Tag Archives: 1999

Movies or shows released in 1999.

The Iron Giant (1999) Review – Guns, Feelings and Nuclear Scare

Advertisements

The Iron Giant. A film that is so beloved; it is a wonder it managed to flop so badly when it came out. On the $70 million budget, the movie only made $23 million. To put this into a perspective of how bad that box office was, this was back in 1999, so the dollar had more buying power. Also, the rule of thumb has always been for any movie to turn a profit; it needs to make roughly 2.5x its budget. So yeah, the studio lost a lot on this. Let that be (yet another) reminder that great films don’t need big budgets or can flop when they come out. I think the reason for The Iron Giant making next to none was simple – 1999 was such a strong year for films. There were so many great ones coming out it was easy for a few to fall through the cracks. And this film definitely was one of them.

If you know how/why this story came about, it makes it so much sadder, seeing this film flopping at the time. For those who don’t know, Brad Bird was partially inspired to make this movie because of his late sister Susan, who died when she was shot by her husband. His pitch was: “What if a gun had a soul and didn’t want to be a gun?” (source IMDb.com). And I believe knowing that only enhances your viewing experience as you can clearly tell this question is lingering throughout this entire film. The Giant himself acts almost like a curious toddler for the most part until he gets triggered to be the weapon he was designed to be.

What I loved about this film was how pure it was. It also achieved something not many films have done in the past – there was zero filler, and when the story is over, the movie is over. It might sound obvious, yet how often have you watched a film that you enjoyed, although you didn’t care for one storyline which had little to no impact on the main story? If you have been reading my reviews for a while, you know that’s my number one complaint, as lately it seems filmmakers believe they need to have many storylines, at least two-hour runtime etc. And sure, some films do need those things and can justify them. But more often than not, it’s not the case. But The Iron Giant should be the poster child of tightly told films. And I am not just talking about the runtime of 86 minutes. Just because a movie is short doesn’t mean it’s perfect. What I am talking about is understanding the film and what it wants to say, focusing on that aspect while not getting distracted. And that is something this film has executed flawlessly.

The story is so simple yet effective that we don’t need distractions, additional filler(s), musical numbers… I miss movies like this where you get thrown into a story that occurs over a couple of days, and you get to know the protagonists, possibly the community living there. You understand what the film is about; you get to know the protagonists, the era they live in because the movie focuses solely on one location and one community, back in the age when kids were taught to “duck and cover” as the nuclear war was looming around the corner. There is s strength in telling a simple story so well, which might lead you into thinking: “Well, anybody can tell a simple story”. Oh no, it’s not that easy, specifically, knowing when to end it; so it doesn’t overstay its welcome; that’s another level.

What I also find hilarious is how Vin Diesel is voicing the main character of the Iron Giant. He’s at the start of his career here, only for him to be known as the voice of Groot from the Guardians franchise years later while also being an action star. I find it fascinating how voice work (especially when you establish yourself as an action star as Vin has over the years) can impact your career, as many will remember him as Groot or The Iron Giant.

Also, do you know what I would consider a sign of a brilliant movie? If you know what’s going to happen and the film still gets you. Because The Iron Giant has been talked about so much over the years, it was pretty much spoiled for me. I knew everything that was coming. And yet, I might have teared up a bit at the end. And I don’t usually tear up that often. It takes an exceptional film to pull that off. I knew all the emotional beats, I knew what would happen next, and yet, the film still got me.

Overall, The Iron Giant is the little movie that might have failed on its initial run just to amass a massive cult following, whereas now, it is still considered by many to be one of the best animated films of all time. And rightfully so, might I add, as the story is so simple yet effective, the characters here work, and the Giant himself behaves in such a manner it’s hard not to fall in love. It took me a long time to watch this film. I know it won’t be too long before I re-watch it as it’s genuinely a delightful film.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Drop Dead Gorgeous (1999) Review – An Underappreciated Gem

Advertisements

Over the years of watching movies from every genre, decade, country, you name it… I’ve gotten used to the fact that sometimes you “discover” a film only a handful of people talk about. So you watch it and then you wonder, how come it’s not more famous? How come this particular film slipped through the cracks of… well, everything? Not only “slipped through the time”, but even at the box office, this movie flopped hard. And the only reason I can think of is… people didn’t get it at the time?

Drop Dead Gorgeous might, on the surface, look like your run of the mill comedy about a beauty pageant in a small, rural community. But it’s so much more. It pokes fun at everything, including the very fact how these pageants can put so much pressure on the women competing in them, even though at the end of the day, they don’t matter. Plus the mockumentary approach they chose to go with… talk about being ahead of the curve!

I think that is this film’s biggest strength, this (at times) mockumentary approach because it works wonderfully. It’s so clear, what is happening, who is behind the “sudden” death of most of the contenders, but nobody does anything about it. How some town folks are portrayed as being… let’s say simple-minded…? I thought the choices worked brilliantly for this film. But it’s impossible to discuss this movie without admiring the “about to be a big star” cast alongside some well-established ones!

Let’s start with these three “about to be big” names Kirsten DunstBrittany Murphy and Amy Adams. All these actresses had the best ahead of them at the time of the film’s shooting. Well, almost all, as Brittany tragically died in 2009. And this movie serves as a reminder she also could have been great. Just take a look at Amy Adams in this film. She plays the dimwitted character so perfectly; would you have guessed she would be one of the most admired actresses of her generation? If I saw this film back in 1999, I wouldn’t, that’s how good she was in convincing us. Kirsten is the only one out of this cast who is the most down-to-earth and is a great protagonist we can all root for. Her reaction at the end of this film, where something happens, and that something prevents her from competing, is simply priceless and drives the point home even further about the meaninglessness of this competition. And it was in these small moments the film won me over. Yes, some of this comedy stems from being in your face, but then, you have subtle moments that only pay off if you pay attention.

If you weren’t (somehow) impressed with these three ladies, let’s talk about the rest of the cast – Denise RichardsEllen BarkinAllison JanneyKirstie Alley! What I loved about these actresses; they all brought something different to this film. Denise was already a recognisable name and looked stunning. Ellen was great as Kirsten’s mum, same with Kirstie as Denise’s mum, but… Allison Janney yet again steals everything for herself. And proves, we should have been paying attention to her way, way sooner, as she can truly do it all, from playing serious roles to being a sharp-witted and funny character. In a movie like this, that is the definition of an ensemble cast, where everyone gets their chance to shine; she outshines them all, somehow.

And maybe, this was the movie’s problem…? Maybe people thought, given the film is mostly female cast and it’s about pageant show, it won’t be any good…? Well, they were wrong. I honestly hope because of the internet, we could all do our bit to make this movie into a cult classic that could be admired, for what it truly is. A great comedy with little to no flaws that is surprisingly ahead of the curve; when comes to the style of humour. It’s insane to me that a movie like this, with so many great actresses, exists, and people don’t bring it up often (enough).

Overall, Drop Dead Gorgeous is a funny, clever and star-packed movie that I can’t recommend highly enough. My only “complaint” would be it drags a bit too much towards the end, but even that isn’t anything significant that would spoil the rest of the film or my memories of it. If you are looking for a comedy with many great actresses that has something to say without being too condescending about the topic of pageants, look no further. I will 100% re-watch it at some point.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Audition (1999) Review – Chillingly Mesmerising

Advertisements

This movie became kind of a legend for me. I’ve been hearing about it from all different sources on the Internet, and unfortunately one of them managed to spoil one of the key scenes for me. At the time, I didn’t think of it that much, as I thought there will be more than this, but no, it was actually pretty important thing. Because Audition is not what it seems to be, and even though you know the basics gist of it, the movie still manages to surprise you.

And since I want to break the cycle and not spoil anything for anyone, who hasn’t seen this movie (even though it’s been out for over 20 years now) I will need to put a spoiler tag, as this movie is impossible to discuss without talking about everything that happens, so…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

You might have heard the plot line of this movie, where a guy is auditioning for his new wife (hence the title of this movie) and the one he chooses turns out to be bit more psycho than one would appreciate. So far, nothing too unexpected, right? But what I was genuinely surprised by was how little we see of the actual torture (which I am NOT complaining about, just to be extra clear here) and how basically 90% of this movie is dedicated to everything that happens prior to it. For example, the audition process actually takes time, we see the father’s relationship with his son, we see him going about his life, you know, the usual. What I am trying to say is if you are watching this movie just for the “cheap thrills” of just another “torture porn” movie, this is only it for the last 10/15 minutes or so and this movie is much more than this.

Prior to that, the movie deals with plenty of stuff, like how it is to loose your wife and trying to “get back there”, how dangerous it is to trust some random person who you’ve just met, even though they might seem like the most polite, non-threating person under the sun… this movie was truly ahead of its time. Also, I expected for her to move in with him straight-away, but no, after the first night together, she disappears and he is trying to look for her, but all the information he’s got about her turn out to be dead ends. The movie is really great when comes to subverting your expectations of what is to come.

And yet, towards the end, I felt like I needed more. Like something was missing from the overall enjoyment. And I think I might know what. The thing I had spoilt for me was the scene where Eihi Shiina (chillingly great performance) is using the string to cut Ryo Ishibashi‘s foot and that imagery alongside the sound effects, to me that’s the key moment of this movie. That sheer, raw brutality of that moment, that was unfortunately spoiled for me long time ago. And I know this is going to sound really weird, but I honestly expected something worse, when came to the actually torture scene.

Now I am not saying everything that happened in that scene wasn’t shocking, it was, but unfortunately as a person, who sat through all the Saw movies, who have been influenced to a certain extent by this movie, it takes a lot to stun me. So because I had the “main” scene spoiled for me, I was kind of expecting there to be more and there wasn’t. Which is not to say this movie is bad because of it, not by any means, it just unfortunately I’ve seen it late, I’ve had it spoiled and that unfortunately takes its toll on my overall experience of this really, really disturbing movie.

Audition is definitely one of the “granddaddies” of the term I’ve used prior – “torture porn”. As it shows you something most movies shy away from and it almost bathes in it. But in here, it’s not actually done over the top, like in Saw franchise, where they had to one up every upcoming sequel with more horrifying/disgusting traps. In Audition, it’s pretty straightforward, and mainly – the torture porn aspect of it is almost a by-product! Yes, the movie is famous because of it, but at the same time, it’s much more than that and I think that’s the main difference between this and every other movies in this genre. Audition is a mix of drama, comedy (yes, surprisingly there are funny scenes, mainly during the actual audition part of the movie) thriller, where the movie might have been better, had they given us bit more. Maybe additional 30 minutes, to explore more of Eihi’s background, because from what we’ve been shown, there was a reason she acted in such a way and even though I get not showing us too much, to let the audience be more engaged, I wanted more of her backstory.

Overall, Audition is definitely a movie, that’s not for everyone. It’s still (after 20+ years) a chilling, yet mesmerizing movie that takes its time, it’s meticulously crafted with some great performances, mainly by our main duo. And if you can handle a bit of the “good old fashioned” torture and you love a film, that takes its time, there is a bit of a mystery, drama, comedy and thriller all wrapped up in one AND you haven’t had it spoiled by anyone, this might be something worth checking out.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

But I’m a Cheerleader (1999) Review – Funny, Charming and RuPaul!

Advertisements

This movie reminded me why I love movies that are older, even if by only 20 something years. As every movie (as long as it’s not historical drama or something along those lines) is a time capsule of an era, or a certain time period. But I’m a Cheerleader deals with the fact that Megan (Natasha Lyonne) might be… A LESBIAN?! Imagine the horror… 🙂 Which this movie pokes fun at and at the same time reflects on her experience throughout all of this, and does it really well.

I find it hard to write about But I’m a Cheerleader as it’s almost one of a kind movie. On a surface, it might seem like pretty straightforward comedy, where parents think their daughter can be cured of her lesbianism, so they send her to “rehab camp”, where in a couple of weeks time, they should cure her of all the gayness and make her ready to jump on any dick in her general vicinity. But dig deeper and you will find it’s also tender, gentle story of a few girls coming to terms with who they are, while this silliness is happening in the background.

A big part of this movie’s charm goes with the casting – from Natasha, Melanie Lynskey, Clea DuVall, to RuPaul (as a man!) and in tiny roles Michelle Williams and Julie Delpy! And I need to stop to discuss Ru, as I am so used to his Drag Race persona, I never realized how much “on” he is. What I mean is, in here, he actually uses his “normal” voice, which I almost didn’t recognize, as he’s talking much much higher, even when he is out of drag. It was definitely fascinating seeing him act and to be “prototype” of this manly man and him being the coach for all the gays, that should turn into men, under his supervision.

And I think if you knew who he was back in 1999, you’d appreciate this film much more than your average movie goer, as even that fact (RuPaul being the one who coaches young guys and giving them advice on how to be a man) is making mockery of this idea, that you can “cure” gay/lesbian thoughts. And that is something this movie does really well, as this topic could have been turned really sad really quickly. And yet, it never goes there, there is always a hope.

Something tells me that if you wanted to make a movie like this today, it wouldn’t be a comedy, rather it would be this deep psychological drama, mixed with bit of a thriller, where they would let you wallow in a dirt and misery for just over 2 hours. But I’m a Cheerleader took entirely different route and took this topic as a challenge, it made it into almost light-hearted comedy, that doesn’t shy away from dealing with the idea of how fucked up this system is. And it does it in a very different, more optimistic way and I really, really liked that.

I think we kind of lost this form of filmmaking, where if we want to make a movie about something that’s serious, there can’t be any joy in it, as it is serious, right? This film reminds us that not only it can be done, but it can be done really well, especially if you let somebody like Jamie Babbit write and direct the movie too.

Overall, But I’m a Cheerleader feels like almost a unicorn in the dark. It’s shinning bright, it’s making mockery out of everybody, who is still thinking homosexuality can be cured and actually takes its time to introduce and develop characters, so you as a viewer can easily identify with them. And that is worth a lot as I can’t imagine how it must feel like being a teenage girl, who’s not only confused about liking girls, but now she’s being told it’s bad and she shouldn’t do that. But this movie shows you her experience and perspective so well, it’s really easy to understand and not only her character, but everybody at the “camp”. I think I might re-watch it at some point, as I didn’t expect to like this movie as much as I have.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Bone Collector (1999) Review – Classic 90’s Thriller

Advertisements

The 90’s. Decade of new age technology (internet blowing up), decade of some of the best movies ever made (mainly years 1994 & 1999) and also decade of dark thrillers, that inspired countless TV shows like Criminal Minds, NCIS just to name a couple, where mainly the first one is so influenced by dark, gritty 90’s thrillers, that if it wasn’t for them, that TV show wouldn’t exist. Which is funny, as this movie wouldn’t exist, if it wasn’t for a fact that every studio wanted it’s own version of Se7en (1995), as Phillip Noyce, the director of The Bone Collector, admitted:

Phillip Noyce is not a big fan of his work on this film. In the wake of Seven (1995), every studio wanted a copycat serial killer film on their books. He felt that he was just part of the assembly line by signing on to this film, knowing full well that he would never be able to match David Fincher‘s achievement.

Source: IMDb’s Trivia Section

The Bone Collector is surprisingly tough movie to rate by today’s standards, as the TV shows I’ve mentioned have done this kind of material better (was never a big fan of Criminal Minds, but because of my girlfriend, I have watched couple of episodes and it was interesting) as they not only had the advantage of time, but also… time? Wait what? Don’t worry, I’ll explain.

The first instance of time is the time period – working in mid 2000’s, with different technology and police procedures available, more knowledge about this kind of work, also knowing where the previous movies/TV shows succeeded and failed, that gives you an advantage, as you know what can you do with some stories and what to avoid/what wouldn’t work as well.

The other is the actual time, as by definition, TV show doesn’t have to have everything wrapped up nicely in 40 minute episode. Don’t get me wrong, they can and they definitely have done it, plenty of times in fact, but they can invest a full season or two, if they wish, to fully flesh out a character of a serial killer, think his/her plan through (yes, even ladies can be serial killers, #Feminism) and go in really deep for a really long time. And that’s something no movie can do, no matter how great or long it is.

And even though I understand why these thrillers are no longer being made as much as they were, I do miss them, as specially the 90’s ones have had this atmosphere, that you can’t replicate today. Even this movie, which is really entertaining, but nowhere near as great as already mentioned Se7en (1995), still holds up fairly well, because of the tense atmosphere and great casting. It also holds up as it was shot in pre-smartphone, pre-Internet (at least the “proper” Internet we have available today) era, as the detectives need to actually do some work, not just type everything into a PC, look for information online, where everything is “solved” within minutes.

What I really appreciated in this movie is the fact Angelina Jolie isn’t just an eye candy, but is given something to do, even if the reason for her being in that situation is the ultimate movie reason of all time (because she took some pictures really well and had a half a brain to stop a train, so it wouldn’t ruin the evidence, Denzel Washington‘s character sees something in her…? As I say, only in movies…) I also found it interesting to put Denzel’s character on a bed for 99% of the movie, so his character spends most of his time talking to people on the phone, staring on screens, or hyping Angelina’s character up, so she can see the very same thing Denzel sees in her.

If you are a fan of darker, twisted crime shows or old-ish thrillers, you might want to check this movie out, as I think it holds up fairly well. My main complain would only have to be that the run time could’ve been slightly cut down, as towards the end, movie starts to drag a bit, which is a shame, as until that moment, I was really enjoying it. But then again, I do like these darker thrillers and Angelina, so I might be a bit biased. 😉

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999) Review – The defence of indefensible?

Advertisements

So, this is where to “fun” starts. I have so many conflicting thoughts, about this particular movie, I will definitely have to use two ratings, as I can’t do it any other way. But let’s start from the beginning, shall we? (words uttered by George Lucas in late 90’s).

Unlike most Star Wars fans, I grew up watching the originals alongside the prequels (born in 1991) so I was introduced to both of them almost simultaneously. And even as a kid, not knowing anything about cinema, the cult status Star Wars had established over the 20 years (again, we are in the 90’s, the Internet wasn’t THE thing yet and I couldn’t understand English) I could tell the movies felt differently, and not just “the old ones looked worse, the new ones looked better” way. There was something about the prequels I couldn’t place. I think I do get it now – these are all sole responsibility of George Lucas, whereas the original trilogy had different writers/directors. And as much I admire George for everything he’s done, he should’ve had somebody else take a look at the script, as that’s by far the weakest part of this movie. Some things you can’t deny from the prequels, they enriched the Star Wars universe with new, diverse planets, characters and they had a plan for what the trilogy will be about. It’s honestly shame Lucas felt he could do everything by himself.

I still remember watching The Phantom Menace for the first time, it was in my grandma’s “cabin close to the woods” (just to explain – it’s fairly common for Czech people to have tiny cabins/houses someplace close to a nature where one would go for a weekend, or week’s holiday. Most of the time, these are really not fancy at all, as the point would be to have as little technology there as possible, to “unplug” from the world for a bit and go back to the nature) on her tiny, black and white 10″ TV (that’s right, my very first time watching this movie was in black and white on a really tiny TV). Since there was a gathering of neighbours, I couldn’t really enjoy the movie as much, but I knew it’s being recorded at home on… VHS (oh yeah, that’s how old I am) so I was looking forward to that. Then I watched it at home properly and liked it. Not as much as the originals, but I did like it.

Over the years I’ve seen the prequel trilogy (including this one) plenty of times, last time it was about 3 weeks prior, on Disney+. And yes, the contrast between the original Star Wars and this one is huge, but I honestly believe that’s because George wanted it like that. The problem here is, did it work…? This is where I’m conflicted – I feel like even though some parts of this might be laughable (obviously Jar Jar is annoying, but I’ve never hated him as much as 90% of the Internet) as a whole, the movie somehow works. The story flows, it doesn’t feel bloated, and even though it’s almost 2 hours and 20 minutes, it goes by quickly, which is definitely plus.

And this is (probably) where my personal bias comes in (oh hello, old friend) I grew up with these movies, the same way some people in the 80’s grew up with the original trilogy. I can’t blame people who hate the prequels, as they are totally different to the thing they grew up loving, but at the same time, I can’t join those people, as they are not that bad. Looking back at them now, every episode has something in them that elevates it and adds something to the Star Wars universe, this one had given us probably the most bad-ass Star Wars piece of soundtrack ever composed, listen for yourself:

Duel Of The Fates by John Williams

Yes, I know that’s a bold statement to make given the rich history of Star Wars music, but I stand by it (I’m very, very brave). Also the lightsaber fight between Qui-Gon Jinn, Obi-Wan and Darth Maul is great, even though the finish might be slightly anticlimactic. I’m also in the group of people who likes the pod-racing sequence.

While re-watching all 9 episodes of “Skywalker Saga”, something occurred to me – you can say anything you want about the prequels, but one thing you can’t say is that George Lucas didn’t have it planned out. He knew exactly what he wanted to make, what story he wanted to tell over the course of these three movies, and that’s a really big plus with every trilogy (looking at you, sequels). Did he succeed on every level? Does that excuse Jar Jar? Does that give him a permission to change the original movies as much as he has? No, no and no. It’s up to you, to judge that.

The objective rating of this would probably be around 3*, but this is Star Wars. And even this one (which for me is the weakest one of the prequels) still holds a special place in my heart. Please don’t kill me for that. Just for the record, I am not putting the prequels anywhere close to the originals, as they are untouchable. I like them in their own way.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

This is all for this one? How much you disagree with me on this? Maybe don’t let me know this time 🙂 Just kidding, please do.

Until next time,

Luke