Tag Archives: 4.5*

Four and a half star rating.

Only Murders in the Building Review (Season 1) – Delightful, Quirky and Easy to Watch

Advertisements

I would love to know how the creators of Only Murders in the Building pitched this show. Because every time I tell someone to watch it and name the brilliant leading trio of actors (Steve MartinMartin Short and Selena Gomez), most of the time they’d look at me weirdly. As obviously, one name in here is not like the others. And that is the exact reason this show works so well.

Only Murders in the Building gets you from the very first episode. It hooks you in with a chill vibe, colourful characters, and you stay for the mystery element that is done very well. It also mixes and blends genres flawlessly – everything from comedy, crime, drama; this show has it all. And it’s not afraid to take some risks (for example, the episode from the perspective of an actual deaf actor (James Caverly) was the highlight of this show for me) while still maintaining your attention and not “stopping” the main storyline.

That was something shows like these sometimes struggle with – they take risks and focus on a plethora of characters, so you’d get episodes centring on that new storyline altogether. And that is great for getting to know that particular character better, sure. But often, it’s done to the disadvantage of the “main” storyline that gets stuck for that episode or adds very little to it. For example – this show reminded me in many ways of Desperate Housewives (2004 – 2012). One of only two shows I have started and never finished. Because it wasn’t worth it for me, as the storylines fell into this trap – too many characters were given a lot of time/space, and the main story (or mystery) wouldn’t sometimes exist. I know a part of the reason for that was the “network construct”. They had to fill a “TV year” (10 months); they had to have at least 22/24 episodes a season so you would get these episodes.

And this is where Only Murders in the Building takes this concept (even though it’s an entirely different premise, but the vibe is the same) and makes it work brilliantly for today’s streaming audience, where there are no rules. Want to have a show with only six episodes? Or ten? Sure, go ahead; we won’t stop you. That is why any show nowadays can take much larger risks and still make it work for the overall story. When you have a storyline with a beginning, middle and end, and you don’t have to worry about spreading it thinly across 22/24 episodes, your show tends to become much more focused.

I’ve mentioned them at the start, so now, let’s talk about the casting and mainly our three titular characters. I haven’t seen Steve Martin in a while, so it was great seeing him in something new, showcasing he is still funny. I won’t spoil anything, but in the last episode of this show, there is a scene that had me almost dying involving his character being inspirational, let’s say. Also, is it just me, or does he look the same age for the last 30 years? Martin Short surprised me, as I have only known him for his “out there” comedic performances, where he didn’t get to showcase his other, more dramatic side. In this show, he starts like this too, but you quickly discover that every character isn’t just one thing. And scenes with him and his family were great. He undeniably nailed his performance too. And Selena Gomez is not only stunning but is turning out to be a great actress too! Believe it or not, I have not seen her in many things. I can only imagine how challenging this must have been for her – not only because her character is the glue that holds this show together, but to “step up” on the level of two comedy legends… I don’t know about her, but if somebody told me I need to act (and be funny) opposite Steve Martin and Martin Short, I would have been nervous… for the first five seconds. Then, once my brain would process it fully, I would be downright terrified. But not her, Selena came, was funny and conquered.

And to a certain degree, you could argue she is the main reason this show works as well. Without her, it would just be two old guys running around. She is not only decreasing the average age of this show (significantly), but she “gels” with both of her co-stars so well, it almost seems obvious this combination would work. But here’s the thing – it wasn’t obvious. I think this show took a risk that paid off massively, and the main stars clicked almost effortlessly.

One thing I need to mention is the self-referential nature of this show, its meta-ness. As they record their podcast about a murder that happened, they often discuss that episode’s twists and turns inside of it, as if our protagonists were talking about the episode they are in right now. But that’s because they are. I loved this effective fourth-wall break and how every episode starts with a “cold open”, then credits and then a podcast player. That not only indicates the length of each episode you are watching but shows you how much time has passed since the episode started. And it’s these tiny touches that make this show stand out.

What I will write next might shock you, given how positive I have been until now. I honestly hope there won’t be too many seasons. I know season two has been approved already, and I can’t wait to see it. But I truly feel this concept “we only investigate murders that happen in our building” can’t be stretched (at least sensibly) too far. I would hope that we would get solid three, maybe four seasons maximum. Because I don’t think you can fully replicate this almost lighting in a bottle feel. Precisely the same issue that happened to Desperate Housewives – each season felt the same, even though the mystery was different. And at a certain point, there is only so much you can do with a show like this. But that’s a concern for the future. For now, I have enjoyed Only Murders in the Building and can’t wait for the next season.

Overall, Only Murders in the Building felt like a breath of fresh air. In today’s day and age, where shows are either too dramatic, there is no joy, or too comedic where there are no stakes or character development, comes this “little” (at least in scope), show that mixes several genres and does it well. The central trio should not work as well, and yet, somehow, it does, and it’s a joy to watch them act opposite each other. And the meta-ness of this is just a cherry on top of a pretty sweet cake. Is that the best TV show that’s currently on? Probably not. But it’s certainly up there, and it shows some promise for the future. The future, I hope, will be on the shorter side, as I would hate to see this show overstay its welcome.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Star Wars: Rebels Review (Seasons 1 – 4) – A Surprise To Be Sure, But A Welcome One

Advertisements

After finishing Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 – 2020, my review here), I went ahead and said to myself I might as well commit to the rest of these animated shows. So I have started to watch Rebels and was delighted with the first couple of episodes. Because they didn’t seem to rely too much on the movies or anything else. Sure, we’d still get some characters from the Star Wars universe, but that was expected. But then, a lot of episodes seemed really tailored towards kids. That is when I started having my doubts about this show. However, I have committed and stayed for the entire run of it, and I need to say one thing – thank Yoda, I don’t rate these shows after each season.

Star Wars: Rebels is more kids friendly than its “predecessor” Clone Wars if you can even call it a predecessor. At least, the first two seasons were. Sure, you get the darker episodes every once in a while, but the show is more colourful and animated, which is something I will address separately later on, as I have my thoughts on the animation style. That is not necessarily a bad thing, but you know, you’d think they would try to appeal to a wider audience of Star Wars fans. But then, that’s when it happened – season three and mainly season four were great. They still managed to conserve the lightness, but it started to get more and more serious. And the last couple of episodes of the fourth (and final) season were not only awesome, but they could change how we understand this universe. But of course, we can’t discuss it without going to some spoilers, so…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

But before going into the massive spoilers, let’s start from the beginning. I loved our main heroes; all the voice casting felt right from the get-go. Who I need to give a special shout out are Vanessa Marshall and Tiya Sircar. Both from different reasons. Vanessa felt like the perfect “mother figure” to not just the young Ezra but to the rest of that crew. Her line readings always came across as caring and kind, but you didn’t want to get on her bad side. Plus, she was one of the best pilots the galaxy has seen, even acknowledged by her opponents a few times. And Tiya’s voice just felt soothing, strong and feisty, just like her character Sabine. To me, she’s had the most intriguing character backstory out of all of them, and Tiya’s voice always resonated with me. Both actresses, my imaginary hat is off to you.

I admire how this show dealt with our main hero, Ezra and his path to the Force. Yes, they had to go to “will he/won’t he” go to the dark side, as with literally every single Jedi character, who has ever appeared in the Star Wars universe, but I was glad to discover, we didn’t spend a lot of time on that subject. That was one of my main worries – this entire TV show will be about him being trained at first, then he betrays them, then they will try to convince him to go back to the light side of the Force… but no. Again, it’s definitely there, the show did deal with it, but it’s never this over-arching thing. Even towards the end, when Ezra is tempted by the Emperor himself, I knew his character well enough to know he won’t break.

Let’s discuss Kanan Jarrus, Ezra’s mentor. At first, I thought he was pretty decent. Once the show decided to make him blind, it seemed like an interesting choice. Until you discover it only “truly” affects him for an episode or two, and then “because of the Force”, he can feel things around him and therefore effectively see. That seemed like a bit of a cop-out, but at the same time, I understand that you can’t just disregard one of your main heroes halfway through the show. But then, when the fourth season happened, and you see his character’s back story, see him grow, to the point he sacrifices himself so others can live… That I didn’t expect. And what was so great about it, it totally worked the way it was supposed to work. You felt the loss. You understood why he had to do what he did. Also, they didn’t try to cop-out. They straight up killed him, no possible way he could have escaped or survived. I admire that every time a show has the guts to do that. As it is becoming less and less rare nowadays; for characters to not only die but to stay dead for good.

As I alluded to before, the moment when I really started to enjoy this show was around season three. And the last couple of episodes of season four, I have binged. Once they got to the Force thing, how you could travel via Force, and even alter the past… I honestly wish we get to explore this more in some other Star Wars show. But not with the “Skywalker” timeline; please leave that alone. There was also one more reason I started to enjoy this show more around season three, and the fans of this show will know who I am referring to – Grand Admiral Thrawn, as voiced by the brilliant Lars Mikkelsen.

He is more menacing than Darth Vader to me. Yep, I said it. Sure, he won’t Force-choke you like Vader or won’t pull up his red lightsaber to split you in half. But that is because he doesn’t need to do that. He will beat you because he is smarter than you. He is a brilliant tactician who is ahead of pretty much anybody at least ten steps. He never lets his guard down; his deduction game is so strong, it would make Sherlock Holmes blush… And most of all, his calm, always polite demeanour is chilling. Lars is chewing up the scenery with every line reading without overdoing it. It would have been so easy to try and voice this character over the top, but he never goes there. His vocal performance was pure perfection. If we were to get General Thrawn in the Ahsoka (unknown date) show, and since she’s already mentioned him in The Mandalorian (2020, my review here), the chances of him appearing are high, I want nobody else but Lars to play him. Put in him in all the blue make-up you can get your hands on, pay him anything he asks, and he will deliver one hell of a performance.

What took me the longest to get used to was the animation style. At first glance, it doesn’t differ that much from the Clone Wars; but there are differences. And mainly, and I know this will come across as petty, the lightsabers looked off. They are so thin they look like toothpicks. I understand that this was done on purpose see below:

The ignited lightsaber blades in this series flicker like they did in Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope (1977) when a rotating glowing rod was used during filming as a practical effect. Afterwards, special lighting effects were added to the blades, and glowing rods were replaced by solid pipes in all of the sequels and prequels But for this show, lighting and visual effects supervisor Joel Aron studied the lightsabers in Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope (1977), and even managed to match the original flicker rate to make the lightsabers look exactly like they did in Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope (1977).

Source: IMDb.com

And I admire the level of detail and thinking that went to that I truly do. And you will eventually get used to it, but I am not going to lie every time in the early episodes, when there would be a lightsaber, it would seem off. Sometimes, not everything is better just because “that’s how they had it in the original movies”. But it’s not a big gripe. And, minus the strange lightsabers, the animation style is stunning, and some sceneries are simply breathtaking.

Overall, Star Wars: Rebels managed to convince me that this isn’t just a kids show. And I am so glad I stuck with it. The show tells its own story without heavily relying on most of the existing Star Wars properties. But every once in a while, they will remind you the characters you know and love are still out there, and I applaud them for that. Plus, this show managed to surprise me several times when handling some plot points and even gave us a window into the Force that I had never seen before. If you are a Star Wars fan, I would watch it with little expectations and stick with it; it will pay off. I think I will be more than happy to revisit this TV show at some point, some time from now.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Hope Springs (2012) Review – A Delightful Surprise

Advertisements

As with many films, I had little to no knowledge about it going in. I’ve just seen Meryl Streep and Tommy Lee Jones on the poster, and I was sold immediately. And after the first ten minutes or so, I thought to myself: “Oh, it’s one of those ‘old people not having sex anymore’ movies, isn’t it?” I won’t lie, it is that, 100%. But it’s also so much more.

Hope Springs (is there a more generic title, by the way?) is a delightful movie that handles its topic extremely well. I could see this going too quirky or trying to be too funny, but no. The film takes a more serious approach and explores a relationship that’s way too comfortable. They both are stuck in their routines; they know precisely what they can expect from each other, and it seems to be working fine. Until Meryl’s character wants her husband back in their bed (yep, they sleep in separate rooms), and he’s objecting. So they go and see a therapist (played by the always amazing Steve Carell) trying to save the relationship.

What I appreciated about the movie is how it took its time. The sessions were sometimes taking a bit longer, but there was always a purpose behind it. This movie might seem too “dull”, but I would say it’s the exact opposite of it. And let’s face it, that’s because when you have such a powerhouse of actors, you can’t go wrong. Both Meryl and Tommy played their characters in such an understated, calm way you get where both are coming from once they start opening up. Especially Tommy Lee’s breakthrough and his reasoning behind his behaviour rang true.

Also, what I loved was the therapy, and them looking for a way back to each other again was just a part of the movie, not the entirety of it. We get to spend some time with them after their sessions are finished and see whether they have made some progress. And even if they did, that doesn’t mean everything is fixed now, and all is peachy. I liked the more realistic approach this movie took and showed us how with therapy, as with anything else, it’s never a sprint but a marathon. We need to brace ourselves to work on ourselves for a long time; it’s not “I will do a few weeks of this, and hooray, I am cured.”

And that is pretty much it. Your enjoyment of this movie heavily depends on how much you like Tommy Lee Jones and Meryl Streep, how much you like dramedies about relationships that have been going on for a long time when people often forget what brought them together in the first place. The spark, if you wish. That is this film’s greatest strength, in my view – its simplicity allows you to relax, sit down on a rainy Sunday afternoon and enjoy yourself while potentially thinking about your relationship and whether it needs sprucing up.

Overall, Hope Springs biggest flaw is that generic title. Everything else seemed honest and raw. Plus, the casting is superb; there is some drama but not too much, some comedy elements, but again, neither skew either way. That is what makes this movie, which otherwise could have been a snooze fest about “two old people not having sex anymore”, not only watchable but straight-up delightful.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Squid Game Review (Season 1) – Lived Up To The Hype

Advertisements

As the old joke goes: “Squid Game. Squid Game is everywhere. I open Twitter – Squid Game. I open YouTube – Squid Game. I’ve bought a tin the other day. And I am afraid to open it.” So after this hilarious and pretty old joke that can be used for anything that’s currently trending, let’s talk about this show. For the past month or so, it was impossible to escape it. It seemed that everybody in my immediate surrounding was talking about it (friends, colleagues). I have seen countless memes about it (because that is one way, how you know what is currently hip and trendy, people immediately turn it into memes), so I have finally cracked. I had to see it for myself, what the hype was all about.

I won’t lie, from what I have heard, it seemed like Battle Royale (2000) that is an excellent movie and well worth watching, by the way, but instead of school kids being kidnapped and taken to an island to fight for their survival, it’s poor people now. And as far as over-simplifications go, it’s pretty accurate. Except, of course, not really, because there is so much more. Sometimes a bit too much for its own good. But I will get to that.

Squid Game definitely took some “inspiration” from existing properties, and the creator, Hwang Dong-hyuk, managed to put his unique twist on it. I liked the concept; I enjoyed the performances and the message/parallels about society, the class system. But I couldn’t help but feel that this show sometimes went a bit too much into the “let us explain this to you clearly, so you understand the message here”. Especially in the VIP episode, I understand what the intention was, what the show was trying to highlight, but sometimes a whisper is louder than yelling. Also, I couldn’t shake the feeling that the longer the show went on, the more predictable it became.

I think you know where this is going; I will have to discuss some spoilers, so before that, let me just say this. If you are like me and it takes you a while to watch the “trendy” stuff, give Squid Game a go. I would 100% recommend watching it in Korean with English subtitles, as from what I have seen, the dubbing is awful. So, with this out of the way…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

Let’s talk about the “twisty” nature of this show. In the second episode, where the survivors of the first game vote to leave, I didn’t expect them to vote to leave. It felt like a Brexit referendum – it was really close, it ended surprisingly, and, predictably, it still led to a disaster. Politics aside, I enjoyed that decision. Even though I knew we had to come back, it was interesting to see how many people managed to change their minds and came back when invited back. That was the first difference between this show and any other property dealing with “a bunch of people killing each other for a big reward”. They were given a choice to leave, and they left no strings attached. And yet, when they had the time to think about the reward (as the show states), 93% of people came back to compete, fully realising what they were in for. Even though the majority voted to leave at that moment. I liked that aspect.

But I felt like that was the last “big” surprise of this show. And not for the lack of trying on their part, definitely not. But the more complex the story has gotten (organ harvesting? VIPs? Looking for a brother?), the more predictable those twists and turns became. I didn’t mind it too much, as I still have enjoyed the show overall, but it sometimes felt like the creator put himself in the corner, and the only way he knew how to get himself out of there was via cliches. For example, I could do without the entire “Where is this random policeman’s brother?” storyline. And don’t even talk to me about the reveal who the Front Man was or the fact our policeman is not dead. That wasn’t confirmed yet, by the way, but I am telling you this as an avid TV/movie watching person, I have not seen a character to be “fake dead” like this in a long time.

The concept itself – “let’s make poor people play kids games, but if they lose, they die” is intriguing, as some games, we can all relate to (marbles, tug of war) and some, like the squid game itself, is… to be honest, I still don’t fully understand what is so appealing about it, but I think I get it…? Anyway, it’s not about the games; it’s about the metaphors. It’s about the age-old (or however many decades it’s been since we’ve invented currency and a proper capitalism) question: “How much would you sell your soul for? Would you kill or participate in an activity that kills others if it meant you’d be rich? Of course if you are “lucky” enough to survive?”

Because underneath all the games, all cliches, I believe the universal appeal of this show is how much we believe in ourselves. Respectively, in our inept goodness and that we would have made the correct decision. That we, faced with a massive amount of money in our faces, would have done the right thing. I can see a lot of people watching this show, asking themselves: “How much would it take for me to end up like this?” Because it’s easy to discuss morality, laws and all that good stuff from the comfort of your couch, in your flat, house, where presumable, you have heating that’s working, electricity, and your basic needs are met. And that is why I was surprised by the ending. Not so much about the “who was behind it” bit, but the fact the “good guy” won.

If you think about it for a moment, Squid Game presents a world where evil people come on top. A world where if you are good, that is great and all, but people will take advantage of you (see Ali’s character played by Rama Vallury). He was on the “too good” end of the scale, and that got him killed. So it would make sense for this show to have a darker ending. The ending that should have happened, in my opinion. Where the last two guys are fighting, everything happens precisely, as it had in the show, except Park Hae-soo‘s character doesn’t have the sudden change of heart. He takes the knife next to his head and kills Lee Jung-jae‘s character. As I believe that would have happened. Would I love it? No, but yes. Because that would make the most sense in the world and the story we’ve been presented thus far. And most importantly, it would be in his character.

Because this show managed to do one thing absolutely perfectly, and those were the characters – throughout the entirety of the show, you love people, you love to hate others, but even with them, you could see why they would act the way they had. And Park’s character had sacrificed his soul (or morals or whatever you want to call it) long before that fight. I know why they went with the more “viewer-friendly” ending because it ties everything up nicely with a bow and the scene in the very last episode with the drunk guy and whether somebody would help him. What I am trying to say is this – I honestly believe there are genuinely amazing people walking among us every day. Selfless, helpful people who want to make this world a better place. But this “change of heart” of this particular character… I just didn’t buy it. Within the show, he would have taken the opportunity to kill his friend; he would take the money and then try to be better, maybe use the money for charity purposes to make himself feel better, justifying the choices he’s made.

And I guess this right here – this is why Squid Game became such a phenomenon. It gave us something interesting to talk about, to examine one’s morality, our thoughts. Because here’s the thing – I know people will disagree with me, saying how I didn’t understand what this show is about, how I am wrong about Park’s character etc. And this, to me, is a fascinating debate. I can’t be wrong because I can’t be right. There is no right or wrong answer here. It all goes down to whatever your moral compass is set to, what your core beliefs are. Everything plays a part. Your upbringing, your experience… kind of like in these games, right?

Overall, Squid Game managed to do something I was positively surprised by. It managed to deliver on a massive hype. I tried to approach this show with no preconceived notions, as that is not the best mindset to see something that’s supposed to be “the best thing ever since the sliced bread”, even though that was difficult, as it was literally everywhere around me. What I have gotten was almost a perfect show that provided me with something new-ish to think about, offered me some cool visuals, and left me wondering about morality, humanity and all that good jazz. My only complaint was that sometimes, the less you tell us, the better and the more I think about how the “final game” went down, the more I am convinced the show should have had the balls to make the “antihero” the real winner. It will be interesting to see whether this will get any second season, what that might look like and more importantly, how it will be received. For my money, I wouldn’t be mad if there was never any other season. Sometimes, less is more.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Black Christmas (1974) Review – A Slow Burning Gem That Aged Well

Advertisements

When I started this film, I had zero expectations, and quite honestly, zero clue as to what I was about to see. Because, unlike other horror movies, I have not heard much about this one. So when the film started, and the story was a bit slow, I thought there might have been a reason for me never hearing about this, as it was not worth mentioning. Boy, was I wrong.

Black Christmas is a nice slow burn. It’s almost like leaving meat in the smoker – if you check on it after only 20 minutes, it won’t be done, and you’ll just be disappointed. You have to trust the process that, in the end, you will eat a nice, juicy piece of meat of your choice.

The first thing I will say about this film that surprised me – I don’t see it as a slasher film. Sure the movie established plenty of things we now know from slasher films, for example, the group of students getting killed off one by one. It also helped to set in stone a lot of other “rules” for slasher movies. But, for the most time, I was thinking of Black Christmas as a psychological thriller rather than a slasher. And here’s why. The murders aren’t in your face; you don’t see a lot of blood, nudity or anything like that. Everything is more subtle than that, and often enough, you will see the killer’s POV, helping you feel uneasy. Plus, even “the final showdown” isn’t what you might expect. Everything is more tense, less bloody and overall plays with your head. Especially the ending (but I will get to that).

The second thing that surprised me about this film was the lack of nudity and not-so-subtle feminism. But, believe it or not, both were done very well. And here I think I need to explain myself – this film takes place in a sorority, in 1974. Forget about everything else, the movies from this era and with any kind of university setting is usually full of dated things, especially concerning behaviours towards women in general, their privacy, choice, you know, what I am talking about here. And here is where this movie is different. Not only it doesn’t go for some cheap “young girls in sorority have a lot of sex or are walking around naked all the time” scene, no. Our main character is vocal about not wanting to have a baby (she’s pregnant) and wanting an abortion. She is using the same language we still use today while discussing it. She is her own person and wants to be in charge of her body. And from reading the trivia, this was very much intended:

A strict rule that Clark had set for himself when it came to writing the female characters was to never objectify them sexually or give them nude scenes. He wanted the college girls to come off as real people and not disposable horror characters waiting to die.

Source: IMDb.com

It’s funny, isn’t it? How a simple rule like that, can have a profound impact on your movie? Because you can tell this film is different in plenty of ways. But what truly got me over the edge and got me praising this film as much as I am, was the ending. Or better yet, last 20 minutes or so, when the film is getting to some conclusion, where the tension is racing, and it seems, we will know who the killer is soon… Well, let’s talk about it…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

I am far from a horror movie aficionado, although I have seen my fair share of horror movies. And yet, I am failing to remember another film like Black Christmas, where the twist is that not only the killer isn’t the person we thought it was, but we never know who “Billy” is/was. I loved that decision. The entire time, I was thinking whether there might be a twist coming our way. And sure enough, the killer wasn’t the boyfriend, even though he had his issues. I adored the last sequence, where our heroine is lying in bed, surrounded by the police. We hear a chatter, news people wanting to go in. And slowly, everyone leaves the room. The camera starts to pan throughout the house, and suddenly, we hear the familiar noises, just like before every murder, and the ominous phone starts ringing. The camera zooms out of the house, leaving us wondering whether Olivia Hussey‘s character (a great performance by her) survives or not. Not only we don’t know that, but we never know who the killer is. And to me, that takes balls.

If you read through the trivia page on IMDb, you will discover that plenty of things this movie does (regarding the slasher/horror movie genre) is not “revolutionary” in the sense that this isn’t THE first movie to do this or that. But, and this is quite important, it helped to forge these rules. That is why Black Christmas is such an important film in the horror genre, as it might have not invented the tropes, but it helped showcase them, where movies/horrors afterwards took those elements and forged them once and for all to the clichés we all know and… love? Yes, the clichés themselves are not good or bad. Everything depends on how you use them, how you make them work for you. And this movie made them work.

Overall, Black Christmas is yet another example of “it doesn’t matter how you start, it’s about how you finish”. It’s a film that throws you into a situation where you might expect one thing to happen and then something else happens, leaving you pleasantly surprised. I went in, expecting nothing much but a decent slasher. What I got was a psychological thriller/horror, with great atmosphere, decent performances, superb ending and surprisingly strong feminist ideology that’s not “in your face”. And that is worth mentioning, especially from a movie made in 1974. I had a great time with this movie and maybe next watch, who knows? I might go all-in with my rating. Until then, this film is something you for sure want to re-watch or watch if you haven’t seen it yet for the upcoming Halloween.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Knight and Day (2010) Review – A Forgotten Gem

Advertisements

I need to start this review by acknowledging my bias here. I have always loved Cameron Diaz. She has always been one of those actresses who was typecast (pretty, usually dumb blonde). Therefore, she wasn’t given the best roles to prove her talent. But she managed to have a great career, and I miss seeing her on the big screen. What I wouldn’t give to see her in a new movie. Anyway, this has been addressed, we can move on.

Knight and Day is the perfect example of what many action comedies go for, but plenty of them don’t succeed. They mix a great action with humour that’s not awkward or dumb or “proven hit” of the last couple of years – they don’t feel the need to shout jokes at us. While re-watching this movie, I have noticed how surprisingly “calm” both actors are while delivering most of their jokes. It’s a shame that this even needs to be said, but have you see a comedy nowadays? It is pretty clear somebody in Hollywood thinks: “The more loud/shouty we can be, the more laughs we get!” And that ain’t it, chief.

What is also different about this film is that you can’t fully switch your brain off. Because there are a couple of plot points in the movie that keep you interested (who is Tom Cruise watching on his phone, is he a good guy or a bad guy, what side is Viola Davis on…) and guessing. Sure, can you safely guess most of these? Yes. But the movie is at least trying to give us more than yet another “switch your brain off” action-comedy with two big stars.

Here the thing – I like this movie, mainly because it has Tom Cruise. What that means is, it’s not a secret that he does his own stunts. That inspires more people around him to try to do as much of their stunts as possible. And that is when we get an action film that doesn’t have to be cut to death. Yes, Knight and Day might not have the same big stunts/set-pieces as Mission Impossible franchise, but it still has a lot going for it. And when you don’t have to cut around stunt people to mask the fact the actors were on their break, not in front of the camera, your action scenes look better, plain and simple. I have talked about this before – I understand why they do it and how I can’t blame anybody who doesn’t want to do their stunts. After all, we all can’t be Tom Cruise. But all I am saying is, it makes a difference.

Another aspect this film has going for it, Cameron and Tom have chemistry. But not just “the one” chemistry, where you can see them being together, but they are both playing off each other perfectly. For most of the movie, Tom is the level-headed one and Cameron is the “fish out of water” character. But the film manages to turn this around too and give her a few things to do too. And since Cameron isn’t shy about action, it comes naturally to her, and you believe her when it’s her time to kick some ass.

This film also feels big in scale – plenty of different (real life, not just green screen) locations, a bunch of set pieces, so the movie never feels stale or slow. It almost felt like the Energizer Bunny, it just keeps on going and going and going… Who also surprised me (by appearing in this for a few minutes) was Gal Gadot before she became “the Gal Gadot”. In here, she’s got almost a cameo role. It’s funny to think that now, she is a much bigger star than Cameron and on the same level as Tom Cruise, at least when comes to being recognizable.

Overall, Knight and Day is just a simple, fun movie that doesn’t pretend to be anything else. It’s a funny action-comedy with two big stars, who play well off each other, have chemistry between them, so you are on board with their team-up. It also tries to give you something to think about, as it doesn’t want to be just a dumb, fun movie. Which is something I always appreciate. I honestly miss movies like this. I miss movies that realise what they are without going over the top with everything in them, you can still enjoy them. Even though there are things in this film that are unbelievable at times, they always tried to ground them in reality. If you crave a fun summer film with great casting, decent action scenes and some laughs, try this film.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Free Guy (2021) Review – The Bubble-Gum Ice Cream Equivalent of a Movie

Advertisements

If you are like me and follow Ryan Reynolds on Twitter (if not, you definitely should, as he’s funny, charismatic and overall does seem like a good guy), you would have seen the massive push, him promoting this film. And honestly, if it wasn’t for that, I wouldn’t have probably gone to the cinemas (the first time since the pandemic started!) and watched it alongside my girlfriend. Which would have been a shame, as we both liked the film, she even loved it. But that might have something to do with the overall sex appeal of Ryan. And who can blame her?

Free Guy is a film that 100% (strangely) benefited from the COVID-19 pandemic. Let me explain. This movie was supposed to get released in July 2020, but we all know why it got pushed back. So the filmmakers waited and put it in the cinemas now when it’s reasonably safe. And by that, they scratched something I call “the pandemic itch”. Don’t get me wrong this is by far the best video game based movie (even though is it fair to call it that? Will discuss it later.), so I think it would have been received well, but… I don’t think it would have been received nearly as well as it is being received now if it wasn’t for the pandemic. Why? Because people (myself included) are looking now more than ever for something light, funny, to brighten their day, to lift their spirit. And Free Guy is that. It’s a colourful, funny action-comedy that knows what it is, avoids most of the genre pitfalls well, and most importantly, it never gets boring.

This film also struck gold with casting. From the leading roles to the tens of cameo roles, some more expected than others. I won’t spoil any of those, as I’ve had some spoilt for me and let’s say if you don’t know, who might appear in this film, you are in for a treat. But let’s discuss our main stars. Let’s start with the aforementioned Ryan Reynolds. I appreciated this wasn’t a “Ryan Reynolds type” of a character. He always seems to be down to make fun of himself, and his Guy is a funny character who isn’t trying to be funny. I liked his performance. Jodie Comer was a newcomer for me, who gently reminded me that I have to watch Killing Eve (2018 – 2022) because she was great in this film. I loved that I can’t compare her to any other character from either film or a TV show. She plays a perfect mix of fun, clever and overall well-rounded character with a clear goal. To claim, what is hers. Who surprised me was Joe Keery, as I only know him from Stranger Things (2016 – 2022), where he is great. But as we know, just because you are great in one role in a TV show, that automatically does not translate to a movie. But he was fun to watch. I understood his character, his motivations, everything he did. I honestly hope we get to see more of him. Who kind of let me down, just a tiny bit (and is my only “complain” about the film) Taika Waititi. Listen, I love his work. I like the fact, he makes weird, over the top choices, and I understand what he and the director were going for in this film – I honestly do. But for me, his performance could have been toned down by good a 30% at least, as he was too obnoxious. Again, I understand that was the point of his character, but I think some of his jokes would have landed better if he wasn’t over the top from the very start.

As mentioned prior, after some thinking, I genuinely think this might be the best film based on video games. But as you can see, I wrote “video games” – hence my question. Does this count? Because other movies, based on video games (like the Resident Evil franchise, Silent Hill movies, even the coke and alcohol fest that is Super Mario Bros (1993, my review here)), all are based on one game or franchise of those games. Unlike Free Guy, which succeeded by playing it smart – borrowing the best elements across the spectrum. The biggest inspiration is Fortnite, but you can easily find GTA elements here, a few MMORPG game hints, and some nodes to classics like Half-Life, Portal etc. So this raises the question – since this film is “borrowing” from a plethora of games, is it any wonder it might be the best? Is it fair to say this did a better job than Silent Hill (2006)? A movie, btw, I consider being pretty much the best video game adaptation, as it came quite close to capturing the spirit of the game? Because if you think about it, by borrowing elements from a variety of games, you are not restricted by anything but your own mind/fantasy, whereas Silent Hill had to be contained. And this is a genuine question, as I don’t know myself. This question is not any “gotcha” towards Free Guy as what they have done was clever, and they executed it well.

Maybe this is the more important point – no matter how many elements the people behind this film might have borrowed, it wouldn’t have mattered if the movie wasn’t good. But this film is good. I honestly think the main reason for that, I believe (I don’t know whether I am right or not) that the people behind this are gamers. I used to be a massive gamer (both in the literal and not so literal sense). Nowadays, I don’t play as much, but I still got the references, but what’s more important, this will be one of those films that reward multiple viewings. Forget about the “obvious references” or even the story for a second. This film is jam-packed with literally hundreds of easter eggs in the background or the corner of the screen. I honestly think I can re-watch it five times, and each time, I will find something else I have missed before. I love movies like this.

What I also need to address is how they went about with the main story. They could have simply told the lazy “just a bit of magic/love, that is why we have an NPC, who broke his programming and acts like a player, all of a sudden” story, but no. The movie has a satisfactory explanation for why it happened that made sense and served the story in the real world. I was pleased that they did something different.

Overall, Free Guy is a “bubble-gum ice cream” equivalent of a movie. As in, right now, we live in a weird world. So, when a film like this comes around, which wouldn’t usually connect with you as much, it suddenly does. The same goes for “bubble-gum ice cream” – it’s not a flavour I would ever have/order. It’s too colourful, it can feel like it’s just for kids, and it can be too sweet. But then you get it, after a long time, and you are surprised. It’s still way too colourful and sweet, no question about that, but at the same time, it hits the spot. For whatever reason, it just does. Take my girlfriend, for example – she isn’t and never was a gamer. So she didn’t get most of the references. But she still enjoyed this film. And I used to be a hardcore gamer who has turned into a softcore gamer (phrasing!), and I still enjoyed this film. And who knows? Maybe on a second viewing, I might be down even with Taika’s acting. If Free Guy is playing in the cinema close to you and you feel safe going out, I would strongly recommend it. Even if it might seem from the trailers, it’s not your type of movie, go out and give it a try. It might surprise you.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Apples (2020) Review – Life, Amnesia and Apples

Advertisements

Apples is one of those films I would have never even heard about if it wasn’t for Mubi. This review is not in any way paid by them (even though that’d be awesome) as I have been using this service for about four years now and still love it. Anyway, while browsing through their selection, this grabbed my attention – Greece, 2020, worldwide pandemic. When you see these words together, you think: “Really? Isn’t it a bit too early, random Greek filmmaker I have never heard of?” But this film isn’t about the real pandemic. This is a movie pandemic that causes people to suddenly suffer from amnesia. Only some of them. And we follow Aris, your normal Greek man, who just really loves apples.

Apples is an interesting movie that won’t be for everybody. Not because it’d be too complicated or some scenes uncomfortable to sit through. No, this film has its own pace, its own vibe, and it just flows. It isn’t concerned with the world, it’s a very “closed”, down-to-earth story about a man, who is dealing with this sudden amnesia, and we follow him, trying to get back, “live the life”. But if you suffer from amnesia, you don’t know/remember anybody, not even your name, it’s hard to get excited about life.

I loved the concept and how the movie went about its story. It’s minimalistic, it felt raw and most importantly, even though it doesn’t sound too exciting, the film knows how to keep your attention. Since this is a film not many people would see, I will put the spoiler tag soon, as I don’t want to discuss anything that might spoil the experience of this unique film. So before that, let me say that if you like dramas that deal with real people, going through real things (take away the “pandemic” aspect, and it’s as real as it gets), you might like this film. Now, let’s get down to the nitty-gritty…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

I liked the twist this movie took. With the subtle hints dropped throughout the film, you soon realise that Aris might not have amnesia at all. He just wants to start over, using the situation to his advantage. At least that is what he thinks. But the “deeper” into the rehabilitation program he is, the more he realises starting again isn’t as great as he might have thought. And I appreciated that twist within a twist…?

The movie didn’t have to have any surprises in store, and it still would play well, but that surprise adds an extra layer of reality, as that would have probably happened if there was that kind of pandemic. What I liked about this story was the fact we can only speculate, what pushed him over the edge. What was the last straw? What motivated his character to try and start all over again? Apples is one of those films that ask plenty of questions, but it doesn’t answer most of them. Oddly enough, that doesn’t bother me, as it gives us the freedom to come to our conclusions about what he might have been through.

I also loved how the social interaction was broke down to its bare bones. For example, when he was going through the program, that should prepare him to be an active member of society again. The program did it so “perfectly” it took away the spark of humanity, which makes life interesting. How everything was just lined up for him, where he would play a tape that would tell him: “Go to a bar. Meet a woman. Try to flirt with her, don’t be afraid.” That is encouraging, but once we get to known Sofia Georgovassili‘s character, who is “a few steps” in front of him, he starts noticing and questioning her motives. If you think about it, that is not the best way to be a part of society again, questioning every single decision made by everybody around. Or wondering whether somebody is with you because they want to be, or just because they were told to be with you?

Overall, Apples is a movie that you need to experience rather than read about it. You can almost say the story doesn’t matter that much here as it is more about the characters. For example, the fact our main character isn’t suffering from amnesia doesn’t mean that much. The movie is trying to take a look at what it means to be a human. Are we honestly just nothing more than a collection of our past experiences? Because that would mean having no memory at all would nullify us, making us almost non-human. Isn’t it sometimes better to forget everything and start again? That is what the movie is trying to explore here, and I think it does it brilliantly. I will be looking forward to what is next in store for Christos Nikou.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke