Tag Archives: 2024

Alien: Romulus (2024) Review – Fede is Here to Stay!

Advertisements

Ever since I watched the first trailer for Alien: Romulus, I was in. I liked the vibe, the grittiness, and when the name Fede Alvarez popped as the director, I knew I would be checking it out in the cinema. He did the remake of The Evil Dead (1981), simply called Evil Dead (2013), which I loved. He also made Don’t Breathe (2016, my review here), which I respected; you could even say I liked it. The thing about him is that he seems to be a very “back to basics” director whose movies feel real, gritty, and raw, and he isn’t afraid to disgust you a bit (sometimes, a bit more). So I hoped he would bring those elements to the Alien franchise, and luckily, my hopes were answered. This movie is almost everything I wanted it to be and then some.

The movie starts on this planet full of people who are effectively slaving away for Weyland-Yutani and hoping to escape it by working hard. But given this megacorporation is as evil as if you mixed Amazon and Apple, they keep changing the conditions, so people stay, work and eventually die there. No inspiration taken from the real world; let’s move on… 😉 And it’s even during this “boring but necessary” exposition I noticed that this movie feels real. It’s a shame that this needs complimenting, but it did feel like they shot this on location and with physical objects rather than being trapped in a green screen studio (or the VFX were THAT good).

I also liked the new group of soon-to-victims/alien birthing chambers. For me, the standouts were a bit obvious – Cailee Spaeny and David Jonsson. Their “brother/sister” dynamic at the start worked, and as the events of this film unfolded, I liked how that dynamic changed and got challenged. Whom I always enjoy seeing and who has a tinier but pretty crucial role was Isabela Merced. I think she is sneaky great, and, given a couple of good roles in a row, she could rule Hollywood.

Now, let’s get to the meat of this story – the Alien. You can have the best characters ever, but if your Alien movie fucks up the “Alien” part, you are in trouble. Luckily, Alien: Romulus knows what it wants to do and, more importantly, how to build the tension. There are some predictable things and some questionable things as well (more about that soon), but one thing this movie nailed was the action and horror. Because of its settings (“abandoned” spaceship), we go back to the claustrophobic roots of this franchise, where it seems like Xenomorph or Facehugger can be behind any corner. I also love the shots when, a few times in this movie, the Xenomorph almost blends in with the background, and we can only see it when it moves.

Fede understands this beast very well and makes it (alongside the numerous Facehuggers) scary, ruthless and almost unstoppable, just as we remember from the numerous Alien movies before this one. I also appreciated that this is a dark movie, but I was never confused about where we were or struggled to see any action on the screen. As I always said, there’s a difference between “movies taking place in the dark” and “let’s hide our shitty action/CGI with a lot of shadows and darkness”. Also, Fede does something unique with this franchise, and we have several outstanding sequences. The clear standouts were the zero gravity fight and crossing the room full of Facehuggers undetected.

My only tiny issue with this movie would be the clunky way they bring back someone from the past. I don’t want to mention which movie; I don’t want to discuss spoilers that much, but I don’t know whether it was needed. Especially given who that person is/was within that universe, you could have easily made this movie with some other, unknown character rather than what this movie chose to do. It didn’t pull me out of the film, but it was a weird choice for… numerous reasons. Also, if I was nit-picky, towards the end, they seem to run around this big ship quite quickly, and the timer seemed to be pausing/stopping because, of course, there’s a self-destruct timer, wouldn’t be an Alien movie without it!

But I can’t lie; neither of those two things bothered me as much as to spoil my enjoyment of this twisted film. Especially the last third, where you know some shit will go down and then it happens, and it’s even bloodier and more intense than I thought. And that is why I am fully on board with Fede Alvarez being one to watch out for. Even if he doesn’t do something I would fully appreciate (like Don’t Breathe), I still think his movie has a unique sense of style and grittiness I gravitate towards. We live in an age where many movies look alike, no matter whether you watch comedy, action or a thriller. And his films always have a more “cinematic” look to them. They feel more grounded, and I am including Alien: Romulus in that conversation too, which is saying something.

Overall, Alien: Romulus was a blast. It’s an almost two-hour thrill and horror ride that never bored me. The jump scares (only a few, which is another positive) worked, but what I appreciated more than that was the atmosphere, the willingness to show us something new and Fede staying true to himself and showing us some good old horror fun. I can’t wait to rewatch it and see where this will ultimately end up in my Alien ranking because, at this moment, it’s pretty high. Go and support this movie in the cinema if you fancy a great Alien movie.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Mean Girls (2024) Review – Playing the Hits, The Movie

Advertisements

I am old enough to remember when the original Mean Girls (2004) film came out. It took me two viewings to get into it, and I still wouldn’t say it’s my favourite movie. However, within that genre, it undeniably left a mark on our pop culture and helped to put some young girls (at the time) on the path to stardom, namely Rachel McAdams, Amanda Seyfried and Lizzy Caplan, I could argue were the most impacted by the success of this film. I have never seen the musical this movie is based on (yes, technically, it’s not a remake of the original; it’s a remake of that musical). Still, I have heard many people enjoyed it, and it gave us Reneé Rapp. Unfortunately, I can see how this would have worked much better as a stage musical.

Let me start with some positives. I thought Reneé Rapp was awesome as Regina, and she can sing. I thought the girl who played Janis was familiar, so when I checked IMDb and discovered it was Moana herself, Auli’i Cravalho, I was stunned. She was also great in her role, and I don’t think I need to even mention the fact that she has some pipes on her because she is freaking Moana! Of course, she can sing. But the standout of this movie was Avantika, who portrayed Karen. Sure, she is gorgeous, so that doesn’t hurt, but what’s much more important is that she (the same as Amanda Seyfried in the original film) is perfect as this idiot. The most I laughed at was her and her line deliveries because I know this isn’t an easy role. Playing the comic relief, you are always in danger of overstaying your welcome, and when that happens, it’s easy to get on people’s nerves. But the film gives her just enough scenes for it not to happen, and she capitalised on every single one. I wouldn’t mind seeing her career trajectory follow Amanda’s and seeing her in more dramatic roles and possibly getting some Oscar love. I hope she has been cast in 20 movies.

My biggest problem with this movie was the awareness of itself being a remake and needing to deliver on the iconic lines and scenes. Because the problem with the iconic lines (“That’s so fetch.” “On Wednesdays we wear pink!” etc.) and moments is that they became iconic organically. And this film puts so much emphasis on them that it becomes distracting. I would imagine all the crew and actors wanted to make sure they did them justice, but in doing that, they took it a bit too over the board, so every time a line or a scene from the original movie gets recycled, it becomes cringy, really fast. And this is what I can see would work as a Broadway musical because you MUST play it big for those moments to land in front of a live audience. Unfortunately, just like with many adaptions prior (whether you are adapting a book, game or musical), this film fell into the same trap, not realising that what worked on the stage doesn’t translate on the screen.

Another example of this would be the musical numbers. I watched this film a few weeks ago and can barely remember any that would stand out. I had to go back and read my review on Letterboxd (feel free to follow me here, shameless plug ;-)) because I remember naming two scenes that stood out. Those were the Halloween party and the Burn Book reveal scenes). I felt like those two musical set pieces at least tried to do something more cinematic. But as far as the rest is concerned, they weren’t any more imaginative than your average music video of the last decade. To be fair, I could probably name some music videos that are much more intriguing than most of these musical scenes. Again, what might have worked as a musical won’t work in cinemas or TV screens.

And if I must be brutally honest, I thought the songs were… fine. I think one of my biggest let-downs was that even after the movie finished, there wasn’t one tune, one song that would get stuck in my head. When I watch musicals, I love it when at least one or two songs stay with me to the point I would want to add them to my Spotify playlist, but here, nothing. I remember feeling like this when the credits were rolling, let alone now, a couple of weeks removed from this film.

Look, I am not saying this version of Mean Girls is bad. No, it’s a perfectly fine, semi-enjoyable movie that will, hopefully, catapult some young actors and singers to stardom. What I am trying to say is – when you adapt a musical based on a film that defines an entire generation, there are a few things you must balance out. You should also realise that there is no stage limit. Therefore, you can shoot musical numbers differently. You must, or otherwise, the final result will be average at best.

Overall, Mean Girls is a solid movie full of decent performers and actors who will be intriguing to watch where they end up in 20 years’ time. The movie won’t probably bore you, but especially if you have seen some musicals in your life, this might underwhelm you just a bit. But if you love “young sexy people” being young and sexy and every 10 minutes they break into a dance number, this film might be for you.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Deadpool & Wolverine (2024) Review – A Tribute to All Broken Things

Advertisements

For the first time since The Avengers (2012), we only have one MCU movie coming out in the entire calendar year of 2024, and it is this one. The pressure was on to deliver and, to an extent, prove if people are, in fact, sick and tired of comic book films or whether they just don’t like when movies that don’t do anything new. And by the massive success of Deadpool & Wolverine, it seems clear that people still care; you just need to motivate them to show up in the cinemas. The Marvel Jesus (Ryan Reynolds) did it.

I can’t lie; it’s been a while since I have had such a blast in the cinema. This movie throws everything at you and then some; the cadence is roughly 22.5739 jokes per minute, and there are various quips, quick jokes, and references to many things (mostly pop-culture related), but most landed for me. What I loved is how this movie dealt with the idea of “bringing” Wolverine back, as I don’t think it’s a spoiler to say that he died in his last film and Hugh Jackman officially retired from playing him. That was until this movie, where what they did and how this movie opened was brilliant. And the laughs didn’t stop for me for pretty much the entirety of this buddy hero movie.

It’s hard to discuss specifics without going into spoilers because there are some amazing jokes, scenes, and characters who I had no idea were coming. So, before delving into spoilers, I will say that I enjoyed this movie and was on the verge of giving it 5/5 stars. The only thing that stopped me was the nagging feeling of whether some of those scenes and jokes would work as much on my second watch. But other than that, I had a good time with this film, as it’s a pretty poignant farewell to a specific comic book era where things weren’t always going great. It’s a love letter to all the “forgotten” comic book movies, characters and some that never even gotten their chance to shine. I have noticed when people discuss this movie, one of the biggest criticisms is that there is “no story”. I don’t get that at all because this movie is about many things; you just need to look beyond the vulgar humour. It’s about finding your place, fitting in and wanting to be something bigger than yourself. This movie talks about how no matter how super you are, you may never reach the heights you want to, and that’s fine. So, I don’t agree with that notion.

I will also give the movie this – the action scenes and montages were executed well. Unlike many MCU films, the action scenes in Deadpool & Wolverine seemed less edited and more fluent. And the montages, whether it’s the finale or the closing credits one, were tastefully done, and I wouldn’t be surprised if many teared up during either of those. Especially the end credit one, where we see behind-the-scenes footage from many comic book films of the past, made me want to rewatch the X-Men movies as it’s been a minute since I watched the first ones. Anyway, let’s go to spoilers so I can talk about some scenes and characters more freely.

BEWARE, SPOILERS ARE COMING!

I expected more cameos, to be honest, but I will say I am not disappointed by “only” having those we got just to clarify something from the start. I imagined, given the fourth-wall-breaking nature of Deadpool, everyone who has ever appeared in the MCU would be in here, even if in a big group scene for a second (like in Deadpool 2 (2018)). Instead, we get a more sensible approach, and the first hint of that is when Chris Evans shows up, but not as Captain America. Instead, he shows up as Johnny Storm from the Fantastic Four movies he made in the mid-2000s. One thing I don’t think people appreciate about this movie is they could have gone for the expected (especially with the subplot of Deadpool trying to join the Avengers) and made him come back as Captain America, but that wouldn’t have worked with the theme of this film. Don’t get me wrong; this movie goes for the obvious jokes when it’s funny. But as far as plot and all these cameos are concerned, they seemed to have more thought put into them than simply: “Hey, we need to bring back this person and that person, just because we can!”

Speaking of which, did I like seeing Jennifer Garner as Elektra and Dafne Keen as Laura back? Yes, I did. Did I expect to see Channing Tatum as Gambit? Absolutely not. The choices they made with his character giving him this goofy… dialect? Accent? Speech disorder? Either way, it worked, and I, yet again, ask for Channing to star in more comedies because he is a low-key underrated and brilliant comedic actor. But, who brought me so much joy and I didn’t know I needed to see back on the big screen was the man, the myth, the tax dodging legend himself, Wesley Snipes. Blade has always been one of my favourite characters ever, and to see him back, be as cool as he was back in 1998 (!) and referencing the fact there is only one Blade (can you believe they announced the Blade movie in 2019 and we still haven’t gotten it?!) just made me so giddy. As much as I loved all the cameos and Deadpool variants, Wesley Snipes coming back in that scene as Blade was something I didn’t know I needed, and it made my day.

What this movie then does with all these cameos is also underappreciated. Sure, Evans is mostly the punchline, but as far as the others are concerned, Deadpool & Wolverine gives them all one last chance to shine, to be cool. And as Gambit himself points out in the movie, it gives him the chance to even exist because his Gambit movie was stuck in pre-production hell for a decade until it got cancelled altogether. And despite making him into “a bit” of a joke, when the action time came, they give him some cool set pieces too where it acted as this glimpse of what could have been. Everyone got the chance to shine in the big battle, and I am glad they didn’t bring them back just to kill them off. Well, except for Johnny Storm, but did you see him shit talking Cassandra Nova? No wonder she did what she did to him.

Speaking of her, Emma Corrin was awesome. Emma goes by they/them, and their character was a nice spin on Charles Xavier’s character. I liked how their journey almost mirrored Deadpool’s, and they also had to live in someone else’s shadow and just wanted to be seen. This film also showcased something we had never seen before – what if Professor X was evil? This movie goes through several things, and they barely manage to stop Cassandra’s character, fully displaying just how powerful someone with those powers would be.

I can’t wait to rewatch it and see how well it plays the second time around. But as far as my cinema visit, I had a blast. I thought MCU desperately needed a hit; they got it, and hopefully, they will understand that they need to mature now. I am not saying every MCU movie from this point forward needs to have this much profanity, but the audience is ready for more mature, darker comic book movies. And if there is one thing Deadpool & Wolverine proved without a doubt, people will show up and make you money, even if the movie is R-rated. If the source material calls for it, don’t soften it; nourish what makes the characters and stories unique.

Overall, Deadpool & Wolverine surprised me with how much fun I had with it. I expected a cameo fest of all the famous people. Instead, we get a few cameos that mean something. I didn’t expect this movie to be a reflection of how far we’ve gotten (comic book-wise) while giving some characters a proper send-off. I think this also will be an amazing time capsule film. In 20/30 years, when you put this on, you will be transformed into 2024, as no matter how much or how little you liked this movie, it is a mirror to the modern pop culture and our current obsession with nostalgia, multiverses and all the other things that make studios money. And sometimes, it’s good to reflect.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

LUke

Role Play (2024) Review – Mr. & Mrs. Boring

Advertisements

“Hey, you! Yes, you over there. Did you like/tolerate The Big Bang Theory (2007 – 2019)? Do you think David Oyelowo is criminally underrated and deserves a better career? What about a fun Bill Nighy? Well, if you said yes to all of the above, get ready to be super whelmed by Role Play! What’s that, you say? Whelmed is not a word? Shut up and buy Amazon Prime to watch this more average than the average movie!” – an Amazon executive, probably. I didn’t expect much from this film, but what I got was… somehow, almost exactly that. Not much.

Firstly, I don’t understand how nobody throughout the shooting of Role Play pointed out that Kaley Cuoco and David had no chemistry together. Just because you cast two good-looking people together, it doesn’t always mean they will mesh together, and I think that was, by far, the biggest problem of this film. The movie spends too much time on Kaley’s career and past, where we get only a few scenes where she interacts with her husband. On top of that, all the interactions (either the beginning or the end) feel just like they are good friends rather than husband and wife. Which is weird because I think both are capable actors.

The other thing I thought was weird was how the second half seems to be building up towards a big showdown, where we see Kaley utilising all her assassin powers on the people that kidnap her, her husband and her children, and then we have about five people in total for her to deal with…? So, instead of some fun action set piece, we get a couple of mid-kills, some happen off the screen for “comedic” effect, and that’s it…? This movie is hyping up the agency going after Emma (Kaley’s character), and then they only had three guards with one boss and her henchwoman. Really?

I don’t think this is nostalgia talking, but when watching movies like Role Play, I remember that even “silly” action comedies like Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2005) gave us much more of… well, everything. Yes, I know that I am kind of cheating because we are comparing bigger budgets, larger names and all of that, but if this movie wants to play in this sandbox of “I’m married to an assassin, and I had no idea?!” than there were so many fun things for them to do. And this film does none of them.

To name some positives, Bill Nighy does his absolute best in the couple of scenes he had and almost steals this movie. Usually, I would say that’s because he is that talented, but in this case, it’s not as hard to stand out, given everything around him is various shades of beige. I also appreciated some comedic moments by David Oyelowo’s character, even though, for the most part, he seemed wasted in this film.

The biggest issue is that if I am being objective, there is nothing else to say about this movie because it was shot competently, paced well enough, and the runtime was a swift 100 minutes, so it’s not like you will rue the day you pressed the play button on your remote. But it’s so “by the numbers” I struggled with every aspect of this movie. There isn’t a single standout – no scene, performance, action set piece, or anything that would allow me to remember and rate this film much. Hence why I said this movie whelmed me because it’s not underwhelming by any means; it’s just the food equivalent of the most basic fast food you can get. Even the moment you are eating it (watching the film), you know you should be having a healthier meal (watching better films), and you won’t remember it within the next couple of days. I watched this film a couple of days ago, and honestly, besides the hotel scene with Bill, I am grasping for straws.

Overall, Role Play is one of the most average movies I have ever seen. The main couple consists of two good enough actors who, unfortunately, have no chemistry. And everything skews from there; the action is okay, the story is fine, the ending seemed rushed… If you are looking to watch something after a very long day and just want to switch off, I might still recommend 100 better movies than this. But if you want to watch something new-ish… Well, you can’t say I didn’t warn you.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Inside Out 2 (2024) Review – Anxiety, Puberty and Pixar

Advertisements

When Inside Out 2 was announced, I was less than enthusiastic because, like many, I consider the first movie (Inside Out, 2015) one of the best films Pixar ever made. Also, unlike some other films, this one didn’t never feel like there was much for expansion, as the first movie did everything it wanted to do without setting up any potential sequel. Yeah, they make the puberty joke towards the end that came back at the beginning of this film, but other than that, the idea of a sequel felt more unnecessary than with other films in the recent past. And let me remind you, we live in an era where quite a few movies are sequels, prequels or remakes. Anyway, I was curious, and the film was getting positive reviews, so I had to check it out for myself and honestly… Not bad.

The one thing this sequel did well was utilising the fact it was a sequel, so we jump straight into the story. We get one quick scene of re-introducing all the emotions (just in case you have not seen the original film and felt like going to see the sequel, I guess?), but besides that, the movie starts almost immediately with Riley starting puberty. Well… the puberty buzzer goes off, and they “bin” it. Does that mean Riley’s emotions delayed her puberty? Because that would be wild. Moving on, Inside Out 2 takes place two years after the original when our protagonist hits puberty and is introduced to new emotions – anxiety, ennui, envy and embarrassment. The new emotions quickly overtake her, banishing the old group to the side and taking over Riley’s life whilst she is getting used to the idea that her two best friends will attend a different high school than her.

I thought the movie displayed, yet again, each emotion brilliantly. I can imagine this film helping many younger people to describe what they feel much better, especially anxiety. I also appreciated how much this movie spent on the sense of self-worth and how, at that age, that gets directly tied to a different sense – of belonging to a group. Feeling the pressure to like the things the new group likes, because if you don’t, the chances are, they might not like you as much… I thought this was where Inside Out 2 shined the best in all the Riley scenes and how relatable they portrayed everything she was going through.

My only problem was with the “emotions’ journey”. Not only does it mirror the first movie (the “sensible” emotions get banished and need to find their way back to the control room), but the journey that our old emotions end up on feels a bit off. Because every time they stumbled upon a problem, it almost magically gets solved on its own. In the first movie, Joy had to think on her feet and figure out the way out of problems. In this movie, there were some moments where literal magic helps them out, and that felt “a bit” cheap.

Also, the overall point is the same as in the original movie. It’s been a minute since I watched the first Inside Out, but I am pretty sure the main message is sadness isn’t always bad; it just can’t control your life. And the same point was made here, with anxiety, respectively, with the “planning” part. It’s fine to plan, but if you do it to the point of driving yourself crazy, that’s not helpful. And it was in that way my worries came through and how, ultimately, this world isn’t as large as one might think. Because the “ultimate” message will always stay the same, all human emotions can be helpful if the person lives an examined life. Sure, we follow a teenager who doesn’t understand anything (as everybody their age), so it makes more sense, but from the viewer’s perspective, if you watch these back to back, I imagine it can get repetitive.

Another thing – where the original had a big emotional scene that almost got me (yes, I am talking about Bing Bong), this sequel didn’t have anything like this. They try, don’t get me wrong, and all the scenes hit just right, but there wasn’t one that would stand out as much or hit me a bit more.

I will have to rewatch it at some point to sort my thoughts on Inside Out 2. I might even rewatch the original movie first to see whether I am viewing the first movie through a “nostalgic lens” (that was a great scene with nostalgia, btw), but for now, despite all the tiny issues I had with this movie, I actually had more fun than I anticipated. Pixar didn’t miss with this movie as it’s a beautifully animated, relatable story about a young girl on the brink of puberty. Sure, the “road map” might be familiar, but given the sensible runtime, great voice cast (the clear standout is Maya Hawke, given how much runtime her Anxiety gets) and the fact that I had a good time, I enjoyed it.

Overall, Inside Out 2 is better than I expected, although it doesn’t reach the peak of the original movie, which isn’t a fair criticism, given the original is just on another level. Nevertheless, if you are looking for something familiar, fun and easy to watch, this movie is that and more. And if you have a teenager living with you, this movie might equip them to talk to you about what they are going through a bit better, and that’s never a bad thing.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Idea of You (2024) Review – Anne Hathaway Does It Again

Advertisements

I can’t lie; when I agreed to watch this movie (Happy Girlfriend, Happy Life); I wasn’t expecting much due to the generic title and even more generic-looking trailer. I had hoped that at least Anne Hathaway (who refuses to age and looks as stunning as ever) would keep my attention. Not only did she do that, but she reminded me why I could never hate her, as she gives everything to this film, and without her, The Idea of You would become “just another” rom-com.

And sure enough, this film starts as your generic rom-com – divorced parents, a dead-beat dad who breaks all the promises and a mum who must pull her weight to make up for him… Not breaking any new ground here. However, if we put Anne’s performance aside for a second, the film quickly devolves into something more intriguing. It has many things to say about celebrity lifestyle, relationships with a significant age gap and how the Internet (respectively, obsessive fans on the Internet) can shout everything at you without thinking about the fact that they are not screaming at the wall but at a person on the other side of that smartphone. And, as it is in the case of Anne’s character, that person is a “civilian” who didn’t knowingly sign up for this shit.

This discourse happens mainly in the second half. Therefore, for us to be in this until that happens, we must be pulled into the movie by the performances. I thought Nicholas Galitzine was fine. Despite him being the second lead, his character wasn’t as interesting to me, but I thought he did the best he could with it. But as I mentioned above, this is Anne Hathaway’s one-woman show. There were at least three separate moments she showed such sincerity and understanding for her character; I was in this movie because of her. I believed her every word, and she yet again proved that she was a great actress and should be a leading lady for some time to come. There are many great actresses, but I can’t think of anyone I would rather see in this role as Anne made it her own.

The second half, when we delve deeper into the double standard of older woman/younger man relationship and how society still treats it… let’s say poorly, was something I didn’t expect from a rom-com like this one. Especially, how this movie treats this topic with the nuance it deserves, rather than coming off as preachy. The more I thought about this film afterwards, the more I managed to convince myself that The Idea of You has a chance of becoming a classic of this genre and in 10/15 years, people will still remember this movie. Only time will tell, but I would honestly not be surprised.

The only thing (except for the rocky beginning) I had an issue with was the ending, and I mean the last few minutes. Without going into spoilers, the movie does everything to end, and then, it decides not to do that and adds something that feels very Hollywood-y. From what I understand, the book ends where the film logically should have ended, so the end is on the filmmakers, and although I understand why they thought they had to do it, I wish they hadn’t. I don’t want to write anything more, but once you see it, you will know what I mean.

Besides those few things, though, I enjoyed The Idea of You much more than I thought I would. This film is paced well; I was never bored, the movie addresses a few important issues we deal with nowadays, but, most importantly, Anne Hathaway carries it on her shoulders and makes it into something much better than it had any right to be. Even if you are not into rom-coms, I think it’s worth watching this one for her performance alone to see how I wish more actors approached rom-coms.

Overall, The Idea of You surprised and entertained me with little to no cringe, which is rare for modern-day rom-coms. It has a reasonable runtime, young hot people doing young hot things (like travelling across multiple countries and living their lives), but, most importantly, it has Anne Hathaway reminding you why she has been a star for over two decades and counting. Quite honestly, I didn’t think I would recommend it, but I am recommending this film because, as far as rom-coms go, you can do much worse.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Fall Guy (2024) Review – Camera, Stunts, Action!

Advertisements

Ever since the first trailer, this looked fun. David Leitch (ex-stuntman turned director) continues to establish himself as the guy who will make fun action movies with a bit of twist and is mostly succeeding. His film before The Fall GuyBullet Train (2022, my review here), was one of my favourites of 2022 (which was a great year for movies), and although The Fall Guy never reached those heights on my first viewing, I can’t wait to see it again.

First and foremost, this film is an open love letter to action movies and, most importantly, stunt people working on them. You could feel this comes from a guy who knows this industry well and has years of experience under his belt. Everything rings true from the stunt perspective, at least from the stories and interviews I have seen and heard. Yes, this is an action comedy, so you will mostly laugh; nevertheless, The Fall Guy shows you the nitty-gritty of all the action, from the planning to the numerous takes and how this is a job that takes a special kind of person who needs to be very versatile, fit and ready for anything that gets thrown their way. We see how much pain Ryan Gosling‘s character goes through, although we see it through a comedic lens.

What I appreciated the most is that it’s not too “inside baseball”. Yes, as with many “movies about making movies”, the more you know about this industry, the more little things you catch, but this movie never goes too much into it. It is more focused on the mystery of the main actor (portrayed by Aaron Taylor-Johnson) disappearing and Gosling being “hired” to not only take his place in the film but find him as well. We also have the romantic subplot regarding Gosling and Emily Blunt, and that gets intertwined during the making of this epic space movie that is definitely not Dune.

Let’s be honest, if you have ever seen a movie, the central piece of this film, aka “mystery”, isn’t really a mystery, as you could tell from miles away what is happening. Sure, maybe you don’t get all the details right, but you know the general gist, who is involved, and all that jazz. But I didn’t mind that, as for the majority of this movie, it’s fun to be in this world and with these characters. Both Ryan and Emily are excellent actors, and in this film, they can lean more into their comedic chops, and they both worked for me. The beginning and the batshit insane ending worked wonderfully.

It is the middle part of this film I had issues with. And by “issues”, I mean mainly pacing. The movie starts strong, and then it comes to a halt for some time. Don’t get me wrong, something is always happening on the screen, and I wasn’t ever “bored”, but in the second act of this film, you can feel the runtime more than you should have. It almost felt like Leitch had a problem “killing its darlings” in the assembly and didn’t cut out enough. There were a couple of scenes that ran for several minutes too long. You know how modern movies do one joke three or four times, and only then do we move on? That’s how most of the second act felt for most of those scenes; they seemed to go on for a bit too long. There is an excellent 100-minute movie hidden in this 126-minute film, and had we just shortened a few scenes (mainly in the second act), I would have had a blast.

The way the movie is now, I still enjoyed my time because the passion is palpable. This movie shines a light on people who are still, for the most part, ignored and not recognised enough. There’s the endless debate about why there are no Oscars for “Best Stunt” or “Best Stunt Performer”, and the main argument against it (from the industry) is they don’t want to push stunt people to do something dangerous to try and outdo each other, just so they can get that Oscar next year. And as much as I would love for stunts to get the recognition they badly need, I think that is a valid point. Does that mean we shouldn’t change anything? No, it just means we need to reconsider this issue; maybe don’t nominate specific people, but rather have “Best Stunts” for the ensemble cast…? Maybe that’s one way to do it, maybe not. Back to The Fall Guy – the passion is there, and I can’t fault it on a technical level either. Regarding the stunt work, there is no discussion, as some of the things you see in this are insane. I wonder how well this film will play on repeat viewings, for as it stands, I wanted to love this movie so much. After all, it has so much going for it. And I “just” liked it.

Overall, The Fall Guy is an action love ode to stunts, stunt performers and, via that lens, movies themselves. It has a very likeable leading duo, a couple of stunning stunt sequences (like that 8.5 car roll that actually is a world record, by the way) and intriguing enough mystery. The film’s only issue is the second act, where you get reminded that “less is more”. But other than that, The Fall Guy is worth seeing in the cinemas, if you can.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Ted (Season One) Review – Surprisingly Charming

Advertisements

I will be the first to admit that I wasn’t sure whether we needed a TV show based on the Ted movies (my reviews for both films can be found here and here). And I write this as someone up-to-date with Family Guy (1999 – ?) and American Dad (2005 – ?), so you can tell I enjoy me some Seth MacFarlane and his style of humour. But for some reason, I couldn’t see this being anything else but an “ok” show. Well, after this show came out and received pretty decent reviews, I had to check it out to see how wrong I was. I am glad to say I was very wrong.

Yes, Ted won’t surprise you with the humour much (it is very Seth MacFarlane), so it is up to you how much you gravitate towards this sometimes political, many times over-the-top, often pushing many boundaries, humour. And as I said above, I like Seth’s humour, so I had a blast, but that much I expected and wasn’t wrong about. What I didn’t expect was how, in just seven episodes, Seth created a family unit that doesn’t just feel like fodder for jokes.

You might think the biggest difference between this show and his other shows is the fact that Ted is live-action, and the others are animated. In reality, that isn’t the biggest difference, as we still have many jokes/scenes that feel very absurd, as if pulled from an animated show. The actual difference is that this family might seem like another bunch of stereotypes Seth can bounce jokes off, but in reality, you get to know and understand them all throughout this show.

Max Burkholder, who had to play a younger version of Mark Wahlberg as this show takes us back to the 90s after all the hype around this talking bear died out, was a great choice. I wasn’t sold on him from the first minute, I won’t lie; however, he turned me into a fan, as he isn’t just a one-dimensional character. He portrays John (while being 24 at the time of shooting) as your stereotypical teenager of that era before the Internet, who is full of dreams and aspirations, wanting to chill with his best friend and possibly watch some porn. You know, the usual stuff. But in the later episodes, we see some growth; we can see a personality and that he isn’t just a dumb stoner.

The same can be said about his parents, played by Alanna Ubach and Scott Grimes, who start one way where you think: “I know what these people are about.”, only for them to surprise you throughout the show. No matter if it’s a mom who tries to be a substitute teacher and discovers what she actually likes or whether it’s a dad whose (maybe?) gay truck convinces him about the errors of his ways. That sentence doesn’t make sense, you say? Just watch the show; it will be much clearer after.

Who I thought stole this show and managed to squeeze the most out of her role was Giorgia Whigham. Her Blaire could have easily become another “shut up, Meg!” punchline character, but it didn’t, and Giorgia positioned herself as the heart of this show. Her character goes through some trials, and sometimes she can be too much, but I was always rooting for her. And the more we get to know her throughout this show, the more you find yourself rooting for her.

Most importantly, they all complement each other so well. They all contributed to my enjoyment and biggest surprise of Ted, how much I cared about this quirky family. The thing is, when you watch a Seth MacFarlane show, you expect a crude, political, boundary-pushing humour. But when comes to writing full-rounded characters, that was something he didn’t have to do that much, given most of his shows are animated sitcoms that are, more often than not, composed of chaotic humour with little to no stakes. And despite Ted having the same style of humour (although a little bit less chaotic), the family unit, composed of actual characters rather than caricatures, helps to ground everything. Towards the end, I found myself laughing less and being invested more in the story about this one family, who happens to have a talking teddy bear living with them.

I hope this will come back for at least one or two more seasons, and that is a sentence I didn’t think I would write in my review of a Ted show. Right now, my only problem with the show is that we didn’t get enough episodes, and I hoped to get more. As long as everyone from the core family (plus Seth, of course) would be on board, I would watch a few more seasons. Especially if Seth doesn’t get wild and will keep this show grounded, because as much as I like his chaotic humour, sometimes, less is more. And Ted seems to have found that line, at least this first season.

Overall, Ted was a delightful surprise on every level for me. I expected to laugh, but I didn’t expect that by the time the first season finished, I would want more episodes. Sure, part of it was the great writing, but honestly, this show’s casting is superb by casting people who feel real. You believe they are a family, and as the series progresses, you find yourself rooting for them despite some of their flaws. I hope we will get a few more seasons, but even if that won’t happen, Ted is worth checking out. I don’t think it’s a heresy to write that this show is better than the movies.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke