Tag Archives: 2023

Movies or shows released in 2023.

The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023) Review – Mamma Mia!

Advertisements

One of the most popular game series of all time has had it… let’s say tough on the big screen. For the longest time, we’ve only had Super Mario Bros. (1993, my review here), and if you had the pleasure of seeing this masterpiece, you know why Nintendo was more cautious than ever about anything movie related. That is until now, and it seemed that history would repeat itself. I can’t think of anyone who was happy with casting Chris Pratt as Mario besides him. And the fact this was from the same studio as The Minions movies also didn’t inspire confidence. But then the first reviews came out, and to my surprise, most people were praising it! Sure, nothing spectacular, but it was intriguing enough for me to catch it in the cinemas.

Before we go any further, I just let you know one thing – I have not played any Mario game ever since… maybe the original? Or its sequel and that was probably 20 years ago. Yep, you read it right; I have never played any Mario Kart games or Mario Maker games… Basically, if you can name it and it has Mario in it, I haven’t played it. The reason is simple, I am not a big gamer anymore, and when I play something, those are not games I would want to spend my time on; they are just not appealing. But that doesn’t mean I don’t like Mario or this franchise quite the opposite; I think it’s a great, colourful world that is simply not something I want to spend my limited hours on. Why am I writing this? It is simple – you should know that my opinion of this movie is about the film, as I have no attachments to any games. Sure, even I know Mario, Luigi, Peach, Bowser, Toad etc., but I can’t judge the movie based on how close it was to the games or whether I caught some Easter eggs.

The first thing that hit me about The Super Mario Bros. Movie was its animation. It was pleasant, vivid, and, most importantly, it resembled the characters even I (not a gamer) was familiar with. The second thing that I thought was odd was how we started on our Earth, and we see both brothers as plumbers. I don’t know whether it was needed, but I understand it was to shut up people who’ve always complained about Mario being a plumber and not doing any plumbing. The “Earth” part was the weakest part of the film; the moment both our brothers finally enter the Mushroom Kingdom is when this movie finally starts.

And once it started, it was… pretty good? Again, don’t expect anything Pixar-like; this movie knows what it is and goes for it; however, most jokes work, the story makes sense, and it’s only 92 minutes! One of the best decisions the directors made was making this film tight. There is always something happening, I was rarely bored, and nothing ever felt “disposable”. There were stakes to this film and its story, everything felt consequential, and Bowser felt like a threat. And that’s all I could ask for from a movie about Italian plumbers.

Let’s talk about that casting. Chris Pratt would not be my first choice, but I feel like he became one of those “we hate him because we’ve already decided who he is” people. He’s not my favourite actor, but I think the hate he is getting is a bit too much. And he was perfectly fine as Mario. Sure; could you name five to ten people who would have been better? Probably. But he did a good job. Anya Taylor-Joy is always a joy (some pun intended) to listen to, and we have many others, mostly comedians (Keegan-Michael KeyCharlie Day or Seth Rogen), who have also had their moments. But, there was someone who stole the film, the same as his character. Jack Black. Before he started to sing (as he does in most of his movies), I wouldn’t have recognised him at all. Yes, I knew he was voicing him, but had I not known, I would have been shocked to learn that it was him, as it felt like he gave his soul to this role. While others were fine and sounded pretty much the same, Jack put on a performance. And his song Peaches is a bop; I secretly hope it might get an Oscar nomination.

What I was pleasantly shocked by was this blue character called Lumalee. I didn’t recognise this character at all, so I don’t know whether they are part of some game or they made it up for this film. Nevertheless, it had a delightful sense of dark, existential humour, but all lines were voiced with this baby voice. At some point, I even wondered how did the directors get this material past “would someone think of the children” people. One example that may showcase why I enjoyed this character this much: “The only hope is the sweet release of death.” Whoever came up with this character, bravo.

The only negative is the first 20 minutes are not as fun as the rest of this film. Also, you can precisely tell what will happen at any given point. But I can’t hold it against this movie too much, given its history and everything that went against this film too, for it to be a quick, enjoyable enough ride is sometimes enough. I wonder how much I would like it or not if I played any of the newer games.

Overall, The Super Mario Bros. Movie might be one of the biggest surprises of 2023. The movie I didn’t expect anything from; I wouldn’t have dreamed of going to see it in the cinemas, and yet, I did and had a great time. Sure, it’s mindless, vividly colourful fun with a dash of dark humour, but sometimes, that’s all you need. If you have kids, you can do much worse than this movie, that’s for sure. I would be open to a sequel, is a sentence I thought I would never say in the same breath as “The Super Mario Bros. Movie“.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023) Review – A Weird Film on So Many Levels

Advertisements

I can’t remember an MCU film that would have had so much going against it from the moment the first trailer dropped. People made fun of the CGI and questioned whether this film would be any good… little did we know that was not the end of the discourse about this film, given the antagonist (on and off the screen) Jonathan Majors has had the sharpest downfall since… Honestly, I can’t even think of a different name, as he was popular, he was the next big thing (not just within the MCU), and because of him (by all accounts) not being as “nice” (read more about it for yourself here), he has pretty much ruled himself out of Hollywood for the next couple of years. And honestly, what a shame, given he is a talented actor and the best part of this film.

When you want to talk about Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, you can’t avoid talking about Jonathan, so we might as well address that first. No wonder he was supposed to be the next “big bad” in the MCU; given his presence and acting chops, he is the one reason I am rating this movie above average, as I had fun with his portrayal of Kang. I wonder who will take over (read: who will they recast instead of him), as it’s pretty much certain he is out of the MCU. Now, we need to be adults here, meaning just because I liked him in this film, that doesn’t mean I somehow support him or “stand with him”. Nah, fuck that. We have always had the separation between the artist and the art they produce, and when you watch this movie, it’s not hard to see he is the best part about it.

Why is he the best part? Well, you can tell Peyton Reed wanted this film to feel more epic, as he stated in many interviews (for example, here) about his efforts to make the third Ant-Man movie feel different, much bigger than its predecessors. That all sounds swell, except for the part where he didn’t stop to think why some fans like the Ant-Man movies. I always thought they were just alright, but I know the first two films have their fans because they are fairly low-stakes movies. Therefore, changing what you are in a third film does not seem as clever because then you turn this jokey and fun(ish) character into something he isn’t.

The movie felt like a CGI fest. I will admit that in many scenes, the CGI looked pretty awesome (definitely improved from the first trailers), but even the CGI is not stunning all the time. I have noticed the moment we zoom in a bit, that is when the CGI starts to look a bit “funny”, to say it politely. When the movie shows us these wide shots, I realise those scenes are still all CGI, but they look pretty great. It was when we got closer to our characters and action that is when the CGI failed.

Speaking of characters… where is everyone? I understand since the premise was “the family gets stuck in the Quantum Realm”, there wasn’t space for Michael Peña, but there should have been. As much as I like and admire Paul Rudd, he isn’t your stereotypical “leading man”. To explain, he is a gem, a great actor, but I think he is one of those who works best with somebody who is as funny as him, maybe even funnier. And Paul desperately needed someone of Peña’s comedic chops to bounce off of. Sure, we were more focused on the family bit and Kang being the next big bad, but honestly, the film didn’t have any, for lack of a better word, soul.

I like Michael Douglas, but he didn’t have much to do here; Evangeline Lilly also felt underused and re-casting Cassie with Kathryn Newton… I didn’t mind that, but it felt like it went against “the family” theme. I thought the main issue with this film is it should have never tried to be something bigger, more exciting, this CGI fest. Having said all that, is it as bad as everyone on the Internet claims? No, I didn’t think so. The problem is this film is the most average film, where there isn’t much to talk about except for Jonathan Majors. But given what happened with him now, it felt wrong to enjoy his performance. I wouldn’t say Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is a bad movie; I thought it felt almost like there was a curse against it. From the questionable trailers that made the CGI look much worse than it is, to the film just being average, to Jonathan Majors being a dick (to put it mildly), everything has gone against this film.

Overall, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is the most aggressively “mid” film you will see in ages. It has some pacing issues, the CGI (especially in the close-up shots) looks funky, and the only bright thing about it no longer matters, given he will be re-casted. If you have enjoyed the previous Ant-Man movies, brace yourself for something completely different, as this movie’s director decided it will be the most epic film yet. Unfortunately, the hits don’t land, the CGI is not “reliably awesome”, and Ant-Man’s character works better as a part of a group rather than him being “the” superhero. But, I will also say, after everything I have heard about this movie, it is not AS BAD as some fans claimed. It is, unfortunately, mediocre, and the best thing about this movie is someone; who we no longer speak of.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 (2023) Review – So Close, Yet so Far

Advertisements

I will be the first one to admit that the Guardians films never hit me as much as others around me. Since the first Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) came out, I have seen and met many people who adored that film. And I never hated it, but I “just” liked it. And the same happened with the sequel from 2017, which I also like but do not love. Sure, I haven’t watched either of them since then, so I might feel different now, but I doubt it. And the reason for that is Vol.3 is the best Guardians film, and I loved… some scenes/pieces of it. But this film is one of those “the pieces are better than the overall picture”.

I will have to do something I usually avoid, especially with movies as new as this one, but I will have to go into full spoiler talk soon, as I can’t otherwise explain my issues with this film. As I alluded to, there were moments I thought this film was brilliant. Some scenes and characters worked for me, and I liked what the movie was doing. But the longer the film went on, the more I found myself frustrated with the writers wanting to make you feel some stakes and never committing to anything meaningful. Despite the fact “meaningful” no longer matters in the MCU, when your characters can simply come back from the dead, and all we get is a jokey explanation for it.

Before diving into the spoilers, I must say I have enjoyed the focus on Rocket, I liked what they did with his character, the things that were hinted at in the past paid off, and we finally saw his (very dark) past. I must command that decision, as this film might just be MCU’s darkest film to date. It’s not necessarily scary (even though I can imagine some scenes giving 10-year-olds nightmares), but most of Rocket’s past and the main storyline are darker than usual because it touches on real-life things (the most obvious example is the cruelty of animal testing). I liked that aspect and how this movie felt like one of the most “adult” MCU films to date. Hence I regret that I can’t just find the strength to reward this film with a higher rating for a few reasons.

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

This might be an issue on my receiver; for example, I might have missed something in some other MCU film since Avengers: Endgame (2019), but how the fuck is Gamora alive? Yes, they say it quite clear she isn’t the same Gamora and something about her being from some alternate reality or something, but… The film really skips over that. It made me question whether I have missed some Marvel special explaining this or whether they loved Zoe Saldaña so much they had to bring her back. Look, you don’t have to convince me hard for Zoe’s comeback; I am a big fan of hers. But her death meant something in the Endgame and for Star Lord’s character (Chris Pratt) too; as seen in the beginning of this film. And yeah, I have read the official justification on IMDb, but… it doesn’t work for me. As much as I love Zoe and her portrayal of Gamora, I feel like not having her in this film would have had a more meaningful impact on this film, like there are actual stakes. That brings me to my biggest problem with this film.

“Stakes? What is this strange word; is it French? Don’t know it!” – says Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3. As the film constantly hints at everybody being killed at some point (and I mean every major actor), and just when you think they are actually going through with it, they are back alive. The most egregious examples are Drax (Dave Bautista) and Star-Lord. Drax gets shot straight to his chest and back, collapses to the ground, and epically sad music starts playing; you think that’s it; there is no way he is recovering… Nah, get fucked! He’s fine on his feet (well being carried by Mantis, portrayed by Pom Klementieff), and it’s not addressed at all afterwards; he is just peachy for the rest of the film. The same with Star-Lord; he (yet again) freezes up in space, and it seems like there is no saving him until the almost literal deus-ex-machine (in the form of Will Poulter) saves him.

I understand that, to some degree, the same can be said about most MCU films, but here, especially with the story being centred on endings and new beginnings, it felt like the movie wanted to have it both ways. They want you to feel like this story is so different and anything can happen, but the moment they can be different than the rest of the MCU, they always chicken out, just so we could have the actors available for other movies or possibly one last Guardians film… Who knows. I don’t mind suspending my disbelief, especially if watching a comic book movie. However, if you brand yourself as the “edgy one”, like this crazy, quirky comic-book film where anything can happen, and you make it so close to having a few meaningful deaths and then always pull back at the very last second, it feels contradictory.

Which was a shame as I have enjoyed most of the film; as mentioned before, Rocket’s incredibly sad backstory was heart-breaking, and with his almost death and coming back alive, I was ok with it. Because we spent so much time with him, I didn’t feel cheated by that, and I am glad he is now the new leader of this brand new team of Guardians. I also enjoyed the villain (portrayed by Chukwudi Iwuji) despite him getting almost cartoony towards the end, but overall he definitely belongs to the conversation of most intriguing MCU villains. I also need to shout out Bautista and Pom Klementieff, as both of their characters serve mainly as comedic reliefs, but they still managed to find some scenes to shine and have an impact. I don’t think they get enough credit for their work, especially the comedy elements that could have turned annoying fast, and yet they never failed to at least make me smile, if not a full-on laugh.

It will be interesting to see whether we will ever get the “original” Guardians, as a few have left the team, but given all of them are still alive, I would not rule it out. And I am looking forward to seeing what this new team can do, but it will be weird without James Gunn. Hopefully, Marvel will take some notes and hire some other, not mainstream director(s), and give them more of a “free range” over the film. Even though they might not be 100% my cup of hot cocoa, I can’t deny the success this trilogy (well, trilogy and the Holiday Special (2022)) has had. And this one is definitely the wildest, most out-there film yet, and this is precisely what Marvel needs – something a bit more out there to break through the mould of averageness.

Overall, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 is the best Guardians film by far. It still has some issues, mainly not being as “daring” as the movie seems to think it is, but it is a good time with a bunch of unique characters that gel together well. That and the soundtrack is always spot-on. I would say, if you loved the previous two Guardians movies, this is an easy choice. If you are like me and still haven’t gotten the love for these unique weirdos, I would still recommend it, as the film has enough themes and well-shot action sequences to keep you entertained.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

John Wick: Chapter 4 (2023) Review – The Best One Yet

Advertisements

After delivering almost a perfect trilogy of action films (my reviews can be found herethere, and also here), John Wick is back and longer than ever. No, that’s not a euphemism (but it can be if you try hard enough ;-)) Chapter 4 is one hour longer than the first John Wick film. Therefore, despite the bad-ass trailers and my positive attitude towards these films (now I guess it’s a franchise), I was a bit worried. It is a fourth one; it’s almost three hours long; there is no way this film will deliver, right? All my worries disappeared when I finally sat in the cinema and caught this one (better late than never). And the further the film went, the more I loved it. And there are several reasons for that.

One of those reasons must be the casting. Sure, we can talk about the main stars like Keanu ReevesLaurence FishburneIan McShane or Lance Reddick, for whom this was his last fully filmed movie; may he rest in power. They all know their roles well, and despite some line readings that may be leaning too much toward them being bigger than life (mainly with Keanu and Laurence’s characters), it never distracted me. But this franchise knows how to cast the “side roles”, and this one might have been the best one yet. Everyone from Hiroyuki SanadaRina Sawayama and Shamier Anderson to our antagonists Bill Skarsgård and Donnie Yen were outstanding in their roles, each serving a different purpose; they never once felt like an unnecessary character. And especially Donnie’s character, one who can go toe-to-toe with John Wick himself; and survive… He might have been my favourite character in this film. I wonder whether they made him blind to equalise the “playing field”, as the real-life Donnie Yen is pretty much John Wick if you do some reading on him. I am not saying he is in some sort of mysterious world of assassins and kills people on the side; all I am saying is he could do that if he wanted to; that’s how good of a fighter he is.

Halfway through this film, when John survives yet another “how the fuck did he survive that?” moment, I began to wonder why am I not mad about it? It usually bothers me when our protagonist turns into a superhero, and there are no stakes. But then it hit me, or to be precise, they hit John again in another well-shot, well-edited action sequence. That is the key; I am willing to forgive a lot (and I suspect many others are too) as long as you give me something unique, like an action sequence shot from the top, with no (visible) cuts for a couple of minutes. Or your “standard” fight scene with slow and steady camera movements, where we cut only when necessary. Yes, I am describing what’s been the staple of the John Wick franchise since its first movie, but I feel like they have taken the action to the next level in Chapter 4. This movie has several long action sequences (after all, it is almost three hours long!), but they never felt the same. The one in Osaka feels different than the one in Germany or the other towards the end in Paris. They are specific to their location, to whoever is in them, but they have one thing in common, they are always well rehearsed, and you can tell they spend hours upon hours shooting them. And I appreciate it.

I think that is the main difference between this franchise and something like the Fast & Furious franchise. Both are “silly” movies on the surface, with regular people doing something special. But, and this is Megan Thee Stallion’s level of but(t), one franchise expects you to understand that all people within the universe are indestructible machines with a lot of CGI behind them. The other tries to justify most of its shenanigans (like bullet-proof suits and many different rules in the world of ruthless killers), and when it’s time to “let loose”, it gives you the unbelievable action of “hero beats 100 men” or “hero survives this and that!” scenes that feel real. They feel real, even though we all know deep down John Wick wouldn’t have survived 10% of what happens to him in this film, let alone all four movies combined, but the way everything is shot and edited, the way we can tell what is happening, where everyone is, that is where the cookie crumbles. So yeah, I am more willing to forgive some of these “there is no way he would survive that!” scenes as long as I can see everything happening clearly, without a headache or a pause button.

I also loved how this film ended. Without going into any spoilers, I don’t know whether we will get any more John Wick films. I know there are two TV shows in production right now (The Continental (2023) and Ballerina (2024) starring Ana de Armas), and I will be checking them both out; especially looking forward to Ballerina because Ana de Armas kicking ass? You don’t have to threaten me twice with a good time! But regarding any “official” John Wick films, they made it so the story is reasonably closed after this one, but I can also see how they could “reopen” it if they wanted to do John Wick 5. I wouldn’t mind if this were the end of the films, and they would just continue with shows. But, if we have to get a fifth one, they better bring back Chad Stahelski as a director, as he is currently one of the best (if not THE best) living directors who understand how to shoot compelling action sequences. He has proven himself several times now, so I am not afraid to make this statement; he gets everything, from making every sequence pop to understanding the audience is willing to accept (read: forgive) a thing here and there if you make it compelling enough.

Overall, John Wick: Chapter 4 is a blast. If you are worried about the runtime, don’t be. This movie justifies it, and I never felt it because the film feels like you are on several different rollercoasters throughout it. Each one is different from the last, but there wasn’t one that would bore you or leave you cold. To top it all off, we have gotten a plethora of outstanding supporting actors, who I hope to see more of in one of those TV shows. But most importantly, it is a satisfying conclusion (?) to this John Wick saga if the creators decide we won’t make any of these films anymore. I can’t imagine anyone who loved the previous three films being disappointed with this one.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Last of Us Review (Season One) – The Best Video Game Adaptation

Advertisements

Let’s get one thing straight, I know writing “the best video game adaptation” isn’t such a high bar to conquer. In the sea of either awfulness; or pure mediocrity (I can list many films, but let’s just not), there were only some that stood out. My personal favourite was always the first Silent Hill (2006) or the Resident Evil franchise, despite most of those films being objectively bad. And this is the thing, even though I could find myself enjoying most of them, I could tell they were not all that. But HBO struck gold with The Last of Us. One could say it’s easy to adapt one of the best games of the last decade, possibly in the 2000s. But here’s the thing, had we gotten this adaptation around 2015/16, I bet you it would still be a mediocre, 100-minute “horror” that would disregard what made the game so unique and beloved. And I think this is what the people behind this show managed to crack – they didn’t treat it as a “video game adaptation”. They treated it as a story that had to be told properly and translated well into the cinematic medium.

You can imagine there are already many “hot takes” about this show, the latest being that this show is better than the game. And even though this might sound odd, you are comparing apples and oranges here, people. Hear me out. Both are excellent in their own medium, and that is the point of well-made adaptation. This show (as great as it is) doesn’t compare to the game because it doesn’t have to. This show has details the game doesn’t have and vice versa. It is the same argument as whether books or films are better in the Harry Potter franchise. The answer is: “Depends on you and what you are in the mood for.” The books have much more details and characters the films are condensed in a more cinematically pleasing package. And that is my point; I think this is how they “cracked the code”. We don’t just want to see the same scenes replied on the big screen. We want to see the same characters with their strengths and flaws. But on the opposite side of the flip coin, many other films based on video games failed when they showed us the characters we recognised but put them in a generic environment. Or, like Warcraft (2016), you had to know most of the world to enjoy the film. There is a very thin, prickly line between copying the best scenes from the game onto the screen without going overboard, and The Last of Us nailed it. Why? Because they weren’t afraid to change the details. And that is why I won’t tell you I prefer this show over the game or the other way around. Because the game is perfect when I control it, control our characters. The tv show works beautifully, when I want to watch it. That is the beauty of different mediums.

The answer is so evident, but Craig Mazin and Neil Druckmann understood that no matter how beloved the game is (and the game is in my TOP 3 games of all time), they need to change some details. But here is the thing about that those changes have to serve the cinematic story; they can’t be random. For example, the fungus, how it spreads, how the pandemic broke through, we got that, and they have tweaked that slightly from the game. They gave us quite a few scenes that were not in the game, and I love them because they made sense within this “TV” universe.

The only valid complaint (because we have to address the anti-LGBTQ review bombing soon) I have read from the fans is they wished there would be more action scenes. Because that is the most noticeable change the creators have made – we get much fewer action sequences, especially with Infected, let alone Clickers or Bloaters. And, on the one hand, sure, I wouldn’t mind one or two more of those tense scenes like in episode two. However, this is where I bring it back to my original point about different mediums and why ultimately, they succeeded – this is not what the game is about. Again, hear me out. Sure, do you kill a lot of infected? Yes. But had we gotten just nine or ten episodes of that, how different would that be from other shows? I admire the decision and the foresight to understand that to translate what was so special about this game to the TV screen, they had to get rid of most of the action. Because you can see/get post-apocalyptic action on almost every corner of pop culture today, but that wasn’t what made this game win over 200+ game of the year awards. It was the flawed, broken characters. So I didn’t mind it being less actiony or horror-y because they nailed the atmosphere, the characters, and their dynamic. But before we talk about them, let’s talk about the elephant in the room.

If you go through the IMDb episode list, you may notice two episodes rated lower than the rest, episode three (Long, Long Time) and seven (Left Behind). Now, were these just two random episodes the creators “dropped the ball” on? No, they were both as great as the rest of this show. What they showed, however, were characters who were openly gay. Both characters, by the way, were gay in the fucking game too! That isn’t even the “they changed things” argument; no, because if you go to the game, one of those characters is hinted at being gay, and the other is openly gay. And somehow, in 2023, it still rubs people the wrong way…? Honestly, this is tiring. If you look at these episodes, they were both done in such a great way it’s hard to hate them. Especially episode seven is literally a copy of the game’s DLC, called Left Behind. They hit all the notes they were supposed from that DLC, and I loved it. And regarding episode three, I liked the novelty. They showed us how some other people would handle a pandemic like that. For example, you always see the survivors who shoot their way through everything; you see looters, rapists, murderers, and the worst of humanity. But then there is this character who simply wants to be left alone. He is crafty and was prepping for something like this for a while (all the doomsday preppers must have felt validated). And yeah, he happens to be gay. Jesus, people grow the fuck up. Gay people exist. And some could kick your ass whilst having a lovely duck with wine as their dinner later on.

Anyways, the show (the same as the game) is about Joel and Ellie. And when Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey got their roles, I was cautiously optimistic. I knew them both to be great actors; I just wasn’t sure they were “suited” for these roles. And now, I am more than happy to say they were the perfect choices for their roles. Pedro brings the “lone wolf” quality, yet they made him more vulnerable than the game, which I thought was a great decision. It gave us more glimpse into Joel’s character, and his hesitancy about Ellie and their relationship between them was superb. You get why he is hesitant to let her get close to him. But when the show needs it, he is a ruthless killer, the same as in the game. And in the same vain, you understand that he isn’t a hero, nor a villain. He is just a guy who has been through a lot and is just dealing with shit. A lot of shit.

Bella got me from the second episode (as she wasn’t in much of the first episode), and ever since then, she slowly transformed into the Ellie we knew from the game. Foul-mouthed, loyal, honest and caring, Bella Ramsey managed to portray all of these and much more. She gave Ellie everything she had and then some. And her chemistry with Pedro, aka Joel… simply perfect. At the start, you believe they don’t like each other, only for you to see them as this daughter/dad. And hence the ending (the same as the game’s) hurts again, especially for us who played the second game (my review for The Last of Us: Part II can be found here). The amount of almost invisible setup they did for the next season or two… will be the real test of whether this show will be “one of the greats”. Again, the gamers know why, but if you think this season was dark with characters making questionable choices, you have seen nothing yet.

And that is the thing, that is the key to “cracking this video game adaptation” code. The Last of Us was never about the pandemic or the infected. It was about us going through this world with two characters that act and feel like real people. Both have done questionable, sometimes straight-up evil stuff (albeit Ellie not as much in this season, but don’t worry, it is coming) and yet, because we saw their entire journey, we understand them and even root for them. Despite knowing deep down, these are more complex and nuanced characters whose actions can be, at times, hard to defend. There are no heroes or villains.

Overall, The Last of Us came, saw, and slaughtered the competition of video game adaptations. Which was unfair, to begin with; given their quality, it would be like Gordon Ramsay challenging me to a cook-off. And don’t get me wrong, I know my around in the kitchen, but that is just unfair. I enjoyed this show; I enjoyed all the changes they made because they worked for the TV medium, and the best part about it is anybody can enjoy it. Have you played the game ten times? You will probably love it! Have you never heard of it? You will probably love it too! This adaptation is as rare as they come, and if the only argument is “well, is the game or show better?” we know we live in a great timeline. Also, fuck the anti-LGBTQ review bombers.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Happy New Year!

Advertisements

Hello movie friends,

Yet again, we have managed to survive another year, so I wish you all a very happy new year and let’s hope 2023 will be a good one.

I will continue writing my thoughts about movies and TV shows, and I can’t thank you enough whether you read them occasionally or every week. I don’t know how to express my gratitude, so I will simply say; I appreciate any of you taking the time out of your day to read my (occasionally) random thoughts about films, shows and anything else.

Let’s make 2023 an even better one!

Luke