Tag Archives: 1998

Movies or shows released in 1998.

Jack Frost (1998) Review – Charming, Creepy and Christmassy

Advertisements

As a self-proclaimed cinephile, I have seen many Christmas movies, but many more still escape me. Take Jack Frost until not long ago; I only heard about it maybe once before, a long time ago. But it recently popped up on one of the streaming services I pay for (Amazon Prime), and I thought, why not; I might as well expand my horizons with a Christmas film. And with a cast like Michael KeatonKelly Preston and Mark Addy, what could go wrong?

And honestly, for the first 40/50 minutes, Jack Frost was a delightful, even if slightly predictable, film. We have the typical “dad works too much and might miss Christmas!” plotline, but here is the thing. Michael Keaton was (and I would argue still is) a charismatic dude, to the point where we should dislike him as the audience (after all, he’s bailing on his son!) I didn’t. What’s more, I understood him, and those scenes we got with him and his son (played by Joseph Cross) felt real because Michael’s character was never too mean/shouty about his mistakes; he sat down with his son and talked to him. That might seem like nothing, but in these Christmas movies, where we usually see this type of conflict, the parent (or the child) can go way too over the top for the main dispute to mean anything.

I also appreciated the inventive cinematography, mainly the snowball fight from the beginning of the film, shot like a war movie, even with some camera angles from the perspective of a snowball. Again, little things, but as they say, they do make the difference because it’s easier to stand out from such an overcrowded market, which in this case are your cookie-cutter Christmas films that are not only the same, but they all tend to look the same too. So I appreciated it when Jack Frost was at least going for something more to latch on to.

The moment I became slightly detached from the film was when Michael Keaton returned as the snowman, aka Jack Frost. That was weird because that should be the main point of this film; dad gets killed and returns the next year as a snowman to make things right. But that was when the film took more of a forced comedy route and started to look and feel more formulaic.

Not to mention the snowman CGI is slightly unnerving. I don’t get spooked easily, but I can understand why some people hate this movie purely because of the CGI alone. One needs to see it in action to comprehend it, as it’s not like it is a creepy design for all of the film, but there are some scenes where the snowman looks more menacing…? It’s hard to describe it correctly; it’s one of those “you just gotta see it to believe it” types of situation.

And these two things took Jack Frost down a peg for me because I don’t know whether I am getting softer as I get older, but I loved the first 40/50 minutes. Before the dad died, I was enjoying the film, whether it was Michael Keaton’s charisma or the stunning beauty of Kelly Preston (it is strange to write about her in the past tense). I was enjoying myself and thought this could potentially become one of those Christmas films I would put on every Christmas season from now on. Now that won’t probably happen, but it’s still a solid movie, and this is where I need to make my last point.

Don’t pay any attention to the rating of this film. For some bizarre reason, Jack Frost is currently rated 5.4/10 on IMDb and only 19% on RottenTomatoes. Sure, the movie is far from flawless, and it can be overly simplistic and sentimental, mainly in the second half, but come on! That is way too low. When I checked those scores after finishing the film, I had to make sure there wasn’t some different version everybody but me watched, but no, most people don’t enjoy this film at all. I would like to know why, especially since we have gotten many, many, many worse Christmas movies that don’t have Michael and Kelly in the titular roles. They also (probably) don’t have a creepy CGI snowman in them too, but that’s beside the point… 😉

Overall, Jack Frost is better than expected Christmas film. I believe; if you can get over the CGI that can be a bit too much at times and some overly sentimental moments, you might enjoy yourself. I can’t say this enough, for some reason, I really liked Michael in this role, at least before he transferred into the snowman because that man is a walking charisma. If you are like me and have never seen Jack Frost, this Christmas would be a good time to fix it. Don’t expect anything spectacular, just your good old-fashioned Hollywood Christmas fluff that is sometimes needed.

Wishing you all Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and whatever else people do or don’t celebrate!

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Whose Line Is It Anyway? Review (Season 1 – 17) – The Greatest Improv Ever

Advertisements

Before going into this review, let me clear something up. I know that in theory (and reality, really), the original Whose Line Is It Anyway? ran from 1998 – 2007 and the newer one, hosted by Aisha Tyler has “only” started in 2013 on CW, so therefore shouldn’t really count towards the OG Whose Line Is It Anyway?, but I am counting them as one. Sure, the original host Drew Carey has been replaced by aforementioned Aisha, but other than that, it’s exactly the same format. Except it’s slightly shinier, the video quality has gotten better and our beloved improvers have gotten slightly… more matured. 😉 But everything is the same, the same people are running the show, it’s basically the same cast and most importantly, it’s still hilarious.

I might be one of the few nutcases, who actually watched every single episode of not only the original show, but the CW one too. Yeah, I know. But let me tell you, the original show helped me get through some tough times. Back when I moved to Scotland, I had a job where I was promised more hours per week then I was ultimately given (so you can imagine, as a working student, the money was extra tight) and I had barely any time on my hands, as I was either studying or working a job I didn’t like. This show kept me laughing in my time off. These geniuses of improv comedy, they helped me through everything and even now, when I have different/better job, I am no longer a student and have more free time to myself, I am always looking forward to watching this show. When I learned, back in 2013, it’s coming back on CW, I was so happy, as I can’t even begin to describe how much I love it.

Let’s name names. I can’t list every single person involved with this, but the main trio (Colin Mochrie, Ryan Stiles and Wayne Brady) are all hilarious in their own ways. Colin is the “I will say exactly what’s on my mind, either it will work, or it will work because it’s not working” comedian, absolutely love him. Ryan is the “I like dirty jokes, really quick on his giant feet and tall freak” kind of guy and probably my favourite, if you put a gun to my head and I had to choose one. And Wayne is insanely talented when comes to making up songs as he goes. He’s funny as hell, but his main strength is definitely his rhyming ability and the fact he can actually sing really well! But here’s the thing, over the years, so many great people sat in the fourth chair, I do need to name some of my absolute favourites out the “guest comedians”.

Greg Proops (witty intellectual guy, who’s always up for some political joke, throwing shade or knowing most of pop culture), Brad Sherwood (definition of somebody, who is in between “chaotic neutral” and “chaotic evil”, love the guy), Charles ‘Chip’ Esten (who’s one of the few people who is as great as Wayne when comes to song challenges), Jeff Bryan Davis (also somebody, who can keep up with Wayne singing-wise, and if you want to do some Christopher Walken impression, give Jeff a shout), Gary Anthony Williams (who’s not only funny, but his amazing weight loss was a huge inspiration for my own weight loss journey), Jonathan Mangum (if golden retriever was a person, it would have been a Jonathan, because he seems like the goodest of boys), Heather Anne Campbell (her sense of humour can be all over the place, in the best possible sense) and I am pretty sure I am missing out on some people. But there have been so many. And all have their strengths, and most importantly, all of them will make you laugh in different ways.

Here’s the thing about this show – given the fact it’s improv, you are bound to laugh at least a few times per episode, even if you can tell where the scene/joke is going, because these guys know it’s not just about the joke itself, it’s about the delivery. Or sometimes about how not to deliver anything, when they crack each other up, by admitting they have nothing, no punchline, no joke, mostly in the singing challenges. Those are especially funny, when they don’t go the way you expect them to go. What I liked about the latest season (technically season 9, but I will refer to it as season 17) is they have started to leave in more “ruined” takes of those singing challenges, when they have no idea where the joke is going, and they just say/sing it, so they “restart the scene” instantly. Reading it backwards, it sounds so boring, but trust me, you would be having the time of your life watching these top of the class comedians do their schtick.

If I have to be critical a bit, I would only say the CW reboot (or continuation) started a bit slow, and it took them a while to get back in the groove. Also, since it’s CW, they have more episodes with a extra special guest stars, who (surprise surprise) star in some shows produced by (you guessed it), CW. Some of the celebrities can be funny, some want to be funny, but they don’t know how to do improv properly (which is understandable, as it’s a genuine skill to do it as flawlessly as those guys and girls) and there were couple of special guest stars, who didn’t seem to care too much either way. It seems like CW got the message, as good portion of the season 8 (or what I would call season 16) and the entirety of the season 9 (or 17) there were no celebrities, just improv people, doing what they are doing best. I honestly believe that was one of the strongest seasons out of them all.

I could rant about this show for hours, as I genuinely love it. What I admire is the fact that the performers don’t really feel the need to swear (at least not that much) and if they do, it usually serves as kind of “punch” for the scene/character. And let me clarify, I have no problem with swearing, I do swear a lot myself, but why I mention this at all – you know, when something is successful, there will be versions of that all around the world. I mean, even this started as a British show. Yeah, did you know that? Whose Line Is It Anyway? (1988 – 1998) started in the UK and I’ve tried to watch it, but after season and a half, I gave up on it, as it was too dry/intellectual for me. One of the rarest of occasions, where the American way, making it flashier, faster, sillier, actually worked. Anyway, in 2011 Czech people jumped on the bandwagon with a show, that’s basically a copy of WLIIA (in Czech language it’s called Partička (2011 -?), that can roughly be translated to “wee group”) and I have tried to watch an episode or two. And not only they got time in between scenes to change to costumes to make the scene funnier (which it usually isn’t and is clearly there to allow them to think about the scene, hence kind of going up against of the improv idea in general) they swear basically in every second sentence. And again, I have no problem with swearing, but in comedy, there is a point where you are obviously relying on the “shock” factor of “oh, they said a bad word, funny!” and that’s not funny. But I might have already been spoiled by this masterpiece.

Overall, I can’t praise this show enough. It got me through some rough times, and even made me proper belly laugh like anything, that’s currently airing. I honestly hope people at CW know, what’s best for them and keep this running for as long as possible, or at least for as long as these guys want to perform all these crazy, hilarious stuff for our amusement.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

August 32nd on Earth (1998) Review – Car Crash, Model and Desert

Advertisements

I am not going to lie, yesterday I had no idea this movie existed or what was it about. But, as soon as I saw the name Denis Villeneuve, I knew I needed to watch this (without even knowing this is his feature movie debut!) just to see how the director behind movies like Prisoners (2013), Arrival (2016) or Blade Runner 2049 (2017) started his journey. And August 32nd on Earth is a really tiny movie, that’s definitely slow, yet beautiful.

This movie is 100% as indie as it gets. You can tell there was little to no budget, and yet, this movie looks stunning. What I like about directors like Denis is even though he dips in different genres and no two movies of his feel the same, he’s got his style, his own almost “feel”. The same way you can tell when you are watching a Spielberg movie, or a Scorsese movie, I can always tell I am watching a Villeneuve movie, as no matter what’s happening on screen, it’s shot beautifully, yet with certain distance. I always thought he’s a really subtle filmmaker, whose movies are stunning “almost by accident”, where the way his film are shot doesn’t feel “flashy” or in you face. I really, really like his aesthetics.

August 32nd on Earth is a strange movie, where “almost nothing happens”, but at the same time, a lot happens. To me, I was slightly confused when the movie was over, as I was expecting a little more from the ending, but the more I thought about it afterwards, the more I understood nothing was missing. Because the story is about second chances, life and death and how circumstances beyond our control (such as car accident) may shape our life.

What I was also struck by was the fact you can’t really fit this movie into one genre/category. The first 10 minutes reminded me a lot of Mulholland Dr. (2001), which is one of my favourite movies of all time, as we have a car accident, possible memory loss, etc. Then, all of the sudden, it gets more upbeat and the movie shifts into a third gear, where it almost feels like a comedy, but without any laughs. And towards the end, it turns into “romantic” drama of sorts…? But neither of those genres I’ve just named describe this movie correctly. It’s been a while since I have seen a movie that’s simple to describe narrative wise, but hard to describe genre wise, as it shifts between couple of them fluently. And the word “fluently” is the important one in that sentence, as plenty of smaller indie films do this, but not successfully and as a result, the films can feel all over the place. But this film never felt like that. Everything felt natural, every shift that happened felt earned, every decision one of our main characters made felt in line with the story and their character.

As you can tell, it’s quite hard to describe this movie, so I will tell you this – if you don’t mind indie movies, that move at their own pace and you (like me) admire Denis Villeneuve, give August 32nd on Earth a shot, because the chance is, you might enjoy it. It’s not something that will change your life, but at the same time, it is a movie that gets to you in a weird, subtle way and you will think about it for a bit (or at least, that’s what happened to me). For a debut, not bad at all.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Practical Magic (1998) Review – How to Fail at World Building

Advertisements

Practical Magic is the perfect example of a movie, that has everything going for it. From the story/outline (witches exist and live among us) to casting (always had a weak spot for both Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman) everything seems to be where it needs to in order for this film to be a great one. Except there is one tiny thing this movie didn’t do properly – establish any rules! Which, if your main selling point is witches and magic, is kinda important.

What frustrated me with this movie more than anything, is I am not even talking about re-writing the entire thing, or saying the movie overall is not watchable, as it is. Literally only thing that would help out this movie massively, would be inserting two, three lines maximum about the actual powers these witches posses! What can they do? What can’t they do? Is there a limit to their powers?

The reason I am asking these questions, is quite simple. Throughout this movie, our main duo finds themselves in a few situations, where, I don’t know, maybe a bit of magic could help them sort it out within a second, yet they don’t use it…? Or if they use it, they only do minor things…? The problem with any magic being in your movie is you need to spend some time on rules, otherwise the audience can just say something like “Hey, how come they can’t magic their way out of this situation? Oh, they can’t? Because they don’t have that kind of power, huh? Ok, one more question, HOW am I supposed to know that?!”

What hurts even more with this movie is if only those rules were established, Practical Magic could have been one of those movie I would love to go back to, every once in a while, as everything else is great. The cast is great, the story is fairly compelling, but the longer it goes, the more questions you have and the end… ok, let’s talk about the ending here, because Jesus on a pogo stick, that was confusing.

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

The entire film we see how all people in this small town are afraid of this family, how it’s “public secret” this family are witches and how some of them even hate them because of it. Yet, when they need “help” to create a coven of witches, so the last spell would work, suddenly, plenty of those same women are only one phone call away to help them out…? First of all, what?! How? How did the family manage to persuade them to suddenly help them out? Also, does that mean all the women that came out to help out are also witches, therefore were hating their own kind? And if not, if they are just “regular ass women”, would they posses any power to actually help out the witches with their spell in the first place? So many questions. I know the movie is trying to have this all empowering message about unity, womanhood and all that, which is great and all, but not in this instance, as it doesn’t feel earned. It feels like somebody cut out a good hour or so of the movie that explained everything, just for the fun of it, with no real reason behind it.

Practical Magic to me is a flawed movie, that had potential and all the elements of being a pretty great film in it, just the people making it didn’t fully grasp the potential. To me, these are the movies we should remake (I mean, if the studios really can’t come up with something original and we have to have remakes of movies in the first place) – the movies that had potential, that had good stories, that could have done with somebody different going over the material and making it better. Don’t tamper with well beloved films people already managed to make great, give chance to movies like this! I could easily imagine this today, as the story doesn’t need any changing, just again, give it to somebody, who would establish some rules within the universe and you are almost there. All the “hard work” has been done, we just need to iron out the details.

If you aren’t a fan of either Sandra or Nicole, first of all, why? Second, and most importantly of all, deduct one star from my final rating, as those two working so well together is the only reason my rating is as high as it is. Sometimes, my brain says one thing, but my heart and soul can’t fully hate a movie with two of them in it. 🙂

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke