Tag Archives: 2019

Movies or shows released in 2019.

Last Christmas (2019) Review – Emilia Clarke Shines, Movie Does Not

Advertisements

Thinking about this now, would it be more sensible for me to write about this movie right around the Christmas period, while people are more likely to read reviews for Christmas movies to watch…? Yeah, probably. Oh well… Last Christmas is a weird movie for me, as it’s perfectly watchable, but ultimately it feels like that one friend, who’s trying so hard to be your best friend, he becomes irritating. That’s how this movie ultimately felt like to me, except in this instance, it’s trying to be way to clever.

The biggest strength of Last Christmas is without a doubt, its casting. Henry Golding is (and I am saying this as a heterosexual man) really good looking and charismatic, to the point he makes me jealous as to why I can’t be like him, Michelle Yeoh was fun and her story line with her man I mean Boy (played by Peter Mygind) was actually sweet and charming and Emma Thompson playing a Croatian, first feels slightly out of place, but I liked her performance and her place in the movie, as it belongs there (I will talk about that in a second). But the best performance by far and the reason I am rating this as “high” as I am, is Emilia Clarke. On the first glance, you might think she’s just playing real-life version of herself (as she is as adorable as a basket full of puppies and kittens mixed together) but her performance has layers. She’s got some scenes in this movie, where her character is all over the place (as her character makes one bad decision right after another) but she plays it in a really relatable way and she’s not over the top. Plenty of actors in other comedies would have chosen to play character like hers more comedically, even in the moments where it wouldn’t fit. But not Emilia, she wasn’t afraid to be all over the place emotionally, as that made sense for her character. So it’s much easier for us to root for her throughout the film, because we want to see her succeed, as her character feels real. Honestly, I don’t think people give her enough credit.

As mentioned before, this movie ultimately feels bit more needy, in two aspects. First aspect was, and I need to warn you here, this will get a bit political, how Brexit influenced the mood in the UK. And I didn’t mind that as much, as I am also a foreigner, living in the UK. Luckily, Scotland seems to be a bit more welcoming and a way less “get back where you came from!” place, as 99% of all Scottish people I have met throughout my almost 10 years living here, were friendly, smart and kind people. It’s a brave move to make a “feel-good” Christmas movie, but you also feel the need to include Brexit, and how the toxicity surrounding it affects people (and not just the foreigners/immigrants, but the English people and their attitude towards “others”) living in the UK and that is why I did eventually liked the fact Emma Thompson’s character was a Croatian migrant. Yes, it is a bit of downer, and yes, it is a bit (ok, a huge) of political statement, but wouldn’t it be more harmful to make a Christmas movie based in London in 2019 and completely ignore something as massive and life-changing for so many people? Anyway, this aspect felt strange, but I would be able to “cope” with it better, if it wasn’t for the second aspect, and the ultimate reason I struggled with this film.

I am not going to go into spoiler territory, as I think I can discuss it vaguely enough for people to understand my point. From the very beginning of Last Christmas, it’s strongly hinted that Emilia’s character went through something bad (medically) not that long ago, but we don’t know what it is, until we are about 70% into the film. Fine, seems interesting. But you can tell there will be more linked with this, you can feel there is a twist coming up. And there was. I am not going to claim that I predicted THAT particular twist before it happened, as I didn’t guessed it right. But you know what’s even more disappointing, when watching a movie, knowing there is a twist, and it’s not something you were expecting? The fact once the twist is revealed, it does nothing for you. Honestly, Last Christmas for me will be that one movie with a twist, that literally didn’t have to be there, as it didn’t add anything extra. I understood everything they were trying to do/say with this, I honestly do, but it felt shallow, empty and false. Especially with the constant foreshadowing, I expected something different, more impactful and when it happened, when the twist was finally revealed, I just said “Wait, that’s it?”. Honestly, it didn’t work for me.

And that was ultimately the biggest let down for me – if this movie didn’t feel the need to have some sort of twist and focused more on the relationships they already had established (Emilia and Henry, Emilia and her mum, Emilia and her sister, “Santa” and her “Boy”) and flashed them out a bit more, this could have been an interesting Christmas movie, that might have led the way for others. It could have been a great example of “see, Christmas movies don’t have to be just all happy, they can touch on complicated relationships or even politics” but instead of that, Last Christmas will be remembered as the movie with a twist, that leaves you colder than Santa’s balls throughout the toughest winter on North Pole.

Overall, I think Last Christmas is a decent movie, that could have been even better, had they focused on the right areas and weren’t trying so hard to surprise the audience. But, if you are a fan of Emilia Clarke (and who isn’t?) it’s definitely a must see, as she carries this movie on her tiny, elf shoulders. 😉 I am not being funny by the way, if she wasn’t part of this movie, my rating would have been way lower.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Bad Education (2019) Review – Bad Title, Solid Movie

Advertisements

Before we dive into the review itself, can we just (and by “we” I mean Hollywood people in charge of coming up titles for movies) stop naming movies “Bad _____”? Honestly, this is the third movie and fourth “content” called Bad Education, next to the TV show Bad Education (2012), (hence the word content), the movie based on that TV show called The Bad Education Movie (2015) and Pedro Almodóvar’s Bad Education (2004), which I haven’t seen, but given the synopsis “An examination on the effect of Franco-era religious schooling and sexual abuse on the lives of two longtime friends.” I will take a wild guess and say that isn’t really a comedy, or anywhere near close this movie starring Hugh Jackman. Anyway, how many of these “bad” movies do we really need and when is enough, truly enough? From a really quick search, we’ve had Teachers (2011), Moms (2016 and 2017, twice!!) Santa’s (2003 and 2016, also twice!!), Boys (1995, 2003, 2020 AND just announced another sequel?!) and I bet I could find even more examples. Honestly, at this point, can we just retire this “Bad ___” and don’t use it for anything for at least 20/30 years?

One of the reasons for why I feel so strongly about this, would be this movie. Because it is actually pretty good film, but I bet you plenty of people were not keen on watching it, as the title does not really relate to the film…? I mean, I guess kind of? You know, since he’s not a teacher…? This could have been called “Hugh Jackman is a Pretty Big Dick in This Movie” and that would have described this film more accurately than its current title.

Basically, this movie is about money embezzling that goes on at one school and the movie let’s you guess when comes to who’s involved (even though it’s fairly obvious from the very beginning) and how long it’s been going on for. That’s the basic gist of it. And I know it sounds boring, and with lesser actors, it would have been. But Hugh Jackman, Allison Janney and Geraldine Viswanathan are bringing their A+ game to this, and mainly these three actors make it above average experience. Especially Hugh, who I was surprised by. How he tried to do something, he doesn’t do that often anymore, be a pretty big dick in this movie. But his character is convinced until the very end, he’s not being a dick and everything he does he justifies to himself and the audience, and because of his charm (and come on, Hugh is charming, you know it) you want to believe him, even though you know the truth about his character all along.

As a person who’s never heard of this scandal, I think it was told very well, but there was no major surprise within the movie. Which is a bit disappointing, especially if it’s based on something real you’ve never heard of, but the movie can’t surprise you in any way, as you can tell where everything is going the entire way. But, it is well made TV movie (HBO movies usually know how to bring quality material) so I do think it’s worth watching.

Overall, please ignore the horribly plain title of this movie and give it a shot. Especially if you only know the nice, gentleman-like Hugh Jackman, give this a watch, to see that he can do something, that is very outside of his (usual) wheelhouse. This movie probably won’t change your life in way, shape or form, but it’s pretty entertaining ride, even though you know how that ride will finish.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Doctor Sleep (2019) Review – Almost Perfect

Advertisements

When comes to sequel(s) to classic movies, I am always a bit too sceptical. Let alone after almost 40 years, where the story usually revolves around “let’s catch up with our hero and see how miserable he/she is”. And Doctor Sleep is no exception, at least for the later part, as we do follow adult Danny, and let just say in the first half of this movie, he’s in much worse place than The Overlook Hotel. But, here is the difference – this sequel is actually not bad, quite opposite… It’s pretty great!

I think there are two main reasons why Doctor Sleep succeeded where others have failed – the story was actually there (the book with the same name came out in 2013, and that always helps when the author of the original book does a follow up himself, rather than this being made/written up by somebody else) and most importantly, they hired Mike Flanagan, who put together bunch of talented people and pulled the impossible – managed to satisfy both the book and movie people.

What I mean by that, is even though The Shinning (1980) is one of the best regarded horror movie of all time, it’s also no secret that Stephen King hated that movie, as it wasn’t a faithful adaption of his book and Stanley Kubrick took a lot of liberties adapting it, particularly the end. I don’t really know more details, as I haven’t read the book, and I don’t want to spoil it for myself, because it’s waiting for me on my bookshelf to finally be read, but I am sure you can find a lot of things online about why King hated the movie Kubrick made. Anyway, based on what I have heard from fans of both movie and the book, Flanagan made this movie to please both groups, and I that couldn’t have been an easy job. What he also did correctly was casting the three main leads.

While Ewan McGregor and Kyliegh Curran are both great in their roles (especially Kyliegh, for somebody as young as her, her performance was impressive) there is somebody, who stole the movie for herself – Rebecca Ferguson. I still have not seen her in plenty of things, but every time I have seen her, she was always great. But in this movie, she’s the villain you won’t forget any time soon. Her “Rose The Hat” character is terrifying, because she’s trying not to be terrifying if that makes sense…? She’s handled that character so well, I was honestly surprised she wasn’t up for any major awards, as to me, I can’t remember the last time a villain was so compelling, and felt as real as her. I wouldn’t even mind comparing her to Heath Ledger‘s Joker from The Dark Knight (2008) as they are really similar characters to me, where she’s got a goal, and will do everything in her power to get it. And even though (unlike Joker) she does have some magical powers, her Rose The Hat feels realistic. Honestly, my hat (some pun intended) is off, as to steal a movie where Ewan McGregor is giving one hell of performance from him, is no small task.

Doctor Sleep is almost a perfect movie, where the only thing that bothered me slightly, was the reliance on The Shinning a little too much. I understand this is a sequel and we had to have some scenes from the original movie, but especially the beginning felt slightly out of place. Yes, I know most fans have issues with the ending of this movie (which I won’t spoil) but I actually didn’t mind that, as to me, it did feel natural, or more natural, than the beginning of this movie. I know, I am a weird one. 😉

Overall, I wasn’t expecting to like this movie as much as I have. And I can actually see myself watching Doctor Sleep alongside The Shinning in a couple of years and who knows…? Maybe a second or a third viewing will nudge my rating over the top, where I will admit this movie might not be The Shinning, but it’s great on its own terms and it might be a small miracle put together, given everything that needed to align for this movie to please the fans of the book(s), the original movie and the toughest audience ever, Stephen King himself (who reportedly loved this movie). If not for anything else (and there is a plenty to like about this movie) please watch it for Rebecca Ferguson.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Richard Jewell (2019) Review – From Hero to Terrorist

Advertisements

Biopics are hit or miss with me. That is why I went into this one with not only no expectations, but also no knowledge of what actually happened back in 1996. I had no idea there was a guy named Richard Jewell, I had no idea that he went from a hero, who was just trying to do his job properly, to a possible suspect, based on almost nothing… And I think that is maybe the reason I was so pleasantly surprised with this movie.

Richard Jewell definitely hits your stereotypical biopic “notes”, where certain things didn’t happen the way they were portrayed in this movie (which is why you always do your own research, as movies don’t show you history, they are here to entertain us) but Clint Eastwood knows how to milk the most out of the every single moment and (more importantly) how to get the most out of every single actor in this movie, because that is where this film shines.

I have seen Paul Walter Hauser in a couple of movies prior to this one, but given he’s never had a leading role (at least in the movies I had seen) I would never remember his name, or how would he look like. But after Richard Jewell, I will definitely remember his name, as he portrayed the character perfectly. And I don’t know whether this is how the real Richard was, but to be honest, I don’t really care, as what Paul did worked perfectly within this movie. You could tell this guy is no threat, but at the same time, he definitely lacks “some” social skills, and that plays against him in a number of scenes. And you genuinely find yourself rooting for this guy, especially towards the end, where he finally stands up for himself, it feels earned. Without Paul’s performance being what it is, this movie wouldn’t have worked.

This might be just wasting kilobytes at this point, but both Sam Rockwell and Kathy Bates were also great. But not only great, they were both perfect by being “just” supporting actors, in the best possible sense. Both of their performances felt like they are there for Paul/Richard, but they never seem to “clash”, I have never gotten a feeling from any scene that they would try to “compete” with him. They understood that if they are there for him, the movie succeeds and that makes them succeed. In turn, they also proved (yet again) that there is no such thing as small roles, only small actors, as they both do the maximum they can with what they have been given.

I think the main reason this movie resonated with me so much, is how little had changed since 1996 and how actually, the things movie is commenting on (sensationalized media, not verifying their sources, making something, that’s not news, into news, shattering someone’s life in the meantime, and once we know more, nobody cares about the truth anymore, as we remember the sensation, not the truth) is much worse, due to social media and it’s almost real-time ability to report on current events as they happen. To be fair, I know plenty of major news organisations are stepping up (as we could all witness during the 2020 presidential election, where most of the mainstream media were really careful to report any new updates) which is great, but things and mistakes will happen, no matter how “bullet-proof” your system is. That is why I try to remember, that anytime something major happens, 90% of the time, we don’t have the full information available, and in a day, or a week, something once reported as true, might be debunked.

Overall, Richard Jewell is surprisingly swift, and maybe even slightly underrated biopic, with at least three really, really strong performances, which two of them might have been expected, but the main one hits you hardest with how raw it feels. I do hope Paul Walter Hauser has a great future in front of him, because he’s proven that with a right script, he could lead a movie, like there is no tomorrow.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Klaus (2019) Review – New Christmas Classic!

Advertisements

I remember hearing really good things about this movie a year ago, when it came out. But then, regretfully, I have forgotten all about it. But couple of weeks ago, some movie people I follow on Twitter started to “argue” that even though it’s really new, Klaus is a Christmas movie done right and will 100% become a new holiday classic for years to come. Yes, Twitter can sometimes do great things! So, being reminded of this movie, I’ve discovered it on Netflix and watched it with my girlfriend. And we absolutely loved it.

The story at first seems to be as cliché as it gets, spoiled son is shipped away to make something out of himself, he hates everything, he’s lazy… you name it. But there are these little things, quirks that differentiate Klaus from other movies. First of all, the animation looks more unique than your “average” Disney/Pixar/DreamWorks so it hits you differently, in a good way. The second thing was the jokes seemed to be more subtle, nothing too “in your face” like animation movies have done over the past couple of years. It’s almost like they have decided that even though this is an animated movie, it doesn’t mean we can’t have better jokes or deeper themes to cover. And that brings me to the most unique thing about this movie – the actual story.

See, Klaus is really about how this legend of Santa started. But it’s done in different way, European way. What does that mean, you might ask? Well, plenty of European legends/fairy tales are actually darker than American ones and are usually not shy from dealing with heavier topics within its stories. Just an example, have a read of the original story by Hans Christian Andersen, The Little Mermaid and you might be shocked to see how much Disney had changed it to be more palatable to Americans. And that is the biggest advantage of Klaus, it is not Americanised in any way. There are some darker elements and the back story behind the actual Klaus and why he has so many toys, is heart-breaking. But don’t get me wrong, this is a movie for the entire family, 100%! Just because it might deal with certain topics that would make you a bit sad (my girlfriend cried her way through most of the second half, either it was too sad, or too cute for her gentle soul to handle) it doesn’t mean it’s not a family movie. I would argue it’s one of the best animated family movies in years!

That’s the other point with your story having some slightly darker or more adult themes – it juxtaposes with the light themes/jokes much better, which only makes sense, if you think about it. That is why I believe it’s a mistake for (mostly) American animated movies to be all jokes, no even remotely adult themes anywhere, as when you have a film, that’s one joke after another, eventually you will feel dull. Whereas with Klaus, one scene might make you a bit more emotional, just so in a couple of minutes, you will genuinely laugh. This movie mixes it perfectly, so it never goes overboard with being either too dark/adult or too silly/cartoonish.

Plus, the voice casting! The main trio is just excellent, Jason Schwartzman as our protagonist was great, Rashida Jones, who must really love voicing Christmas characters, as she’s in the latest “remake” of  The Grinch (2018, my review here) too, is always pleasant to listen, but the main star is J.K. Simmons as Klaus, because he fits this role just perfectly. I love the fact J.K. Simmons is having this late career push, where he is in everything and he’s great, because he deserves it. And his voice, his slightly darker/threating voice, was oddly enough, perfect for this figure.

Overall, I loved this movie. I am always trying to be careful with what I say, as you never know what will happen in the future (remember how we believed 2020 will be great year…? Yeah…) but I am convinced, that Klaus will become a holiday classic, and not only for this generation. The same way we have holiday classics from different eras (the oldest is probably It’s a Wonderful Life (1946) with the latest probably being Elf (2003) as I can’t remember any other mainstream movie that would be considered holiday classic after Elf) this movie has already in my mind joined those movies, where it will be re-watched every holiday season, because it is that great. At least in our household, I will be more than happy to call this movie the new Christmas classic.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time & have happy holidays,

Luke

Ad Astra (2019) Review – One Man (Space) Show… Literally.

Advertisements

Ad Astra feels familiar, yet different. It mixes Interstellar (2014), 2001 A Space Odyssey (1968) and Gravity (2013) together to create something that’s not as great as either of those film, but it’s still interesting nevertheless. Also, it take the “best” elements of those movies (space travelling feeling of Interstellar, the slow pace of 2001 and some action-like sequences of Gravity, especially the sequence at the very beginning of this movie) but it doesn’t feel repetitive, it feels like its own unique(ish) thing.

For me, the biggest draw to this movie was Brad Pitt. Especially the last year was really kind to him (it’s easy to forget because of COVID-19, that he’s won his second Oscar in February 2020 (yes, this year!) for Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood (2019), his first for an acting role, as his first Oscar was for producing 12 Years a Slave (2013)) and it seems like people finally are recognising him for his talent and are seeing what he’s doing for other filmmakers in Hollywood, as he’s produced more than 60 movies in the last 14 years. Not bad at all. And in Ad Astra, he gives us something different, as his performance is really subtle. Basically, there are almost no scenes without him, as the entire movie revolves around him, but you never get the feeling like it’s too much. Pitt’s performance is really… approachable…? The best way to describe it is “low key” as it seems like he’s barely acting, in the best possible way. At times, this movie felt more like a documentary about a real guy, who’s actually this level-headed astronaut, whose blood pressure barely goes over 80. Definitely one of Brad’s best performances.

The movie ultimately suffers from a tough competition, as just in the last couple of years, we have had our fair share of truly great sci-fi movies. And while Ad Astra is definitely a good movie, that stands out, it also drags on a bit too much every once in a while. As I mentioned in my previous reviews, I honestly don’t mind movies that take their time to build their world/atmosphere/feeling properly, but there is also being a self-indulgent. And this movie might have been bit too self-indulgent. Yes, plenty of shots were stunning, but plenty of them dragged on. Yes, there were some great action sequences (yet again I need to mention the beginning of this movie) but than there were large chunks of this movie where if you told me you fell asleep while watching, I wouldn’t blame you.

Also, any time we might have another interesting character Brad Pitt can interact with, they either serve as exposition dump for him, or they just die after a few minutes. And look, I understand this movie is ultimately about this dad/son journey, where the son is looking for his dad and in doing so, looking for piece of himself in the process, but sure would be nice to get to know some other characters in this movie. Especially if the film includes actors like Tommy Lee Jones, Ruth Negga, Donald Sutherland or Liv Tyler (who if I am not mistaken, doesn’t speak a single word in this entire movie, which must be some kind of record…?)

I do understand the division with this movie, as it’s definitely more about the feeling, rather than a simple story/narrative structure. If you are into movies, that make you think about life, and if you want to see how Brad Pitt matures to perfection and can have the entire film basically rest on his shoulders, than you might like Ad Astra. But if you are looking for more “conventional” sci-fi film, I would stay clear of this movie, as you might fall asleep while watching it.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Shazam! (2019) Review – From Zero to… Enjoyable Film!

Advertisements

Who would have thought, that DC, who have Batman and Superman in their catalogue (arguably two of the biggest and well known superheroes ever created) would finally figure out how to make a watchable superhero movie with a guy, who’s not that known and kind of Superman’s rip-off…? Shazam! is a surprisingly great movie, that is witty, funny and has a bit of heart to it.

And “only” thing that took to make it was David F. Sandberg who understood the material, perfectly casted Zachary Levi alongside great villain played by Mark Strong, make it about family… well, looking back at it now, there were quite a few things that had to come together. I think that is what makes Shazam! such a nice surprise. I knew this movie was coming out, but at that point, only decent movie DC came out with was Wonder Woman (2017) and it was definitely the best DC movie, but still nothing I would be rushing to re-watch. Whereas this film I can see myself going back to, especially if the sequel(s) will be any good.

I think the main difference is the tone – DC seem to finally understand, that just because they have the more serious superheroes, not every movie needs to be dark, serious and deal with some serious topics. This movie is almost dancing on the line of making fun of the genre, but at the same time understanding it, so it never goes beyond that line. It never becomes annoying and in hands of somebody, who doesn’t understand the material, I could have easily see that happening. Shazam could have easily been really annoying superhero. But maybe it was the script, maybe it was the focus on the themes of what family means (it’s not the people who brought you to this world, but the people who are there for you, who actually care) maybe it was the perfect casting of Zachary, or maybe it was a mix of all of the above, it just never got annoying.

The only “issue” I had with this movie is – it’s not as clever as it think it is. And let me explain – the movie is doing more or less the same thing as Deadpool (2016). It is very much aware of what it is, even though it won’t break any fourth walls, it is still very self-aware, while at the same time, still playing by the same “comic book” rules. And Deadpool managed to surprise me along the way several times, where the was always an extra joke I wasn’t expecting, or scene that pushed it over the top for me and made it highly enjoyable. Shazam! doesn’t have that element of surprise, everything is lined-up and going exactly where you think it’s going. Which is fine, as it serves the story, but there is nothing extra. At least there wasn’t for me.

But that is very minor detail, as don’t get me wrong, this is highly enjoyable film and unlike this movie, where I knew it was coming out, I just didn’t care about it as I knew little about it, I will be looking out for the sequel, hoping it’s going to deliver, expand on the world and stays true to what’s been lined up here. I would be disappointed, if the sequel(s) suddenly went dark and serious. Let us have something lighter, DC, just for once. Also, plus points for foster family, who actually weren’t terrible people and having a disabled step-brother, who doesn’t feel like he’s there to fill in a quota, but actually serves the story!

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Abominable (2019) Review – Formula Done Right

Advertisements

If you have been reading my blog for a bit (and I can’t thank you enough if you had, really appreciate it) you’d know that I often use phrases such as “as average as it get’s”, “perfectly predictable” or something along these lines. Abominable could be summed up in three words I have used to name this review “formula done right” and that sometimes can be enough.

Let me start with the animation style. I know it’s like bringing alcohol to a pub, but every year, the animation gets better and better. Sure, we don’t see such a big jump like we used to, even though the technology is still evolving, but not to a degree we would be stunned the way we’ve seen animated movies of the past. But this movie still looks beautiful and especially the nature scenes in the middle/end portion of the movie. Some sequences are simply charming, same goes for the characters.

The story is… as average as it gets. Honestly, if you have ever seen an animated movie, you won’t be surprised by anything, as I feel like now we have reached a point, where we need to stop relying on those same clutches (one parent who’s dead, but they had a plan with their child, and the child will stop at anything to honour the plan) we’ve seen a lot in this genre. Nevertheless, the voice cast is great, animation is stunning, so I will let this slide, especially when it is more of “feel good” movie, that doesn’t take itself too seriously, which is always nice.

Only thing I can’t think of improving, would be the actual villain of the story, as it wasn’t menacing, or even memorable, to be perfectly honest. There seems to be a thing lately, where all the animated movies of past couple of years don’t have great villains. It’s almost like the studios started to believe they can’t scare kids anymore. Really? I mean, I don’t think we need to traumatize them, but at the same time, memorable villain can lift up your movie, big time. Just couple of examples, Scar from The Lion King (1994) or Jafar from Aladdin (1992) are not over the top threating villains, but they don’t shy away from being villains and they can be menacing. And in both cases, they contributed to make those movies what they are, fondly remembered classics. I do also need to add one often overlooked animated movie, which I love, Anastasia (1997) and its movie villain, Rasputin, who has certain scenes that are threating, but again, nothing I would consider too dark. This “trend” needs to come back, as especially nowadays, young kind are more “mature” than ever before (I mean, plenty of 7 year old can use iPhone/iPads better than their parents).

That, in all honesty, was the thing I was missing from Abominable. Because overall, I really enjoyed this light-hearted movie, but there was nothing too memorable, and the villain was so non-threating, I don’t remember plenty of it a few weeks after. But I do remember thinking “if only this movie had a better, more impactful villain, this could’ve been on the next level.” And that is exactly what this movie is. It’s a lovely, fun, charming film, that is really easy to watch, but also to forget. The only reason my rating is still fairly high is the movie’s charm and stunning animation.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke