Tag Archives: 2016

Movies or shows released in 2016.

Train to Busan (2016) Review – Sometimes, You Just Need to Play the Hits

Advertisements

If you are a movie person and like the zombie genre, it’s almost impossible not to know this title. It seemed like, ever since this movie came out, word of mouth spread like wildfire as many were praising Train to Busan as one of the best zombie movies ever made. Naturally, I was curious, and when I saw a Blu-Ray for a reasonable price, I knew I had to get it to finally watch it for myself. The result didn’t surprise me, but it still delivered everything I hoped for and then some.

This movie understands how to hook you in by focusing on several protagonists while everyone else is just a side character. As every great film does, it grounds itself in reality (here, it’s the father/daughter relationship), and everything else is “extra”. It’s the new reality our heroes must adapt to extremely fast; otherwise, they turn into zombies. One thing I appreciated was how quick the turn takes. In many other movies, people get bitten, they die, and after some time, they come back hungry for your brains. In Train to Busan, they don’t even have time to die; they effectively transform in front of our eyes into fast zombies that can’t be stopped.

That’s right, we are dealing with the “fast ones” in this movie, and the way those crowd zombie scenes are done, alongside the decent CGI, makes it terrifying. You feel like there is no way to stop them because they roll over everything and everyone who finds themselves in front of them. What also makes this film a bit unique is that it (mostly) takes place on a train. I know, shocker, right? Who would’ve thought with a title like Train to Busan? But that claustrophobic feeling, combined with the sheer violence, ferocity and the amount of zombies, worked. There are scenes when our heroes notice one weakness these zombies have (I won’t spoil anything) and have to go past them, and it is as tense of a scene as any I have seen in ages.

I must also acknowledge, as the title of this review says, that this movie doesn’t do anything “groundbreaking”. If you have seen a few zombie films and played some video games “featuring” zombies, nothing in this movie will surprise you. But it’s the way this movie plays those “hits” and how it makes you care about our main protagonist, combined with that powerful ending, where I realised that I didn’t mind. This movie is a brilliant example of how fans aren’t asking filmmakers to reinvent cinema every time they make a film. But if you put your spin on an idea (or, in this case, ideas), ground it with some realism and make us care about the protagonists, we are there. Well, at least I am, and I can honestly say I have enjoyed this film.

What also plays into this movie’s hand is that it came from South Korea. Although now I hope the country is getting more recognition (due to Parasite (2019), my review here, making Oscar history), I still believe it’s not enough because everything from the past almost two decades I have had the pleasure of seeing from South Korea was great to excellent. I would go as far as to say that if you have never seen a movie from there and are a horror movie fan, Train to Busan is an excellent movie to start with. It almost encapsulates everything I love about films from there. They always care about the protagonists first and build the story around them. I know that seems obvious but think about it like this. How many times have you seen a Hollywood movie with underdeveloped protagonists? Or someone you should be rooting for, and you are not? On top of that, they know how to shoot big movies and small movies, with CGI but not too much… Honestly, Hollywood should be paying closer attention to movies coming from here because there is variety, passion and excellence that, many times, can overshadow the biggest US blockbusters.

Overall, Train to Busan truly is one of the best zombie movies ever made and a brilliant addition to the zombie genre. The movie sets everything up just enough for you to care, then throws you into the action and doesn’t let go until the very end. Although you will see where everything is headed and how/when each character will die, you will still have fun with this film because it is just so well done. This film is a must-see for any horror movie fans.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Good Place (Seasons 1 – 4) Review – Subversively Smart

Advertisements

As with countless other shows, I have heard many good things about The Good Place. The only other thing I knew about this show was that there was a twist somewhere that changed the entire show. When I watched it, it wasn’t that hard for me to guess what that twist was because if you know “something” is coming but you don’t know what, you can only guess so many things, especially with this show. The good thing is that even knowing there is a twist doesn’t spoil anything for you because The Good Place is really about the journey, not the destination. And I think that is what will make it a great show to rewatch over and over again.

Before I delve into this show, I want to take a moment and briefly mention the creator of this show, Michael Schur. For some, he might still be pretty unknown, but he is not only behind this show; he also co-created Parks and Recreation (2009 – 2015), Brooklyn Nine-Nine (2013 – 2021, my review here) and wrote some episodes of The Office (2005 – 2013, my review here). Even if he stopped working today, his legacy is undeniable as he has either created or helped to create some of the most hilarious and iconic shows of today, spanning almost three decades. He is a phenomenally talented guy who should be much more known, given his involvement with many A+ projects. And from all I can tell, The Good Place was his baby from the start until the finish and what a show to be responsible for.

This show is one of those rare ones where you might not laugh all the time while watching it. I would even argue that, in the later seasons, there are fewer laughs and more chuckles. But, it never bothered me because I was intrigued by the story and how effortlessly the writers managed to avoid falling into some obvious traps just for the story’s sake. What I mean is, if you rely on philosophy as heavily as The Good Place does and want to explore such ideas as death, the afterlife, what’s fair and through that lens, you take a look at our lives on Earth and the obstacles we face in day to day lives, it would be easy to take some shortcuts. But this show never does that. Every time we seem to have it figured out, and there might be an answer, the goalpost gets moved. And it isn’t until the last season that you see the clear parallels with life and how that goalpost moving isn’t a cheap trick but rather a necessity because it simply mirrors life.

I could talk about the more indisputable themes this show touches on, like how it is much harder to be a good person because in the times we live in, we are forced to choose many “lesser evils”, many times unknowingly (the flower example was spot on). But what I absolutely loved about The Good Place was how this show sticks by its logic and showcases that life and the afterlife are messy and you can’t be happy forever. The idea of “just” being happy, life with no conflict would be no life at all and how eventually, if you are lucky enough to achieve everything you have ever dreamed of, there is a point where life has no meaning because it’s hard to stay motivated with no purpose.

It’s hard not to watch a show like this thinking about whether you are a good person yourself. I will put my cards on the table and say I don’t believe in any God or afterlife; however, I might be wrong. Therefore, like everybody, I occasionally wonder if some sort of afterlife exists and whether it would be as simple as some religions love to claim (“Just be a good person!”), and you will be eternally awarded. The Good Place is clever about everything, where they jokingly judge people, but, in reality, this show is vocal about how people aren’t inherently “good” or “bad”. Furthermore, if you are only good because you expect a reward at the end and therefore all your good deeds aren’t “pure”, are you a good person?

I must mention the cast, as they are excellent. I will split them into three groups. Kristen Bell and Ted Danson are this TV royalty, where you know they will be great no matter what, and both were. Then there is a second group I would call “almost newcomers”, where people get their chance to shine, some for the very first time. Jameela Jamil is the prime example, as this was her first-ever project, and this show put her on the map. William Jackson Harper and Manny Jacinto have been in some shows and movies before, but it was this show that allowed them to flex their acting muscles and showcase what they had, and all three nailed their roles. But, there is a third mini-group for one person only, who should have gotten more praise – D’Arcy Carden.

Before I write why, let me stipulate something – The Good Place is the perfect example of an ensemble show. That is why I won’t be writing much about other characters, as they all have been excellent, but, for me, nobody stood out because they all had their well-earned moments in this show and worked their best in a group setting. But if I truly think about one performer who managed to stand out and made the most out of their role, it’s D’Arcy, aka Janet. Not only did she have to portray several different Janets (The Good, Bad, Neutral, Disco and a few others) throughout the show, but there were episodes where she had to portray other characters. Especially the ninth episode of the third season, simply called Janet(s), showcases how D’Arcy takes the boundaries of her role (remember, she can’t emote much because she is neither a girl nor human) and weaponizes them to her advantage. I think that if there were a poll between The Good Place fans about who their favourite character is, it would be (almost) evenly split between the main four (Kristen, Jameela, William and Manny). But for my money, D’Arcy is the MVP of this show, and I hope to see her in more shows and films.

On top of everything I have mentioned, The Good Place also understands what character growth means without compromising the character’s core. Everybody in this show goes through a believable growth, but they never change what made their character unique in the first place. It’s always great when the show understands the difference between growth and character change. If you watch the last episode, everybody has evolved, but they remained Eleanor, Chidi, Tahani and Jason.

No wonder that when we put all of it together, I ended up loving The Good Place. This show doesn’t rely on a twist; they manage to make that twist almost a joke because of what happens next. There are many quick jokes that you need to pay attention to; otherwise, you miss them, and every episode has one or two laugh-out-loud moments. However, this show wasn’t about the laughs. For me, those were a pleasant bonus. This show managed to talk about some of the biggest ideas without sounding condescending. It managed to discuss our current social and political issues without being too snarky or preachy, and if anything else, acknowledged how hard everything has become today and how easier some people have it, but even with those means to excel, they aren’t good people. It showed us our current system and how it favours some over others, but it always moved forward towards improving it rather than abandoning the entire thing. For a comedy show, it presents you with many big ideas, and it’s only up to you how much you take from it.

Overall, The Good Place is an excellent show that knew what it wanted to say, did it and ended. It didn’t drag on for a bit too long; it knew when to go, and because of that, no episode felt like a filler. Everything made sense within the story; the cast had superb chemistry, and it presented you with some big ideas packaged so well that they were easy to understand. I can see myself rewatching it and getting something new from it every rewatch. I can’t praise or recommend this show enough.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Kim’s Convenience Review (Seasons 1 – 5) – Give Us More!

Advertisements

This show feels like a bit of a throwback because, throughout its five seasons, it never feels “bigger”. Nowadays, even sitcoms have this phenomenon, as they get more seasons, they usually get more money, and with a bigger budget, they can go “out” and shoot on more locations, bring more guest stars, and things of that nature. This never happened for Kim’s Convenience; I guess because it has never gotten “too big”, but weirdly, that contributed to the unique charm and charisma this show has set from the beginning, and it upheld it until the premature end.

But it’s that simplicity, that fact this show always stayed grounded and never felt too big/polished, that worked for me the most. Kim’s Convenience is a simple story done right. Husband and wife, who emigrated from Korea to Canada, opened a convenience store. They have two kids and raised them as well as they can whilst having their business. The show starts with their son (played by Simu Liu) not being part of the family as he got in with bad people and has been through some stuff. That’s the basic premise of this comedic show with some dramatic elements; they tackle everything from racism and integration into different cultures to their children’s experience as first-generation Canadians, and all issues are viewed through a sense of humour that’s oddly relatable.

The best thing this show has is the perfect casting of the family unit. Paul Sun-Hyung Lee plays Mr. Kim (also known as Appa), and he portrays him so brilliantly. He knows when to lean into the stereotypical “stern dad” and when to take a step back and goes through some character growth throughout the show. Jean Yoon portrays Mrs. Kim (also known as Umma), and she compliments her on-screen husband beautifully; it’s hard to believe they aren’t together in real life. Her character isn’t just “his wife” or “his opposite”; she is a force to be reckoned with and has some funny moments and (later on) some truly touching real-life moments. Andrea Bang portrays Janet, their daughter, who has been dealing with a lot ever since her brother left home, and her parents fixated on her being perfect. That results in her often trying to overcompensate or overachieve in many areas. The already mentioned Simu Liu plays Jung, the son who is now back on the “right track”, but because of unresolved issues from their past, he can’t find his way back into the family.

Those four create the cornerstone of this show and complement/play off each other so well that it’s easy to like them from the first episode. Kim’s Convenience is such an easy watch because every problem this family goes through feels real. I am not a Korean emigrant, but I recognise many things from my family, and it’s through these shows we can see that there is more that unites us than divides us and how many things are universal and many people deal with the same things, no matter where they are from. And when most of those issues are viewed via this comedic lens, this show quickly becomes something you can watch five or six episodes in a row and not get bored. There are always a few great jokes in each episode or something that feels relatable and familiar that you quickly feel like you know this family.

What I appreciated is how, throughout the show, all main characters go through some character growth without losing their “id“. Without going into spoilers, Mr. Kim stays the same on the surface, but you can see him trying to be more understanding/forgiving of his children while examining his childhood. The same applies to Mrs. Kim, although her character goes through something more, but I won’t spoil that. Both Janet and Jung grow from young adults to full-blown adults, and they understand that it is time for them to start building their lives.

The only real issue is the cancellation of this show throughout season five. From what I understand, the creators thought they would have at least one more season, and they got cancelled halfway through shooting the fifth season, so they tried their best to give us some ending. However, it not only feels rushed (which I can’t blame them), there are many loose ends with three out of our four main characters as they all go through significant changes. I won’t even mention who, but honestly, I wish we would have gotten at least one more season, where Ins Choi and Kevin White (the creators of this show) would know from the start that this would be it, and they could plan everything around it. I don’t want everything tied up with a nice bow, far from it. But when we left Kim’s family, things were happening and I wished they would explore them further.

Also, I don’t think this is a spoiler; I wanted to see Jung interacting more with his family and spending more “quality time” together. One big theme of this show seems to revolve around forgiveness, and that gets explored mainly with Jung’s relationship with his dad and how those two want to talk to each other, but they both hurt each other in the past so much, there is so much “residue” they don’t know where to start reconnecting and how to do it. And towards the end, there was finally some progress, and I just wished we would have seen more of that because those scenes always felt special. As I said, the entire family had incredible chemistry, and it was easy to root for them.

The last thing I want to mention is that I liked how this show presented everybody as people. I just mentioned how easy it is to root for the entire family, but they still have issues. No character in this show is without their flaw(s), whether it is stubbornness, short temper, being overachiever, etc. But, it’s because of these flaws, not despite them; I rooted for this family even harder because I believe that’s the “secret” of their relatability. Think of it this way – you love your parents, grandparents, aunties, and uncles. But despite them being related to you, now, when you are an adult, can you say they have no flaws? They do, we all do, because that is what being human is. Some have minor flaws, and others might have bigger flaws, but we try to give them a break because they are family. I think that aspect is what Kim’s Convenience nailed the best, having characters going through character growth without making them into perfect human beings.

Overall, Kim’s Convenience is an easy, funny, and occasionally touching show, and I would recommend it highly. The “core four” performers are great, and their chemistry is wonderful. Even the side characters (Andrew Phung as Kimchee or Nicole Power as Shannon) are fun and get their time to shine as the show progresses. The only caveat I would have to give is if you want to watch this show, get ready for the ending that feels incomplete because it is. I can still hope that we might eventually get one more season, but I know it’s unlikely now (mainly due to Simu and Paul finding success with Star Wars and MCU), but one can always dream. Anyway, if you are looking for a great, chill show to watch, look no further.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Don’t Think Twice (2016) Review – Life Through the Improv

Advertisements

This film may belong to the category of “little films that could”. You can tell the people behind this film shot it on a minuscule budget. And even though I can see how this could be an insult for almost any other movie, it is not for this one, as they have managed to put together something funny, interesting and oddly relatable. What do I mean by that? About 99% of people who will watch this film will never become a stand-up comedian, let alone attempt to become one. And yet, we can sympathize with the trials and tribulations of one of our heroes, who finally “makes it”, only for him to see how making it isn’t the hard part. The hard part is staying at the top.

You may think a movie about such a niche profession could become a bit too “inside baseball” to appeal to anyone outside the show business. And in another universe, or maybe with somebody else at the helm, it could have happened to this film. But Mike Birbiglia must have realised it and made sure this movie was, above all, funny and never too “inside baseball”. I don’t know that much about stand-up comedy; I have heard of certain comedy groups, but on a very surface level, so I am no expert, and yet, I never felt I wasn’t in on any joke or reference. Everything was tailored to the mainstream audience without seeming desperate or wanting to be relatable. And that goes back to the “captain” of this ship and the cast, and here, we have some of the funniest people available.

Keegan-Michael Key is probably the most known actor out of this bunch, and the movie plays into that smartly. In a film with no apparent lead, he is the one you will remember the most, but mostly because he is the best-known one. Who surprised me was Gillian Jacobs. I will be honest; she probably only surprised me because I still haven’t seen Community (2009 – 2015), so I don’t have much to go by for her, but she was the stood out performance for me. Especially; because her character seems to go one way, and then something happens, and she makes a different decision. And Gillian plays her character so earnestly; you are rooting for her, no matter what and understand her decision. Then we have Mike (yep, not only he wrote and directed this film, but he also stars in it), Kate MicucciTami Sagher and Chris Gethard and they all play their parts perfectly. That is probably this film’s biggest advantage, not having an obvious lead and instead having six people who are unique and yet, work so well together. And despite the fact you can tell where most of them are coming from within minutes (this person is wealthy, this one has this chip on their shoulder etc.), they play these archetypes well enough that you don’t care about that, and you are there to enjoy the show.

What may hit the hardest for some people is this film is layered and honest. The film is not shy to show us; how just because you are passionate about this one thing, it doesn’t mean you will be successful. I think this goes back to the relatability of this topic and how, even though it’s “just about stand-up”, it’s not just about that. In a very weird; and clever way, this film is more about life, growing up and realising some people can dream and achieve those dreams and some… will never manage to achieve them. No matter how many hours per day they spend doing the thing they love, how much they sacrifice, eventually, you have to face the music. That layer is something that makes the end of this film so bittersweet, where you see our heroes, and almost everyone is at a different place than they were when the movie started. Don’t Think Twice shows lifelike character growth, what it takes to succeed and what it takes to admit to yourself you “just don’t have it”. Whatever that “it” is.

I wouldn’t be surprised if, on future rewatch, this film climbs up even higher in my ranking, as it missed the “full” 5/5 by a smidge. I believe this film will give you as much as you are willing to “take in”; at the moment. If you watch Don’t Think Twice when you are around 20 years old, you may not enjoy it as much. But I would be willing to bet that if you watch it when you turn 30 years old (or around then), you will suddenly see it through different lenses, as by that time, many people have had their dreams crushed, hearts broken, hope lost, or they actually managed to succeed. But only they know how much they had to sacrifice. Again, this film is about stand-up comedy, but it’s hardly “just” about stand-up comedy.

Overall, Don’t Think Twice is an underseen and underappreciated gem of a funny, relatable and earnest movie. It is filled with great performances and believable characters and has this bittersweet ending that makes you realise how layered this movie is because, at its core, it’s about a group of friends going through life. The stand-up comedy part is just a bonus to keep us entertained. Also, I have to watch more films with Gillian Jacobs.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Edge of Seventeen (2016) Review – All Hail(ee) Steinfeld!

Advertisements

Long before she became Kate Bishop in the MCU show Hawkeye (2021, my review here), I knew of Hailee Steinfeld, and I heard tales about this film. Tales about how this film is actually a pretty awesome depiction of how it feels to be a teenager, so this has been on my radar/watchlist for a long time. So one evening, I’ve found myself in the mood to give The Edge of Seventeen a chance and holy shit. I wasn’t surprised it was great; I had a suspicion this would be a decent film but what I didn’t expect was to love it. And the credit where the credit is due, it’s all due to Hailee because her character (Nadine) is one of the most annoying characters I’ve ever witnessed. But somehow, due to Hailee’s performance, I was never annoyed by her, and I found myself even rooting for Nadine…?

The Edge of Seventeen tells a story about Nadine, who lost her dad at a young age. So she is being raised by her mum (Kyra Sedgwick) and her brother (Blake Jenner), who are also excellent in this film. And as you can imagine, it’s not hard for either of them without her dad, let alone with Nadine, who is acting up like she’s still a child. That was the first time I thought to myself that this movie might not be for me as I usually don’t have patience for characters such as Nadine. But when the film tells you her story, and you see Hailee act the shit out of it, you can’t help but root for her. And even though you see how wrong she is and how much growth she has in front of her, you have patience/empathy for her character as this is her coping mechanism. Not the best one, that’s for sure, but hey, who was “switched on” when they were 16?

Let’s talk about her relationship with Woody Harrelson‘s character, as that was when the movie showed me what I am in for, besides Hailee’s range. I loved the relationship those two had where you can tell there is a history between them, so they are more comfortable with each other. But their relationship never crosses any boundaries, and it never goes into some questionable territory as his character is de facto her step-dad. Nadine goes to him as much as she can, and those scenes featuring just their characters were the highlight of this film for me. Hollywood seems to be obsessed lately with unlikely couples in action movies, where we pair up one action star and one comedian, so why not pair up Woody and Hailee? I thought they worked very well together and would love to see more of them.

If The Edge of Seventeen shined in those scenes with Woody and Hailee, it got me 100% with Hailee’s acting. There were a couple of scenes where Hailee goes from smiling to crying (or almost crying) from high to low, and it was effortless and, more importantly, it felt realistic. Take her awkward “date” (if you could even call it date) with the guy she’s obsessed with for most of this film. The guy takes her out on the ride, hoping to “get some” because that is what Hailee’s text was not just implying but straight up saying. And that awkward car scene where you understand both him and her perspectives, their young inability to talk about what they really want… I think that car scene can be used to summarize this film – young people wanting something they don’t know what exactly or how to ask for it. But we don’t have to worry; they will figure it out, eventually. As the old saying goes: “Youth is wasted on the young.”

The other aspect I appreciated is the idea of the older sibling stepping up and acting as almost a “shadow” parent and how much he needs to sacrifice to help their mum out, mainly with “raising” Nadine. Blake’s character had two powerful monologues, one explaining Hailee’s character and how “great” his life really was, and the other when he was talking to their mum about him not being an adult, yet she would always call on him to be one. I think this is something many people can relate to when they were growing up, the idea of them having to “step up” because of reasons beyond their control. How it was not fair, and yet this is what was expected, so you “just” have to suck it up?

Overall, The Edge of Seventeen was a film I enjoyed tremendously. I had a sneaky suspicion I would like it, but I ended up loving it instead. And the person I “blame” the most for this has to be Hailee Steinfeld. I still remember when she was nominated for an Oscar for her role in True Grit (2010) and thought that kid had a great future in front of her. Now more than ever, I am convinced that she will eventually win an Oscar. Given her enormous talent, the question is not “if” but “when”. And I, for one, have officially become part of her fan club as she proves time and time again she can do no wrong. If you haven’t seen this film, you are doing yourself a disservice.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Don’t Breathe (2016) Review – Bad People on Both Sides

Advertisements

Don’t Breathe is one of those movies you hear about if you are in any way, shape or form into films at all. What I’ve heard most about this film was that it contains a disturbing turkey baster scene. So even before going in, I knew I was in for a ride. And for the first hour, I enjoyed… well, not enjoyed myself, but I liked what the film was going for. And then the last 30 minutes happened. I know “movie’s gotta movie”, but almost every single decision made by all the characters in the movie towards the end were just… so dumb, it pulled me out of it.

But let’s start from the beginning. I liked what this film was going for, having characters who are so flawed you can’t help but almost stay impartial on who to root for or, in this case, not. I always admire people who don’t see the world in black and white, and I don’t think it’s a spoiler to say there are no good people here, just a variety of shades of grey and black. Even the “best” character in this film (I am guessing it would go to Jane Levy almost by default) makes some questionable choices throughout the film. And I didn’t mind that at all, if anything, that allowed me to be a spectator in this twisted game of blind man’s bluff (is that really how that game is called in English? You learn something new every day) with a literal blind man. Well, a literal actor who pretends to be blind.

That transitions us well into talking about Stephen Lang. First of all, this man is buffed. Like his muscles have muscles. He spends his free time working out, and by the looks of him, he’s got PLENTY of free time because damn. On a more serious note, props to him for committing to this role by wearing contact lenses that restricted his vision. And his buff persona worked so well for this film, always looming around you were never sure where he might appear next. I thought he’s done a great job playing such an evil character.

I don’t think there was any “single” decision that somehow started to pull me out of the film; it was one blow after another. But it’s hard to write about those decisions without discussing some heavy spoilers, so…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

My main issue and where the film started to fall apart was when characters (pretty much all of them at some point) had the chance to either escape or kill the other party and didn’t do it. And the fact some characters have survived way too much.

Let’s start with the “kill the other party” side. Look, I understand Stephen Lang is a big dude, but the movie made him blind. And not “superhero” blind, where somehow he could sense more than other people. So I can understand he might scratch that, is smarter than the robbers (because they are simply a bunch of idiots), but he still should be easier for them to get rid of. Either to lose him (read, escape) or once they literally had him captured and chained up, not to chance it (they’ve already gone too far at that point) and to finish him off. Honestly, even before that, once his character learns there was more than one person in his home, it felt like especially two people should be able to “trick” him, no matter how buff he is. But since we have to have a feature-length film and them killing him would end it 20 minutes too short, they don’t do it, and he gets loose.

And the same goes for Stephen’s character called “The Blind Man” in the credits. He’s got no problem killing off the strongest out of their group, but he struggles (several times!) with somebody who is not exactly his match. And once they get down and it seems like he (The Blind Man) will kill Dylan Minnette‘s character with gardening scissors, he somehow stabs the other dead body! Which wouldn’t be that tough to swallow had we not seen him being more than aware of his surroundings very well. It seemed like the movie wanted to have its cake and eat it too with his character. You can’t make him this buff ex-soldier who kills one guy almost instantly to not only struggle against the second one but then to miss his body once he’s hovering above him!

The other “survives way too much” problem, yes, it’s about Dylan’s character again. The beating, falling, this guy survived almost everything. I half expected for him to survive even the bullets towards the end. Luckily, that wasn’t the case, but really, he should have been dead long before that.

The infamous turkey baster scene… Sure, it’s creepy and unsettling. But to be honest, I expected, I don’t know more? Maybe this is more of a comment on me rather than the film, but after everything I’ve heard about it, how people “hyped” it out as something so gross they couldn’t watch it… I don’t know. Unsettling? Yes. Tough to watch? Also yes? Will that scene stay with me for a while? Not really.

What hurts more than anything is I enjoyed everything about this film before the last 30 minutes. Because I like it when movies don’t have “heroes vs villains”. Where every character is somewhat of a twisted one, and it’s only up to you whether you will root for the “lesser of two evils” or whether you can sit back and be invested in the story without necessarily rooting for either character. Quite honestly, that was me. Once I’ve realised what was up with our “friendly buffed blind man”, that’s when I realised this movie has nobody to root for here, and it’s a good thing. I was admiring the balls on this film for doing that; it would have been so easy to make him the most sympathetic character, where we could justify him killing the intruders. But the film never takes the obvious route. It’s a shame nobody managed to step back while shooting this film and question whether the characters’ decisions towards the end made any sense.

Overall, Don’t Breathe is a movie that will stay with me for sure. Unfortunately, not for the reasons I thought (turkey baster!) but for remembering that there was a superb horror film here until the already dumb characters (and I am mainly talking about the robbers/intruders here) decided to act even dumber. I would still recommend this film but maybe make sure it’s nowhere near Thanksgiving. Otherwise, your turkey might be dry as fuck that year. Sure, that scene didn’t stun me as much as I thought, but I can still see some people avoiding turkey basters for a while.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

My Life as a Courgette (2016) Review – What a Film!

Advertisements

My Life as a Courgette (or Zucchini if you live in other countries) is a film I’ve heard many great things about. So my expectations were set pretty high from the start. And one day, it finally arrived on one of the streaming services I am paying for (thanks, Mubi), and I immediately put it on and hoped for the best. But I still doubted this film (a tiny bit) because of its surprising runtime – only 66 minutes! How much can you do in that amount of time? It turns out, more (way more) than some films that clock in around two hours.

I will give it to you straight; I fell in love with this film. And it’s not because of the cutesy animation style or the lovely kids’ voices (even though these elements were phenomenal), no. The main reason this film won me over is simple – it’s a kids movie that deals with A LOT of dark themes. Even Pixar movies that are brilliant regarding dealing with darker issues in their films seem almost “laughable”. I know that’s not the “correct” word because they are not. The best example I can give you is this. The main differentiator between most Pixar movies and this film would be how many things they both touch upon.

Because Pixar mastered its formula well, and usually one film deals with one major thing, and that “thing” is the main plotline throughout the film. For example, Inside Out (2015), one of my favourite Pixar films, deals (and brilliantly, may I add) with mental health and growing up. And that is important to discuss and showcase. Whereas My Life as a Courgette deals with much muddier and darker waters, from child abuse, deportation, the feeling of not being worthy/enough, and that is why you are “up for adoption”… And this is just scraping the surface.

And here’s the thing – when you write it down like that, it sounds like a lot, especially for a kids movie that’s not even that long, that can’t work, can it? That is what I would have thought before watching the film. But since I’ve seen it, I can tell you it works. This film juggles a lot, that is true. But it manages it so brilliantly you never feel overwhelmed, or it would be “too dark”, and everything, somehow, works. Well, it’s not somehow. The people behind this film crafted everything so meticulously, from the screenplay to the type of animation (that sort of reminded of me claymation); one can’t help but fall in love with this tiny movie, that could.

The most impressive thing about this movie is how emotional it makes you. One minute you want to cry because something sad happens or is mentioned, and in the next minute because something delightful and unexpected happened to one of our characters. And it never felt cheap, exploitative or wrong. And that is an achievement on its own, given the topic and imagining how Hollywood would make this film. They would make it longer by roughly 30 minutes or so and potentially hit you over the head with everything. Nothing like that ever happened here, or at least I’ve never felt like it had.

I remember seeing this film nominated for Best Animated Movie in 2017, the same year where Zootropolis or Zootopia (2016), depending on where you are, won. And back then, I was rooting for another animated movie that’s not talked about that often, Kubo and the Two Strings (2016), because that is also a criminally underseen and touching animated movie. Had I watched My Life as a Courgette before the ceremony, I wouldn’t know what movie to root for, to be quite honest with you. But I would still be disappointed that Zootopia won (even though that is also a superb animated film, but in the year when we had such unique animated features, it feels like it shouldn’t have won). And I am saying it as someone who enjoyed Zootopia.

My Life as a Courgette also showcases (as mentioned before) how much can be done with so little. I can’t imagine this movie having a huge budget, and yet, it never looked or felt cheap. You can tell most of the voice performers were first-timers and kids, but that also enhanced the movie rather than degraded it. I couldn’t imagine a kids movie could deal with a variety of darker themes in under 70 minutes, and yet again, this movie does it flawlessly. Even when I squint my eyes and try to find a fault, I am left speechless, hollow and empty. So, quite the opposite of how I felt after finishing this film.

Overall, My Life as a Courgette is a fantastic, brilliant movie that everybody should watch. Yes, it deals with a lot of things that many movies (let alone animated films!) shy away from, but it does it so well, in such an eloquent manner, you will be invested in all the characters, not just our main hero, who calls himself Courgette. You might have noticed I didn’t talk about the story that much, and that was on purpose because I would love for you to experience this yourself. It’s been a while since I’ve loved a movie this much.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Bacchus Lady (2016) Review – Old People Need Some Love Too

Advertisements

I am not going to lie the only reason I’ve watched this film is the “groundbreaking” Yuh-Jung Youn. As believe it or not, she’s the first Korean actor ever to win an Oscar (she won it for her performance in the movie Minari (2020) that is on my ever-growing list of films to watch). Plus, The Bacchus Lady managed to combine two topics seemingly nobody wants to see/think about – older people struggling financially and having sex. This film combines these two issues into one – what if we made a movie about older people having sex for money BECAUSE they are struggling financially? Yes, it’s true, and apparently, it is a thing in South Korea.

You know I don’t usually post plot synopsis, but in this case, I think it’s a must, as I don’t believe this would become my “most read review ever” by any means because the film is as niche as it gets.

The Bacchus Lady looks into the issue of elderly prostitution in South Korea. So-Young, an elderly lady who provides sex services to the male senior citizens using the pretext of selling Bacchus (an energy drink) to them. When So-Young picks up a Korean-Filipino boy named Min-Ho from the clinic she visits after Min-Ho’s mother stabs the doctor (Min-Ho’s father), she takes care of him while seeking a living through prostitution. From her interactions with her former clients, she finds that the golden age in their silver years may not be that bright after all.

Source: IMDb.com

And that is precisely what the film is about. We follow Yuh-Jung, who is superb in this film and see her “stumbling” upon this kid. And you can tell she knows she shouldn’t just take him. But she is worried for him, and she just wants to help. So she starts to split the little she has with him. Luckily, she’s got some friends who also stand by her (from a one-legged man to a transwoman who is also a prostitute and the one-legged man secretly loves), so we get to see her interactions with the little kid. And her life, struggling to get by, doing what she does.

But believe it or not, this is merely a “B plot”. The main storyline is her working, and us, seeing what she needs to go through. The Bacchus Lady never felt cheap or exploitative. It deals with sex work and Yuh-Jung’s storyline very well. It never goes into details; it gives you “enough” so you don’t get to romanticize anything but never takes it over the top. And more importantly, it shows you something we don’t want to think about – how we treat older people and sex workers. And now, combine these two.

But even though this movie will make you think about these issues, it never feels preachy or over-the-top. It is subtle; it takes its time to tell the story it wants to tell, leaves you with some questions (mainly about Yuh-Jung’s family, I thought that storyline was done very well), but most of all, it leaves you almost wanting more. Which is a weird thing to say, considering this is not a cheery movie by any means. But it deals with every topic it touches with such gentle touch of humanity, it slowly gets to you. Or, at least it got to me.

The only thing I would say “against” this film – sometimes the pacing was a bit off. Not often, but especially towards the end, I could see trimming about ten minutes or so from the film would improve it. But that’s just a tiny nitpick.

Overall, The Bacchus Lady is a movie like no other. Sure, that’s because it primarily deals with a topic like no other film would (at least I don’t remember a mainstream movie about a senior citizen having to be a prostitute to support themselves). If that previous sentence didn’t deter you, I would highly encourage you to search for this movie and watch it. I don’t think it matters if you like it or not, because it’s a film you won’t forget any time soon. It stays with you. And to be clear, Yuh-Jung Youn was absolutely superb in this role. I can’t wait to finally watch Minari.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke