Tag Archives: MCU

All reviews for the Marvel Cinematic Universe – from movies to shows and specials.

The Marvels (2023) Review – Much Better Than Expected!

Advertisements

It’s hard to talk about The Marvels on its own merit, given that ever since it was announced, everything was going against this film. From many fans discussing whether we have superhero fatigue or are we not simply getting “the good stuff” we have gotten accustomed to, to many others having a problem with this movie because of the cast (some people really can’t stand Brie Larson for reasons), I was never so sure that an MCU movie will bomb. Not because I wanted it to, but because many had decided this film would be the worst thing ever months before it was released. And honestly, it’s a shame it’s bombing at the box office because if you put everything else aside and focus on the movie itself, it’s actually pretty fun.

What I admire about The Marvels is that it is a movie that knows what it is, what it wants to be and say and just goes with it. It doesn’t take itself too seriously but also hits you emotionally at times, and it’s all due to our three leading actresses, Brie Larson, Teyonah Parris and Iman Vellani. Especially Iman and her Ms. Marvel was a highlight of every scene she was in as she was purely vibing; there is no other way to describe it. She understands and mirrors her character so well as Ms. Marvel needs to get used to the fact she is a superhero, the same way Iman is getting used to her being in the big leagues and being famous, and I am honestly so happy for her. She radiates joy on and off the screen, and I hope she won’t lose it. I am all in for her to be one of the centre figures for the next MCU stage.

Where Iman brought vibes and fun, Brie and Teyonah brought the soul of this movie. At first, I wasn’t sure about their “conflict”, but once we got the flashback from Monica’s (Teyonah’s character) perspective, it all clicked and felt real. The relationship between her and Captain Marvel helped ground this movie full of space hijinx. What also helped was that once all three ladies were on the screen together, their chemistry was off the charts. I enjoyed their interactions; I liked how their powers were intertwined, and they had to figure out the best way to utilize that to their advantage. It was mainly those three actresses and the chemistry between them that I enjoyed The Marvels.

Where the film lost me slightly is the MCU’s biggest weakness ever since it started – the villain. Yes, Marvel has delivered some great villains over the years, but mostly, they are not memorable or that much menacing. Zawe Ashton, aka Dar-Benn, was perfectly fine, and the actress did as best as she could with her role. Ultimately, the problem was that they had to cram so much backstory into this film that we never truly see Dar-Benn as the complex villain she should have been. Especially in today’s world, full of wars where more and more people realise not everything is black or white, her character and what she stands for should have been one of the most complex arcs in the MCU. But since there is not enough time to delve into her past fully, it all feels rushed. And again, this is not Zawe’s fault; this is Marvel being Marvel, again.

I believe they forgot how they became so big – by taking chances. How cool would it be, since Marvel has to release 12.409 TV shows by the end of 2025, if one show was about Dar-Benn and how she became this leader who was there for her people? How interesting would it be if we had gotten a limited show where Captain Marvel, one of the mightiest superheroes ever, is viewed as a supervillain by an entire civilization, and we would see Dar-Benn’s rise through the civil war and chaos that ensued once Captain Marvel was done “saving” their planet? And I am not even talking about this show having eight episodes. Give us two or three as almost a prequel to this movie. That way, her character would have been much more impactful, and The Marvels would stand a chance to resonate more with people and say something more than this surface-level stuff.

One thing I didn’t expect is how silly this movie will be. From the visit to the planet that’s 99.6% covered by water (I won’t tell you what happens there, you just need to see it) to a surprising song from a famous musical that makes so much sense, and it’s also silly as fuck. And this is where I need to go back to my point from the beginning of this review. I think that if this exact movie were directed by someone like James Gunn, with little to no changes, people would be tripping over themselves, praising how quirky and fun it is. And yet, when Nia DaCosta tries to give The Marvels its unique flair, people are suddenly over it. What a weird thing… Isn’t it?

Look, The Marvels isn’t amongst the top echelon of the MCU; that’s not what I am saying. But it is a fun movie with silly moments mixed with more serious stuff; it knows what it is and how to have fun. It also has a generic villain you will forget about the next day. And what I just did there is I described about 70% of all the MCU. But it’s only this movie that is the box office bomb, and people are “very angry with”… I wonder why… Anyway, I don’t think it deserves all the bashing this film is currently getting, and I hope people will give it a chance and not pre-judge it because they heard how bad it is. See it for yourself; give it a chance.

Overall, The Marvels was a fun time in the cinemas. I enjoyed my time with all three leads; I liked how we finally got the confirmation of what is coming next for the MCU (yes, I am talking about the middle of the credits scene), and I can’t wait to see more of Kamala Khan, aka Ms. Marvel in the MCU. Sure, the villain is a bit bland, but the rest of the film held my attention, and I enjoyed myself. It’s definitely not the worst MCU movie, not by a mile. And if you are looking for something fun to watch, I would recommend The Marvels.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania (2023) Review – A Weird Film on So Many Levels

Advertisements

I can’t remember an MCU film that would have had so much going against it from the moment the first trailer dropped. People made fun of the CGI and questioned whether this film would be any good… little did we know that was not the end of the discourse about this film, given the antagonist (on and off the screen) Jonathan Majors has had the sharpest downfall since… Honestly, I can’t even think of a different name, as he was popular, he was the next big thing (not just within the MCU), and because of him (by all accounts) not being as “nice” (read more about it for yourself here), he has pretty much ruled himself out of Hollywood for the next couple of years. And honestly, what a shame, given he is a talented actor and the best part of this film.

When you want to talk about Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, you can’t avoid talking about Jonathan, so we might as well address that first. No wonder he was supposed to be the next “big bad” in the MCU; given his presence and acting chops, he is the one reason I am rating this movie above average, as I had fun with his portrayal of Kang. I wonder who will take over (read: who will they recast instead of him), as it’s pretty much certain he is out of the MCU. Now, we need to be adults here, meaning just because I liked him in this film, that doesn’t mean I somehow support him or “stand with him”. Nah, fuck that. We have always had the separation between the artist and the art they produce, and when you watch this movie, it’s not hard to see he is the best part about it.

Why is he the best part? Well, you can tell Peyton Reed wanted this film to feel more epic, as he stated in many interviews (for example, here) about his efforts to make the third Ant-Man movie feel different, much bigger than its predecessors. That all sounds swell, except for the part where he didn’t stop to think why some fans like the Ant-Man movies. I always thought they were just alright, but I know the first two films have their fans because they are fairly low-stakes movies. Therefore, changing what you are in a third film does not seem as clever because then you turn this jokey and fun(ish) character into something he isn’t.

The movie felt like a CGI fest. I will admit that in many scenes, the CGI looked pretty awesome (definitely improved from the first trailers), but even the CGI is not stunning all the time. I have noticed the moment we zoom in a bit, that is when the CGI starts to look a bit “funny”, to say it politely. When the movie shows us these wide shots, I realise those scenes are still all CGI, but they look pretty great. It was when we got closer to our characters and action that is when the CGI failed.

Speaking of characters… where is everyone? I understand since the premise was “the family gets stuck in the Quantum Realm”, there wasn’t space for Michael Peña, but there should have been. As much as I like and admire Paul Rudd, he isn’t your stereotypical “leading man”. To explain, he is a gem, a great actor, but I think he is one of those who works best with somebody who is as funny as him, maybe even funnier. And Paul desperately needed someone of Peña’s comedic chops to bounce off of. Sure, we were more focused on the family bit and Kang being the next big bad, but honestly, the film didn’t have any, for lack of a better word, soul.

I like Michael Douglas, but he didn’t have much to do here; Evangeline Lilly also felt underused and re-casting Cassie with Kathryn Newton… I didn’t mind that, but it felt like it went against “the family” theme. I thought the main issue with this film is it should have never tried to be something bigger, more exciting, this CGI fest. Having said all that, is it as bad as everyone on the Internet claims? No, I didn’t think so. The problem is this film is the most average film, where there isn’t much to talk about except for Jonathan Majors. But given what happened with him now, it felt wrong to enjoy his performance. I wouldn’t say Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is a bad movie; I thought it felt almost like there was a curse against it. From the questionable trailers that made the CGI look much worse than it is, to the film just being average, to Jonathan Majors being a dick (to put it mildly), everything has gone against this film.

Overall, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is the most aggressively “mid” film you will see in ages. It has some pacing issues, the CGI (especially in the close-up shots) looks funky, and the only bright thing about it no longer matters, given he will be re-casted. If you have enjoyed the previous Ant-Man movies, brace yourself for something completely different, as this movie’s director decided it will be the most epic film yet. Unfortunately, the hits don’t land, the CGI is not “reliably awesome”, and Ant-Man’s character works better as a part of a group rather than him being “the” superhero. But, I will also say, after everything I have heard about this movie, it is not AS BAD as some fans claimed. It is, unfortunately, mediocre, and the best thing about this movie is someone; who we no longer speak of.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Werewolf by Night (2022) Review – This Might Be The Way

Advertisements

I might have discovered “the theme” for Phase 4 of the MCU. Some say it’s “multiverse”, and others might say “post-blip madness”, but I see it differently. Due to the variety of movies and shows we have gotten over the past few years, I believe Marvel is now in their experimental phase. I believe the technical term is “throw everything on the wall and see what sticks”. And I understand many people aren’t… exactly happy about this, but I respect it. Because it gives us new things to marvel at (I see myself out), and even if something doesn’t work as much cough, (Eternals 2021, my review herecough, I still would rather see somebody swing big and miss than the same old, same old, recycled, repackaged and sold to me like a brand new thing.

That brings me to Werewolf by Night, MCU’s first Halloween special, and if I am not mistaken, a surprising release we didn’t know was coming until a week before…? You can tell right from the start that whoever made it loves old Hollywood horror films and pays homage to them quite well. That someone, by the way, is nobody else than the Oscar-winning musical composer Michael Giacchino for whom this was his directorial debut. From the title font, and opening credits, to the “cigarette burn”, everything is here, just as we are used to. That is if you have seen a few of these old, spooky films from the 1930s/1940s. I won’t pretend I am some sort of expert (hey, this could be the title of this blog!), but I have seen a few, and their “purity” always wins me over. What I mean by that is they are dated films by all means. Most of them had little to no budget, and, in case they had a decent budget, they had to make a horror film with many obstacles. The obvious is no CGI; the less obvious hurdle would be censorship (you could only show so much) or the overall filmmaking standard. Today, almost anything goes. Back then, people were stricter behind the camera and in front of it, let alone the audience. Nowadays, horror films try to trump each other with the goriest death scenes and scariest jump scares, showing more messed up things than the previous horror film.

And you can tell by watching Werewolf by Night that Giacchino has a sweet spot for these films, and I can’t blame him. I was hoping for him to lean into the horror a bit more. I know, it’s still Marvel, so I wasn’t expecting any “hardcore horror”, but given the Halloween tie-in and the fact it went to streaming with a little announcement, I hoped they would allow for more creative freedom and lean more into different genres. Take Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022, my review here), which also wasn’t a full-blown horror by any means but compared to Werewolf by Night, it definitely felt more horror-y. I know a big chunk of this is Sam Raimi, one of the undisputed kings of modern horror films and maybe that was the biggest difference. Whereas the second Strange film showed us a glimpse of how the MCU might look through the “modern horror lens”, Werewolf takes a different route and focuses on the past.

I thought this special feature (it’s hard calling it a film when it’s only 52 minutes) was a fun ride that fizzled away quickly. I enjoyed Gael García Bernal alongside Laura Donnelly, and I wonder whether we will see them again within the MCU. But my main issue might be a controversial one. As much as I am happy for Giacchino spreading his wings and experimenting with other art forms besides music, I don’t think he should have directed this.

The reason is simple – I firmly believe that your feature debut should tell us what you are about. And since Werewolf by Night was one big homage to classic horror movies within the MCU, I had fun with it, but I couldn’t tell you whether I like Giacchino’s style because there isn’t anything I would consider “his”. Everything is either homage or MCU stuff – things we have seen before. Don’t get me wrong; I will 100% watch whatever is next for him because if he is at least 10% as talented as a director as he is a composer, that would be amazing. I just don’t think this was the best vehicle for his debut; I wish he would have given us something more personal.

Especially when I have my pick who should have directed this – yes, I have already mentioned his name, Sam Raimi. He is already mingling with the MCU; can you imagine a werewolf horror story as shot by Raimi? I would absolutely be there for it. Again, I understand it would not come close to any of his Evil Dead films. But Sam has proven that he can dance that line effectively with the second Doctor Strange film (love it or hate it, the horror elements/scenes were pure Raimi), and I honestly think MCU has missed a trick not giving this to him.

Overall, Werewolf by Night is a slightly above-mediocre fun feature that knows when to finish. The two main characters were fine, but due to this feature only being 52 minutes, we barely got to know them well. Nevertheless, I give Marvel props for the willingness to experiment, for inviting new directors and for giving them their own little sandbox to play in. I just thought with this film and this theme, there might have been a better choice for the king of the sandbox.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

She-Hulk: Attorney at Law Review (Season One) – Tatiana, Twerking and The Internet

Advertisements

You can call this show many things, but one “label” is unfortunately correct, and that label would be “divisive”. She-Hulk: Attorney at Law is, by far, the most divisive MCU show to date, with people on both sides of the spectrum screaming about this show either in support or disgust. Why disgust? I have seen many saying something like: “Oh, how far/deep has the MCU fallen.” Honestly, because it took me a minute to start this show, I was doubtful as the hate seemed to come from all directions. But I don’t tend to listen to other people, so when I finally caught up on this show, I was surprised by how much I loved it. That shows that no matter what you hear, you must make your own judgement and see it for yourself, and I am glad I did; otherwise, I would have missed the funniest MCU show to date.

She-Hulk: Attorney at Law is probably the most light-hearted, low-stakes MCU show we have gotten because it wants to be that. Well, at least regarding MCU. You literally have the main character (more about her soon) tell you in the first episode: “It’s true. I am a Hulk. And I’m guessing you won’t be able to focus on this fun lawyer show until you know all about that.” And at that moment, I realised what this show was. It’s a sitcom in MCU, but in the Internet age and given its ties to the MCU, people weren’t ready for this show to “just be that”. I have touched on this in my previous MCU reviews, but the MCU fanbase needs to get their shit together. During their “peak” (with just movies leading up to the Avengers: Endgame (2019)), the second biggest complaint I heard was that MCU couldn’t just make something on its own, that everything had to be linked somehow to the previous movies or setting up upcoming films. Why number two, by the way? Because the number one complaint was always about their action scenes (still something they need to work on). And all these MCU shows have tried to do just that, especially something like Moon Knight (2022, my review here); you can watch with almost no knowledge about any MCU films/shows and enjoy it. And virtually the same can be said about She-Hulk. Sure, you need to know a bit about Hulk, Avengers etc., but I can imagine even if you don’t know much, you would still be able to enjoy yourself because this show doesn’t rely on your extensive knowledge of the MCU. This show wants you to relax and have fun alongside Tatiana Maslany.

You can say many things about this phase (I believe we are about to end MCU’s phase 4) and how “uneven” the films, the shows, and the themes have been. But one thing the MCU still knows how to do is cast their leading roles. From Hailee Steinfeld in Hawkeye (2021, my review here) to Iman Vellani in Ms. Marvel (2022, my review here), and now Tatiana as She-Hulk. Side note, I know Hailee technically is not a lead in that series, but I consider her role to be as vital as Hawkeye himself, plus she will play an important part in the future. One stellar casting decision after another, and Tatiana is yet another jewel in this crown of casting decisions. She has the acting range to do both comedy and drama spectacularly, and she switches between those two lanes with ease. But the main reason I loved her as Jen Walters is the fun she was having as the character. Her attitude and positive thinking were infectious, and I can’t compliment her enough. Also, she breaks the fourth wall as much as Deadpool, maybe even more. And for her to do that so effortlessly, when not once it seemed off or not funny… that tells you all you need to know. She gave this character the correct amount of snark; every decision Tatiana made for her character worked. It worked so much that out of all the MCU shows, this one is the clear frontrunner for me as to “we need a second season as soon as possible”. I would also appreciate seeing more of She-Hulk in the MCU films.

If you are “on the Internets” at all, you must have heard about the now infamous scene featuring Tatiana and Megan Thee Stallion twerking. If you somehow missed this “controversy”, first of all, please teach me your ways and second, congratulations. Nevertheless, when I first became aware of that, I cringed as out of context; it looked weird and out of place. And here’s the operative phrase, “out of context”. I wasn’t watching the show by the time this episode was out, so I had no point of reference, and that scene seemed just bizarre. But after I caught up and watched that episode the moment this scene happened, I chuckled. Because that episode was funny, and this was just a funny, silly moment of a funny, silly show. It was just a post-credit scene that closed the episode where (believe it or not) Megan was in, so that scene was just “a tag”. Nothing more, nothing less. Marvel isn’t dead because Megan now exists in the MCU, and she dared to twerk with Tatiana, no. People need to take themselves less seriously and take what they get less seriously as well, especially if the show you are watching tells you this will be a silly lawyer show!

Unfortunately, as is the rule, in today’s day and age, many “fans” have review-bombed this show only after the first episode. And look, I get it, I… no, wait, I don’t actually get it. I never understood why people feel the need to rate/rank a show after the first episode. I don’t get why people (and, in this instance, some men) are so afraid of women leading shows. It was funny to me; that, in the end, the main storyline of this show was about a group of young men who hate She-Hulk and want to get her powers because they feel she doesn’t deserve them. And by funny, I mean ironic. It’s insane to me how some people will yell about these shows “being woke/political” and all that shit, and then they proceed to review-bomb a show after the very first episode, saying how “this isn’t MCU anymore”. Why? Because we don’t get to have fun? This show understands today’s culture and, unfortunately, proved it. You don’t get to complain about the show being “woke” and then proceed to do that very stuff this show is dealing with; this is just not how any of this works.

My only criticism of She-Hulk: Attorney at Law is the occasional over-reliance on other MCU characters. I won’t spoil any who appear in this show, and it was nice to see them, but I was enjoying Tatiana so much I thought sometimes, these “guest appearances” distract from her, a point, by the way, even the show acknowledges. My other, more serious point – I wanted more. I could have easily watched at least six to ten more episodes of just Jen struggling to live a normal life while being a superhero lawyer. She-Hulk: Attorney at Law was the show we could easily have had more episodes without compromising the quality. Come to think of it; we could have even gone deeper; with the villain(s) and established them even more, but maybe that was on purpose, not giving them too much oxygen…? Be that as it may, I wanted more.

Overall, She-Hulk: Attorney at Law is a superb show with one excellent performance by Tatiana Maslany. She is having so much fun it’s almost impossible not to have a great time alongside her. The rest of the show portrays very well how it would look like; if somebody did gain superhero powers and didn’t want to be a superhero. Jen’s struggle to juggle her personal and private life, her comedy and her breaking of the fourth wall were all on point. I would strongly recommend this show if you can accept it on its terms. If you are fine with watching “just a comedy show” that also has something to say about today’s world, go ahead. Now, if you excuse me, I will be on the lookout for season two and need to watch more movies/shows with Tatiana in them.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Thor: Love and Thunder (2022) Movie Review – Surprising on Many Levels

Advertisements

From the moment I saw the first trailers for this film, I had a feeling this might be one of the most divisive MCU films to date. Why? I think there are obvious reasons, such as fans having expectations of what this movie is about and then being disappointed when it’s just a “silly” film is one of them. But I also have a theory – with his previous Thor Ragnarok (2017), Taika Waititi brought his quirky sense of humour into the MCU. And ever since then, most MCU films and TV shows have tried to “replicate” it, so now, five years later, the unexpected became “tiresome” for many as it’s no longer a shock to see Thor being more comedic rather than “serious” film. The novelty wore off for many fans, and others expected something different altogether. I had a blast.

Is Thor: Love and Thunder a perfect film? No. It is not. But is it a funny, over-the-top blockbuster that has two screaming goats piloting a chariot with several gods on them, riding to meet Zeus, played by Russell Crowe, who has a Greek (?) accent and is more interested in orgies than helping the mortals who worship him? Yes, it is that kind of film. And it’s up to your taste to decide whether it is for better or worse.

Let’s start with the positives, as those heavily outweigh the negatives. And first things first, Christian Bale nailed his role, as expected. You knew the moment he got involved that his villain would be in the TOP 5 of MCU villains easily (and to be fair, that’s not that impressive feat to achieve), and yes, he is. His Gorr is menacing, dark (well, grey-ish), and most importantly, is one of those “villains” who you could argue has a good point. And until he starts killing innocent people, you might even agree with where he is coming from. I liked how the movie started with him; we didn’t even see the Marvel logo until his Gorr got established. Nice touch, Taika.

Another thing I appreciated about this film was the return of Jodie Foster, I mean Jane Fonda, I mean Jane Foster aka Natalie Portman. And this is where I encountered surprise number one. From the promotional materials and posters, you might think her return to MCU might be something epic, something like a “handing over the torch” kind of deal, but no. I won’t go into spoilers, but every choice they made about her character surprised me, and I liked that. I know this is a “small victory”, but in this world, where stuff gets leaked all the time and trailers often give away the entire film, it’s nice to know some movies still won’t do the expected.

I also liked what they have done with the Guardians (and no, this isn’t a spoiler as they were featured heavily in all trailers). I hoped they would be there only for a tiny bit, and the rest will be a Thor movie, and that’s what happened. It was great to see them back for a bit; they made some jokes and disappeared before overstaying their welcome.

The most surprising thing about this film is that Chris Hemsworth might be one of the funniest comedic actors of our generation…? Even the jokes that fell flat for me (and there were a few, I won’t lie); I could somehow get behind because you can see in Chris’ eyes (and those fucking muscles) how much fun was he having. Chris is too distractingly buff and handsome to be this funny. I feel like because he’s the “stereotypical” muscle guy (and let’s face it, Thor is all about having those arms), many might not realise how great Chris actually is. And in the last two films (and some other non-MCU films), Chris proved to be a great comedic actor. And no, before you point out the obvious, Men in Black: International (2019, my review here) was an awful movie, but he was not the issue with that film. You can tell he loves Thor and was all in, no matter what craziness was happening on the screen. I wish somebody would write a great comedy for him because he is (at least in this department) still criminally underrated.

A few issues I had with Thor: Love and Thunder – as mentioned above, some jokes fell flat. And for a movie that seemed to have “pause for laughter” scenes included, it occasionally felt a bit awkward watching it in the cinema where nobody was laughing at them. What I also thought was a bit disappointing; was the ending and how Gorr reached his conclusion. Without giving anything away, let’s say I thought the movie was heading towards a surprise ending. Where you think the main villain is after one thing, only to discover he is after something else completely, but it wasn’t until Thor “put him on the right track” that the movie went with that ending. I thought it would have been slightly more poignant if Gorr ended up where he would have, but because of his decision, as that was his ultimate goal, not because of Thor’s speech.

But other than that, I enjoyed this balls-to-the-walls blockbuster more than I thought. And I don’t know why. Thor was never one of my favourites, yet something in this film clicked for me. Maybe it was the fact except for a few tiny things, Thor: Love and Thunder is a standalone movie. You don’t need to watch every MCU film/show to understand what is happening. Sure, it helps at times, but I could imagine even an occasional MCU watcher wouldn’t get lost watching it. As the film has a clear beginning, middle and end that is as self-contained as a franchise spanning almost 30 movies and several TV shows can be at this point.

Overall, Thor: Love and Thunder was a delightful surprise. I went in expecting nothing except to laugh and have a good time. And that is (more or less) exactly what I got. Bale is amazingly menacing, the film is beautifully quirky (if you told me they consumed many different hallucinogenic drugs on the set, I would have believed you), and most importantly, I was entertained for the entire runtime. If you go into this film expecting to understand where the MCU is headed, you will be disappointed. This film is just a good old-fashioned (almost) no-stakes fun. Sometimes, it’s not enough, but in this instance, I liked it.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) Review – Marvel After Dark

Advertisements

I pity people who are Marvel fans and can’t go to the cinema on opening weekend when a new Marvel film comes out. Why? Because it becomes increasingly harder to avoid spoilers, especially with something as big as Marvel has gotten over the last years, it’s almost impossible not stumbling upon something about any of their upcoming movies, shows etc. And I am saying that as someone who isn’t looking up spoilers. I don’t follow any “news” outlets that would report “spoilers” or anything like that. And yet even I did see a few things I wish I didn’t before watching this film. Nothing major, but still wished I wouldn’t see those. Also, it seems that after Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021, my review here), everyone expected some major “cameo fest” from this film based on some leaks that we now know were false. I believe I can mention those at this stage because they never meant to happen, but people honestly expected Tom Cruise to have a cameo as Iron Man? Really? And I believe that was one of the factors contributing to the lukewarm response Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is getting. People saw some badly photoshopped images and thought: “Yey, multiverse concept will be so great!” And the thing is, this movie was great even without many cameos.

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is Marvel’s darkest film yet. Sam Raimi‘s handwriting was all over this film, and I loved it. While watching this movie, I marvelled (get it?), how come this movie wasn’t ‘R’ rated. A question that turned “sour”, to say the least. Anybody who dares to ask that question now seems to be ridiculed…? Honestly, the more time I spend on social media, the less I understand some people, but ok, let’s try to have this conversation properly. The conceit of the “how was this not ‘R’ rated?” question has nothing to do with the fact there were darker movies in the 80s. Yeah, there were but guess what? Those movies are the reason we have got ratings, MPAA and all that jazz. So that’s the first thing. Secondly, nobody (not even I) was trying to say: “Will somebody think of the children?” No, that’s another way of skewing this debate into something it wasn’t meant to be. The main point of this was merely to point out that if you hire a horror director like Raimi and give him more freedom, he can bring some stuff into the MCU we haven’t seen done until that point. Anyway, now I have that off my chest, let’s talk about this film a bit more before going into the spoilers.

Unlike many, I didn’t love the first Doctor Strange (2016); I “only” liked it. So I went into this film with no baggage and not expecting any crazy cameos. And maybe that is why I enjoyed it a tad bit more than your average moviegoer? Where Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness rules (besides the already mentioned Raimi effect) is cast. Elizabeth Olsen is THE highlight of this film, by far. She understood her role, and her performance was a joy to watch. I can’t say anything more about her without going into some spoilers, but before getting into some spoilers, I need to mention a newcomer Xochitl Gomez. Her character “America Chavez” got me intrigued about what role she will have in the MCU moving forward since her character seems to be the only one who can freely jump in between different multiverses. And since this is where the MCU appears to be heading more and more, she might just become one of the most significant characters in the entire MCU, and I can’t wait to see (and learn) more of her. I feel like I can’t discuss anything else without at least hinting at some spoilers, so…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

From what I can gather, many people thought this film undid everything WandaVision (2021, my review here) was about, specifically the growth Wanda went through. And see, this is where I would politely, yet firmly, disagree. WandaVision was about Wanda dealing with the loss of Vision (hence the name), and she was already on the path to becoming a psycho villain. After all, she literally enslaved an entire city! And even in the end, she realised that was wrong, sure. But she never seemed remorseful about it, even in the show. It seemed she was only sorry about that situation (the town people being her entrapped slaves/puppets) having to end so she could no longer continue living her fake life. Also, did people forget (or not see?) the very last scene in WandaVision, where she already was reading through the Darkhold? That is why it made perfect sense to me, her character being a straight-up villain here, where the ends justify the means, even if the “ends” here were “just” to be with her (fake) children she made up.

I thought Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness displayed cleverly how similar her character was to Strange’s character. And as always, it’s not about how similar you are to someone what matters is where you differ from that someone. Stephen Strange might be full of himself and dickish at times; we can all agree there. But his moral compass seems to be aligned well, as we see in the opening scene where one of his many different versions is ready to sacrifice and take America’s power “because her life is in the grand scheme of the universe not significant”. I liked this film played around with the idea of where the line was between good and evil. Between who is (or who gets to be) a celebrated hero and who is a villain and how/why that happens.

But, here’s the thing – hence why I enjoyed Elizabeth’s performance more than Benedict’s. She was the perfect example of a broken character who has been through so much and had to give up (or lost) everybody she ever loved (before Vision, it was her brother). I didn’t agree with what she was doing, but I understood where she was coming from and mainly why she was doing it. She might be one of the best villains the MCU has had in a while, and I wonder where will they take her character next, now since the Darkhold got destroyed. What’s that, you say? She died, you say? Nah, nobody believes that. Besides, there was a brief shot of her “red powers” being used as the temple was collapsing on her, so she did not die. It will be interesting to see whether MCU gives in and makes her go “full-on villain” or whether she gets a redemption arc.

I loved the darker tone of this film because it wasn’t literally dark (you could still see the action and characters well, hey DCEU, maybe make a note or two?), and more importantly, it was “blended” well with some moments of levity. Like the “epic music battle” scene that was superb both visually and musically, stunning set-piece. Or how The Scarlet Witch penetrated the defence of Kamar-Taj that scene was maybe the first time we could see The Scarlet Witch’s full potential and how formidable a villain she will be.

The only weakness Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness has had, was the eyeball action sequence. I understand we need to get things moving somehow, but that entire sequence simply to get to America’s character felt a bit weird, and given where the tone of this film went right after also felt off. It almost felt like it was shot by somebody else before Raimi showed up on the set and said: “Ok, let’s try to infuse MCU with a bit of horror.” Honestly, next time you watch it, notice how everything changes after that sequence. And for my money, that change was needed. If we are getting MCU films for at least ten more years (according to some news), I hope Feige will invite different directors and gives them more freedom to play around with genres within MCU. That is one of the few ways to keep things interesting moving forward because the idea of the multiverse where everything goes is intriguing until you realise what that really means – no stakes. Because so what, this character died a few movies ago? There is a version of them living in another multiverse; let’s bring them back or visit them! I would hate to see MCU go down that road.

Overall, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness was a fun time in the cinemas for me. I went with no expectations, and when the film ended (the best after-credits scene in the entire MCU, by the way!) I left the theatre with a smile on my face, thinking about the different themes this film touched on, the characters it introduced and some fun cameos that actually happened. I wasn’t bogged down by those cameos that were never meant to happen or the fact we didn’t unleash the multiverse concept “fully”. As somebody who truly enjoyed Spider-Man: No Way Home, I would say, not every MCU film must have cameos. As the immortal quote by Dr Malcolm goes: “You are so preoccupied with whether or not we could that we should stop to think if we should.” Just because we have a multiverse now doesn’t mean we NEED to pack every single Marvel film from now on with 15 new cameos. And most importantly, let’s try to enjoy these films for what they are, rather than dislike them for “what they could/should have been” based on unreliable leaks. I can’t wait to rewatch this film, and I am glad Raimi is back directing.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Moon Knight Review (Season One) – MCU Goes To Egypt

Advertisements

Another year, another Marvel TV show, one could say. Marvel rules everything and can get almost anybody they want, so why not cast Oscar Isaac and Ethan Hawke while having F. Murray Abraham be a voice of a literal God? If you get as big as Marvel, that’s not an issue, and hence, Moon Knight was born. What I absolutely adored about Moon Knight was the self-contained and how it managed to avoid most of the MCU clichés… Well, at least until the last episode, which wasn’t bad but felt more formulaic than the rest of the episodes…? But we will get to it.

Where Moon Knight shines (is that a pun?) is its casting and its self-containment. Let’s start with the casting first. We all know by now Oscar Isaac is one talented performer, and in this show, he’s not letting us forget that. His performance, playing multiple characters throughout this show, was superb. I loved it wasn’t just his accent that changed every time he became the other person; it was his posture, face, everything. And it always felt “right”. I know some fans have had an issue with his British accent, which didn’t bother me…? I can’t say it was 100% nailed; after all, I am not British, even though I am a British citizen now, but that accent sounded perfectly fine to me. It wasn’t distractingly bad, and it fit the character.

Ethan Hawke had the more subtle role of villain, who is always quiet yet menacing. And his performance was great too. But again, it’s Ethan Hawke; if you have seen some films over the past 30 + years, you should not be surprised by him knowing how to get the maximum out of any role. Who surprised me the most (which is logical since this was my introduction to her) was May Calamawy, aka Layla. I liked where they took her character at the end and hope we will see more of her in the future because she can do it all – strong, witty, charming. I hope this show will be a jumping platform for her to showcase her talent and capabilities.

I have really enjoyed Moon Knight as a whole, at least the first five episodes. I thought the concept was original; I have always loved stories/movies set in and around Egypt and Egyptian mythology. Also, as mentioned before, I liked how the show managed to be self-contained for its entire length. I don’t think there was one reference to any other MCU property. I was waiting for somebody to refer to something else happening within the MCU, and it never came. I don’t think this would be considered a spoiler, but also, I was surprised we didn’t see anybody we already knew. There were no cameos from any other MCU movie or a TV show, and this was refreshing to see. Not everything needs to be tied up to MCU directly; not every TV show of theirs has to have some cameos or references to Thanos, The Blip, Avengers etc. I liked and admired that they have done it, and I can only hope we get to see more of this. A brand new superhero whose introduction will only rest on their shoulders, not on references or cameos.

So wait, how come I am praising this TV show for its originality and yet I said at the beginning of my review that the last episode falls into some MCU clichés? Well, that is because it does. And for me to discuss it properly, I might need to touch on some things that will be spoilers, so…

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

I might be in the minority, based on the early reactions from all over the Internet (I am writing this review on Wednesday evening, the day this episode dropped on Disney+) but I only “liked” this episode, not loved it. And I will tell you why – because I recognised many MCU patterns. Moon Knight does it so well for its entirety to feel different, to feel like its own thing. And then, in the last episode, we get your typical “same vs same” battles, both for the Gods and Avatars (but not the blue ones directed by James Cameron!) and even though I knew it would come down to this (again), I secretly hoped for something slightly different. But Layla being “the first Egyptian superhero” was a pretty cool scene, I am not going to lie.

One thing that bothered me more than most about the final episode was the reveal of the third “alter ego” in the credits. The show hints at least one other character living “inside” of Oscar Isaac (besides Marc and Steven) for most of its entirety, and it was pretty clear to me that there must be a third alter ego. So I thought we would get to see him in the finale. And sure enough, the big climactic fight is happening our main hero seems to be losing the battle, now is the time when we surely get to see him… But no, the show cheated, cut to black like it did in the first episode and showed us only the aftermath of that third character, where all the bad guys are dead. To me, that felt like a step backwards. I get it doing it in the first episode because it worked brilliantly; it creates the tension for us to ask questions about who this “other” alter ego is. Back then, it was Marc. And now, we should have been introduced to Jake (that apparently means something to you if you read the comics, which I have not) and to finally see how dangerous he truly is, only for the show to cheat. Sure, we get to see a glimpse of him at the end, and that was a pretty cool ending, sure. But imagine how much cooler would that be, had we seen him take over when our hero was losing the battle? He suddenly comes back up, starts fighting super hard, and might even utter a word or two in Spanish, so we understand this isn’t Steven or Marc anymore. And then, we would cut to black, back to Steven or Marc. How awesome would that be?

I will also say the rules in Moon Knight aren’t that clear. I understand everybody is hoping for a second season (and trust me, I am everybody, I also want more), so things should become clearer then, but if there was an MCU show that needed more than six episodes, it was Moon Knight. I would love to spend two or even three more episodes in this world, to establish the rules more. Like, what happens after Khonshu releases Marc and Steven? Will they continue living in one body, effectively being schizophrenic? What happened to Layla? Are the other Gods actually dead, or were those just their Avatars who died? Who is Jake, and why should I care? See, the MCU does this a lot too, where they set up many things “for later”. I don’t mind when their movies or shows set up new things, heroes, stories, no. As long as they finish telling the story, they start. And this final episode felt a bit rushed at times. I could have really used a few more episodes to get more answers.

Overall, Moon Knight is a show that had a great promise, that introduced two new superheroes I hope we get to see more of, and I had a fun time watching. Sure, I might not be the biggest fan of the final episode, but that doesn’t mean I hated it or that it somehow spoiled my enjoyment of the entire show. No, I will say Moon Knight is 100% worth your time. Part of it is it’s only six episodes, but mostly due to the outstanding casting, stunning camera work and the self-contained element, where you don’t have to watch any of the previous MCU shows or movies to enjoy this one. I hope we get at least one more season and possibly a movie…? It will be interesting to see where exactly will Moon Knight‘s and Layla’s characters fit in in the MCU as it stands.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Falcon and the Winter Soldier Review (Season One) – Art Imitating Life

Advertisements

Sometimes it’s good to watch a movie or a TV show after some time has passed. Take The Falcon and the Winter Soldier. Ever since it finished, I’ve been hearing more or less from everyone and their mum how it’s the weakest out of the current MCU shows. And to a certain degree, I can’t blame people for thinking that. WandaVision (2021, my review here) had some flaws but was pretty beloved. Then came Loki (2021 – ?, my review here) and that was pretty much beloved from the start due to Tom Hiddleston alone. Hawkeye (2021, my review here) was the most “chill” of the MCU shows to this date; it was not asking much from you except to have a good time. And each of these has dealt with something different. WandaVision was all about grief and letting go, Loki about dealing with your past while focusing on the future. Hawkeye also deals with grief, yet differently, while showing us what it would be like for an Avenger, who is “just” human. And then, we have The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, a show that tackles race and ideas of what it means to be good or bad and how intertwined those can sometimes be. It also talks about history, putting this in context and looking at everything critically without going into cynicism. And this is what I loved about this show. I know this won’t be my most popular opinion, but this might be my favourite MCU show to date.

You can judge The Falcon and the Winter Soldier purely based on the “entertainment” value. If you want to, you can look at it without the political and race commentary (you shouldn’t, but you can). So let’s do this now because I have to go to spoiler territory to write about this show in a meaningful way. Even minus the commentary, I was entertained. Sure, the first episode might be the “worst” one, as this show takes a bit before it finds its footing. But even that has some great action sequences. Look, are all the actions sequences done well? No, some are your Marvel “let’s cut 20x in five seconds” deal fans have been vocal about from more or less the start of MCU. But more often than not, I’ve noticed how Kari Skogland (who directed all six episodes) tried her hardest to make each fight sequence stand out. Some are pretty impressive with a limited amount of cutting. So, I would say well done here.

The primary duo (Anthony Mackie and Sebastian Stan) worked for me. And I am saying this as someone who didn’t care for either Falcon or Bucky before this show. But you can say that about all of these MCU shows. I knew who they were, I remembered their characters, but both were… meh. I am sure I’ve mentioned this before in my other reviews for these MCU shows, but that is that one thing they did 100% correctly -giving these side characters shows, so if we wanted, we could spend more time with them and get to understand them better. It’d be so easy for MCU to make a show with one of the main characters, but why? Because of these shows, I’ve grown to appreciate almost every character who appeared in them as they give them material, character growth and something to chew on. These two gentlemen worked for me; I thought their banter was all right. I didn’t feel there was anything forced.

Before going into spoilers, I also need to mention one more thing I appreciated about The Falcon and the Winter Soldier. And that is that they don’t rely on other MCU characters (too much). Yes, some other characters from the MCU make an appearance in some episodes, but they managed to avoid cheap cameos. All those who come back make sense within this show’s world and story and, most importantly, have some ties to our main characters. Ok, let’s move on to spoilers.

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

I have heard that The Falcon and the Winter Soldier addresses race, but even I didn’t expect how much or how complex the themes would be. The overarching theme of this show is: “What if Captain America was a black man?” At the end of Avengers: Endgame (2019), when Cap handed the shield over to Falcon, I didn’t think anything of it except: “So, he’s the new Captain America. Cool.” And the show addressed how even this well-meaning gesture comes with so many issues due to American history, how some people will hate him simply because he is the one lifting that shield.

Let’s talk about this shield. I loved how the screenwriters made the shield representative of Captain America, not just “a person” but the entire institution/idea behind it. An institution/idea that should represent “good” but started on shaky grounds. The show made me think of the shield as almost the USA itself – a melting pot of people from different backgrounds that should represent something great but historically started very questionably. And not just started, but over the years still has many things (injustices) to deal with and is struggling to deal with even today. Or even address it with appropriate terms without “some” people getting offended.

I thought this entire show got beautifully summed up with one line from one episode that went like this (paraphrasing here): “It used to be simpler, used to be good guys and bad guys. Everything is much more complicated.” It was that quote that made me think of this show in a different, more nuanced way. Take, for example, the Flag Smashers. They would have been portrayed as terrorists, cut and dry, not long ago. But now you could see and understand the point they were trying to make and maybe, for the most part, agree with it. As Sam himself says in one episode: “Look, I agree with everything you’re saying; I just don’t agree with how you go about it.” This radicalization theme ends justifying the means, has always been part of pop culture, and if used well, it makes for a good drama. I’ve felt like this show used the Flag Smashers well enough. Sure could I do without Erin Kellyman‘s “we do our thing no matter what” approach? Yes. I understand that was what must have happened for her character to be wrong (killing people, just to get your point across), and the show even acknowledges that she’s too radicalized, but I’d love to have seen somebody like that with a moral compass. Standing for the same ideals as her, minus the killing, bombing etc. That is what I was slightly missing from making her a proper complex villain. But again, I understand why they’ve made the decisions they have.

Let’s talk about John Walker, the “new” Captain America. First of all, I loved the performance by Wyatt Russell as he seemed to be on the same path as Karli’s character (Erin Kellyman), and he probably still is, but in the heat of the battle, in those crucial moments that define us, he makes the right decision. But I don’t think the show was trying to say: “Ok, you saved those people here where you could have let them die; we forgive you for killing that one dude while the entire world was watching.” On the contrary, he might be the ultimate example of how the times have changed, as I thought of him (and this might be controversial) as this is who Steve Rogers would have been if he had been born about 30/40 years later. Think about it his character even says this about his medals:

Yep. Three badges of excellence to make sure I never forget the worst day of my life. We both know that the things that we had to do in Afghanistan to be awarded those medals felt a long way from being right.

John Walker

How many times have we heard something similar from real-life soldiers? That fact they not only don’t feel like heroes but the things they had to do “for democracy, for the USA” have crossed the line? He, to me, was the modern-day soldier who has been through nonsensical wars, did unspeakable things and then came home being celebrated for those things. His character arc tied it well with the show’s theme of “there are no longer just good vs bad guys”. You could even take it one step further. I could argue Steve fought in the last “fair” war. I know this term is dumb (what even is a “fair war”?), but I can’t explain it in any other way. America has been involved in how many wars since World War II? Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan… how many of them had soldiers do unspeakable things to civilians, let alone the other soldiers? And how many black soldiers came back home from those wars and faced more problems at home?

The entire subplot with Carl Lumbly‘s character Isaiah was quite powerful. And unfortunately, it was due to how consistent it was with the USA’s history with race. Rather than talking about it, I would strongly recommend watching a powerful movie about this very issue (black soldiers coming back home from World War II and the challenges they were facing) called Mudbound (2017). A superb and beautifully shot film about awful things.

The more I think about The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, the more I realise I don’t love it because it’s clever. I love it because it has the balls to point out these unpopular issues and put them front and centre in this massive TV show. And I guess that is what some people didn’t appreciate about it? Not to say: “everyone who didn’t like this TV show is racist”. No, that’s dumb. I understand some reasoning why you might not like this show; maybe the metaphors were too clunky or potentially obvious for you, or the characters didn’t work. And that’s fair, after all, art is subjective, and that is why there will never be one “universal” truth about what constitutes good art. However, it feels like this show has amassed a more than usual amount of criticism, and I don’t think most of it is warranted. Especially the themes the show is wrestling with; I thought they had done a marvellous (pun kind of intended) job. Given even Sam, once he finally takes the mantel and becomes the new Captain America, you can tell he is still conflicted about it. Because he understands what he is in for and how it won’t be easy. He also understood how ironic it is for him to take it from a historical point of view (Isaiah’s plotline), but he needs to try to shape his own future. And I hope this theme won’t get dropped from Captain America 4 (no date yet). I am not saying we have to make all Captain America movies political from now on; no, but it would feel a bit disingenuous not even reference this show at least a tiny bit.

Overall, The Falcon and the Winter Soldier is a show I went in expecting mediocre fun. What I got instead of that was a show that was not afraid to openly discuss race, American history, and their roles within “an institution of hope” that was supposed to be Captain America. And how difficult that conversation can be, how even the best ideas can start on bad/shaky grounds or how “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”. And how that line between “good vs bad guys” gets blurrier and muddier. Yes, if you go into this show expecting popcorn entertainment, you are in for a disappointment. Sure, you can focus on the popcorn element of the show and still have a decent time with it, but I wouldn’t. Or better said, I can’t imagine how can you watch a show like The Falcon and the Winter Soldier and “blank out” the heavy elements, as that is the entire point of this show. “I can’t wait for the next Captain America movie” is a sentence I thought I would never write, but here we go. And if you are like me and were putting this show off because you’ve heard how mediocre it is, give it a shot and see for yourself.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke