, my review here, just to name a few of the more famous ones) and I will not be adding National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation anytime soon. But who knows? Maybe, in couple of years time, I might re-visit these movies and find something there…? Never say never.

Overall, I do recognize the importance of all National Lampoon’s movies to the American cinematography, I mean after all, entire generation grew up watching this family and their adventures and I get it. I just feel like these movies don’t stand the test of time on their own merits. Which is fine, it’s perfectly fine if a piece of art no longer works, because not everything is immortal. On the flip side of the coin, not everything works for everyone and I might just be the exception that confirms the rule, by not understanding why are these movies so beloved. Would I recommend for you to watch them, if you haven’t? I would, because I can see how somebody might enjoy them, I wish I had, trust me. Go give these movies a shot, they might be your cup of coffee! And if not, welcome stranger, we already have one thing in common, care to grab a drink? 😉

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke