Tag Archives: 2003

Movies or shows released in 2003.

The Station Agent (2003) Review – Indie Movie 101, 2000s Edition

Advertisements

I remember a period when this film was one of the most recommended films by many movie people I talked about movies with. That was the mid to late 2000s when Peter Dinklage was virtually unknown, same with Bobby Cannavale, and Tom McCarthy was still mostly an actor rather than the Oscar-winning writer and great director he is today (for those who don’t know, he wrote and directed Spotlight (2015)). So yeah, before they all became big in one way or another, they met here in McCarthy’s debut as a director and writer.

It was fascinating going back 20 years and watching them all (alongside Patricia Clarkson and Michelle Williams, by the way) act in this little indie film before they all became huge. And that, weirdly and cruelly, is the only reason this film doesn’t work as it might have 20 years ago as I think the main charm of this film is you not knowing all of these actors are so good. And The Station Agent banks on them a bit too much, as the story kind of goes from somewhere to nowhere.

I realise this was supposed to be one of those “slice-of-life”, character-driven movies, and I usually love those. But I had two issues with this film the predictability of the story and the ending. Let’s start with predictability; when I say this is as indie as it gets, I mean it. And if you have seen a few indie movies (like I have), nothing about this film will surprise you. A man who is quirky or unique in some way gets his life turned upside down when something major happens in his life. In this instance, he inherits a piece of land with a train station. And who would have guessed it; he is, of course, really into trains, where he not only knows different train models and makes, he goes train watching.

So this man (played by Dinklage) moves to his new train station, where he just chills around, getting to know the locals; it’s all about the vibes. One thing that wasn’t clear was whether he happened to have some money saved or maybe he also inherited money along the train station because he doesn’t work and is not in any rush to get a job. Anyway, he meets up with locals, and they slowly become friends; some feelings ensue, and they might or might not return those feelings. Some other things happen I won’t spoil, and then the film ends.

And when I say the movie “just ends”, believe me, it happens without any prior warning. When it seems we might be going towards some resolution or answers, the movie just ends. If you are a frequent reader, you know I have often said I don’t want movies to spell everything out, tie everything with a nice big bow, on the contrary. But The Station Agent is one of the rare exceptions where I wanted more of… everything. I wished to get to know the characters more, as some seemed to only be examined on a surface level (like Bobby’s or Michelle’s characters). And I hoped for some resolution to the story, but this film merely hints at things. And in this case, I didn’t think it worked as well.

But other than those things, The Station Agent is a charming film with incredibly stacked casting full of “soon to be famous” people in front of the camera and (at least one) behind it. It is a delightful little movie full of warm moments that don’t necessarily bring the film together as well. It’s like the pieces/scenes of this film are better than the overall result. I am not saying this film is bad by any means, no. I think if I were to watch it in 2005, let’s say, I would have probably loved it as it would surprise me how many great actors I have not heard about are there. But knowing everything I know about them and watching them in many other shows or movies, I know they all have been much better. I know that’s not fair, and I would love not to have that knowledge and be surprised, but that is impossible. This movie definitely felt like one of those “at the moment” movies; if you saw it in 2003, you would probably remember it fondly. But I am willing to bet you if you were to watch it now, you would see some holes here and there as you won’t be as captivated by the main protagonists because you have seen them all in many different things.

Overall, The Station Agent is a fascinating movie. I believe your enjoyment of it would directly correlate with how many films of “its kind” you had watched before as if you had seen some, nothing about this will surprise you. But if you are looking for one of those slice-of-life films with a cast of great performers before they were famous, this film might be for you. I would recommend it, but with the caveat that if you want to watch a great indie film by Tom McCarthy, do yourself a favour and watch The Visitor (2007). A movie that is still criminally underseen.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

24 Review (Season Three) – The Best Season Yet

Advertisements

When I wrote my review for season two (if you missed it, it’s here), I did wonder whether the gimmick (events happening in real-time equals you get a lot of unnecessary things/plotlines) would prevent this show from ever having a truly 10/10 season. Well, lo and behold, it was right around the corner. And surprisingly, I couldn’t see it because we start with drugs and cartels until we move into the main threat for this season – a possible spread of a virus; that could result in a pandemic. Yeah, is that ringing any bells?

The third season of 24 really pushes your belief regarding the end justifying the means; and how we can root for somebody like Jack because we know he is the hero. And that brought me to this idea – what if we didn’t know? What if we were always a couple of steps behind what Jack knows, so we would have to take him on his words, exactly as the characters around him? Would we still be okay with him torturing people and sacrificing them for the greater good? What I liked about this season, it was not just him who had to make some tough choices/ It was most of the team, from Tony (Carlos Bernard), Michelle (Reiko Aylesworth) and even the president himself (Dennis Haysbert). It was a great decision that the third season forces multiple characters into this morally grey area as some characters deal with the pressure better, some worse. Or, I guess some cave into the demands, and some don’t. And here, to me, lies “the key” to fully understanding Jack Bauer.

I think Jack’s character is so compelling despite the fact he is quick to torture; he will cross the line to get the results; sure, we agree there. But… and, here is where the difference between him and the others lies, he is always willing to put his own life on the line. The one constant of this show (and in this season as well) was his willingness to do whatever is necessary to succeed, and if that means risking his life, he doesn’t blink or hesitate for a second. He is the perfect agent, soldier, and American. Ultimately, I believe that is why 24 was so popular for so long; it came at the right time when many Americans needed to see “good guys doing everything they can to protect them”.

This season also had (so far) the most compelling villain – Stephen Saunders (Paul Blackthorne). I loved how they incorporated his story back to the first season without it being clunky because it’s not about his ties to Jack. It was more about him knowing the protocols and being a few steps ahead of the CTU most of the time. He seemed like the type of villain I would love to see evolving and looming over the rest of the show, but that won’t happen (spoiler for a 20+-year-old show ;-)).

The third season also introduces a character that seems to be the one who stays with Jack from now until the end of the show – Chloe O’Brian (Mary Lynn Rajskub). I wasn’t sure what to think of her in the first couple of episodes, but by the end of the season, it’s impossible not to root for Chloe. And Mary Lynn’s portrayal of Chloe is wonderfully unique. She is a straight-talking, no-nonsense kind of badass who occasionally just doesn’t know how to communicate with people. I can wait to explore her backstory and get to know her character better throughout the rest of this show.

There was a moment that pushed me over the edge for this season, from being great to 10/10, and it was the last couple of minutes of the final episode. Maybe some spoilers are incoming, but this is nothing related to the plot, so readers, be aware. I am talking about Jack, after 24 hours, finally getting a moment to himself to catch a breath just for a second and then breaking down in his car, crying. What a powerful image of this man, who we have seen make one tough decision after another (many times in a split second), being “just a man”. When everything he’s just been through finally catches up with him, he can just let go for a few seconds. But not too long because, sure enough, everybody wants a piece of Jack, so he has to wipe his tears and ride to his next mission.

Overall, the third season of 24 surprised me every step of the way. The moment a plotline became a boring one, it got sorted; or it became irrelevant. Every time you think: “Oh, so this is how they catch up with the bad guy.” Nope, he’s got another ace up his sleeve. And when they finally do, it’s so satisfying to watch. And also, some of our old familiar characters get their comeuppance, and those scenes were also satisfying to watch. It will be interesting to see whether any other season will top the third one in my eyes or whether this will be the peak for 24.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

24 Review (Season Two) – Different Threat, The Same Jack

Advertisements

After the first ground-breaking season (my review can be found here), I wondered how the show would “evolve” after one major death and another pretty big twist. I am happy to write that the second season of 24 might have been even better than the first one. I was so close to calling it one of the best seasons of any TV show of all time because it was a mostly exhilarating ride from the very first episode until the very last one, however… I had a few issues with this season. And they mostly revolve around one character and one character only – Kim.

Look, I have nothing against Elisha Cuthbert. Quite the opposite, I did like her character in season one, and she can be quite easy on the eyes, especially when the show seems to be finding reasons for her to wear revealing outfits no matter what. But, this season, her character not only annoyed me, it downright stopped the show within its tracks each time she appeared on the screen. I believe there are two reasons for this.

The first reason is apparent – her storyline has nothing to do with the second’s season main threat, the nuclear bomb. Rest assured, she gets told by Jack to avoid Los Angeles, but that’s pretty much it. Kim’s character starts this season as baby sitter who happens to babysit a girl whose father “might” be one of the most despised dads to ever appear on film or TV. So, for the first couple of episodes, every time we break away from the main storyline to check on “what is our Kim up to now”, we can mostly see her running, screaming, hiding or all of the above from this psycho “dad”. And for the rest of the season, her character is all over the place, from a random encounter with a doom prepper to facing the consequences getting bailed by the CTU.

The second reason her storyline didn’t work is that the writers didn’t know what to do with her character. The thing is, I don’t blame Elisha for any of this; she was simply doing what was on the paper. The problem was with “the paper” – you could tell the writers tried their hardest to make her problems/story make sense during this nuclear storyline. And what was supposed to take off the edge a bit, give us (the audience) a chance to breathe for a while, has turned into this messy, screamy subplot that honestly made me hate Kim’s character. And I have to repeat myself; I had no issues with her in the first season despite in spite of her character getting into precarious situations too. However, they were at least somehow connected. I am watching season three right now, and they actually incorporated Kim’s character into the show in a better way. Is what she is doing now 100% logical, and could I see her being where she is? No, but you know what? I am more than willing to overlook a few things if we stay away from Kim always having to be saved.

And that’s a shame, as otherwise, the second season was great. Everything from the nuclear bomb to it actually going off to the consequences, the whole masterplan behind it, the morality of (now) president Palmer being questioned more than ever, all of that I liked. Was the show really wild at times? Sure, but that comes with the territory, as 24, I think, is every American’s wet dream. The secret agents go solo/against the system for the most selfless reasons only. The government where no matter where people stand (politically), they all have principles and know what is right and what is wrong. And everything pretty much works out in the end, bad guys get punished, and people who (again) went against the orders (albeit with good reasons) aren’t punished; serve it with steak, hot dog and cheeseburger on the 4th of July, because that is ‘Murica, baby. At least in this show.

I am starting to question whether this show gimmick (real-time events needing to have 24 episodes per season) will ultimately lead to 24 always being “almost amazing” and never “truly amazing”. Because if you think about that gimmick for a bit longer, you will start to see why we need to have many different, often annoying side-lines (like with Kim in this season) because the showrunners had to fill in 24 episodes. And sure, the current streaming binge trend isn’t perfect by any means, but in this one instance, the shows we’ve had over the past 10+ years are much better because they don’t have to meet any quotas. They don’t have to have this gimmick that might be eye-catching, but it also makes it almost impossible to make one kick-ass season of a TV show where every storyline matters. Well, I still have six seasons ahead of me, so who knows? Maybe, there is a season of 24 where I will feel like there was nothing wrong with it. So far, nothing yet, but the second season was almost there.

Overall, the second season of 24 was intriguing, and if it wasn’t for some obvious filler episodes/storylines, it had the potential to be indeed something special. Sure, there is nothing that ground-breaking if you take it apart; it is your “typical” level of “conspiracy behind every corner” plot that gets stretched into 24 episodes. But it’s stretched effectively; the season took some turns I didn’t see coming, and I had a good time with it. It will be interesting to see what is coming next.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Arrested Development Review (Seasons 1 – 5) – Let’s Talk About Those Last Two Seasons

Advertisements

I remember a long time ago when I started to “delve” into pop culture, into movies and TV shows more; I have always heard about Arrested Development. Of course, that was long before Netflix (well, at least the streaming version of Netflix, as I believe the “beta version” has existed for a while) and their additional seasons four and five. I will seem so old, but “back in my days, we only had three seasons of Arrested Development, and they were all great!” But even though I’ve heard so many things about this show, I never got to watch it. That is until now.

Let’s just cut through the chase – yes, everything you might have heard about this show is true. The first three seasons are hilarious, funny and still work today. Sure some jokes might have aged worse than others, but they also come from characters who were supposed to be unlikeable out-of-touch people. That is why I won’t be talking much about those seasons, as there isn’t much to say. They are great. They are clever, funny, self-referential (mainly third season, how the main storyline is the actors pleading not to get cancelled) and your “typical” two steps forwards, five steps back kind of show. And had it not been for seasons four and five, it would have been pretty much a “bulletproof” show, quality-wise. Yes, even in the earlier seasons, there might have been some weaker episodes. But overall, there was still a lot of quick “blink, and you’ll miss them” jokes.

And then, Netflix came around and issued the fourth season (2013) and fifth season (2018). And here is where the cookie crumbles a bit and what most of this review will focus on. And because there might be some spoilers (even though I don’t think it matters as much here), let me put the spoiler tag right here, so we can go into the details.

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

When I first started the fourth season, it seemed really messy and all over the place. Almost nothing worked, and to top it all off, my TVTime (an app I use to track the TV shows I watch, a really great tool if you are like me and watch too many TV shows) was also confusing, as the titles didn’t match at all. After a few episodes, I discovered the reason – I was watching the “newer” cut, titled “Remix – The Fateful Consequences”. Luckily, Netflix still kept the “original cut” under “Trailers & More”, and that one was much more palatable. Not just that, but if you stick with it and binge it as we (my girlfriend and I) did, you end up enjoying that season very much. I might be in the minority from what I have read on “the internets”, but I 100% prefer the original cut. It seemed more cohesive, and I loved how if you watch the show closely, you will notice little details in each episode and quickly discover how intertwined the story is how everything relates to each other.

The reason they have done it like that (speaking of the cast not being together for most of the season) was simple – most of the cast members became “big”, they couldn’t shoot around all their schedules, so they turned the negative into a positive. Well, at least they have tried. For many fans (again, from what I have read after finishing the entire show), this is their least favourite season, but not for me. I might be on the island here, but when season four finished, I thought they did it well enough to the point I don’t think the quality dropped that much. What I mean by that – if it wasn’t for some of the cast members getting older, I might have presumed the fourth season was a part of the original “airing” before Netflix stepped in. The same can’t be said about season five.

Season five was a story of two halves. The first half was quite difficult for us to get through, as even the characters we could always rely on being funny (Gob, Buster) seemed to be less funny. And I swear some actors seemed to be done with this show. Well, luckily, the second half of season five was much better. It still never reached the “peak” of the original three seasons, or even season four, in my opinion. But at least I could see what they were going for in terms of the story. Well, except the very weird, almost out of place ending, making Buster into an actual murderer…? I know this show was always trying to balance edgy, darker humour but those last minutes seemed really out of place.

But here’s the thing about both seasons four and five. I understand why the fans don’t like them as much, as I have alluded to the fact slightly. Their entire dynamic is different because we only get a couple of scenes where the entire family is together. And that was the strength of those first seasons. These characters on their own can be dark, despicable and very out of touch wealthy people, and that’s the entire joke/point here. But, because of a couple of characters, who have always been more down to earth than others (well, let’s face it, mainly Michael aka Jason Bateman), we could always rely on them being called on their behaviour or made fun of, in some way. The ensemble cast was this show’s biggest strength, the sharp dialogues for even sharper characters. But in the Netflix seasons, we barely got those moments, and therefore, we could see the characters we know and love to hate suddenly getting more space by themselves or with only a few family members around and for some, it didn’t work as well.

Because the ultimate strength of this show was the (albeit dysfunctional) family dynamic and how sometimes, almost accidentally, they inspired each other to be better. Maybe just a tiny bit better, but still. And it simply couldn’t be the same with characters as complicated as most of these are.

I can’t review this show without mentioning some of the actors. I’ve already mentioned Jason Bateman, who is great in this show. But my absolute favourites are two women who stole any scene they were in – Jessica Walter (rest in peace, Lucille) and Alia Shawkat (aka Maeby). At first, these two characters seem to be pretty much the same – sharp-witted women who don’t take any crap from anybody. But there are differences. Jessica’s character was the true “devil” of the family. Her character to me was the impersonation of the old saying we have in the Czech language that roughly translates to “Where the devil can’t succeed, he’ll send a woman.” Yep, it’s an old and sexist saying, but it is supposed to be a funny one, not to be taken literally. But I can’t help and think it fits so well for her character – I loved the fact that even though it’s later explored, and explained why she was the way she was, she was behind almost everything “evil” this family was entangled. Hell, she was even ahead of “the Donald” in 2013 when came to the border wall! Or was he such a big fan of this show? We might just never know.

Whereas Alia’s character has her moment, where she takes things too far, but she either never goes “fully” evil, or her intentions are always good, and the situation simply spins out of her control. But her character Maeby is funny, clever, and is just looking for some love/validation from the rest of the family. Well, mainly her parents. She was the highlight of season five for me by far. The entire story arc of Maeby pretending to be old so she can escape the world was one thing I genuinely was looking forward to for the entirety of season five. Of course, I could mention pretty much the rest of the cast because there all were great, but I can’t lie – Lucille and Maeby stole the show for me. They were the only two characters in my view who never got tired, too overused, and they both always managed to surprise me.

Overall, Arrested Development is 100% worth your time. It is one of those shows that got cancelled too early and unfortunately became one of those “be careful what you wish for” examples when fans are trying to bring some other cancelled too early shows back. But even though the quality of those last two seasons isn’t up to the “golden” standard of the first three seasons, there are still some good laughs to be had. Especially in season four, which in my view, gets a bad reputation. I need to repeat it here too, but if you watch this show for the first time, make sure to watch the “original cut” of the fourth season. I’ve read someplace that even the worst episode of Arrested Development is still better than 80% of current comedy shows, and I could see that. This show definitely is a legend and created something that will last for years to come. I am just hoping they won’t bring it back again, especially now, when Jessica Walter is no longer with us. We can only hope that is it for this show.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Lost in Translation (2003) Review – My Favourite Film. Ever.

Advertisements

It’s hard to put into words what this movie means and has meant to me for the past more than 15 years now. But I knew starting this blog, that sooner or later I need to review Lost in Translation. The movie, that’s been at the very top of my favourites for more than 15 years now (I believe the first time I’ve seen it was around 2004/2005). On my most recent re-watch I’m happy to say nothing has changed. Which either means this movie is still as close to a perfect movie as possible, or I’ve stopped growing mentally and have peaked when I was 15. For the sake of this review, let’s presume it’s not the latter, and move on. 😉

I still remember my very first time watching this movie, as everything came together nicely – it was one of the very first movie’s I’ve seen with subtitles and not over-dubbed (believe it or not, it’s still not common on Czech TV to have movies or TV shows in their original language, so we dub movies and TV shows, which doesn’t sound that weird when you are born into it, but once you get used to English and other languages, it’s striking how it can change and sometimes ruin a movie), it was just after my birthday, it was just at the time when I was getting into watching not just your “typical” Hollywood movies… One Czech TV had a summer thing, focusing on “indie” cinema, something you wouldn’t find someplace else (again, this was 2004/2005, way before streaming services became a thing) and this was one of the movies they were showing that summer. I remember watching all of them (one movie a week) but no other movie stayed with me for as long as this one. There was something about it I knew I loved, even though I couldn’t precisely pinpoint what is was.

That’s when I’ve started to realise I seriously love movies, as you don’t have to understand every single detail, you don’t have to “get” every single scene, hint, or symbolism, as great movies will let you in and make you live the story. Lost in Translation certainly does that. It drew me in with its almost documentary like cinematography, with its soundtrack, that is still unique but not in some “hipster” way, with the performances of the main stars, the ever so great Bill Murray and really young, but already perfect Scarlett Johansson just before she became THE Scarlett we know today.

I’d like to stop and talk about her, as I don’t think she gets the praise she deserves. People tend to focus on Bill Murray’s character, as he’s the funny, more “relatable” character, but Scarlett is the humanity of this movie. You could make an argument that Bill Murray is the brain, but Scarlett is the heart, potentially the soul of this movie. Before she became the sex-symbol and later the Black Widow, she was Charlotte – the girl next (hotel) door, who if played just a tad differently, would became annoying character, and the movie wouldn’t have worked as well. But Scarlett understood the character so well and knew how to portray her strong, yet vulnerable, confident, yet not sure of what to do, and most importantly, slightly terrified of things to come, doubtful of herself, looking for a purpose. And she plays it so honestly and with no hesitations, it seems like she’s not playing any character, it’s just who she is. Honestly, looking at the different awards and nominations, I can’t help but think Scarlett was snubbed that (Oscar) year big time, she deserved at least a nomination. This is the movie that made Scarlett Johansson into the superstar she is and I am so grateful.

The main reason I fell in love with this movie and why I still admire it today, is the beautiful direction by Sofia Coppola. And I am not just talking about shots and composition, no (even though this movie is beautiful to look at!) I am mostly talking about her establishing a relationship between Bill and Scarlett that feels so close, real and beautiful. Any lesser movie would’ve tried to have “something” happen between these two (either a really big fight, or some sort of bullshit romance) whereas this one takes its time to develop a friendship, that feels genuine, where there ups and there are some downs. But because both of them are written like actual people, there is no big fight, or over the top emotional scene, they just acknowledge that “the down” was a bad “move” on both of their parts and move on, almost instantly, but it feels like real life. The same goes for any hint of romance – any lesser filmmaker would’ve gone for something like that, but not Sofia, as it wouldn’t fit and the movie would’ve lost the connection. They were never meant to be together, they might not even see each other again in their lifetime after they both say goodbye, but they will always have that week or so in Tokyo, where they found each other, where each found something in the other person they needed at that very moment, that particular time. I am not sure whether any director would be able to give us something like this, where we have a man and a woman, in a really close relationship, without any hint of romance, sex or sleaziness involved.

As I was saying prior, I was just lucky enough to stumble upon this film at the right time, where I wasn’t sure where my life is going. And to be honest, I still don’t sometimes. But you know what? That’s ok. Just take it one day at the time. And maybe fly to Tokyo, go to a hotel and see if Scarlett Johansson is hanging around… 😉 As the movie tagline says, “Sometimes you have to go halfway around the world to come full circle”.

Lost in Translation is the perfect movie to me. I wouldn’t change a single frame, scene, actor or a song. I can’t see any way this could’ve been improved. Everything, and I mean everything, fits just right. Every time I watch this movie, no matter what stage of my life it is or where I am, for those 102 minutes, everything is alright with the world.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke