Tag Archives: 2019

Movies or shows released in 2019.

Sound of Metal (2019) Review – Almost Perfect

Advertisements

Sound of Metal is one of those movies, that has everything going for them. Oscar winning performance (this review was written before 2021’s Oscar ceremony, but I’d be genuinely shocked if somebody else snatched that Oscar from Riz Ahmed, as he’s the one everyone keeps talking about), great story about something, that we haven’t seen a lot of prior, something unique (the best sound Oscars should be a formality) and most importantly, it’s an inspirational story. So how come, there was something that just didn’t click with me…?

Look, I am not going to say this film is a bad one, no. Quite the opposite, it’s a really great piece of cinema, that pulls you in, gives you a tour de soul of this young drummer, who only wants to do one thing and one thing only – be a drummer. That’s something I appreciated, we get how much this means to Riz’s character without having to see some sort of montage of how he used to drum ever since he was a little boy. The reason we don’t need that is because of his performance. The movie definitely is one man show, where he doesn’t have to say a lot for you to understand how much he’s freaking out, how much he hates, what’s happening to him, how much he’s hurt by it… On this front, the movie succeeded 100%.

I also loved all the sound choices, that might seem obvious, but they were not. For example, I think (and this is just my theory) that the way we hear the movie totally depends on Riz’s mind. What I mean by that – I’ve noticed that in scenes where he’s “getting better”, he’s trying to face his condition, the sound is clear, even though he still can’t hear anything. But when he “slips out”, when he makes some questionable decisions, that’s where we go back to the sound of the movie being distorted. Maybe the movie is telling us that deep down, he knows what he’s doing is wrong? Or maybe I am reading too much into this…? Who knows, but the second half of the movie (especially the scenes on the farm) seemed like that was definitely a purposeful choice. And I can only applaud to that.

But unfortunately the movie also starts to drag on a bit, towards the end. I think my main issue with it was (and this might sound really bizarre, but hear me out here) Riz’s performance was so great, you knew where this guy was going, before he made his move. You knew, how he thinks, what he will do. And once you understand him, that is when the movie needs to either give you something really entertaining (read different), as the “mystery” is gone, maybe for something unexpected to happen, but no. Everything that happens to him you could tell from about halfway through the movie, which speaks to his level of great performance, but also that means that the second hour of this film drags on, as nothing surprises you anymore, so the movie doesn’t feel as fresh, but slightly more like a chore to finish.

Also, I will say this – I understand this movie was supposed to be mainly about Riz’s character and his journey and I get that, but I still thought we could have used more scenes with him and Olivia Cooke. Their interactions felt real, raw, sincere and especially towards the end (which again, you see what will happen with him, so there is no surprise) that moment those two characters shared, felt earned. I feel like movie kind of undercut itself by having such a great actress and somebody, who could go toe-to-toe with Riz, only for her to be gone for most of it. Again, I understood why they did it, I just wish they would have given them more scenes together, as that couple dynamic really worked for me.

This is one of those movies I (already) can’t wait to re-visit couple of years from now, to see whether my perspective changes, as sometimes it happens. You watch a movie everybody seems to love and you “only like it”, and then, once you see it again, with a clear head couple of years from your first viewing, you find things you haven’t found the first time around. Because I need to say this again, Sound of Metal is not a bad movie. I was just waiting for something, that would punch me in the stomach, something that would deliver the final blow and it hasn’t… Ok, let me put it this way – before COVID-19, remember those magical places called restaurants? The establishments, that you would go into, you’d sit down, had some nice food…? Yeah, so now imagine, you go to one of those, you’ve heard a lot of great stuff about it, you order a starter, a main and a dessert. The starter is great, but you could’ve used a little bit more of it (in this metaphor, that would be his relationship with Olivia’s character), the main is excellent piece of food, where you have no complaints whatsoever (Riz and what the movie is trying to do, the story it’s telling) and then the dessert arrives. And you are looking for that fine looking dessert to give you that great, sweet finish, but instead of that, it leaves you kind of… indifferent. Sure, the starter and the main was still great, so the overall experience isn’t ruined by any means, but you can’t help but feeling like there was something missing from the perfect experience. And also, now I am hungry.

Overall, Sound of Metal is definitely a movie, you need to see. It’s different, it’s told from a unique point of view, it has great performances all around. Personally, there was just something that was missing for me to call this movie excellent. It’s still really, really great piece of film though, so do give it a chance.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Missing Link (2019) Review – Cute, Funny and Charming

Advertisements

Let’s get one thing straight – Missing Link is definitely one of the “lesser” Laika movies (the studio behind such gems like Corpse Bride (2005), or my personal favourite Kubo and the Two Strings (2016)) but it’s almost like saying “Pixar’s lesser movie”. Because as with them, even their “lesser” movie is still really, really well made, told and executed. And Missing Link has a few things going for it, that worked for me.

The first one is the voice casting – Hugh Jackman, Stephen Fry, Zach Galifianakis, Zoe Saldana or Timothy Olyphant are great and pleasant to listen to. They also give this stop-motion animation that extra level of charm, personality and that is definitely THE main thing this film has going for it, big time. It’s really charming. I can’t really explain it, because overall, the story isn’t anything new we wouldn’t seen before, it’s your typical “explorer finds a new species, but he’s trying to get him to his own people, rather than profit from it”, but there are evil people after them. So they go from one location to another, escaping one escapade after another.

But there is something about the stop-motion of this movie and that voice cast, full of really talented people, that even though you know exactly where the story is going (Missing Link is definitely more of kids movie, rather than “adults can get something out of this too”) you will still be glued to the TV screen. It’s funny at the times, cute most of the time and most importantly, the moment the movie starts to drag on a bit, it’s only about 10 minutes from being finished.

I know this might sound weird, complimenting the fact this movie is short (the runtime is 93 minutes) or making it sound like it’s a benefit, but it really is, as to me that is an underrated art, knowing when your movie should end. There are movies that definitely overstay their welcome, so for this film to be fully aware of what it is and knowing when to end, it’s definitely a benefit.

Also, I need to talk about the end credits, where you can see how painstakingly slow the process of stop-motion animation actually is and how much work goes into every shot. Those have always fascinated me, and I know it’s almost “standard” at this point for stop-motion animated movies to have a scene or two during the credits to show the fans how the movie gets made, and I will always respect people behind these movies, because you can tell they really care and it shows, as this movie is stunning to look at.

Who I really want to talk about in this movie, is Zach’s voice performance as Mr. Link/Susan. I used to think he’s not a great comedian, but the older I get, the more I appreciate his comedy chops. And in this movie, his performance was perfect. What pleasantly surprised me was that plenty of A list celebrities, who would do voices for animated movies, especially in some sort of creature/animal role, they would usually do a “shouty” performance, slightly over the top. Zach took it in totally different way, making his character really sweet, tender and quiet. Only thing that did get old, especially towards the end, was his character taking everything so literally. It was funny the first couple of instances, but repetition only works so many times before it doesn’t.

Overall, even though Missing Link won’t be attacking any TOP rankings/lists when comes to “best animated movie” or even “best stop-motion animated movie”, but it’s still a really good movie, that targets kids exclusively. Parents might have a good time too, but they will have much better time with some other stop-motion movies. For example the prior mentioned Kubo and the Two Strings is to me on the same level as the best Pixar movies, because that film is stunning, with great performances, brilliant story and really big chunk of heart in it. I am not going to say you will get the same experience with Missing Link, probably not. But it still has its charm and I don’t think there is any danger of you dying from boredom.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

RuPaul’s Drag Race UK Review (Seasons 1 -2) – Shantay… UK, Hun?

Advertisements

First RuPaul conquered USA with RuPaul’s Drag Race (2009 – , my review here). Shortly after, he gave some queens the chance to prove themselves again in RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars (2012 – , my review here). So the next logical step towards the world’s drag dominance was… UK? At first, I was slightly nervous about that, but after watching the two seasons available (with hopefully some more to come) my nervousness went away.

What I thought was “does the UK truly have such a pool of queens to make interesting show”? I mean, drag is still fairly niche (even though thanks to the success of shows like Drag Race, there seems to be more people interested in it than ever) and there are 5x more people living in USA than the UK, so I just wondered how many truly interesting, original queens will there be? The answer seems to be – more than enough, mate!

The UK version of Drag Race is bit more toned down, I’ve noticed. Don’t get me wrong, the queens are still shady, funny, creative, bitchy, original, emotional, and there is plenty of fun to be had, but because it’s on the “majestic” BBC, there are differences. The biggest difference – prizes to be won are “less fun” for the queens. For example, in the American version, for winning the episode’s mini (basically a side challenge at the start of the episode) & maxi challenge (the main’s episode challenge), you can win “a cash tip” (usually around $2.500/$5.000) and for winning the entire show, you win $100.000, which is nice. In the UK version, if you win a maxi challenge, you get “the coveted RuPeter Badge” and the winner of the show wins a grand prize of “starring in their own digital series produced by the creators of RuPaul’s Drag Race“, which is pretty cool, but it’s not $100.000, is it? And I know, it’s nothing to do with anything, it’s just this show is airing on BBC and therefore they can’t take any sponsorships, or deals with brands and without those, the budget (especially for prizes) is limited. What I have also noticed, even the drama is more “down to earth” but I think that’s more to do with the UK/European personality being more down to earth than American.

And I don’t mean that in bad way, it’s just there is major difference how Europeans behave. As we are raised to be more like “look, you are not that unique, great or anything, but if you work hard, you can amount to something”. In America it seems to be more like “you are special, you are star, you can be anything you want”. There are benefits and disadvantages to both ways, as one way tends to produce more over-confident people (to put it nicely) and the other way tends to produce more people, who doubt themselves every single time and get in their own way. And it’s interesting to watch that contrast.

But back to the show – after the first season, I thought it was really good, but except a few queens, neither truly stuck with me. But with the second season, that’s where I was sold almost instantly, plenty of really great, talented queens and two from Scotland, where I have been living for the last almost 10 years now! I really hope that the producers of the show will realise, that even some of the UK queens belong to All Stars, as one or two from the first season and a good few from the second season I could definitely see getting their second chance at the crown and also, it would be nice to let them make some money. 😉

In both instances so far, I was really happy with the winners, even though the Internet wasn’t happy, especially with the winner of the second season. I am not going to spoil anything, but I will just say, the queen who won, really deserved the win, as people tend to forget that’s she’s been pretty constantly great throughout the competition, not “just after they came back from the lockdown”, so I am 100% happy with the results.

That’s another thing – I really admire the queens from the second season, as they had to shut down the shooting in the middle of it, because of the pandemic, for whole 8 months. It definitely added another layer to those queens and that’s been interesting to see, who took their time to improve their craft and who didn’t as much…? And I can’t really imagine how hard that must have been – finally being on the Drag Race, living the dream and suddenly, you’re being told that because of the pandemic, the production is shutting down and nobody knows when (or possibly if) you will be back. So all the props to those queens who came back.

Overall, if you (like me) are a huge fan of the original Drag Race and the All Stars “spin-off”, I think it’s highly likely you will enjoy the UK format. But just as with anything British, it’s good for the audience to known some UK references, as it’s definitely more UK oriented rather than world-wide, so sometimes what happens, there is a theme or a pun in the show and if you don’t live here or you are not familiar with UK culture/TV, chances are it will go over your head. But that is why we have Google…. 😉 Can’t wait for a next season and hoping to get to know (and love) more UK queens.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Jojo Rabbit (2019) Review – F*ck Off, Hitler!

Advertisements

Ever since I’ve seen the first trailer for Jojo Rabbit, I knew that this will be a film like no other. I had faith, as Taika Waititi has proven himself several times now (from What We Do in the Shadows (2014), Thor: Ragnarok (2017) to somewhat underseen and underappreciated Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016) which if you haven’t seen it, please do yourself a favour and do see it) and plus the topic was more than intriguing (young kid, who during World War II adores Hitler so much he sees him as his imaginary friend, what’s not to love there, right?) and the cast! From Scarlett Johansson to Sam Rockwell, Alfie Allen and surprisingly great Rebel Wilson, everybody fits perfectly and put their 100% into every scene. No wonder this movie is just pure perfection and I don’t say this lightly.

There are times, where I don’t know how to rate a movie and I need to think about it, how I felt about it, etc. And then, there are times where you are just so into a movie, you are enjoying it and no matter what’s happening on the screen, I know easily what my rating will be. And from around 20 minutes in, I knew Jojo Rabbit will be that case. But it’s not purely because of that great casting, or that wacky aspect of this movie, even though that part contributes to my main point. And that is this movie does something, that plenty of films try to do, but only a few succeed – mix comedy with some heavy themes. Balance crazy, wacky scenes with some dramatic ones. Plenty of times, one feels distracting and you as the viewer, get annoyed easily. Especially if one part of the movie is much better than the other (for example the comedy part is better than the dramatic part). And that is the main reason I have enjoyed this film so much – it’s perfectly balanced.

Jojo Rabbit feels like the most perfect blend of wacky comedy about a kid, who wants to be Hitlerjugend really badly, but for variety of reasons, he never succeeds as much as he’d want to. But deep down, it’s about plenty of other stuff and that is the thing – every time the movie feels like it might get skewed too much into the wacky stuff, there is always something, that reminds you that yeah, even though you are laughing, because let’s face it, Hitler as portrayed by Taika himself is funny. But the things that are happening (like, you know, the war) have real life consequences for everybody and especially our main protagonist. And to me, that is something extraordinary. This could have gone wrong so easily, or could overstayed its welcome, but it never does. And that goes for the dramatic scenes too – when some scenes happen, they hit you and they hit your hard (especially one scene that I unfortunately had spoiled for me because of Twitter, quite pivotal scene, so imagine my frustration) but they never take you out of the movie, they are there to work as almost a contrast for the comedic part of the movie.

This might sounds really cheesy, but I don’t care – I think the reason this movie works so well is because it reflects life itself – plenty of things around us can be really wacky, sometimes can feel almost surreal, and then something major happens, where even though we were fine and laughing just a few minutes/hours/days ago, we are not laughing now. And to balance it out like this… my hat is off to you, Taika. The Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay is definitely in good hands.

Also, let’s talk about the cast. As I’ve mentioned prior, it’s not only star-studded, but everyone is great, no matter how small their role might be. For example, Stephen Merchant is in this movie and I don’t think this is a major spoiler to say, he’s not there a lot, practically he’s in just one (quite long) scene, but I guarantee you, you will remember his presence. Same goes for Sam Rockwell, who it seems like said to himself “I’ve been acting since 90’s, but nobody’s noticed me, so let’s turn it up a bit” and he continues in this impressive streak of great roles and brilliant performances, where we need to start having a conversations about him being one of the best actors of our generation. I don’t think Scarlett had a better role in years, as again (with plenty of people in this movie) her role is not that big (the film mainly focuses on Roman Griffin Davis and Thomasin McKenzie and I will talk about them soon) but she does her absolute best with her role. Her scene at the dinner table, where she plays both herself and Jojo’s dad, is simply amazing. Well deserved nomination for her.

The main star is obviously Jojo, aka Roman Griffin Davis and… wow. When he made this film, he was around 11 years old and Jesus… to act like a kid and at the same time actually act, talk about talent. You know it’s always risky to have a kid be the protagonist of your movie, but did he deliver. And the same goes for Thomasin McKenzie. She was a great counterpart to Jojo, more then equal partner to him and in their scenes, they really complemented each other so well, they both felt really natural. Really hope both of them have long careers ahead of them.

The same way I said we need to involve Sam Rockwell in the conversation for one of our best actors of today, I honestly believe Taika has earned his place to be in the same conversation for one of our best current writers/directors. He’s got his unique voice, but he’s not banking on just that. He’s managed to give us a superhero/comedy, horror/comedy, adventure/comedy, and now almost historical drama/comedy, but here’s thing – he can mix any genre with comedy so well, it doesn’t get repetitive or annoying. He doesn’t feel like one trick pony, because everything he does has his handwriting all over, but at the same time it feels really unique. I don’t think it would be too big of a reach to call him “Stanley Kubrick of comedy” as no matter what he does next, I will be there, patiently waiting and there is a good chance I will enjoy whatever he does next. So far, he’s yet to have a miss and I don’t think that is coming anytime soon.

Overall, if you’ve seen the trailer and you think you don’t want to see Jojo Rabbit because it’s “just a silly movie with Hitler in it”, please do yourself a favour and see it. Because it is much, much more. From the casting, to the musical choices (where else would you hear The Beatles or David Bowie in German?) everything fits together to create a really unique, funny, sad, yet somehow hopeful piece of a film. I will definitely re-visit this movie and gladly.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Ready or Not (2019) Review – All About That Ending

Advertisements

I realise this might be slightly controversial view, based on what I have read about this movie right after seeing it, but… I need to say what I feel. The ending didn’t work for me the way it (apparently) worked for most of the people on the Internet. Which slightly hinders my enjoyment of the movie overall, as I thought it was going one way and the movie went the other way. Which, reading all the different reviews/reactions, was probably smart decision, as I am definitely in a minority of people, who thought the ending didn’t work as well. But we will get to it…

For the vast majority of Ready or Not, I really liked it. Even though some of the things/scenes I could see coming miles away (and by others I was pleasantly surprised) I still had some fun this movie, and will definitely remember name Samara Weaving from now on, because she absolutely rules this movie. And yes, she looks like what would happen if Margot Robbie and Emma Stone somehow had a baby, but holy shit, this woman can act! Put somebody else in this film, who might scream less, or has lesser presence and the movie loses a lot of what Samara is bringing to the table. I will definitely need to watch more films with her and be on the lookout for her name in any movies and TV shows from now on.

The film overall felt like it wanted to be Get Out (2017) so bad, but it didn’t have the complexity or symbolism of that movie, which is why they decided to go with that ending. I need to discuss it in some length, and obviously that can’t be done without going into the spoiler territory, so…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

For the entire movie there is this idea, that if the family doesn’t succeed with killing Samara’s character by the dawn, they will all die, because, as you learn, their grandfather made a deal with Mr. Le Bail (who could have been called the Devil just to simplify it, really) so they don’t have any other choice, which is something a few characters say (like Andie MacDowell, who I don’t think I have ever seen playing a villain character!) And I was really looking forward to either them realising it was wrong and them truly understanding how wrong they were all these years, or how Samara’s character will kill them off one by one, but only because they tried to kill her first, therefore it would have been this ironic situation, that yes, they would all be dead, but only because they believed in such bullshit in the first place. But then the movie decides that the curse is a real thing, they even show a flash of “Mr Le Bail” and… to me, it doesn’t work. Because it justifies the family’s actions to really shitty extent, where that crazy, satanic shit they are doing/worshipping, actually exists and they actually need to do it. And I know it should have been more of “yey, her soul was pure, that is why she didn’t blow up and they did, fuck the rich fucks” hoorah, but honestly if anything, that made me feel (a little bit) sorry for them, because they were right. They were still crazy and insane for going through with it, no questions about that, but I feel like part of the “dark comedy” this movie wants to be so hard is lost, when the main crazy thing turns out to be true.

Let me put it this way, I can handle a movie that justifies villain(s) in a way, because as the old saying goes, “there are always two sides to every story”, but with this one, that side/secret/the reasoning behind it is just so ridiculous, I can’t get over it. It’s maybe because up until that point, movie is trying to be realistic about everything, it puts Samara’s through hell and back and I thought even most of characters make logical choices that are aligned with their characters, no matter how sane or insane those choices are. So yeah, I just couldn’t get over that curse being a real thing. And don’t even get me started with the true darkness of that ending, where she’s totally and utterly fucked. She’s going to jail or some sort of mental institute for a long time, because what else would happen? What’s her defence? “I had my wedding here yesterday, but as you can see, there are splashes of DNA all over the place, but not because I killed anybody, but it’s this ancient curse, see? This family worshipped Satan and I try to sacrifi- Wait, where are you taking me??!”

Who really surprised me in this movie was Adam Brody. I have seen him in couple of movies, but never in something where I would say “he’s pretty good”. But in this movie, he’s pretty good! You can tell on his character how affected his entire life was by what happened to his brother and him when they were children (I will get to that in a second too). Pretty decent performance, I thought.

The other issue, even before the ending, was the opposite, actually. Yes, the beginning. And the reason I had an issue with that is simple – the movie totally undercuts itself. Let’s presume you are like me, never seen a trailer for this film, don’t know what the story is about, you just wake up one day, and decide to watch Ready or Not. When the movie starts with the scene of the brothers being kids and seeing the “hide and seek” game, the surprise is really out of the window within a first minute. Then, once we get to the wedding and see the groom more nervous than usual, it doesn’t take a genius to put 2 + 2 together to figure out what is about to happen. Just imagine this movie starting with a wedding, maybe some “cliché” opening credits, to trick you into thinking you are about to watch something else. That’d be awesome! And you can still have the “opening” scene later on, as I understand why it’s there, we need to understand especially Brody’s character and his reasons for… well, everything he does in this film. You could have it later on, in form of flashbacks, and I think it would actually improve the flow of the movie. It would also give the audience the chance to catch their breath, before another horrible thing happens to Samara’s character.

Overall, Ready or Not is a pretty good movie, that could have been better. Your enjoyment of the movie really depends on how much gore you can take, because there is a fair amount of it in this movie and how tolerant are you to see a movie, where the villain(s) are justified dicks. They are still dicks for doing what they are doing, but given they are correct in everything (what would happen if they won’t do it), can you REALLY blame them? I mean, yes, of course, but really? Oh, and it’s definitely worth seeing it, just so you remember the name Samara Weaving.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Painted Bird (2019) Review – War Is Hell, European Version

Advertisements

Do you (somehow, in this day and time) feel happy, joyful and just wish to be down? Have you ever wondered how it would feel like to experience the war through child’s eyes, and to see many horrors, some of which, you didn’t want, or didn’t even think of seeing, happening to said child? Well, look no further, because I do have this Czech movie to tell you about, full of… *shuffles card deck* made-up, European language… (elaborate choice of the director, he made up a language as he “did not want to associate the film with a specific country”)?

Yes, The Painted Bird is a Czech movie I have heard a lot about, it made more waves than any other Czech movie in recent memory and… yeah, it’s definitely talked about for a reason. This movie is beautifully shot, it deals with heavy themes and topics, BUT… If you happen to be a sensitive soul or if you (especially now, in early 2021) don’t want to experience plenty of unnecessary depression, you might just want to skip this movie altogether. As it’s definitely one of those “great, but probably once in a lifetime watch” kind of movie.

The main story deals with a boy, who wonders around Europe, as the World War II is happening. And he meets variety (and that’s putting it mildly) of people, most of them really bad. I have already read an opinion, saying the movie is painting the wrong picture of Europeans being savages living in huts, which is true, but at the same time, not the point of this movie…? Plus, during the WW II, there definitely were people living in really poor conditions, and more importantly, I don’t think the movie was saying these people were savages, but we will get to that later.

The Painted Bird is split up into “chapters”, and each chapter is named after a different person, whom our protagonist meets. As I mentioned earlier, most of these people don’t treat the kid nicely. Some even properly abuse him and… well, imagine the worst thing that can happen to a boy who is about 12 years old. Now imagine, what you wish it wouldn’t happen to that boy. That thing you imagined? That probably happens to him in this movie and then some. And I think the movie is exploring two themes here.

The first one is the war – I felt like the movie begs the question “were these people so horrible prior the war, or did the war make them like this?” That is why I believe the point I read someplace about “Europeans being savages” is invalid, as you are not focusing on the cause of why they act like they act. As this movie shows in some of these chapters, desperate people do desperate things, which is true and not just in war times.

The other, and I would argue the main theme of this movie is bit more “poetic”, and it focuses on a soul. Specifically, can you loose your soul? If you go through hell and back, can you ever get back to “normal”? You will probably never be the same person, but can you be a good person? Even in the face of everything that’s been done to you, can you keep a bit of humanity left? Or once it’s gone, is it gone for good? I found the movie’s answer (and I believe the very end does give you an answer to this question) satisfying. Is it satisfying enough to justify the torture the movie puts you through for almost 3 hours…?

I would have to say… kind of…? My biggest problem with this movie is definitely its length. I understand you need the boy to go through a lot, but with certain scenes I had a feeling the director was making “art for the purpose of making art”. In another words, I don’t think the story justified the length. But I also need to say, I don’t think you’d have to cut out a lot. Maybe 10/20 minutes…? Because this film needs to put the kid (and therefore you) through something, you won’t forget, otherwise the ending and what the movie is trying to say, wouldn’t work.

Overall, The Painted Bird is definitely not a movie for your usual moviegoer. It’s more of “brace yourself, because you will see some things you have never even thought of before” kind of movie. And it’s not easy to get through. But the story is interesting (luckily now proven to be mostly fictional), the camera work is stunning (as a Czech, trust me, this is not how 99% of our movies look like, this is some next level camera work) and the black and white only adds the bleakness to the already bleak, sinking feeling you will have once the movie is over. It’s been a while since I have seen a film I would want to recommend to everybody, but at the same time, would not want to recommend to anybody, because yeah… It’s a tough watch, but (for me) it was worth it. Absolutely one of those “glad to have seen it, but (probably?) never again” movies.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Le Mans ’66/Ford v Ferrari (2019) Review – Cars Go Brum Really Fast

Advertisements

Before I go into this review, let me just explain the heading – this movie has two different titles, depending on where you are. In most of America, it’s called Ford v Ferrari, and pretty much everywhere else it’s called Le Mans ’66. I don’t know the reasoning behind this, whether the producers believed Le Mans (the actual race) has such a pull, that it would bring more people to the theatres than names of two (arguably) biggest car brands in the world, but I don’t like it. I understand, especially being from non-English speaking country, that movie titles get translated, which is fair. But here we are, talking about two different titles for the same movie and that just confuses everything. Just imagine trying to have a conversation with somebody, who is not such a movie fan, and trying to explain to them, that you both have seen the same movie, but since you are from two different places, it’s titled differently… What I am trying to say, it’s needlessly confusing. Now, with this rant out of the movie, let’s talk about the movie (I will be calling it Ford v Ferrari as personally, I prefer that).

I will be the first to say I am not into moto sports at all. Doesn’t mater if it’s Le Mans, F1, F2, F365, F42069, it never grabbed my attention. But, strangely enough, I do enjoy movies from moto sports, as they tend to be great (perfect example of this would be Rush (2013) that was pure joy watching in the cinema and a movie, that’s still not talked about enough) so I was looking forward to watching Ford v Ferrari. And sure enough, it didn’t disappoint.

Strangely enough, not the driving/racing scenes, but the actors are the best part about this movie – both Matt Damon and Christian Bale are great as their characters, but more importantly, they have great chemistry between each other. You trust the fact these too have been friends for some time, especially when you see them argue about technical things that, unless you are a mechanic, you will probably not understand. I also need to highlight Caitriona Balfe as she wasn’t just “Bale’s wife”, even though she didn’t have plenty of scenes, the ones she was in, she delivered and made us, the audience, understand exactly what kind of relationship her and Bale’s character had. And that’s not easy thing to do, especially in the fairly limited time she had. Definitely somebody I need to watch out for.

My only issue with this movie and the only reason I am not giving it the highest rating – there was something about it that didn’t pull me into the story properly. I don’t know how to explain this, so let me try it this way… Do you know the feeling, when (sometimes) you are watching what you know is a great movie, with great performances, everything feels properly done and great, and yet, there is something that’s not clicking for you? As if something, some invisible hand is pulling you back slightly, so you can’t “absorb” yourself in the movie fully? No, just me? Ok then. Because that is how I felt while watching Ford v Ferrari. Technically, this movie is great, I had no issues with the story, casting, soundtrack, even the length didn’t bother me too much, but… there was something that didn’t grip me.

And it’s not even the fact the movie is about something I have no interest in outside of it, as I have loved (and still love, even though I haven’t seen it since the 2013 cinema screening) Rush the moment I left the theatre, saying what a great movie it is. Don’t get me wrong, Ford v Ferrari is definitely a movie worth watching, I don’t think you would have a bad time with it, I sure didn’t. There was just something, that either wasn’t there, or something that subliminally bothered me…?

I do have a list in my head, that’s full of movies just like Ford v Ferrari, where I might have liked the movie, but I didn’t “love” it and want to go back to them in some time, to see whether I change my opinion, whether I might grow and appreciate a different aspect I might have missed the first time… this movie definitely goes on that non-existing, yet very real list, as it’s 100% worth your and my time.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Cats (2019) Review – What The…?

Advertisements

I was not ready for this. I have seen trailers, I have seen the reviews, I have heard movie people rejecting this movie in unison, telling you (and me) not to watch it, even out of sheer curiosity. Have I listened? No. I just needed to see it for myself to believe… it. To believe, that even in 2019, with budget of almost 100 million dollars, with a studio behind this movie, with great talent both in front of the camera and behind it, something like this is still possible to make. Cats is truly once in a lifetime experience, where you are terrified, confused, slightly excited (why do some of them look sexy?!) and just stare at the screen for its entire length with your jaw open, wondering how the fuck movie like this went through the studio system, without somebody, someplace trying to stop this from ever being released.

I have a proud “tradition” of always finishing every single movie I watch. No matter how bad a movie is/gets, how it infuriates me, I have never not finished a movie I started. And let me tell you something, it’s been a long time since I have been so tempted to do this, but while watching Cats, I honestly wasn’t even curious where this nightmare fuel is going. As everything was so bizarre, so all over the place, I actually tried to imagine doing a live review, as I was watching the movie. It might look like this:

What is Jellicle? Why should I care? Why do the say it all the time? Can somebody stop them?

Is Heaviside Layer cats’ heaven?

Why do those cats look like deep-fakes?

Is that Idris… Oh my god, that is Idris Elba.

Can somebody just end my suffering?

For being the centre of attention (protagonist), Victoria sure doesn’t talk much.

Are some of these fucking cats magicians now? Is Idris Elba Thanos mixed with Nightcrawler?

Rebel Wilson has just been told to spread her legs as many times as possible, wasn’t she?

Wait, do cats wear cat suits and if so, WHY? Did Rebel’s character just undress from a cat suit?

Is this how Christians believe hell looks like?

Oh my god, I didn’t think it’s possible to dislike James Corden even more, but Jesus, he’s not funny in this at all.

Who thought Jason Derulo should have a British accent? Because I don’t trust that person with opening of a pickle jar with no lid.

Why does Jennifer Hudson look LIKE THAT?! They all look fake as fuck, but what’s up with her face?!

Why does Dame Judi Dench look like half cat and half plucked chicken? Why is she in this movie?

Why is Sir Ian McKellen in this? Did they seriously make him lick a milk from a plate?

Will the suffering ever end?

Of course that’s Taylor Swift. Did she seriously been given just one line to read?

Why do these cats still have human hands and feet and not paws?!

Oh, Memories is on again, hopefully that’s the end now. Did Jennifer just ascended? What does that mean? Will she be reborn, or did she just become a cat Jesus?

Oh my god, this is not the end?

Judi Dench is talking to a camera, surely that’s the en… MOTHER FUCKER! End already!

I honestly can’t produce a normal review, as this is beyond any normality. I was trying to wrap my head around what’s happening, why is it happening and most importantly, how could a movie like this be improved? And I think I might figured it out. The entire point of Cats is this no ordinary movie, so Tom Hooper doesn’t make sense to direct this, as he’s as “ordinary” as they come. If this movie needed to exist (and it didn’t) it should have been done properly, with a mad genius at helm – this movie needed David Lynch.

I know what you are thinking, “WTF? Why him? He doesn’t have any experience wit musicals, or Broadway?” and sure, in this instance, it would have been a challenge for him. But in every other aspect, this movie needed somebody to fully embrace every single weird aspect of this mad, mad cat world and if Lynch has proven anything in his rich career spanning 40+ years now, he is not just a friend with weirdness, weirdness is getting some coffee and Christmas cards from him every year. Just before the end of this movie, it finally clicked to me, this doesn’t work because it’s done half way. Couple of examples – they are cats, but don’t have paws. The actors are fully aware of the absurdity, so they are not fully in that world. Lynch would have embraced every single detail, everything. I am not saying he’d have fixed it, but at least it would be something.

Let me put it this way – I would highly recommend you watching one of his newer shorts, called What Did Jack Do? (2017) as it’s amazing. A 10 minute short film, with just Lynch and talking monkey called Jack, where David is trying to figure out what did the monkey do, as of course, the monkey talks. But, in those 10 minutes you get into the story, because Lynch doesn’t do anything halfway and embraces the weirdness, so at the end, you do understand what Jack did. And it’s a great, weird short. And that is my point – if he could make you believe in just 10 minutes that talking monkey is absolutely normal thing, he could even make a movie like Cats work. I don’t know how well, that’s a different debate all together, but he would have given us fascinating, once in a lifetime experience, where it’s entirely possible you might not be thinking about “is this what hell feels like?” while watching it.

See, it’s not possible to write a normal review for Cats. Do you honestly believe that I knew I will advocate for this movie to be remade with David Lynch in charge? No, I didn’t think I will go there, but it happened. Because I didn’t know how to grasp this review, as is the same as watching this movie – an out of body experience like no other, that leaves you terrified, speechless and strangely aroused (don’t even get me started on the butthole cut of this movie, let’s not even open that can of worms).

I can’t recommend you watching this, don’t be like me and trust the people who have been there before you – even out of curiosity, this movie isn’t worth it. I really felt bad for Francesca Hayward as you can tell she’s a talented dancer and singer and I honestly hope that it will only get better from here onwards for her. I mean, I needs to be right…? Right…?

Rating: 1 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke