Tag Archives: 2020

Movies or shows released in 2020.

Tenet (2020) Review – The Most Nolan Movie Ever Made… Yet

Advertisements

I don’t even know where to start with this movie. You can tell ever since around 2014, Christopher Nolan really decided to go all out and experiment with… well, everything. His movies were always high-concept, but each new one tops the previous one, and Tenet is his current peak. It’s as conceptual as it gets, as you either are on board with not understanding plenty of things about this movie and having to re-watch it a few times, or not. I am still in the first camp, where I admire what he’s doing, even though I would appreciate understanding some of it… It also makes me wonder what his next film will be like.

It’s really hard to rate this movie, or even meaningfully talk about it, as I am sure I have missed so much, or that plenty of things will be much clearer next time I watch it. I do understand where people, who really don’t like this movie, are coming from, as it’s definitely a challenging film, that not only demands your full attention, but it also needs you to re-watch it a few times before everything (hopefully?) falls into place properly. And this is what I admire about Nolan, he knows he can shoot movies. He knows his strengths. He could be making perfectly understandable, great movies, that wouldn’t challenge you or force you to spend the next 2 hours of your life on google/youtube watching/reading everything about it, trying to piece everything together, but it’s almost like he’d ask himself: “but what is the point?” He’s making everything harder for the audience, but what plenty of people are missing is the fact, that he’s also making it harder for himself.

I honestly don’t think he’s being snobby about his films, or that he would want to “eliminate” some of his fans/audience. To me, he strikes me like that kind of guy, who can’t stay put. He needs a challenge, he needs to learn new things on day-to-day basis. But since he already operates on much higher frequency than most of us, his challenges are not the same ones as ours would be. He wants to challenge our norms, how movies are made, told, he loves to play around with time (think about it, more often than not his movies are all about time being relative and how that affects the story) and since he’s already mastered the art of making movies, he wants to improve upon it.

For what it’s worth, I really enjoyed Tenet, even though I am not sure… no, I am sure that I didn’t get everything. I really enjoyed the action sequences, especially the highway chase scene and the ending. I really liked how John David Washington is handling himself in this movie and proving to everyone he’s not just Denzel‘s son, but he is a great actor in his own right, who isn’t afraid to do some action too. I loved Elizabeth Debicki‘s performance and how they didn’t try to make her look smaller. What I mean by that – she’s a really tall woman, and usually, if your male actors are not as tall, plenty of movies employ bunch of tricks (shooting at different distance, angles, or the tall woman sitting a lot of times) to make the actress look shorter. But in Tenet, she’s hovering above everyone. It’s mainly noticeable in her scenes with Kenneth Branagh, who’s not short by any means (177 cm) but can’t compare to Elizabeth (190 cm). Throughout the entire movie, I found their scenes fascinating and I couldn’t put my finger on what it was, until I’ve listened to the SinCast podcast about Tenet, where they were talking about it and I’ve realised, that yeah, they are right. You can also argue that her performance is the most memorable, as to me, she was given a lot to work with and she nailed it. Especially her scenes against Kenneth, who was dancing on a really fine line between being great villain and Russian caricature (at times, he might have crossed that line) were great, as we can see everything her character’s been dealing with, living with him.

I honestly can’t wait to watch this movie couple of times more, not just to wrap (or try to) my head around the concept, but because I really enjoyed myself. The movie is almost 2 and half hours long, but yet again with Nolan, you don’t really feel that, as you are just so into everything that’s happening, you won’t even notice. The movie never dragged on for me, I never got bored. And maybe, that’s the hidden brilliance of Nolan’s movies – just confuse your viewers and that way, they won’t complain about the movies being too long…?

Overall, Tenet is something, that I feel will be more appreciated over time, than now. I can see this being one of those movies, that 20 years from now, we will be reading articles about containing lines like “it wasn’t as highly received as his other movies when it was released, but now it’s a cult classic, and considered among his best work”. Honestly, that wouldn’t have surprised me, as I know I’ve said it a lot throughout this review, this film requires multiple viewings. That’s the only thing that’s preventing me from rating this even higher, I want to see whether this movie improves or not upon multiple viewings. Knowing Nolan, it probably will.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Invisible Man (2020) Review – Close to Perfection

Advertisements

The little movie, that could. The film, nobody expected to be as good as it was. Those two sentences sum up The Invisible Man perfectly. What originally was slated to be a second movie in the “dark universe” franchise, that failed to happen, as The Mummy (2017) made no money and didn’t impress anybody from critics to general audiences, found its way to Leigh Whannell, who was given little to no money (around 7 million dollars, which in Hollywood is nothing) to make this work on its own. What is most interesting to me, was the fact that if The Mummy didn’t fail, this movie would have been different for sure (bigger budget for one), but also, it would have starred Johnny Depp as the invisible man. And that could have been interesting to say the least. But that’s the only reason to be slightly sad about the fact the “dark universe” didn’t happen. To be fair, with what we’ve been given, we (the movie watching audience) definitely got the best possible movie, considering it only costed 7 million dollars!

There are two main things, that contributed to this movie’s overall brilliance – innovation of this story in really clever way and Elisabeth Moss. Yes, I know it’s more than two factors involved, but to me, those are the two main reasons, why I enjoyed this film so much.

Let’s start with the story and how it got updated for this day and age. That’s not always easy thing to do, or in some cases even the best/smartest thing to do (as I’ve argued recently with Scoob! (2020, my review here), that some stories don’t play well in today’s environment and should remain in the past setting), but in this case, it worked really well, because Leigh Whannell, who not only directed it, but has also written a script for it, changed two key things. He grounded the fantasy element of The Invisible Man in science (it’s not the person, who has an accident, or suddenly becomes invisible, but they need a suit, that also looks pretty believable to work) and most importantly, he shifted the focus of this film. Yes, The Invisible Man is not the main character/protagonist of this movie, even though it might seem like that, but Leigh grounded this movie by making it part thriller, part drama about toxic relationship, and how it feels like to be in one. Really smart and ballsy choice to make Elisabeth Moss the main protagonist of this movie, and that brings me to my other point, which will be just me, admiring Elisabeth’s talent.

I need to admit something – I’ve always heard about how talented she was, and I have seen her in couple of movies prior, but I still have yet to see her big performance pieces such as The Handmaid’s Tale (2017 – ?) and Mad Men (2007 – 2015) as those are the two main things I have always heard mentioned alongside her name. So for me, she was a revelation. What she can showcase in a few seconds, with no lines… I was blown away by her. She is the true driving force behind this movie, she basically never goes off the screen for the entire length of it and yet, you want more of her. Now I understand people mentioning her name between those being snubbed for an Oscar nomination, as she should have definitely been at least nominated. It is a shame that she wasn’t, but I am sure she will get the recognition she deserves soon. She’s one of those actresses, for whom the phrase isn’t “if she wins an Oscar”, but “when she wins an Oscar” as it will eventually happen.

The movie is really clever, entertaining, gripping and really well thought out with couple of twists I didn’t expect. That is why it pains me, that I can’t give it the ultimate rating. For me, the last 30 minutes or so, is what slightly spoils the movie. I am not really talking about the actual ending, I thought that was amazing. I can’t really discuss what bothered me without going into spoilers, so just for a few tiny nitpicks…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

I really liked the idea/twist that his brother not only knew about him terrorizing Elisabeth’s life all along, but also was wearing the suit (what I liked is the movie never tells you how many times it was Elisabeth’s boyfriend bothering her and how many times it was his brother) and had part in the entire thing too. But my main issue was with the whole scene, where Elisabeth’s character is fighting back and escaping the mental hospital. She damages the suit, so it glitches and finally, there are guards, who can clearly see somebody has this kind of technology (let alone, they would have had cameras, right?) so that’s great. My two issues: Number one, Elisabeth’s character is down on the floor, the invisible man is fighting and mostly killing guards left right and centre. I am pretty sure she’s within a reach of a gun from one of the guards, but we can see her just being on the ground, observing everything…? She should be keen to at least injure him, to finally have the evidence she isn’t crazy. Also, in the same scene, even though he kills most of the guards, he does let some live – why? That made zero sense – their entire plan was to make everybody believe she’s crazy, but if you let people, who have seen a person in some sort of glitching invisibility suit walk away, surely that’s defeating the entire carefully crafted plan…?

I know, these are two fairly minor things, but until that scene, everything was grounded in reality, where you felt bad for Elisabeth, but at the same time, you would not have believed her either! Think about it, somebody tells you, that bad things happen around them because their ex (that’s supposed to be dead) is somehow invisible and haunting her. Of course you wouldn’t have believed anybody like that, and that is what makes this movie so chilling. We can clearly see she isn’t crazy, but we can also understand why everybody would think she was. And until that hospital escape, everything made sense to me. That is why those two tiny details bothered me maybe a bit too much.

Overall, The Invisible Man had no right to turn out that well. But yet again, it proves that it’s not the budget or star power, that makes great movies. It’s stories and most importantly creators, who have new perspective, who bring something new to the table, who can think outside of the box. Especially in the thriller/horror genre – go back and study the most beloved ones – they are not just “scary” movies. They always comment on something bigger than themselves. They always address much bigger things, often overlooked. This film addresses toxic relationships and makes a horror movie out of something, that’s bit too real for some people, but that’s what makes it scary and unfortunately relatable. Definitely a movie I will re-watch and who knows? Maybe next time, even those two tiny things won’t bother me that much. It’s definitely one of the best movies of 2020.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Bad Boys for Life (2020) Review – Same Old, But Slightly Cooler

Advertisements

I need to admit something – I’ve only watched the previous Bad Boys movies just once. It’s been a long time ago, so I was really young. And when you are really young, you tend to like most movies you see. So I remember liking both of them, as they were fun action movies. I am sure a re-watch might probably be handy to see, whether I still like them or not. Anyway, the point of that story was that I had no previous attachment to this franchise. To be honest, I was surprised it’s been brought back and what’s more surprising is, how many people went to cinemas to see it (see for yourself) and of course, because of the lovely COVID-19 pandemic, we all have been having lately, this will always be the highest grossing movie of 2020. Yep, check it for yourself.

And let’s be fair, this movie isn’t actually bad. It’s entertaining, the action is mostly done well and not overly edited, the main duo is “a bit” older than we remember, but hey, they still have the chemistry and we get some “new blood” like Vanessa Hudgens, Alexander Ludwig and Charles Melton who are fun and I could imagine their characters having some sort of spin-off, you know, exactly according to what’s in fashion these days. The main thing about Bad Boys for Life is that even though there is one or two twists you might (not) see coming, the rest is your “same old” story, you come to expect from this franchise. Which is not bad, but the movie is just slightly over 2 hours long and towards the end, even though the action is still going on, you are so numb to it, you don’t really care that much, almost like there is too much action…? It’s like you watch some many music videos, you are numb to seeing a great booty (nah, that would never happen :-)).

As mentioned before, the movie is entertaining enough, but I couldn’t help but to be bored after a while, knowing what will happen next. Only two things genuinely surprised me, but I won’t spoil them, let’s just say one was about somebody dying or not, and the other was, as Vin Diesel‘s character would say in the Fast & Furious franchise, about family. But here’s the thing, even though those are there, the movie barely stops. The movie wants to have its emotional moment(s), while in the next 5 minutes, we go back to action and bullets flying everywhere. And you can’t have it all, movie, pick a lane!

Also, let’s mention the finale – and don’t worry, I don’t think this will count as a spoiler, as I need to address CGI. There is this big set piece involving fire and I understand they can’t actually set a fire to a building, but Jesus-tap-dancing-Christ, have they run out of time, money, or both when they were making that? I swear this was the only thing that kind of woke me up, as it’s been a while since one piece of bad CGI stood out so much to me (funnily enough, the only other example I can think off right now is another Will Smith movie, Gemini Man (2019), my review here, where the end involves one CGI character that looked straight up wrong) and took me out of the movie for a good minute.

Anyway, Bad Boys for Life was a mixed bag. On one hand, you have fun for most of the movie, the characters are likeable, the action is decent and you are mostly having fun. Unfortunately, the movie overstays its welcome, and other than two surprises, you will know where the movie is going. And there is one bad CGI fire at the end of it. Of course there are already plans for Bad Boys 4 (no date yet) because of course there is, if your movie makes some extra money, we need to milk it. I honestly hope, as much as I like Will and Martin Lawrence, they will have the “young guns” take over in this one. You only get to make one “one last time” movie, you had something decent, let’s not spoil, shall we? And also, it wouldn’t be as fun to see those two “old guys” going at it again, let them retire respectfully.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Promising Young Woman (2020) Review – Twisty, Uncomfortable, Brilliant

Advertisements

I love movies like this, where going in, I have some idea of what to expect, only for the movie to surprise me a few times along the way. Promising Young Woman is superb movie, that’s really hard to watch at times. It’s also a movie, that is difficult to discuss without spoiling most of it, as that’s where the brilliance lies. Every time I thought I knew where this movie was going, it went some way I didn’t expect and I honestly don’t want to spoil it for people, who haven’t watched it yet, so before I put the spoiler warning let me just say this.

Carey Mulligan is proving yet again she’s one of the best actresses of her generation, and this movie succeeds in making you feel uneasy for its entirety, which is the point – it manages to replicate how most women feel a lot of times. I know that from talking to lot of my friends, how aware they are when comes to things men don’t have to ever think about and I this movie will make you understand how it is to feel you are not being heard, you need to always watch out, always be on the lookout for what happens next, because you just never know. If this movie was no good (and trust me, it is) it 100% succeeds in replicating that feeling of anxiety, having to always be on the lookout, because then, if something happens to you, you were somehow “asking for it”. If you are in a mood for a movie, that’s pretty fucking brilliant, but quite hard to watch at times, and challenges plenty of ideas about what is right/wrong, this might just be a movie for you. So, without any delays…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

First things first, I love the fact somebody finally got the balls to give Carey Mulligan role like this, where in some scenes, she’s more anti, than hero. See, to me, the brilliance of this movie is, it understands that even though everything Carey’s character is doing is “the correct thing to do”, sometimes you can definitely tell she’s beyond the line, in a way where “ends justify the means”. She’s on this war path, where nobody ever changes, because if you’ve done one bad thing years ago, you definitely still are a bad person in her book. So sometimes, she needs to push her victims several times, before they are in the situation she wanted them to be in, so it justifies her actions. She becomes the literal “judge, jury and the executioner”, which is not anything remotely new. There are/were plenty of (mostly men dominated) movies, where one man takes the situation into his own hands and deals with it. But in here, it’s a bad ass woman and it’s Carey Mulligan. And I am here for it. I always love, when somebody isn’t afraid to cast people against their type, for example somebody, who seems (from the movies and interviews I’ve seen her in) so gentle and quirky, to transform for a role like this, to go to this dark place. And Carey nailed it. Even if she doesn’t win the 2021 Oscars, where she is nominated, it’s only a question of when will she win, rather than if, because she will definitely get at least one of those golden boys to her name. You just watch.

Let’s talk about the the story and ending, shall we? Because this is where the movie shines. For the most part, I thought this was a pretty great movie, but I thought I could see where this is going. This is where the first major twist happens and we see Bo Burnham (who even though he’s the most likeable guy in this, still has his past) in “the video”, even though he’s not doing anything, he’s also, you know, not doing anything. He’s there, part of the problem. From then on, I yet again thought I can see where this is going, until Carey’s character dies. And that genuinely surprised me. I admired the balls (or “the ovaries”? ;-)) on this movie to go someplace like this. And then, when the ending is happening, I yet again thought I could see what the film is doing, just to be surprised one last time. And I can’t even remember the last time, when movie took me for a ride so often in such a short amount of time. When it was over, and all the pieces landed where they were supposed to land, that’s when I knew I’ve just seen something great. If there is one thing I really admire, is when movie surprises me, at least once. This one did it 3times in a span of 30 minutes and on top of that, all those twists actually made sense. You can tell everything was meticulously planned, and also how smart Carey’s character was.

I think Promising Young Woman is a miracle of a movie, that manages to discuss the topic of rape and sexual violence not only without ever using those terms in the entire movie, but also honestly and openly. It never feels preachy, it never feels like it’s stuck in its own way. It’s a really focused piece of film, that is keen on having an open, yet uncomfortable discussion on what’s happening, without trying to be pretend it has answers to everything. Because here’s the thing – it knows, if things are to change, it won’t be easy, it won’t happen overnight, and it will take a lot of work, lot of unpleasant conversations, that need to take place.

The movie also leaves the question “does she have the right to be the judge, jury and executioner”? to each viewer to answer. There are definitely moments, where you feel like she’s consumed too much by this “quest” (even Nina’s mum, who’s probably more affected by losing her daughter, is telling her at one point, that she needs to move on, to forgive herself) and then something happens, when you feel like she does need to what she does. It’s definitely well told story and the movie knows exactly what it wants to say by actually saying too little. Because it would rather show you, let you be in her shoes, make you feel how Carey’s character is feeling and does it very effectively.

Overall, Promising Young Woman is not an easy watch. But it’s definitely well worth of your time. It’s a clever movie, that (unfortunately) won’t become dated any time soon, as the main subjects of this movie (sexual violence, believing women, men being excused as being “just kids”) won’t just disappear. This movie took it, ran with it and did it in a really inventive way. Plus, and I can’t stress this enough, Carey Mulligan is one hell of an actress.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Palm Springs (2020) Review – Live, Marry, Repeat

Advertisements

When the first lockdown happened, there were solid two months of nothing but (below) average movies were coming out “on demand”, but nothing that would get any universal praise. And then I started to hear about Palm Springs and how for some people this was an early contender for a movie of the year, even though it’s “just a comedy”. So I was immediately intrigued and wanted to see it, as comedies nowadays are usually miss, rather than hit for me. Some time passed and I’ve noticed it was available to stream, so I immediately watched it and – loved it.

I knew the “twist” from the beginning and to be fair, I don’t think it’s that big of a spoiler, when even the official synopsis for the movie tells you straightaway what to expect – yes, it’s another of those movies, who take the Groundhog Day (1993) route, where character(s) is stuck in a loop of one day. There seems to be no way of getting out of it, so they just try to make it worth their while. But the reason I loved this movie, was it went places I didn’t expect, it did something slightly different with this concept.

Since I want people to see this movie, but also I don’t want to rob potential viewers from those few clever ways how this movie plays with the “stuck in the loop” idea, I need to place a spoiler tag here, so before that, let me just assure you that yes, Palm Springs is a great comedy, great film and definitely one of the highlights that came from 2020. It’s funny, it surprises you couple of times and it has a great story/metaphor that ties everything together really nicely. So without further ado…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

First things first, I really loved the pairing of Andy Samberg and Cristin Milioti – if those two wouldn’t work as well as they do together, the entire movie would have fallen apart. They are the heart and soul of this entire thing. Both are amazing in this, but I do need to mention that I don’t think Andy Samberg gets the credit he deserves – he’s been consistently funny, he’s been involved with a lot of great, successful things, he’s had a big part in Saturday Night Live (1975 – ) and he did a lot for them to stay relevant. When the “shift” towards the Internet started to happen, here he was with The Lonely Island (if you don’t know them, just click on the link and enjoy yourself)… and I am sure I am missing out on 20 more things. The point here is, I really hope he starts to get recognized not just as an awesome comedian, who he undoubtedly is, but for being really “master of all trades”. To me, his goofiness, his sincereness, is the heart of this movie.

And if Andy is the heart of this film, then Cristin definitely is the soul. She’s the one, who’s pulled into the loop by him, even though by accident and he told her not to follow him, but she’s the one, who has the extra motivation of getting out of that loop, because every morning she wakes up, she wakes up to a biggest mistake she’s ever made. For me, that reveal wasn’t really a reveal, as it’s hinted at throughout the movie (very well, might I add) but that doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate it, on the contrary. Since I’ve guessed it prior, I could focus on the little hints scattered throughout and understood even more of her motivation of getting out of that damn loop. And her spirit, her journey throughout this film, is definitely great one, where she arguably has the biggest growth towards the end of the movie. Plus, there is something enchanting about Cristin. You just can’t help and fall for her instantly.

Another thing I really liked, was the fact the film just goes right into it, as it (rightly) presumes this isn’t first movie about this topic you have seen, so yeah, we get the “explain the rules” montage, but nothing too long. It didn’t seem tedious, the movie gives us just enough information to let us know where we stand, confirms what we suspect (even if you try to commit suicide or die, you wake up and the day resets, or no matter how far you drive, once you fall asleep, you wake up at exactly the same place) and moves on. And has fun with it. Those were my favourite moments, where our two main protagonists were just having fun with the time loop. The scene, where they plant a bomb into a wedding cake, I genuinely laughed out loud, and that hasn’t happened to me in a while.

And that’s another thing – this movie is actually funny! Which is great, if you are watching a comedy, as if you have seen any comedies lately, you’d know that laughter isn’t always guaranteed. Usually, it’s mild chuckle at most. But in here, because of those two main protagonist, clever writing, a new spin on a well known and explored premise, this movie grabs you from the very start and doesn’t let go until the very last scene. But the movie also knows when the slow down, and has some genuine touching moments. The main idea behind this movie (and what Andy’s character finally understands at the end) that marriage is kind of like a being a stuck in a time loop and it’s only up to you, what you will do with it and who you bring along.

What I also loved very the mini-twists along the way – some less expected (inclusion of J.K. Simmons in the loop, his entire story and the great final scene in the middle of the credits) some more expected (the already mentioned reveal about Cristin’s reason, as to why she is so desperate to get out of the loop) and what surprised me the most, that this might be the first movie of this specific genre (would it be considered its own genre at this point?) that takes The Martian‘s (2015) route and “science the shit out of this loop”. Well, Cristin is. I really loved the scenes, where you can see her character’s determination of learning quantum psychics, educating herself, to the point she understands what she needs to do to escape it.

Overall, Palm Springs is definitely the surprise movie of 2020 for me – comedy, that came out of nowhere for me, made me laugh, made me think and surprised me with new ideas on the “same old” concept we’ve all seen done a few times. This could have easily been another average movie with some funny(ish) scenes, but Palm Springs wanted to be more. And because of the witty writing, great casting and the fact we all needed something uplifting during this weird time, it hits you differently. This is definitely a movie I will be more than happy to re-visit.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The King of Staten Island (2020) Review – Abundance of Everything

Advertisements

It seems like I have a weird relationship Judd Apatow, as I usually like his movies, but I don’t love them as many people do. Except for maybe The 40 Year-Old Virgin (2005) which I need to re-watch, as I’ve only seen it once some time ago, I also have another problem with his movies – they are usually too long. Which is something he openly talks about in interviews, how he just can’t make himself edit more, as he just believes so much in those jokes and people etc. The King of Staten Island is yet again another of his movies, that could have used a trim, and I mean solid 30 minute trim at least. And then it might have been a really great comedy.

But let’s start from the beginning – the overall story is intriguing, especially as it’s loosely based on Pete Davidson‘s real life experience (his dad was a firefighter, who died during 9/11 attacks) so that part was really interesting, seeing it from his perspective and realizing how that could seriously mess up a child, losing their one of their parents in such an early age. But no matter what, I couldn’t force myself sympathize with his character. I think Pete was actually playing him well, but for me, that character was too obnoxious about everything, too immature, which I understand, it’s the point of the movie, to see his character grow, but here I need to ask the most important question – did he mature enough? Did he truly “change” so much by the end of the movie…? I mean, sure, there is some growth, but I don’t think there is nearly enough as the film thinks there is, if that makes sense…?

Speaking of casting, there are plenty of great people here, but the true highlights were Bill Burr, whose character I really loved and Bel Powley. Let’s start with Bill. The reason I really enjoyed him in this movie, is because when he shows up, you think you know where his character is going, how he’s going to be. And the movie let’s you be wrong for a bit until you learn, not everything is black and white and yes, he might have his flows, but overall he’s a decent man. Plus, he’s always funny and that is a good quality to have, especially in a comedy. I’ve never heard of Bel Powley before, but from now on, I will definitely be paying more attention to her, as there was something about her, that attracted me to her. And not just in physical sense, every time she was on the screen, it was her I was watching the most, as she was funny, relatable and overall gave a really good performance.

The movie can be split in two halves. The first one really bored me, where we are supposed to get familiar with all the characters, get into the story, it just wasn’t for me. From the moment Bill Burr’s character showed up, the movie became much better, funnier and overall more watchable. But then, it lost steam and the last 20 minutes, the movie limped to the finish line. Which was a shame, as there some really memorable scenes (Pete having a talk about his dad with firefighters, or when Marisa Tomei, whose also great in this, sees what is the “big tattoo” Pete’s been working on for a while) but then those get lost by the unnecessary “noise” around.

Obviously I am in minority here, as people seem to adore Judd’s movies, but for me, he should really hire an editor, who could stand up to him and tell him that comedies don’t need to be over 2 hours long, especially if they have said everything they meant to say within their first 80 minutes! Because there comes a point where Pete’s “I lost my father at a really young age, he was a hero and nobody can replace him” “shtick” goes from being heart-breaking to, frankly, annoying. And I feel pretty bad for saying this, especially knowing he was affected by it in a real life and is still struggling with it, but I am not judging Pete’s life here. I am reviewing a movie, that’s somehow based on him. And that movie simply doesn’t work as well as it should, especially with this topic.

Overall, The King of Staten Island is slightly above the average movie, that really gets saved by the amazing performers in it. It’s too bloated (136 minutes!) and I honestly believe, if there was some other editor, who could stand up to Judd and fight tooth and nail with him, they might cut out good 30/40 minutes, improve movie’s pace and it could have been a great one. I can see this being a funny, touching movie, that could have been. Instead of it, we get a film with great scene here and there, that’s surrounded with plenty of almost filler, that’s sometimes funny, and sometimes just misses the mark completely. But if you are a big Judd Apatow fan, and you liked all his previous movies, the chances are you will like this one too.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Scoob! (2020) Review – Nah, Dog

Advertisements

Every time I am writing a review, I try really hard to stay as objective as possible (but is there a such thing as being truly objective…?) where I try to put aside everything and focus on whether the movie/TV show/book is fulfilling it’s purpose. But when comes to Scoob!, I can’t do it. Because I have a very special connection with the original animated TV show and that is the main reason this film didn’t click with me at all.

My special connection is, I grew up watching the original animated show, that was my jam Above all the other animated shows, I loved Scooby Doo the most. I know what you are thinking – hey, that’s not that special, millions of kids grew up on that! Yes, but how many of them didn’t understand the language…? See, when I was growing up in Czech Republic, my grandma had a “satellite package” (good old 90’s, no Internet, had to pay plenty of money to get bunch of channels on your TV and most of them would be in English, language most Czechs don’t understand, especially older generation back in 90’s) so every time I would go to visit her, or to stay at her place for the weekend, that was the only place for me to watch Scooby Doo, Where Are You! (1969 – 1970) on Cartoon Network, as we didn’t have it back home. So there I was, really little Czech kid, watching something I was really, really loving, but not understanding a single word of what they were saying. But the power of animation and the straightforwardness of those stories were so great, I didn’t need to understand, because I’d always get what was happening (and I still have a theory that it’s because I grew up watching this show in English, I took to this language quite quickly, when I started to learn it properly in 2007) and loved it. And because of it, I had this TV show not only connected with my childhood, but also with my time spending at my grandma’s flat, you know, really happy times.

So that is where I am coming from, let’s go back to present, where I am watching the latest theatrical (or what was supposed to be a theatrical run before COVID-19 made a surprise appearance in everyone’s life) effort and truth to be told, the first 15 minutes or so weren’t bad! I was intrigued by how they managed to replicate the “opening credits” to give a nod/homage to the original cartoon, and even them as kids and how they all got together was fun for me. But then, we skip to the present and this is where the movie lost me. As they were trying to make this set in today’s day and time, so of course, we get plenty of smartphones, Instagram jokes, plenty of modern day lingo and I know I am going to sound like a purist, but that just doesn’t fit with the world of Scooby Doo and “vibe” of trying to solve mysteries.

I honestly would have preferred (and I strongly believe this would have made for a much better movie) had the film been set in “undefined” era, where the are no smartphones/technology we have today, but there might have been hints throughout to “when we are” (like cassette tapes, etc). Because I don’t think the comedy element works well for our gang to be in today’s day and age. What made Scooby Doo always so endearing to me was the fact they are just bunch of young people, who are trying to tell you to use your head and if there is something “supernatural”, usually there is a human behind it, who wants to fool you. From this, I really didn’t get the feeling like this movie went for it, as some plot lines here are simply resolved by “oh, I’ve just googled this” or “they just posted a picture on Instagram and this is where they are” and that just felt lazy and out of place.

To me, putting Scooby Doo into “our” current time period, is the same mistake as re-making The Flintstones and putting them in old Egypt, or medieval times. Sure, you can do that, but it changes the heart of the show so much, it ultimately becomes something else entirely. At that point, why not just name it something else…? Oh yeah, because then you wouldn’t have the name recognition of beloved cartoon…

Another reason Scoob! didn’t really click with me was simple – it just wasn’t funny. And again, big part of that is the story being set today, so most of the jokes don’t feel unique, they just feel like your old, tired “random equals funny” comedy formula, we often see in B animated movies, there are created purely for kids and there is nothing in them for adults. Most of the jokes here were not coming from the situation, so you could literally re-use them in a different animated movie and nobody would recognize it, that’s how little they in common with Scooby Doo. And I swear I can’t even see your average kid nowadays enjoying this, because believe it or not, kids nowadays are smarter than kids 20 years ago.

The only good thing I can say about this film, is the first 15 minutes were decent and the voice casting was pretty good, especially Mark Wahlberg as Blue Falcon surprised me, as it seemed like he was trying for something else. Also I really liked the choice of Daphne being voiced by Amanda Seyfried, I thought it fit very well and she’s also done a great job.

Overall, Scoob! is just below average animated movie, that’s trying to make you believe (based on the first 15 minutes) that the TV show you so fondly remember from your childhood is back, just with updated graphics. But it’s not, it’s just your “paint-by-the-numbers” animated movie, that I still can’t comprehend who it was made for. As fans of the original show won’t be happy with this and what is worse, I honestly believe most children will be bored by this too! As especially today, they have so many great animated movies to choose from, I would seriously wonder whether kids of certain age would want to watch Scoob! again, and again. But hey, maybe I am wrong.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Mank (2020) Review – Kane Before Citizen

Advertisements

I should have loved this movie. After all, it’s made by David Fincher (his first movie since 2014’s Gone Girl) about one of the most influential movies of all time, Citizen Kane (1941). On top of that, the script was written by Fincher’s late dad Jack Fincher (the movie is also dedicated to him), Gary Oldman is giving one of the best performances of his career, Amanda Seyfried has, dare I say it, stolen the movie for herself and overall, Mank is working like a well oiled machine. So how come I didn’t absolutely love it? How come there was something, that simply didn’t click with me…?

I think there are two answers to this question – the first is “simple”. Mank is too much “inside baseball“, which is something I didn’t expect and the second might have been the fact that except the very last dinner scene, there was no standout for me. So, let’s start with my first point…

I know it seems almost too silly to complain about this film being so obsessed with one topic, as that’s literally what this movie is about, but it went too overboard/microscopic with that. I always like to claim that I am true cinephile (whatever that means) but even for me, who has heard some stories about what was happening “behind the scenes” of what many critics consider “the best movie of all time” this might have gotten too deep. And if I sometimes got lost in politics and the plot, what about the casual viewer? Let’s face it, plenty of people know of Citizen Kane, but how many of your casual movie goers know there was so much happening behind it? And how many of those would need little to no information about it and just be thrown into it all? Because that is what happens in Mank. You are kind of thrown in, without any warnings, into two storylines, where especially in the flashbacks, it can be a bit overwhelming to remember all the names, who is doing what, who is working where, why is this person saying this about this person… you always kind of get this is supposed to be a nod to something that’s happened, or someone who existed, but the movie isn’t interested in giving you more. It’s almost like it expects you to either go in with all the knowledge prior watching it, or banking on you having such a great time with this movie, that you will spend hour or so on Google, making sense of everything you’ve just seen. And again, I love the passion and the general idea behind this, but it’s really easy to get overwhelmed by watching it (and with the current IMDb ranking of 7.0/10, it seems like I am not the only one who thinks that).

The other major issue I had with this movie – it doesn’t really feel to “Fincher-y”. As I mentioned above, there is only one scene you will remember because it stands out, and that is the dinner scene towards the end. The rest kind of blends in together, where you have tiny moments that are great (like the scene where Seyfried’s character is having the heartfelt conversation with Oldman’s character, where they understand each other perfectly, yet they know it might not be for too long) but the movie kind of flows in one way, where yes there are no low’s, but also no discernible highs either.

Mank is definitely a performance driven vehicle, and as much I would love to say how everybody is great in this (and that is because they truly are) I need to single out two performers I really enjoyed – the already mentioned Oldman and Seyfried. With Gary Oldman, he’s been consistently great for his entire life, but in here, he yet again does something that feels familiar, yet totally different. You understand how witty his character is and yet you see how broken he is, especially when his ideals get shattered. But the real star to me was Amanda Seyfried. She (weirdly) reminded me what Brad Pitt did in Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood (2019) where from the start, it feels like “normal” performance, but the more we get into the story, the more you understand how Amanda’s performance is brilliant, because it’s not “shiny” by any means, yet it could have easily been. She shares her scenes mostly with Gary Oldman, but she not only stands her own, but is more than equal acting partner to him, where you understand that there is something about her that only Oldman’s character can see. And she’s subtly suffering, being silent, knowing fully well, she’s better than the movies her character is given to star in. That is why I loved the tiny moment these two share, as I described earlier. Mutual admiration, and yet there is a hint of everything going away, because that’s how this show they call business works, where she doesn’t want him to write what he’s written and even though he admires and respects her (and again, in the entire movie, he might be the only one!) he can’t just let it go, even if that means loosing her as a friend.

Overall, Mank is a great film I feel it might be great for you, IF you go in with your “research” done. As a bare minimum, I would (re)-watch Citizen Kane right before this film, as I believe it would have made it a great “double bill” feature. And then, (or maybe prior watching Mank, as I would imagine that would have helped you big time) go for one the documentaries about Citizen Kane (or Orson Welles), something like The Battle Over Citizen Kane or maybe a TV movie made in 1999 called RKO 281, as I’ve heard that definitely helps giving you more information about what is happening in this movie. I feel like when it’s time for me to re-visit this film, I will definitely watch some of these and only then re-watch Mank and who knows? Maybe I will fall in love with this movie. But as with everything, that’s focused on one subject in almost microscopic fashion, your enjoyment of this movie will directly corelate with the fact how much you know about Citizen Kane, Orson Welles, the studio system in late 30’s/early 40’s of last century… and of course, the man, the myth, the legend, Herman J. Mankiewicz himself.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke