Tag Archives: 1980

Movies or shows released in 1980.

The Changeling (1980) Review – How to Build Suspense 101

Advertisements

Horror might just be the most specific film genre. As we progress/evolve, so do the movies we consume, and for me, there is no better display of this than horror movies, respectively what can we (the audience) tolerate? Just think about the Saw franchise, which many still call “torture-porn” movies, but for a reason, as with each sequel, they pushed the boundaries of what could be shown on the screen. My point is horror movies suffer (at least in my view) the most from “ageing”. What used to be scary or downright terrifying in the 60s or 70s might not work as well now because we have seen every form of horror elevated. But then you bump into a film like The Changeling that proves that occasionally, the old ones can be as scary today as they were back when they were released.

And why is that? What is the big secret? Well, the secret is that there is no secret. The filmmakers of the past just had to rely on the atmosphere above all. They couldn’t rely on CGI (it existed back in 1980, but it was too expensive for a horror film), so they had to have a gripping story and build everything around that. And this film is the perfect example of how to do it well.

The Changeling starts as your stereotypical horror film; an older guy (portrayed by George C. Scott) loses his wife and daughter in a freak accident. So, as one tends to do, he moves to start someplace else fresh, and for whatever reason, he selects this old mansion. And, of course, there are weird sounds his first night, along with other strange occurrences. But if you are willing to look past that and focus on the film, you will quickly discover it delves into almost a detective story about a potentially missing kid. I won’t go into any further details because there are some nice twists and turns along the way.

I will say the moment I knew the film had me and sent chills down my spine was when our main character figured out what those weird, thump-like sounds were. We would hear them at least two to three times, and it was a pretty ominous sound as it didn’t sound like anything I was familiar with. But the moment he discovers what it was, holy shit. The Changeling works because it doesn’t rely on jump scares; it slowly and meticulously builds up everything to where something that wouldn’t usually scare you scares you. But it’s never any “fake scare”. Do you know how most horror films have the “fake jump scare” before the real one? Yeah, you won’t find anything like that here; everything horror-related ties to the story. I loved the film… until the last 20 minutes.

I won’t say the last 20 minutes of this film killed it for me; no. It was still a decent watch and a satisfying finale, but the central mystery got solved by then. Do you know how I said the movie turns into almost a detective story? Yeah, everything is wrapped up a good 20 minutes before the movie finishes. I understand that is just how they used to make films at the time; they took their time with everything so we would get closure and transparent answers to all our questions. But I can’t help it; if the movie had been 80/85 minutes instead of 107 minutes, it would have been a perfect film.

I also couldn’t help but remember another “old” horror film called The Haunting (1963) and how, despite it being almost two hours long, it never suffered from a premature finish. It built a creepy atmosphere throughout the film, and the film peaked about five minutes before the end. I can say with a clear conscience, The Haunting, a movie from 1963 (!), is still one of (if not THE) the scariest films I have ever seen. Considering the movie has only one equivalent of a jump scare (it’s not a jump scare, but that was the closest that scene compares to a modern jump scare), that should tell you something you need to know. In many instances, The Changeling reminded me of The Haunting, but ultimately, that is where they differ. The Changeling just wraps up everything and then continues going for another 20 minutes at least.

But let me be clear, I would still recommend this to everyone, mainly all horror filmmakers of today. You can tell watching modern mainstream horror movies, many filmmakers don’t go back to these classics, and if they do, they have taken zero lessons from them. I understand audiences have evolved too, but you will not convince me that modern audiences love jump scares every five minutes. I once heard a great comparison that jump scare is to a horror genre, what tickling is to a comedy genre. Sure, if somebody were to tickle you whilst you watched a comedy film, you would laugh much more. And the jump scares (mostly) work, so you feel afraid. But how often do you forget about that horror film? How long does it take for you to “recover”? It doesn’t take that much, does it now? That’s because jump scares are the short-term “solution”; a shortcut, if you will. Especially if you know where they are on your next rewatch, they are not nearly as effective. But if you take the energy, time and make some effort into building a spooky atmosphere, that will work no matter what. And I wish more mainstream horror filmmakers would understand that.

Overall, The Changeling is a nearly perfect horror film with the calmest protagonist ever. I swear many people would have been out of the house and run away from other situations, but not our protagonist. George C. Scott has apparently seen some shit, so he remains cool as a cucumber for most of the film. It is a shame that the movie peaks with about 20 minutes left to go because there is a noticeable difference between the first 3/4 of the film and the rest. But still, this one is an easy recommendation for any horror fan. They used to make them well, and some still hold up 40 + years later.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Flash Gordon (1980) Review – Expect Unexpected

Advertisements

I need to admit something – after everything I’ve heard about this movie, I was ready for one of those cheesy 80’s films that are not watchable today, where I will be bored for most of it. Boy, I was so wrong. This film has surprised me in several instances, where ultimately, I had a much better time than expected. Does it hold up today? Largely, no. But can you still have fun with this film? Absolutely. And the best part? Surprisingly, the pacing.

Where Flash Gordon might lose some points for the laughable CGI (that must have looked fake even during the movie premiere back in 1980), it immediately gains more points for how fast the story moves along. I believe we don’t spend even ten minutes on Earth before we go to space. The story kicks in almost instantly… who cares that it doesn’t make sense? That there is some arbitrary time limit before the Moon will fall apart…? Flash Gordon is a rarity because plenty of times, I struggle with pacing with these movies, as filmmakers “in the ye olde days” usually took their time establishing everything. Not in here though, it honestly felt like we were thrown in the middle of the action from the very start. That was something, I truly appreciated.

Also, I wasn’t prepared for how surprisingly sexy this movie is. For all the talk about how campy this film is, how dated it is etc., nobody ever mentioned the literal harem of women (that belongs to Max von Sydow‘s character, The Emperor Ming) that is “lead” by the stunning Ornella Muti. I have always known her to be a stunning woman, but I had never seen her when she was young (in here I believe she’s around 24 years old) and yeah, what a stunner. Speaking of stunning women, Melody Anderson isn’t too sore for the eyes either. Even though her character is just there to fall for our “all American hero”, Sam J. Jones. And talk about a perfect casting choice. If you asked someone: “How would the most stereotypical American guy from the 1980’s look like?” Sam J. Jones would have been THE prototype. Blond, athletic, patriotic, ready to die for Earth… what else do you want?

Who I also didn’t expect to show up here was Timothy Dalton. If somebody told me he got the role of James Bond based on how charismatic he was in this film, I would believe it. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think Timothy has a lot to do in this film, but he oozes charisma and charm. And that can be said about most people in this movie. Don’t expect any great performances here. Even usually reliable Max von Sydow isn’t that great in this film, but I wouldn’t blame him or anybody else. You know the movie had some issues when the director Mike Hodges says, and I am paraphrasing here:

Flash Gordon might be the only improvised $27 million movie ever made.

Mike Hodges, source IMDb.com

But despite everything, despite the laughable CGI, questionable acting, and von Sydow playing a character called “The Emperor Ming” (again, we can’t judge a movie from 1980 by today’s standards), this movie is still fun to watch and honestly, it flies. I think this might be the best example of “the magic of movies” I’ve seen in some time. Because if somebody were to describe this movie to me, I would be willing to bet this wouldn’t work today. And yet, I had a good time with it. Because of pacing, charismatic cast, killer Queen soundtrack, as let’s face it, music by Queen could improve anything that’s just a fact. But mainly how the movie doesn’t take itself too seriously (at least I never got that impression). Yep, honestly, that surprised me too.

Overall, Flash Gordon is one of those films where it doesn’t matter how many things you might have heard about it because it demands to be seen. This movie is the epitome of “you’d have to be there”. Yes, everything is “slightly” all over the place. Mainly the CGI was out of date even when the movie was shooting, so imagine how laughable those effects look today. But there was this level of honesty, something, that said: “Hey, we know how this looks, but we are trying our best.” I can’t put my finger on what exactly made me feel this way, but that’s “the magic of movies” to me. Sometimes, a film shouldn’t work at all, and yet, despite everything, it kind of does. And what I mean by that it’s not a total disaster. I want to make it crystal clear Flash Gordon isn’t some “forgotten masterpiece”, no. But if you watch it expecting a bore-fest, you might be in for a surprise. At least I was.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Airplane! (1980) Review – Looks Like I Picked The Wrong Week to Quit Loving This Movie

Advertisements

After writing about my favourite movie of all time (my review for Lost in Translation (2003) can be found here for those who missed it) I thought it’s a perfect time to re-visit my second favourite movie of all time, Airplane!. Unlike Lost in Translation, where I need to be in a certain mood to watch it, I can pop this comedy in any time I want and just relax, forget about the world for about hour and half and simply enjoy the delightful disaster…

To this day, Airplane! is the only movie that made me physically roll on the floor laughing. I am not exaggerating, when I watched this film for the very first time and the “calm down, lady!” scene came up, I just gave up and slid down on the floor, laughing and thinking this might be the funniest comedy I’ve ever seen. I was fairly young (I reckon I couldn’t be older than 15/16) and now, almost 15 years later, that statement is still true. I have seen a lot of comedies, TV shows, improvs, and plenty of them had me laughing hysterically, but nothing prior or since “the” Airplane! has made me laugh so hard I’d end up on the floor.

The biggest thing (and why this movie was a bit of a revolution when it came out) was because of the way they made it – a parody movie with a straight face! Can you imagine? Until then, it was unheard of for a comedy (especially American one!) to have such a silly script, silly scenes and plenty of what we would today call “dad jokes” delivered with almost a poker face (with the occasional wink at the cameras) as if the actors were in a dramatic Oscar movie. It’s by no accident this style quickly became the golden standard on how to deliver lines, do visual gags… well, at least for the ones who pay attention.

Plenty of people watched this movie and thought “Parodies are easy! We just need to take scenes from different movies, put our silly twist(s) on them, and job done!” And that is why in the late 90’s/early 2000’s we’ve gotten so many bad ones. Because that never was THE strength of this movie, even though they have done it here a few times. The biggest strength of this movie is the fact the movie works without you having to know the references. Who actually knows/remembers this movie is one giant parody of Zero Hour (1957)! A movie, I dare to say, most people who watched this movie, never even heard of, but guess what? That’s perfectly fine! Because this movie works without you knowing this material, it works because they throw plenty of jokes your way and most of them stick. Plenty of jokes you will only notice when you watch closely (again, you could argue this movie set a standard on how to do visual gags too) and it works because the movie is actually trying to have a story. Yes, that story is told in a funny/silly way, but it’s a story nonetheless you can still follow and be somehow invested in.

Just to make sure I am clear – I am not claiming this movie started the parody genre, or established visual gags. I know it didn’t. All I am saying is this movie worked so well, it brought back this genre, re-introduced certain techniques (like visual gags, delivering funny lines without characters realising how funny they are, playing it straight) to the masses and made Leslie Nielsen into the comedy legend he was. People often forget he’s had a really decent career prior this movie (he was acting since 1950!) but if it wasn’t for this movie I dare to say the world would have been a bit poorer not knowing his name. We were extremely lucky to have him for as long as we had and he definitely shines in this movie.

Airplane! is one of those films that even those it shows its age, it somehow stays funny and doesn’t feel “that” dated. There is something about these jokes and the way they are delivered, it just makes it for me. I’m always slightly afraid of re-visiting this movie, because what if those jokes aren’t as funny as I remember them being? But every time I re-watch this movie, I laugh and I’m reminded of that one evening, being really young and rolling on the floor. This movie will always have a special place in my heart. And I am serious, so please don’t call me Shirley 😉

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980) Review – The start of the franchise

Advertisements

I know what you’re thinking – hey, this isn’t start of the franchise, this is the second movie, you dummy! And yes, technically you’d be right, except as I mentioned in my previous review for Episode IV, only because of the massive success the original Star Wars was, the studios established this would be a trilogy.

When I talk about “the start of the franchise”, this doesn’t touch on just these movies, by the way. As I was talking about in my previous review, where things weren’t planned, this is the total opposite to that and to some degree influenced our pop-culture even more, as in here we are seeing world building (several different planets, not just space ships), we see characters who are established here for the final movie (fan favourite Boba Fett, which I have never understood why as he doesn’t really do much in either movie) and obviously the ending that only “ends” this movie but not the plot per say, if that makes sense. There is no finality to this episode, as it ends on the (in)famous plot twist, on a darker note where our heroes are down. This doesn’t end with celebration and medals.

In my mind, this is what makes this movie the fan favourite in all the “Skywalker Saga” and that includes me. I am so fortunate to have seen this movie when I was around 11/12 years old, without it being spoiled for me (I know right!) so you can imagine how my young mind, who’s seen the original Star Wars movie a week prior, was enjoying this movie and then the twist came and I was mind blown. I remember thinking this was so mad, how could this be!

When I was re-watching this movie 2 weeks ago, nothing has changed. Yes, I wasn’t as flabbergasted as I was before, I was there for the ride and what a sweet ride it still is, even though it’s now been 40 years. I still admire that somebody had the balls. after the almost lighthearted original where good guys win and everything is great, to come up with a sequel that ends on a (especially in 1980) darker note, kudos to Irvin Kershner.

What I’ve also noticed about this while re-watching it, is how in here we establish more who these characters are – Han doesn’t look like he’s changed as he wants to leave (again), but upon hearing Luke hasn’t returned, he risks his life to find him and get him to safety. Leia embraced the leading role, where she has the wits to back it up and struggles with her feelings towards Han. And Luke struggles with fulfilling his destiny and becoming a Jedi, as he’s worried about his friends getting killed, but at the same time realising what’s at stake if he doesn’t finish.

Empire Strikes Back is my favourite Star Wars movie, but it’s not by a mile by any means, as all three films from the original trilogy in my eyes are almost equal, and choosing the “best” ones from them is like choosing between Ferrari or Porsche. Either way, you’re going to ride a pretty great car. It’s splitting hears, looking for tiny details where it’s up to you which movie you gravitate towards more. I couldn’t fault you for choosing any of the other two movies for being your favourite Star Wars film.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one? Which one is your favourite Star Wars movie? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke