Tag Archives: 2024

Spaceman (2024) Review – When You Order ‘Ad Astra’ from Wish

Advertisements

This movie is all kinds of weird. I will put aside my Czech bias of this movie, based on a Czech novel (Spaceman of Bohemia), and the fact this movie contains only some tiny Czech Easter eggs, but the main roles are an American man and an English lady with no attempt to do any accent is a choice… But again, let’s put that aside. Spaceman’s biggest problem is that we now have seen movies “just like this” (like the already mentioned Ad Astra (2019, my review here)) but done better. I am not just talking about the technical side; I am talking about the themes this movie tries to explore, and I don’t think they all land.

Let’s get something clear – Adam Sandler did a good job. I won’t hold the fact he isn’t Brad Pitt against him because I don’t think he did a bad job. The same goes for anyone else, especially Carey Mulligan, who uplifts what, otherwise, could have been a thankless job. I don’t think this will come as a shock to anyone, but I think she is the best actor in this movie, closely seconded by Sandler. The only reason Paul Dano isn’t any higher for me is the fact that we only hear him, but I won’t lie; you will remember his role. Sure, he is doing “just voice-acting”, but that’s a good reminder of how important voice-acting is and if done properly, it can move you, even if you never see the actor.

Where this movie lost me a bit was the split between Earth and Sandler’s space mission. Instead of those two storylines complementing each other, they almost seem to disturb the flow of Spaceman. Every time it gets interesting in space, we go back to Earth. That applies vice-versa every time something happened down there, on the Earth that I liked, we would go back to space. I can’t precisely put my finger on it, but despite those storylines being linked, they seemed disjointed. This is, for example, where Ad Astra understood what it must do and focused the majority of the film on Brad Pitt’s character and the loneliness of space.

Because Spaceman covers (or wants to cover) many of the same themes, from loneliness to realisation about humanity and how you might try to improve yourself as human to the people you care about the most, the themes are there. However, they never hit me as much as they should have. Spaceman wants to be this space drama about many complex things, but when the movie finished, I was… unmoved. I can’t say I was bored per se, and this isn’t a bad movie by any means, but it just felt a bit hollow and disjointed, and even incorporating the Rusalka myth, I wasn’t sure whether that symbolism did anything for this movie.

And this is where my Czech bias I put aside comes back, just for this paragraph or two. It’s weird to see some Czech actors but not in any major roles. It’s fascinating that studio people want to adapt this Czech book but then seem to do the bare minimum. Yeah, it was shot in Czech Republic. Yes, there are some Czech actors in mostly tiny roles and some Easter eggs (cukroví, aka Xmas Sweets Sandler has with him, CzechConnect etc.) But this Czech element ultimately doesn’t add anything to it. It’s still Sandler talking in his voice, the same for the other actors. Yes, they have Czech names, but they never explain why this “Czech” spaceman doesn’t have Czech accent. And it’s not just about the accents; Czechs have a unique attitude towards everything. We have a way we talk, we make jokes about everything, and this movie got… none of it. The best way I can describe it is that it lacked any “attitude”. Like this film felt empty when it shouldn’t.

I have not read the book this movie is based on, so I don’t know how that “Czech” aspect is portrayed in the book. But judging by the movie, I was hoping that the fact the setting and people in it should be Czech would play bigger part in it and at the end, it didn’t. You can literally rename all the characters in this movie, change Rusalka to some other folk tale and completely remove some of those Czech Easter eggs in post-production, and this becomes another Hollywood space movie. And it’s just an ok one on top of it.

Overall, Spaceman is one of those most “it’s a movie” movies I have ever seen. What I mean is this film goes for many things and themes, and some land, whilst others do not. The actors are all capable, and nobody is truly bad, but I can’t shake the feeling I will forget this movie’s existence in couple of months, because it ultimately makes little to no impact. Everything is competently made, there is nothing major to critique, but Spaceman feels disjointed and makes you wanting more. The only thing that had for it was that Czech angle, and trust me when I tell you that adds nothing to this story. That is what makes Spaceman feel like one of the most average films you will ever see. The CGI is fine, the performances are good, the rest you will forget. In a world full of great movies exploring this topic, you can probably skip this one and watch something like Ad Astra instead.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire (2024) Review – Let Them Take a Break

Advertisements

If you are a regular reader, firstly, cheers for reading! Secondly, you will know I am not shy to rate some proper B, C or Z movies highly, as long as they know what they are and I manage to have fun with them. That’s why I would never call myself a movie critic. Before watching this film, I hoped I could put that hat on while watching Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire. There were some moments I was able to enjoy myself (mainly the last fight in Rio), but most things before that just felt unnecessary, and dare I say too much. Am I really saying this movie had too much action? Yes, I do. Fuck me…

Before we proceed any further, I want to make one thing clear. I am not under the spell of Godzilla Minus One (2023, my review here). Is that a much better movie you should see rather than this Godzilla x Kong? Absolutely, no contest there. However, I knew before even sitting my ass in the cinema that Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire won’t reach the heights of that movie (well, I didn’t know, I had a hunch) because this isn’t that kind of movie. Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire is the other monster movie, where one big monster smashes stuff, fights other big monsters that smash more stuff, then they team up for reasons I still fully don’t understand and smash this third monster. The end. I knew this would be more about how they get them fighting and how those sequences would be shot; it is here where this monster cookie would crumble for me. And this movie… surely has quite a few action scenes.

During the third or fourth action scene, this movie gave me in a relatively short time, I caught myself getting bored. If there’s one thing you don’t want to write when reviewing an action movie where two titans fight each other and then fight some other monsters, that “thing” would be the word “boring”. But the action scenes all had the same “feel”, so they all kind of blended in for me after a while; I don’t know about you, but the moment I can’t differentiate what the difference between this scene and that scene, it’s hard for me to have fun.

The only action sequence I would call “pretty good” (notice I can’t even say excellent) is the one in Rio at the very end of this movie. That fight was filmed well where I understood where everyone was, the location was well-lit (read: bright), the action felt dynamic, and even the editing wasn’t as aggressive. But honestly, I can’t think of one other action scene before that one that would stand out to me, and this movie has precisely 11.259!

The other thing is the human characters are yet again in the way, and I couldn’t care less about any of them. This is shit to write, considering Rebecca Hall, one of the most talented actresses we have today, is in this movie with Brian Tyree Henry, who I like more and more! Rebecca at least tries something, but I don’t know whether her storyline with her daughter (played by Kaylee Hottle) could have ever worked, no matter how you shoot it, considering this isn’t that kind of movie. That storyline was beautiful and impactful, but it felt out of place in a movie called Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire. Also, this movie made me not like Brian Tyree Henry, as he is supposed to be the comedic relief. Luckily, I know he is funny and talented, so I know this wasn’t him, but damn, they did him dirty in this movie. Almost every single thing his character said felt off, and maybe one or two jokes landed. I feel like it’s important to repeat I am not blaming either of these actors; they did the best with what have been given, and honestly, if you recast this movie with anyone else, I doubt anybody could make these lines work.

What I enjoyed, besides the Rio finale, was the mythology behind the Hollow Earth and being there. I did enjoy the scenes “below” more than I thought. I thought they did a fine job trying to tie everything together (with Skull Island, other titans, ancient tribe). Does it work if you think about it logically? No. But I can accept it in the movie, because that is what I am talking about when I say: “judge the movie based on its merits”. Those parts worked to an extent for me within the movie.

But everything else left me cold. And again, putting aside the juggernaut that was Godzilla Minus One, I still think this movie is just average. When the movie finished, I thought long and hard about whether I had any bias towards this movie due to Godzilla Minus One. I realised I didn’t because even if I compare this film to something “basic, yet entertaining” like Transformers: Rise of the Beasts (2023, my review here), I enjoyed that movie much more than this one due to the action scenes feeling different. I still remember most action scenes because they weren’t choppy; most of them were shot in a way where you could always understand where everybody was. In this movie, I don’t think it’s the case, and again, it’s never a good sign when action scenes start to blend in with each other after some time.

Overall, Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire is an okay movie that has one pretty good action scene. As it became a trademark at this point, the human characters feel out of place, even if they get decent actors in these films. Most of the CGI feels the same, and halfway through the movie, you start thinking: “Yeah, I guess there is a such thing as abundance of action scenes; who could have known?” At this point, I honestly wonder whether this “monster verse” isn’t due for a reboot or, even better, a break. Ken Watanabe started it in Godzilla (2014) by saying: “Let them fight.” I think it’s time to let them sleep for a bit.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Dune: Part Two (2024) Review – An Instant Classic?

Advertisements

After the disappointing rescheduling of this movie to March 2024 (when it was supposed to come out in November 2023, but due to the strikes, the studio wanted all stars on deck to promote this movie), we finally got the much-anticipated sequel to Dune (2021, my review here). And almost instantly, it’s been universally praised and hyped as this generation’s Star Wars or Lord of the Rings. Although I have enjoyed this movie a lot, I would wait to make these calls, even though I could see it happening myself. But the hype train is so fresh we need some time, perspective and mainly the distance to see whether this (hopefully sooner than later trilogy) will stand the test of time.

Before I get to my review, I must write why this review might not be the most objective. I watched this movie only once, in the cinema, and two things happened that affected my enjoyment of Dune: Part Two. One indirectly, the other one more directly. The first thing was that I didn’t rewatch the first Dune film, so in the beginning, it was a bit harder to remember how we left things. Yes, this one is on me, so usually, I wouldn’t have mentioned it; however, this, mixed in with my other point, made a tiny difference for me. My cinema audience was… not great. Dune: Part Two is one of those films you need to get lost in; you want to be immersed in it to appreciate it. And due to some audience members directly around me, I could not do that. Thanks, the dad and son, where the son kept asking questions quite loudly, and the dad kept checking his phone every 20 minutes, only to receive a call an hour into the film (you guessed it, his phone wasn’t on mute). And thanks to the lady behind me, who had to pee but would rather shuffle around in her seat wearing one of those “garbage bag” like jackets that makes noise, especially when it’s being moved constantly, and it’s right behind. Honestly, something happened with people after the COVID pandemic, and it seems like we need to bring shaming back, at least to the cinemas, because if you don’t know basic etiquette (phone on silence, try to be as quiet as possible), just stay home, please.

It was mainly the audience factor, I presume, why I wasn’t fully immersed in this epic. But I also thought the first 20 minutes or so dragged on a tiny bit, and there is only so much you can do/shoot with sand. The scope of this movie is ginormous, and the worms are also cool, but it is still ultimately a desert, so once you have seen one (sand) dune, you’ve kinda seen them all. But those are very tiny nitpicks; let me start with why I enjoyed this film.

I think it was a genius idea to see the rise and fall (?) of Paul’s character through Zendaya‘s eyes, respectively, her character Chani. Her role felt bigger in this sequel and much more fleshed out where you understand where she stands and how she wrestles with her love for Paul and believing what she believes. I thought both she and Timothée Chalamet did excellent jobs. Speaking of him, I liked him, especially towards the end, where we see that gradual transformation to this fanatical leader who believes his hype. It was scary, felt real, and he portrayed it well.

Who I think almost stole the entire movie (besides Zendaya), was Rebecca Ferguson. Her character (like pretty much all characters in this film) felt more fleshed out and more grounded, and once you understood her “game”, it was on. There were many subtle things her character did throughout this movie; I was happy to see her every time she was on screen. I can’t wait to see what happens with her character next, especially now that we know new information about the Atreides family. I also can’t wait to see someone who makes a brief cameo appearance and should be important in the third episode (if you watched this movie, you know who I am talking about; if not, no spoilers here).

The entire black-and-white sequence on Giedi Prime (I had to look up the name of that planet) where we get introduced to Austin Butler was visually stunning, but I can’t say it stayed with me for that long. Again, this might very well be my audience experience, and when I rewatch it again, I might be mind blown, but most of the action in this film was expertly crafted and beautifully shot, and it was only the last 20/30 minutes that stayed with me long after the movie was over. Speaking of Butler, I thought he did a fine job, but I wasn’t over the moon about his performance. I have seen some comparisons to Heath Ledger‘s Joker, and that is when I know the hype train might have gone off the rails a bit. He wasn’t bad; I enjoyed his performance and what he did, don’t get me wrong, but making this performance into the second coming of Jesus… I don’t see it.

But, ultimately, I think that there is one thing everyone should see by now – Denis Villeneuve is an incredible director and one of the best of his generation. When I said: “We should wait to see whether these films have the staying power”, that does not reflect on his track record and how near flawless it’s been. Realistically, if it weren’t for Christopher Nolan (who is three years younger than Denis), I could argue that he is the best “new” director we have. That way, he is just a touch behind Nolan; however, that’s not a bad place to be, and we are lucky to have these talented filmmakers around at the same time, and they will 100% be remembered 100 years from now.

As far as Dune: Part Two goes, I am so close to saying I loved it; I feel like it will happen when I rewatch it at home, on 4K. I will order it, and when it shows up, I will watch both the first movie and this one back to back. I think my mind will be much clearer as to whether those tiny things I have listed above are actual issues I had with this movie or whether I was just irritated from my poor cinema experience, and therefore, every tiny thing jumped out a bit more. I will repeat myself, but please, people, just be respectful of others, not just in the cinemas, but in general. Let others enjoy themselves, and if you can’t stay off your phone for 20 minutes, maybe the cinema isn’t for you.

Overall, Dune: Part Two was an epic movie that did most things perfectly. From developing the established characters from the first movie to adding some new ones, I liked what they did with all of them. I found Paul’s journey fascinating, and I can’t wait to see what happens next with him, his family and Chani as something big is coming. As long as Denis Villeneuve is left to his devices, we are in for a treat and possibly a generation-defining trilogy. Only time will tell, but for now, this is a near-excellent sequel.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Argylle (2024) Review – Spies, Cats and CGI

Advertisements

Like many others, I must have seen the trailer for this movie at least fifty times. One of the reasons why I was happy about this film finally coming out was that I knew I wouldn’t have to watch that trailer again. It is the same trailer that had me worried about Argylle from the beginning, as it seemed… not great. February release, big names, everything looking fake and the premise that seemed to have relied heavily on who the real agent Argylle was. I had a strange feeling that this might be a first flop by Matthew Vaughn, who’s done well despite not all his movies hitting as hard. And Argylle is… okay.

Whereas the first Kingsman movie (Kingsman: The Secret Service, 2014) was an awesome love letter to all spy films (but mainly the James Bond franchise), Argylle is fractured. Part of it takes place in the author’s (Bryce Dallas Howard) head, another in real life; there is a twist coming our way, and it… simply doesn’t mesh well all together. The entire film feels disjointed, contrary to the past when Vaughn knew how to combine action with comedy and understood how to film them effectively. Argylle still has some fun moments and great action scenes (mainly in the second half); however, the CGI creeps in heavily and takes you out of the illusion. The opening scene featuring Henry Cavill and Dua Lipa has one of the most outrageous “driving away” CGI scenes I have ever seen in the cinema. The CGI is so bad that instead of Greece (where that story is supposed to take place), you are pulled out of the movie, and it hasn’t properly started yet!

What’s probably not helping is that I am watching (and re-watching) all the James Bond movies, and even the weaker ones have one thing going for them – they were shot in real locations, and it shows. The CGI in Argylle is not necessarily bad, but there is something about these big set pieces that don’t photograph well yet, and you can always tell the actors are in the studio. The shadows, elements, the scene… everything just looks more realistic when shot on location because it is! And I get it; if they did it today, this movie would have doubled its budget because it’s expensive and a logistical nightmare to travel, but… Hollywood needs to figure something else out if they want to continue shooting these “worldwide adventure” movies, and the world we see is a projection of Greece, Italy or Japan rather than the actual locations.

One thing this film did well was the casting. Bryce Dallas Howard is an underrated actress who should have been the lead in more films, and she is great in this film. I won’t talk more about her because then we would have to go to spoilers, but her performance worked for me, no matter what was happening on the screen. The same applies to Sam Rockwell; I thought he was a great pick for a more realistic agent, and I liked his comedic scenes as much as his serious ones. Cavill, Dua Lipa and John Cena were all fine with what they had to work with as those characters were stuck in this fantasy world where they had to perform a certain way. I thought it was a waste of mainly Henry’s time, but hey, I hope he had some fun.

As someone who recently adopted a cat, I appreciated the cat element, even though I am still not sure whether the movie had to rely on that cat for as much. There are only so many times seeing this one cat in that one bag can be funny. I wouldn’t be surprised if they added more cat scenes purely so they could use more of her in that one trailer, so that tagline “once you know the secret, don’t let the cat out of the bag” makes more sense.

The main issue with Argylle is that this film is trying to do a bit too much at once, and only some of those elements work. The cast – mostly works. The CGI is mostly bad. The twist – it’s fine. But it’s nothing that would blow your mind or even change how you feel about the movie. The story itself is also okay, but this department was where the film struggled the most in balancing the comedy element with the real-life spy element while having some stakes. And don’t even get me started on the last scene, where the reality just breaks entirely, and it felt as almost Vaughn put it there just to fuck with us.

And it’s this intentional “fuckery” that hurts this movie the most. Vaughn understands his schtick and reputation, which makes his choices more predictable because it feels like he is embracing his image too much if it makes sense. Let me put it this way – if we go back to Kingsman, it worked not because it was Vaughn being Vaughn. That movie worked because you could feel the love for the genre from that movie. It worked because it also did not rely on just that and tried to do a spy movie for modern audiences. Argylle, on the other hand, feels like Vaughn said: “They expect this from me; therefore, this is what I will deliver.” He gave us some fun scenes (although I can see how, for example, the ice skating scene will split the audience), but they all felt like the bare minimum. They all felt, for the lack of a better word, soulless. The same as the CGI, it felt all artificial, somewhat expected and predictable. Also, this film is long. The runtime of 139 minutes is something you have to justify to your audience, and I don’t think this movie did that. You can easily edit around 20 minutes from this movie, and who knows, maybe it might have resulted in a much better picture…?

Overall, Argylle is not as bad as I feared, but it’s also the most okay film Matthew Vaughn has made until now. There are great things about it (mainly the cast) and some bad things about it (mostly the CGI). The worst part is that I enjoy Vaughn’s movies, and I don’t mind when directors make big swings and miss or strike out. But Argylle didn’t even feel like a big swing; it just felt like a by-the-numbers spy movie, which is not a sentence I wanted to write alongside the name Matthew Vaughn.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Beekeeper (2024) Review – An Unhinged Fun

Advertisements

When you see a January movie (the month where movies go to die) called The Beekeeper, starring Jason Statham, you should know what you are getting yourself into. Some people might be buzzing with joy, and some might bee a tad underwhelmed, but don’t worry yourself too much, honey; the movie is as bad as this sentence. And I kind of loved it, despite it being objectively not a great movie.

For the first 20 minutes, I didn’t think I would enjoy it, as everybody was taking themselves way too seriously, especially Jason Statham. It’s almost like he wanted to give this movie some gravitas, so he has a few scenes where you ask yourself questions like: “Is he trying to act like he is in a potential Oscar-nominated drama rather than a movie called The Beekeeper that’s a January action flick?” or “Is this movie real?” You know, the important questions. But I assure you, this movie is real enough, and it’s wild. After the first 20 minutes, I found myself tuning into this film’s frequency, where I understood that this would be “one of those movies”, and I let myself have some fun with it. Luckily, the action came soon, and some bee puns and facts followed, so it definitely stopped taking itself too seriously and started to be what this movie was always destined to be – a dumb, fun, action flick.

Everyone is over-the-top in this film. You expect it from Statham because he isn’t that actor, but Emmy Raver-Lampman‘s character was off (I thought the actress was fine, just some choices for her character were a bit weird), Josh Hutcherson has only one “evil and spoiled” level, and he stays there for the entire film. Minnie Driver is in this movie but only for what could be best described as a glorified cameo, and Jeremy Irons… Damn, he is hamming it up like there’s no tomorrow. Objectively, he was the best actor in this film, but if you only watch this film and nothing else from his long and illustrious career, you would think he is just some old dude who over-enunciates his every line. It was mainly through his character I finally understood that he might be the only actor who understands the movie he is in and, therefore, adjusted his acting to meet it.

Statham’s character in this film plays somebody who can best be described as “what if John Wick and Terminator had a kid.” He is as unstoppable and takes little to no damage from anyone; he makes almost every single action hero of the past decade look like a loser. Even the “final” boss doesn’t pose any real threat to his character, who is on this righteous vendetta to punish these incredibly evil people. Yeah, we need to talk about that.

When I say this film is unhinged, I mean that. The good people are good; the bad people are… pure evil. They not only rob (mostly older) people; they celebrate it each time! Not one person in any of those companies isn’t a straight-up evil cunt who couldn’t be happier to rob yet another pensioner and wipe their savings. And this is what I mean when I say you must get on The Beekeeper‘s frequency to have fun with it. Because this is objectively… not a bad movie; there were some cool shots, and technically, it’s made by someone who understands how to stage a scene. But it’s an incredibly predictable, dumb, over-the-top action piece about this secret government organisation that punishes those that “slip through the system”. And, of course, if you follow the money from those super evil corporations who rob people, it might lead you to the highest places…

There is a reveal around the second third of this film that, if you don’t see coming from a mile away, you are either in a coma or have not seen many movies. But The Beekeeper treats it as if it just landed a knockout punch nobody saw coming. And I think this is the moment that either makes or breaks this movie for you. Because if you are in for this unhinged ride, you will just laugh at this reveal and continue being amused. If you hated this movie until then, you might super hate it afterwards. In my case, I managed to tune into this movie’s wavelength, and somehow, we synched up. It’s one of those “it’s so bad, it’s good” movies. It might also be the fact I expected next to nothing from this, so the fact this movie was so out there was a pleasant surprise.

Overall, The Beekeeper is a dumb, action movie that I managed to have fun with. It is also one of those “I will totally understand if you watch this and hate it” kind of movies. Ok, maybe not hate, because it’s not a bad movie; it’s just terribly average, tonally all-over-the-place kind of film that thinks it’s making a super deep point whilst being shallow as a puddle after a two-minute rain. If you like Statham and want to see him kick ass and be unstoppable, then look no further. Also, for all it’s worth, watching Jeremy Irons ham it up like that was also something you don’t get to see every day.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Madame Web (2024) Review – Don’t Hate the Players, Hate the Game

Advertisements

This review might be a bit different than the ones I usually write. I saw the movie, and yeah, it’s bad. But then I read the IMDb trivia (some great gems there) and began to understand how this movie was doomed to fail from the beginning and in a much worse way than I would have anticipated. So, part of this will be talking about this movie, but the other will be me talking about the current studio system and, specifically, Sony.

One thing that Madame Web tried to be is an origin story of somebody who is quite popular and powerful in comic books (that was all I knew about her, as someone who has never read any comic book in his life). Unfortunately, every beat of this origin story is not only boring, it’s also shot poorly, edited horribly, and many things don’t align logically. I will give one example for many – Dakota Johnson is a suspect in kidnapping our main heroines (Sydney SweeneyIsabela Merced and Celeste O’Connor) and drives off with them in the middle of nowhere. Then, she leaves them, so they wander off to get food at the nearby dinner, and there, a guy spots them and calls the police. And how did he know it was them? We see the guy reading newspapers with no single image. Not only did this “kidnapping” only happen a couple of hours ago (very late newspaper edition, I guess), but also, he just saw three random girls walk in and thought: “Yep, that must be them, better do my duty!” And this one scene is just one example out of many.

Regarding the technical side, this might be the first blockbuster film in ages where you can spot sound being properly off. Especially with Tahar Rahim‘s character, many of his lines are shot with his character either facing sideways or straight-up from the back, so we don’t see his mouth. And it’s very distracting, but knowing now about all the various re-shoots, it makes so much sense why this had to be shown like this.

That brings me to my last point about the actual movie – the performances. Everyone is weird and awkward and seems off in Madame Web. Now, I won’t blame any of the actors, as I know all of them are talented, given I have seen their previous work, so I know Dakota, Sydney, Isabela or Celeste are great actors. But they are misdirected and often seem confused as to what is happening. There was a portion of this film towards the end where we see them in the future with their powers. And for those scenes, I was kinda into it because they seemed like they could kick ass. However, we really get those scenes, maybe for two minutes tops. The rest is just an origin story that puts everything on the right track. Unfortunately, though, that track is dodgy, not well-oiled and also set on fire whilst constantly being changed.

And this is where I must address the IMDb trivia. Specifically, one struck a nerve with me:

According to Dakota Johnson in an interview with The Wrap, the screenplay underwent extensive rewrites to the point that it no longer resembled the film that she signed on for. The original screenplay, which was described as darker and “very ‘Terminator’ inspired,” would have seen Madame Web and the Spider-Women trying to protect a pregnant Mary Parker from Ezekiel Sims, who wants to kill her to prevent the birth of Peter Parker.

Source: IMDb.com

Imagine being an actor, signing on to do a film based on this intriguing screenplay. And as you shoot it, it changes on you to something incoherent, messy and not resembling anything that intrigued you about it in the first place. Especially when that premise sounds awesome, I would totally watch that movie! The studio system has always been like this, and Madame Web is hardly the first movie that had this done. However, when the story and script changes are so obvious that you can’t showcase your villain that much because his words don’t match his lips, and your main star literally changed her agency after the first trailer came out (yep, that’s real), you know you’ve done fucked up. In 2023, we had both writers’ and actors’ guilds striking for better conditions, better pay and all that any sensible movie-loving person supported. I hope part of those terms the actors and writers negotiated was for the screenplay not to change as drastically once everything gets green-lit. I understand changes will always happen, and that’s fine, but if you green-lit a movie, surely you should “leave it” and supervise it from a distance rather than actively mess around with the screenplay and the story… It just doesn’t make sense.

Sony seems to be the unfortunate “king” of these, especially since their comic book movies aren’t… Well, let’s just say they haven’t had the best response (looking your way, Morbius (2022, my review here). I know there must be some weird sense of: “Oh well, we will nail the next time!” and that’s why they haven’t sold everything to the MCU yet, but… Sony, guys, enough is enough. Yes, the MCU has their issues, and its track record isn’t flawless, especially in the last couple of years, but… I would still trust them more. I would still trust the MCU to do reshoots better (they have done them in the past) and to actually get a better grasp of these characters.

That is why I am torn on this movie, as yes, I didn’t enjoy it, but I didn’t hate it as much because, in some scenes, you can see the “what if” potential. Imagine if this movie was good; I feel like the sequel (given they all had their power by then) would have been great. And the more I think about it after reading more about this film and its behind-the-scenes, the more I refuse to talk shit about anyone involved here, especially the actors. Yes, nobody comes across as capable in this film, but I genuinely believe they are giving what they can and what they have been told to do. It’s hard to talk about movies sometimes, especially when you can tell there was so much behind-the-scenes stuff that set this movie on the wrong path from day one.

Overall, Madame Web is not a great movie. However, I didn’t think it was as bad (for me, it’s slightly better than Morbius, but that ain’t saying much), and what’s more, this one seems like it was set to fail the moment they started to move away from that intriguing, Terminator-like premise. Madame Web is like a ship without a captain that is sailing towards the harbour. The anchor still hasn’t dropped, the crash is imminent and on top of that, that ship is on fire, and its crew was powerless to do anything about it. I feel bad for all the actors and creative people involved and hope those who aren’t A-listers will recover from this. It’s rare for studio pictures to fuck that badly, and Sony, you managed again. Here’s your trophy. Now, go fuck yourself.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Flix and Chill Is HERE (Podcast Update)!

Advertisements

Hello movie friends!

As I hinted at before, my podcast is now ready to be launched!

It’s called Flix & Chill, and each second Friday, I will be talking to someone about their life, movies and everything in between. Sometimes, we might get deep, and other times, we might get controversial, but mostly, I was striving to make a podcast where you can put a personality to the name of someone you might know from the Internet but never knew “what they are about”.

Also, you can be on it! If you want to talk to me about life, movies and everything in between, please email me at spdmcrew@gmail.com, send me your stuff (anything from your Letterboxd profile to a blog or YouTube channel you do), and I will get to you!

The trailer can be found here:

Or, if you aren’t a fan of Spotify, you should be able to find it anywhere else, and if not, we are working on it! 😉

So please, give it a listen, and come back this Friday, 2nd of February, for a first episode. If you want to like and subscribe and all that good stuff, I wouldn’t be mad at all 😉

Until next time,

Luke

Goodbye 2023, Welcome 2024 & Announcement!

Advertisements

Hello movie friends,

Firstly, let me thank every one of you for taking the time of your day and reading this blog. I have had the best year ever, view-wise, and I won’t be stopping any time soon. Honestly, I can’t thank you enough for reading my reviews; it means the world to me.

I hope 2023 was great for you and 2024 will be better, bringing us more excellent movies and shows to talk about, but most importantly, you will enjoy yourself and be happy, healthy and satisfied.

For me, I can’t wait to see what 2024 has in store for us, and I can already announce that after enjoying appearing on quite a few podcasts now (see here) and a few more to come, I have been toying around with an idea of starting my own one and now I am in the final stages.

I will reveal all the details here, and I can’t wait for you to listen. I can say it will be about movies (what a shock, right?) but also about getting to know people who love movies online, so the plan is to have a more conversation-style podcast rather than a straight-up “Review of this movie” podcast.

But again, all will be revealed, hopefully soon!

Until then, I must thank all of you so much, one more time, and I hope that 2024 will be a better year for us all.

Until next time,

Luke