Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024) Review – Slow Start, Great Finish

Advertisements

Before watching this sequel in cinemas, I decided to rewatch the original Beetlejuice (1988), which I hadn’t seen in over a decade. During that rewatch, it dawned on me just how original, quirky and full of imagination that movie was. It got me thinking how difficult it would be for the sequel to recapture the magic of this almost accidental cult classic. So when I sat down, I hoped for the best but braced myself for the worst and surprisingly, it wasn’t bad at all…?

It took me probably the entire first act before I got into Beetlejuice Beetlejuice as the movie starts big. As opposed to the original film, we begin in New York; we need to establish a couple of details (like why Jeffrey Jones‘s character had to die; if you don’t know, I recommend reading his “trivia” section) before we get back to Winter River and the house we all know and love. The movie definitely gets better once we have all the remaining, not-so-problematic pieces of this puzzle back together, and we follow three generations of women trying to cope with everything.

The youngest is Jenna Ortega, the new “it” girl. I don’t think you could have picked a better daughter for Winona Ryder‘s character, Lydia. I am saying that as someone who believes she doesn’t have much to do in this movie. Don’t get me wrong, Jenna is in many scenes, but her story is a B plot that serves as a throughline for other stories.

The second generation is the already mentioned Lydia Deetz, as portrayed by Winona. I thought it was great to see grown Lydia having to deal with many things, including her daughter not believing that she can see and speak to ghosts. That mother-daughter conflict didn’t feel forced, especially once we learn the reason Jenna’s character is sceptical and doesn’t like her mom; it made total sense to me and felt right. Also, it’s great seeing Winona back in the cinema.

Someone who almost stole this movie for me was Catherine O’Hara. I love seeing her career renaissance; ever since she struck gold with Schitt’s Creek (2015 – 2020, my review here), she seems to be in everything, reminding us she is one hell of a comedienne. Her character was as chaotic, extra and funny as I remember, but it was never in the “we didn’t know what to do with her character, so here is what you loved but more” vain. There was some growth, where you could see her be unapologetically herself and living her best life.

The reason I said “almost” is there were two surprising characters I loved every time they appeared on the screen – Bob and Willem Dafoe. Firstly, I loved how much more time they gave to Bob and his… friends? It was the ultimate example of how to do so much with so little as Bob and others don’t speak; they just emote. I did enjoy every scene they were in. As far as Willem goes, talk about someone who seems to be in every movie now, replacing Samuel L. Jackson as the hardest-working actor in Hollywood. Anyway, for some reason, his actor character, who plays a cop even after he dies, was the highlight of this movie. I think it was his dedication mixed with the fact that his performance was tipping on the “self-awareness” scale, where he almost winked at us once or twice, but he never does and instead gives us this character his all and has a blast doing it.

I thought Michael Keaton as the titular Beetlejuice was fine, but given his manic state, there was no real growth, so this was “more of the same” as the original, but with his character, it made sense. Who I thought was totally underused was Monica Bellucci. Look, if I were Tim Burton and managed to date Monica, I would also cast her in my movies. But then give her something to do! Her introduction sequence was fun, but afterwards, she spent most of the movie walking because she was on a quest to find Beetlejuice. And without going into spoilers, the end of her storyline was underwhelming. I would also go as far as to say that we didn’t need Justin Theroux‘s subplot in this movie, and he doesn’t fit here. I like the guy, but it would be fine if his role had been completely cut out.

I wonder how Beetlejuice Beetlejuice will work when I eventually rewatch it because, during the movie, there were moments I was struggling to be in it, as mentioned above. But the movie makes some interesting twists and turns I didn’t expect, so I appreciated that. Also, it seems to find its footing as it goes. Even though I had an issue with Monica’s character “end”, I thought the end was great. Especially, I loved seeing practical effects, sets and not green screen, you know, all that good stuff. Looking at Tim’s directorial credits, this seems, by far, to be his best movie in a while (I haven’t seen Frankenweenie (2012) or Big Eyes (2014)), but that doesn’t mean as much as it used to. I need to give Tim some credit as this movie seems the most “Tim Burton” he has been in a while, but part of me thinks it will be so hard to go anywhere near what he used to do, especially in the ’90s. I hope I am wrong.

Overall, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is a much better legacy sequel than I anticipated. The movie definitely struggles at times, I am not sure whether we needed the producer subplot at all, but I left the cinema in a good mood, hopeful that the success this sequel has will light a creative fire under Burton’s ass, and we may get something excellent out of him again. This movie was a step in the right direction.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Twisters (2024) Review – The Dictionary Definition of Fine

Advertisements

Unlike many, I didn’t grow up on the original Twister (1996), and I only watched it for the first time a couple of years ago and thought it was fine. So, I wasn’t particularly “hyped” for this sequel; however, after some initial reactions, I felt if I were to see this movie, I should do it properly – on the big screen. And as the title of this review hints, I seem to be on this island where I know people who love both the original and this sequel. I don’t hate either, but for me, both movies were just “fine”.

My biggest problem with Twisters was that the movie seemed to try so hard to be something different, more grounded, and be a blockbuster with a brain. Cool, I can get behind that. But what happens after that follows the same formula we’ve seen times and times again. We open with a scene that defines our protagonist (most of her friends die). Fast forward a couple of years later, where she leads a safe but unsatisfied life, yearning to chase tornadoes. And what would you know, when she thought she was out, they brought her back in. But it is 2024, so we must have a subplot about corporate greed. And she may or may not develop a substance that kills tornadoes. The end.

Am I simplifying this movie to make a funny (?) point? Yes. But Twisters is really that. The thing is, I went in hoping to see a big blockbuster that I would enjoy. And the movie has two awesome sequences (the rodeo tornado and the end) where you can feel the insane power of nature. But the rest was… neither here nor there. For a big blockbuster, I found myself bored a bit despite everything being just fine.

Take our protagonists. The titular trio are people I like to watch and believe are the future of Hollywood – Daisy Edgar-Jones, Glen Powell and Anthony Ramos. Each of them is perfectly fine in their role, but nobody stands out, and they all have had much better roles in movies where they played much smaller parts. Or take the subplot of corporate greed – yes, Anthony’s character works for the “bad guys” who exploit people right after the tornado hits them, but of course, he flips on the dime, facing no repercussions. What’s more, his turn makes it seem like everything is fine now, even though he helped this company scheme many people out of their homes. That was my biggest hang-up with Twisters; you can tell this film wants so badly to be a “better”, “more intelligent” blockbuster, focusing more on the people and their stories rather than the spectacle. But the story here is paper thin, and we have seen this exact formula done to death.

Even the themes of getting over someone’s death, not blaming yourself, and living with that guilt this movie wanted to explore with Daisy’s character fell flat because the film never digs too deep there. We see everything explored, don’t get me wrong, but it all feels shallow because we have more data to collect so we can stop them tornadoes. What I am trying to say, probably not as well, is everything in this movie felt like it wanted to be much more, but it’s ultimately very shallow.

To make something clear – I don’t understand tornado chasers and never will. However, I don’t understand many things and why people would choose to do those things, and they still make excellent movies about them. So I don’t think it’s a “me issue”, at least not from this angle. I understand that the original Twister was a phenomenal success, and many people worship that film. And I have seen many others support this one, calling it one of the best films of 2024. I am genuinely happy for them and won’t try to tell anyone they are wrong. It seems like this franchise (?) is simply something that’s not meant for me.

Overall, Twisters is one of the most “fine” movies I have ever seen. The story, performances, action, CGI, everything was just… fine. For slightly over two hours, it occupied my time, and I didn’t hate anything about it, but the same night, I couldn’t recall much about this film. Besides those two big set pieces, everything feels like a “by the numbers” blockbuster. I think your enjoyment is directly related to whether you are into chasing tornadoes and watching those YouTube videos or you enjoyed the original film. If the answer is “yes” to either of those two prompts above, you will have a blast with Twisters. If not, you may struggle to latch onto anything here, just like me.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Trap (2024) Review – The Game of Cat and Ninja

Advertisements

I didn’t even know there was a new M. Night Shyamalan coming out this year until about two months ago when I watched the trailer in front of a different movie. But that trailer did everything right; it showed me just enough to interest me. Seeing M. Night’s name on the screen also added to my excitement, given he has redeemed himself from his… questionable period (2008 – 2013, you know what I am talking about). And even if not all of his recent films blew me away, I still appreciate them, as he is one of those few directors who always try for something new. Trap was just that, and that is what makes it my favourite movie of his since Split (2016).

What I loved the most was that simple premise. Dad and daughter go to a concert together; how wholesome is that? Except for the fact that he is a serial killer, and this entire concert is one big, deliberate trap for him, as the FBI knows he will be there. ‘How do they know?’ you might ask, and I won’t tell you because the movie answers that. And it is with this simple premise that M. Night puts us on the rollercoaster of emotions, hide and seek and the game of cat and ninja. Why not “cat and mouse”, you ask? I will get to that shortly.

I never thought I would write this, but I am so glad Josh Hartnett is back to starring in major movies and seems better than ever in this acting thing. It was so smart to make him our protagonist despite the fact he is, in fact, an antagonist. But just like in many films and TV shows of late, it is because we see everything through his eyes that we almost root for him. It’s more like I was intrigued about how he would get around this obstacle and how he escaped from this situation… and Josh plays his character so well. You believe he is a caring dad and husband, but you also see that animal inside him, ready to snap and chop you out. The fact he hovers over most (if not) all the people in this movie because of him being 191 cm (or 6′ 3″ for my US readers) also helped. He is as menacing as he appears and genuinely cares about his family.

I also liked Ariel Donoghue, who played his daughter, as she portrayed the teenager of today very well. That might be because she was only born in 2010, the fact I didn’t know while watching this movie, and now, I feel super old. Anyway, I thought she was great and never became annoying, which is super impressive, given all the yelling/fangirling her character does. I enjoyed Saleka Shyamalan, too, although you could argue this entire movie is just a big promo for her singing career, which is fine with me. You know what they say – nepotism starts at home. But I thought she was not just a good singer, but a decent enough actress, so I wouldn’t mind seeing her in other roles.

As I mentioned above, this movie is one giant thrill ride where you can sum it up by “bad guy sees a problem, he figures out a solution, moves on, just to stumble upon another problem”. My only major problem with it was that, especially in the last third, Cooper (Josh’s character) was in some situations he shouldn’t have escaped from. Or, let me phrase it differently – the only way he escapes is due to the power of editing. I don’t want to go into spoilers, but because of this, I started to refer to him as “bad ninja dad”. Because for you to enjoy Trap, you need to suspend your disbelief. And it’s gradual most things he does in the first two-thirds of this film; I could see how some could work, but once something happens, I don’t care how smart/nifty he is; he should have been caught a few times.

But besides this, I enjoyed Trap. I liked the push-and-pull aspect of this “chase”; I liked this film’s dark sense of humour at times, and I enjoyed the mid-credit scene… There’s a lot to like about this movie, and Josh Hartnett is, by far, the best thing. His performance is excellent, and I want to see him in more meatier roles like this.

Overall, Trap is an enjoyable thrill ride that will entertain you as long as you can suspend your disbelief in the last third. It’s a good old-fashioned “simple” movie with some M. Night elements sprinkled here and there, and he continues to prove that he is a fascinating director who had a period of bad movies in a row, but he’s long past it. I can’t wait to see what he does next because I am here for this kind of Shyamalan.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Alien: Romulus (2024) Review – Fede is Here to Stay!

Advertisements

Ever since I watched the first trailer for Alien: Romulus, I was in. I liked the vibe, the grittiness, and when the name Fede Alvarez popped as the director, I knew I would be checking it out in the cinema. He did the remake of The Evil Dead (1981), simply called Evil Dead (2013), which I loved. He also made Don’t Breathe (2016, my review here), which I respected; you could even say I liked it. The thing about him is that he seems to be a very “back to basics” director whose movies feel real, gritty, and raw, and he isn’t afraid to disgust you a bit (sometimes, a bit more). So I hoped he would bring those elements to the Alien franchise, and luckily, my hopes were answered. This movie is almost everything I wanted it to be and then some.

The movie starts on this planet full of people who are effectively slaving away for Weyland-Yutani and hoping to escape it by working hard. But given this megacorporation is as evil as if you mixed Amazon and Apple, they keep changing the conditions, so people stay, work and eventually die there. No inspiration taken from the real world; let’s move on… 😉 And it’s even during this “boring but necessary” exposition I noticed that this movie feels real. It’s a shame that this needs complimenting, but it did feel like they shot this on location and with physical objects rather than being trapped in a green screen studio (or the VFX were THAT good).

I also liked the new group of soon-to-victims/alien birthing chambers. For me, the standouts were a bit obvious – Cailee Spaeny and David Jonsson. Their “brother/sister” dynamic at the start worked, and as the events of this film unfolded, I liked how that dynamic changed and got challenged. Whom I always enjoy seeing and who has a tinier but pretty crucial role was Isabela Merced. I think she is sneaky great, and, given a couple of good roles in a row, she could rule Hollywood.

Now, let’s get to the meat of this story – the Alien. You can have the best characters ever, but if your Alien movie fucks up the “Alien” part, you are in trouble. Luckily, Alien: Romulus knows what it wants to do and, more importantly, how to build the tension. There are some predictable things and some questionable things as well (more about that soon), but one thing this movie nailed was the action and horror. Because of its settings (“abandoned” spaceship), we go back to the claustrophobic roots of this franchise, where it seems like Xenomorph or Facehugger can be behind any corner. I also love the shots when, a few times in this movie, the Xenomorph almost blends in with the background, and we can only see it when it moves.

Fede understands this beast very well and makes it (alongside the numerous Facehuggers) scary, ruthless and almost unstoppable, just as we remember from the numerous Alien movies before this one. I also appreciated that this is a dark movie, but I was never confused about where we were or struggled to see any action on the screen. As I always said, there’s a difference between “movies taking place in the dark” and “let’s hide our shitty action/CGI with a lot of shadows and darkness”. Also, Fede does something unique with this franchise, and we have several outstanding sequences. The clear standouts were the zero gravity fight and crossing the room full of Facehuggers undetected.

My only tiny issue with this movie would be the clunky way they bring back someone from the past. I don’t want to mention which movie; I don’t want to discuss spoilers that much, but I don’t know whether it was needed. Especially given who that person is/was within that universe, you could have easily made this movie with some other, unknown character rather than what this movie chose to do. It didn’t pull me out of the film, but it was a weird choice for… numerous reasons. Also, if I was nit-picky, towards the end, they seem to run around this big ship quite quickly, and the timer seemed to be pausing/stopping because, of course, there’s a self-destruct timer, wouldn’t be an Alien movie without it!

But I can’t lie; neither of those two things bothered me as much as to spoil my enjoyment of this twisted film. Especially the last third, where you know some shit will go down and then it happens, and it’s even bloodier and more intense than I thought. And that is why I am fully on board with Fede Alvarez being one to watch out for. Even if he doesn’t do something I would fully appreciate (like Don’t Breathe), I still think his movie has a unique sense of style and grittiness I gravitate towards. We live in an age where many movies look alike, no matter whether you watch comedy, action or a thriller. And his films always have a more “cinematic” look to them. They feel more grounded, and I am including Alien: Romulus in that conversation too, which is saying something.

Overall, Alien: Romulus was a blast. It’s an almost two-hour thrill and horror ride that never bored me. The jump scares (only a few, which is another positive) worked, but what I appreciated more than that was the atmosphere, the willingness to show us something new and Fede staying true to himself and showing us some good old horror fun. I can’t wait to rewatch it and see where this will ultimately end up in my Alien ranking because, at this moment, it’s pretty high. Go and support this movie in the cinema if you fancy a great Alien movie.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Mean Girls (2024) Review – Playing the Hits, The Movie

Advertisements

I am old enough to remember when the original Mean Girls (2004) film came out. It took me two viewings to get into it, and I still wouldn’t say it’s my favourite movie. However, within that genre, it undeniably left a mark on our pop culture and helped to put some young girls (at the time) on the path to stardom, namely Rachel McAdams, Amanda Seyfried and Lizzy Caplan, I could argue were the most impacted by the success of this film. I have never seen the musical this movie is based on (yes, technically, it’s not a remake of the original; it’s a remake of that musical). Still, I have heard many people enjoyed it, and it gave us Reneé Rapp. Unfortunately, I can see how this would have worked much better as a stage musical.

Let me start with some positives. I thought Reneé Rapp was awesome as Regina, and she can sing. I thought the girl who played Janis was familiar, so when I checked IMDb and discovered it was Moana herself, Auli’i Cravalho, I was stunned. She was also great in her role, and I don’t think I need to even mention the fact that she has some pipes on her because she is freaking Moana! Of course, she can sing. But the standout of this movie was Avantika, who portrayed Karen. Sure, she is gorgeous, so that doesn’t hurt, but what’s much more important is that she (the same as Amanda Seyfried in the original film) is perfect as this idiot. The most I laughed at was her and her line deliveries because I know this isn’t an easy role. Playing the comic relief, you are always in danger of overstaying your welcome, and when that happens, it’s easy to get on people’s nerves. But the film gives her just enough scenes for it not to happen, and she capitalised on every single one. I wouldn’t mind seeing her career trajectory follow Amanda’s and seeing her in more dramatic roles and possibly getting some Oscar love. I hope she has been cast in 20 movies.

My biggest problem with this movie was the awareness of itself being a remake and needing to deliver on the iconic lines and scenes. Because the problem with the iconic lines (“That’s so fetch.” “On Wednesdays we wear pink!” etc.) and moments is that they became iconic organically. And this film puts so much emphasis on them that it becomes distracting. I would imagine all the crew and actors wanted to make sure they did them justice, but in doing that, they took it a bit too over the board, so every time a line or a scene from the original movie gets recycled, it becomes cringy, really fast. And this is what I can see would work as a Broadway musical because you MUST play it big for those moments to land in front of a live audience. Unfortunately, just like with many adaptions prior (whether you are adapting a book, game or musical), this film fell into the same trap, not realising that what worked on the stage doesn’t translate on the screen.

Another example of this would be the musical numbers. I watched this film a few weeks ago and can barely remember any that would stand out. I had to go back and read my review on Letterboxd (feel free to follow me here, shameless plug ;-)) because I remember naming two scenes that stood out. Those were the Halloween party and the Burn Book reveal scenes). I felt like those two musical set pieces at least tried to do something more cinematic. But as far as the rest is concerned, they weren’t any more imaginative than your average music video of the last decade. To be fair, I could probably name some music videos that are much more intriguing than most of these musical scenes. Again, what might have worked as a musical won’t work in cinemas or TV screens.

And if I must be brutally honest, I thought the songs were… fine. I think one of my biggest let-downs was that even after the movie finished, there wasn’t one tune, one song that would get stuck in my head. When I watch musicals, I love it when at least one or two songs stay with me to the point I would want to add them to my Spotify playlist, but here, nothing. I remember feeling like this when the credits were rolling, let alone now, a couple of weeks removed from this film.

Look, I am not saying this version of Mean Girls is bad. No, it’s a perfectly fine, semi-enjoyable movie that will, hopefully, catapult some young actors and singers to stardom. What I am trying to say is – when you adapt a musical based on a film that defines an entire generation, there are a few things you must balance out. You should also realise that there is no stage limit. Therefore, you can shoot musical numbers differently. You must, or otherwise, the final result will be average at best.

Overall, Mean Girls is a solid movie full of decent performers and actors who will be intriguing to watch where they end up in 20 years’ time. The movie won’t probably bore you, but especially if you have seen some musicals in your life, this might underwhelm you just a bit. But if you love “young sexy people” being young and sexy and every 10 minutes they break into a dance number, this film might be for you.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Deadpool & Wolverine (2024) Review – A Tribute to All Broken Things

Advertisements

For the first time since The Avengers (2012), we only have one MCU movie coming out in the entire calendar year of 2024, and it is this one. The pressure was on to deliver and, to an extent, prove if people are, in fact, sick and tired of comic book films or whether they just don’t like when movies that don’t do anything new. And by the massive success of Deadpool & Wolverine, it seems clear that people still care; you just need to motivate them to show up in the cinemas. The Marvel Jesus (Ryan Reynolds) did it.

I can’t lie; it’s been a while since I have had such a blast in the cinema. This movie throws everything at you and then some; the cadence is roughly 22.5739 jokes per minute, and there are various quips, quick jokes, and references to many things (mostly pop-culture related), but most landed for me. What I loved is how this movie dealt with the idea of “bringing” Wolverine back, as I don’t think it’s a spoiler to say that he died in his last film and Hugh Jackman officially retired from playing him. That was until this movie, where what they did and how this movie opened was brilliant. And the laughs didn’t stop for me for pretty much the entirety of this buddy hero movie.

It’s hard to discuss specifics without going into spoilers because there are some amazing jokes, scenes, and characters who I had no idea were coming. So, before delving into spoilers, I will say that I enjoyed this movie and was on the verge of giving it 5/5 stars. The only thing that stopped me was the nagging feeling of whether some of those scenes and jokes would work as much on my second watch. But other than that, I had a good time with this film, as it’s a pretty poignant farewell to a specific comic book era where things weren’t always going great. It’s a love letter to all the “forgotten” comic book movies, characters and some that never even gotten their chance to shine. I have noticed when people discuss this movie, one of the biggest criticisms is that there is “no story”. I don’t get that at all because this movie is about many things; you just need to look beyond the vulgar humour. It’s about finding your place, fitting in and wanting to be something bigger than yourself. This movie talks about how no matter how super you are, you may never reach the heights you want to, and that’s fine. So, I don’t agree with that notion.

I will also give the movie this – the action scenes and montages were executed well. Unlike many MCU films, the action scenes in Deadpool & Wolverine seemed less edited and more fluent. And the montages, whether it’s the finale or the closing credits one, were tastefully done, and I wouldn’t be surprised if many teared up during either of those. Especially the end credit one, where we see behind-the-scenes footage from many comic book films of the past, made me want to rewatch the X-Men movies as it’s been a minute since I watched the first ones. Anyway, let’s go to spoilers so I can talk about some scenes and characters more freely.

BEWARE, SPOILERS ARE COMING!

I expected more cameos, to be honest, but I will say I am not disappointed by “only” having those we got just to clarify something from the start. I imagined, given the fourth-wall-breaking nature of Deadpool, everyone who has ever appeared in the MCU would be in here, even if in a big group scene for a second (like in Deadpool 2 (2018)). Instead, we get a more sensible approach, and the first hint of that is when Chris Evans shows up, but not as Captain America. Instead, he shows up as Johnny Storm from the Fantastic Four movies he made in the mid-2000s. One thing I don’t think people appreciate about this movie is they could have gone for the expected (especially with the subplot of Deadpool trying to join the Avengers) and made him come back as Captain America, but that wouldn’t have worked with the theme of this film. Don’t get me wrong; this movie goes for the obvious jokes when it’s funny. But as far as plot and all these cameos are concerned, they seemed to have more thought put into them than simply: “Hey, we need to bring back this person and that person, just because we can!”

Speaking of which, did I like seeing Jennifer Garner as Elektra and Dafne Keen as Laura back? Yes, I did. Did I expect to see Channing Tatum as Gambit? Absolutely not. The choices they made with his character giving him this goofy… dialect? Accent? Speech disorder? Either way, it worked, and I, yet again, ask for Channing to star in more comedies because he is a low-key underrated and brilliant comedic actor. But, who brought me so much joy and I didn’t know I needed to see back on the big screen was the man, the myth, the tax dodging legend himself, Wesley Snipes. Blade has always been one of my favourite characters ever, and to see him back, be as cool as he was back in 1998 (!) and referencing the fact there is only one Blade (can you believe they announced the Blade movie in 2019 and we still haven’t gotten it?!) just made me so giddy. As much as I loved all the cameos and Deadpool variants, Wesley Snipes coming back in that scene as Blade was something I didn’t know I needed, and it made my day.

What this movie then does with all these cameos is also underappreciated. Sure, Evans is mostly the punchline, but as far as the others are concerned, Deadpool & Wolverine gives them all one last chance to shine, to be cool. And as Gambit himself points out in the movie, it gives him the chance to even exist because his Gambit movie was stuck in pre-production hell for a decade until it got cancelled altogether. And despite making him into “a bit” of a joke, when the action time came, they give him some cool set pieces too where it acted as this glimpse of what could have been. Everyone got the chance to shine in the big battle, and I am glad they didn’t bring them back just to kill them off. Well, except for Johnny Storm, but did you see him shit talking Cassandra Nova? No wonder she did what she did to him.

Speaking of her, Emma Corrin was awesome. Emma goes by they/them, and their character was a nice spin on Charles Xavier’s character. I liked how their journey almost mirrored Deadpool’s, and they also had to live in someone else’s shadow and just wanted to be seen. This film also showcased something we had never seen before – what if Professor X was evil? This movie goes through several things, and they barely manage to stop Cassandra’s character, fully displaying just how powerful someone with those powers would be.

I can’t wait to rewatch it and see how well it plays the second time around. But as far as my cinema visit, I had a blast. I thought MCU desperately needed a hit; they got it, and hopefully, they will understand that they need to mature now. I am not saying every MCU movie from this point forward needs to have this much profanity, but the audience is ready for more mature, darker comic book movies. And if there is one thing Deadpool & Wolverine proved without a doubt, people will show up and make you money, even if the movie is R-rated. If the source material calls for it, don’t soften it; nourish what makes the characters and stories unique.

Overall, Deadpool & Wolverine surprised me with how much fun I had with it. I expected a cameo fest of all the famous people. Instead, we get a few cameos that mean something. I didn’t expect this movie to be a reflection of how far we’ve gotten (comic book-wise) while giving some characters a proper send-off. I think this also will be an amazing time capsule film. In 20/30 years, when you put this on, you will be transformed into 2024, as no matter how much or how little you liked this movie, it is a mirror to the modern pop culture and our current obsession with nostalgia, multiverses and all the other things that make studios money. And sometimes, it’s good to reflect.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

LUke

Babylon (2022) Review – When You Love Movies But Hate Hollywood

Advertisements

The balls on Damien Chazelle. Think about it – somebody who is still relatively new in Hollywood (despite already winning the Best Director Oscar for La La Land (2017) making a three-hour epic that was sure to lose money (especially on a budget of $110 million) about his love for movies and his contempt for the industry producing them… I call it “balls” you can call it courage, but one thing is for certain. He doesn’t play it safe, and I appreciate it about him.

This film starts with one of the wildest parties you have ever witnessed on the film. There are drugs, naked people, a young woman peeing on an actor, an elephant… You don’t know what to focus on first. To an extent, the first hour of this movie reminded me of the energy of the opening 30 minutes of Moulin Rouge! (2001), one of my favourite films ever. Even though Babylon is much more explicit and not subtle about anything. It is during this party we are introduced to most of the key people we will follow. Although Babylon is that kind of a film with everyone and their mum in here, it is primarily about four people – Margot Robbie, Brad Pitt, Jovan Adepo and Diego Calva and it is through their various pitfalls in this industry we see everything – the rise, the fall, the struggle, morals and those morals getting compromised, the switch to “talkies”… this movie wants to cover it all. And you are either here for all of it or you won’t have a good time with this movie.

The biggest thing I took after finishing this movie was that Damien Chazelle knows his movie/Hollywood history. And he is smart enough to separate the art he unabashedly loves from the deeply flawed artists who made it. Every scene in this movie makes a point every character matters because they are based on either one person who existed or several people mixed in one. And the bigger-than-life parties with no limits to the depravity are and have been known for this era. I appreciate someone like him because it would be easy to look back at the start of Hollywood, look at the revolutionary things they did with the cinema and fetishize the past because of your love for movies. But, as always, he is a realist who knows a thing or two about that history and feels like if he doesn’t show it “warts and all” (or, in this case, excessive parties and all), nobody else will.

It’s easy to watch the older movies from the 20s and 30s and, given how they are always dressed up and presentable, think people back then just used be much more noble. Quite the opposite, the rules and regulations are here because the previous generations did something that made those rules exist in the first place! Babylon realises that that nothing happens in vacuum. There is an action and reaction for everything, and we see it here when the sound starts to overtake or when Manny (Diego Calva’s character) takes all the beating, bossing around and starts making his way up.

It’s mainly through his and Margot Robbie’s characters we see how this industry can take two different dreamers, and when they go through “the system”, they both end up waking up to a nightmare. Despite being successful, he needs to compromise his morals, push others around (something that used to happen to him) and put out fires caused mainly by Nellie, played by Margot. Her character arc was also painful to watch because when we first met her, she had a spark that could power the entire Los Angeles. And in her last scene, she’s burned out and ready for her end despite still being young and pretty. It’s suitable that they form this almost a couple as they both have a similar enough theme where both are young dreamers willing to do what it takes, only to be put through the system and be lucky if they can escape it alive, and we watch both of their sparks die. Slowly, bit by bit, until there’s almost nothing left.

I am now realising that Brad Pitt and Jovan Adepo’s character arcs mirror each other too. Sure, Pitt’s character is the obvious remnant of the silent era that couldn’t hack it in the era of “talkies”, but thinking about it now, I think there’s a deeper theme with both of them, and that’s dignity. We see both being challenged and having their dignity taken away (Pitt’s phone call with a producer about making a “shit movie” and Jovan’s making his face extra black for the audience down South), and we see the aftermath too. One is tragic, and the other is tragic, but both can crush your soul for entirely different reasons.

Here is where the brilliance of Damien Chazelle shines through. Because those four characters are based on specific people of that era, sure. But you can argue we have seen stories like these throughout history, and we still see some now. How many people didn’t sacrifice their dignity or morals and quit the industry instead? How many killed themselves? How many peaked “too soon” and then struggled to do anything else? Babylon might be talking about the age of Hollywood that’s long gone; however, in its last 20 minutes, it shows us how everything is intertwined.

That final montage… Without spoiling anything, at first, it took me out a bit because I didn’t expect to watch what I did at first. But the longer it was going and when I put into perspective why we were watching and through which eyes (again, no spoilers), I loved it. If you have any doubts about the overarching theme of this film, this montage underlines everything for you and answers the most obvious question – why are you in this industry then? Why do you love movies when you know many horrible people made them? The answer is not easy, and I think it changes depending on who you ask, but I would answer that I love movies despite their flaws, not because of them. I imagine Chazelle would answer similarly because that is how I read this movie. He loves films and the medium, but that doesn’t mean you must love everything about it, and that includes the system that often profited from the misery and mistreatment of many, to the people involved within that system who committed horrible things. Also, the idea of being part of something bigger than yourself (another overarching message of this movie) connects that montage beautifully.

There are many more things I could write about, but the movie throws so much at you it’s impossible to catch and appreciate it all on the first watch. That is the only reason I can’t rate it 5/5* because I want to go back and make sure that I can orient myself in that enjoyable mess. Ultimately, that is what Babylon is – an unbelievably epic mess that reflects many complex ideas, themes and Hollywood history all at once. The more you know about the history and the people these characters are based on, the more you will… not necessarily enjoy the film, but maybe appreciate the effort. I certainly did, and I can’t wait to rewatch it, which is something I don’t tend to say for every three-hour film.

Overall, Babylon is a big, loud, extravagant history lesson that throws the kitchen sink, the fridge, the stove and the entire house at you. It is a film that knows what it wants to say and says it loudly. It’s also incredibly well-acted, directed, scored, shot… Look, it’s technically a brilliant movie. I believe that on my next rewatch, I will be in full “love” camp because I still think about this film, and it’s been a week or two since I watched it. I hope and wish Damien’s next project will be another fascinating topic again, and I can’t wait to see it.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Fallout (2021) Review – What a Devastating World

Advertisements

Before the year 2022 that made Jenna Ortega one of the brightest young stars we have right now, she starred in The Fallout, a film about a “school tragedy”, as the IMDb synopsis states. We live in a world where we all know what that means, but for some reason, nobody wants to say it out loud. Yes, as you can imagine, this movie deals with a school shooting. However, we primarily deal with the aftermath of one and how that affects the people around the survivors and their relationships. What a fucked up world we live in where this paragraph had to be written, and movies like these are made, by the way. The fact that this isn’t a “what if” movie, and that there is now an entire generation of American kids who probably relate to this movie a bit too much is just awful.

I didn’t know what to expect from this movie besides knowing that it deals with a school shooting. It deals with it almost instantly, and it is shot in the most effective way, where we don’t see the shooter or the aftermath, but we can hear everything as we are in the moment with what will become our main trio – Vada (Jenna’s character), Mia (Maddie Ziegler) and Quinton (Niles Fitch) and them hiding in the toilets, thinking that any moment, they might be the next ones to die.

That all happens within the first ten minutes. The film then focuses mainly on Vada and Mia’s characters, how they are affected by this horrible event and, more importantly, how their relationships with others change. Vada and Mia, despite not having anything in common before that shooting and never even talking to each other (at least that’s what the movie suggests), suddenly become close because of their trauma bond. They are in a uniquely shitty situation where it seems like they don’t have to put up a show in front of each other and can just be themselves, unlike what we see with Vada’s family, especially with her little sister.

Probably the smartest decision this movie made was to use Vada’s relationship with her little sister (Lumi Pollack) as almost a proxy for her entire family. The film even opens (before the shooting) with a phone call where Amelia (Vada’s sister) gets her first period and is freaking out because of it. Throughout the film, she acts like the younger sister who doesn’t really understand the severity of what her older sister has gone through, which is understandable. It is through her that Vada realises how she behaved towards everyone in one of the best and most touching scenes; the “bedroom visit” scene finally gets through to someone like Vada, who, until that moment, pretends that everything is fine even though she knows that it isn’t.

What I also liked was seeing different approaches to surviving an event like that. Vada is trying her hardest to cope and pretend like nothing happened; Mia does the same to an extent, but her family being gone in Europe for the entirety of the film puts her in a more isolating situation, where despite her popularity, she doesn’t seem to have anyone close but Vada. Then we have Quinton, who lost his younger brother, and it’s hinted that he needs to be the strong one for his family. Lastly, we have Nick, portrayed by Will Ropp (Vada’s best friend, at least before the shooting), who wants change and becomes the face of all the survivors and starts organising marches, going on TV, etc. I appreciated the nuance that although they all have been through the same event, they all respond to it differently, and what works for one person doesn’t work for the other. I also found it fascinating how an event like that can form a friendship (Vada and Mia) and break others too (Vada and Nick’s character).

This movie also has one of the most gut-punching endings I have seen in a while. I won’t go into spoilers, but in the last two minutes, we see and understand how difficult it is to “just get over” something like this. I understood that The Fallout won’t have a happy ending per se, but I didn’t expect that and how real it felt. As a person who hopes I won’t ever have to go through anything like this, when the ending happened, I was heart wrecked, but I also thought to myself: “That makes sense.” And here is, again, where I must mention how fucked up that is that we live in a world where not only movies like this exist, but heart wrecking ending “makes sense”.

The only critique I would have is the character’s work. For example, Vada’s dad, portrayed by John Ortiz, didn’t have to exist. For the majority of the film, even if he was in a scene, he was just there, not doing much, and we were relating everything through Julie Bowen, America’s favourite mom. Yes, Vada and him then have the nice yelling scene, but realistically, this could have been her mom and her, and it would make more sense. He almost seemed like a glorified extra, and the movie might have as well made Julie Bowen into a single mom or a widow. My other tiny issue was the unresolved relationship between Vada and Nick. I get that it’s not the point of this film, but we start with their relationship, and the movie ends, almost suggesting that these two might never speak. That seems a bit harsh.

But other than those tiny nitpicks, The Fallout worked for me and approached this brutal topic with the honesty, rawness and sincerity it deserved. I really hope that some 20/30 years from now, we won’t need films like these, but something tells me I am just being naïve.

Overall, The Fallout is a chilling movie about something that shouldn’t be happening at all. It’s a film that will stay with you no matter where you live in the world. I can’t imagine how this movie affects survivors, their families, or worse yet, those who had lost someone in one of many school shootings over the last 20+ years. This film is a painful yet much-needed watch for some people who still try to convince many that you need a semi-automatic rifle to “defend” yourself.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Movie Reviews, TV Show Reviews and more!

Exit mobile version
%%footer%%