Tag Archives: Non-English

All reviews for foreign films and shows.

Water Lilies (2007) Review – Very Strong Debut

Advertisements

I have stumbled upon this film by a complete accident, I must admit. And before watching any kind of foreign movie I’ve never heard of, what I do is to go through the directors/screenwriters filmography to see, whether I am familiar with any of their other work. With Water Lillies (the original French title is Naissance des pieuvres) I have discovered it’s a debut of Céline Sciamma, the woman responsible for Portrait of a Lady on Fire (2019), the movie I’ve heard so many great things about and what I’m planning on watching soon.

Anyway, I gave this movie a shot and I really liked it. Water Lilies is something I like to call “simplistically difficult movie”. What that means is, the story of this movie is straightforward, easy to follow. What becomes harder to wrap your head around are the characters, as you need to think about why they are doing the things they do, where are they coming from, what’s their motivation…?

Movies like Water Lilies don’t usually give you straight answers, so you either get it, or don’t. And I like that. This movie’s story is focusing on 3 very different girls – Marie, who’s growing up slowly realising she might prefer girls, but is (as most teenagers) really shy and awkward, Anne, who’s your typical “next-door neighbour” kind of girl, who in a normal crowd wouldn’t standout as much as she does next to a team of synchronise swimmers, and Floriane, who because of how she looks like, gets hit on all the time, therefore having a “certain” reputation in her swimming team and beyond that.

And this film follows them throughout hardships, where you eventually find out, no matter how you look, you will always have some issues. Also, what was quite well displayed here, is life doesn’t always workout the way you plan it, as there will always be some curve balls thrown your way.

Beware, SPOILERS are coming!

The “chubby” girl (for the record, I wouldn’t describe her like that, but that’s what the movie was going for) is struggling with her body image and for the entirety of the movie, is trying to date this one guy, who’s more interested in Floriane, the “beauty” of this story. But both of them are still virgins, which is a fact that might surprise you, the same way you might be surprised that it’s eventually Anne, who sleeps with the boy first. What she doesn’t know is he’s tried it with Floriane first before coming to her place, who flinched in the last second (based on what she said to Marie).

I really like when a movie can surprise me, where the surprise makes sense and this one unfortunately did. As this is the kind of typical teenager behaviour, where you’d go for a girl, and if she says no, you’d go to your “safe” choice, who was Anne. I also liked how gently they’ve displayed the relationship between Marie and Floriane, where at first, she doesn’t want to have Marie near by, just so she’d get curious enough about her to allow Marie to be part of the group, allowing her to watch them while practising.

As I’ve put into the title, this is a very strong debut by Céline Sciamma, where it didn’t matter to me I didn’t get all the symbolism she’d put into this film, I still overall liked it, as there was something about her style, her pacing, that even though the movie is on the slower side, it never feels boring or stale. And that’s not an easy thing to achieve. After watching Water Lilies, I’m really excited to watch Portrait of a Lady on Fire and I’m hoping, it will live up to everything I’ve heard about it. And I have a feeling I will be pleased with it, but only the time will tell…

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think of it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Parasite (2019) Review – Modern Day Masterpiece

Advertisements

I need to admit something – I didn’t catch Parasite before watching the Oscars live (yes, almost every single year for the past 11 years, I don’t go to sleep, so I can watch the ceremony live, yes, I’m that weird, yes since I live in Scotland, that means it’s from 2 AM to roughly 6 AM) but I’ve heard a fair bit about this movie, so (as almost everybody) I was expecting for this movie to win something. What I didn’t expect is what followed…

Let me just write this right now – after the historical night at the Oscars, I’ve seen it (twice now) and even with those high expectations, I was still blown away. Parasite is is almost a miracle of a movie. What I mean by that is – everything was kind of stacked up against it.

It’s a foreign language movie, so reading is required (which for me is not a chore, as that’s how I learned English, reading plenty of movie/TV show subtitles, plus I love foreign movies) so that will immediately annoy/deter some people. It’s also a movie about social issues, so it’d easy to fall into a trap of being “too preachy” or “not preachy enough”, it doesn’t have a clear genre (I mean seriously, what is it? Is it drama? Is it thriller? Is it a comedy? Is it all of the above, a bit?) and yet, somehow, everything blended together exquisitely under precise direction of Bong Joon Ho, who’s made history, as his movie was the first film EVER to win Oscars for both Best Foreign Movie AND Best Movie, that’s something I’m not quite sure whether anybody can pull off again (but I hope they do).

And he deserved it so much. Parasite is such a clever, nail biting movie, where it honestly doesn’t matter how many movies you’ve seen prior, whether you’re a movie buff, or you see 5 movies/year, you don’t know what happens next. I think that’s one of the main reasons why Parasite was celebrated that much. To make a movie, where there is a clear narrative story, where the structure is given, and yet you, as a viewer, can’t predict pretty much anything that’s coming, but for what’s coming to make sense afterwards… That’s a pure brilliance.

Beware, the SPOILERS are coming!

The other reason I believe Parasite scored largely with audiences and critics was the social commentary, where we follow a family of… well frankly, the lowest of the low, as Ewan McGregor’s character from Trainspotting (1996) would’ve described them. They hunt for a Wi-Fi from restaurant next door, barely making some money, scrapping from day to day, until their son gets the chance to tutor a daughter from a rich family. That’s where the movie seems kind of a like a comedy, where one by one, they find a way to replace all the “servants” in the rich family and employ themselves. And suddenly, they are living well, not just surviving. And they would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for those meddling… former housekeepers…?

I don’t want to spoil too much, but what happens in the second half of this movie, I’ve not anticipated. That’s where the movie shifts to drama and at the end even bit of a thriller territory. I need to talk about two characters that I feel like deserve the most recognition (even though all actors are amazing) – Kang-ho Song (the “poor” dad) and So-dam Park (his “poor” daughter). Why these two?

The poor dad is the heart of this movie, where he’s trying so hard to belong to this rich world, he wishes nothing else but for his children to belong there too, but no matter what he does, he doesn’t belong. As the “rich dad” says to his wife at one point: “I like him. He always seems he’s about to cross the line, but he never does” – that to me establishes perfectly his character – he’s trapped in between these two worlds, where he is balancing on the edge of both, wanting to belong to the “richer” one, but something always pulls him back, maybe “the smell”. That scene, where the “rich dad” is talking to his wife about his “poor smell”, while the “poor” family is hidden in the same room, is truly heartbreaking, and you can tell how the rage is only bubbling up inside of him from that point.

The poor daughter for me is the soul of this movie, as she’s really smart, confident and she doesn’t let herself be stopped by anything, if she’s in doubt, she will google it and fake her way around it. Her character to me only highlights the gap between those two families, where one can’t help but to wonder, what would she be like if she were born in the “rich” family? Her options would be pretty much limitless, and yet, she didn’t let the fact of being born “poor” stop her and managed to do (or fake) so many things. Not going lie, I was rooting for her the entire movie, and what happens to her character at the end (again, don’t want to spoil this too much) just underlines how unfair life can be.

The another thing about this movie is, even after finishing it, you can have hours long discussion with your friends about one thing – who actually WAS the Parasite in this movie? Without going too much into anything, you could make an argument for several people in this movie, really easily. That’s yet another layer of brilliance that amazes me about this movie – you think you’ve found everything about it, then you re-watch it and find yet another layer that you can peel off and “examine”.

I do hope that this movie broke barriers, where it was needed, so this (non-English film winning the Best Picture award) won’t be just a single occurrence, but will inspire filmmakers from all over the world, and sends them a clear message – it doesn’t matter where you’re from, only thing that matters is the movie you’ve made and how good it is. I really hope we will see more of different movies/filmmakers from foreign countries put into a spotlight on Hollywood’s biggest night.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one? Did you see Parasite yet? What did you think? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

In the Realm of the Senses (1976) Review – Well, that was a… movie?

Advertisements

Before reading my review, I highly recommend reading something about Sada Abe – yes, this movie is based on a real life incident, and her life seems exactly the way you’d expect after watching this movie.

I’ve heard a few things about this movie, so I thought I was prepared for it.

I wasn’t.

Forgive me, if my sentences are shorter than usual, but I’m still trying to process what I’ve just watched.

In the Realm of the Senses is not a movie for everyone. It’s definitely on the artsy side of movie-making, where it’s not hard to follow (the story couldn’t be more simpler) but you need to get over all the nudity, sex, devotion, passion… Let’s put it this way, if you are one of those people, who blush easily during a Hollywood “sex scene”, prepare to be as red as communist’s flag on 1st of May, as boy, oh boy… This movie isn’t about anything else than two people being devoted to each other, where both take it too far (but arguably Sada took it way, way further).

The version I’ve seen was 109 minutes, but I guarantee you, if somebody was to cut all the non-sexual scenes from the movie (and I’m almost 100% convinced somebody’s already done that) the movie would still be around 85/90 minutes. That tells you everything you need to know. In a way, it’s fascinating.

So, is this just a porn movie that somehow got theatrical run? I am going to say no, and yes, I know it sounds weird, especially with everything I wrote up until this point, but bear with me. It’d be really easy to discredit this film as nothing but dirty porn movie about nymphomaniac with some mental issues, but that’d discredit everything the movie is trying to convey.

I feel like this is more about what the movie is trying to make you feel, rather than the visuals. Because after a while, you become desensitised to all the nudity and sex, and start noticing how by each act, each new day, the stakes between the couple are getting higher, the passion/devotion these two had for each other, there was something special about that. I’m not saying something healthy, or something we should all be aiming for, dear god no. But when you focus on the story/character of Sada, and her passion to control the love of her life to the point where it results in one really disturbing scene most men would love to never see again in their lifetime, that’s when you either understand the method to the madness, or not. Because at the end of the day, she was extremely sad, somewhat mentally broken character, and the way I read this movie, she was just looking for somebody to help/sympathise with her, somebody she could feel safe with.

I was a bit mesmerised by this movie, I thought Eiko Matsuda gave chilling performance and it’s s shame what happened to the actress after (basically she was shamed and almost banned in Japan, forced to life in France for most of her life) she made this film.

Is this a movie I need to see again? Probably not, but when comes to this I do have a rule, which is to never say never. But it’s definitely not something that you’d just pop in one Saturday afternoon for some quality family time (if yes, what the fuck is wrong with you? :-D)

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

This is it for this controversial movie. Have you seen it? If so, what did you think? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Antiporno (2016) Review – More than meets the eye?

Advertisements

Wow. Where to start with a movie like that…

Antiporno is one of only a few movies I’ve ever seen, where after it was over, I wasn’t sure how to rate it, let alone what to say about it. So I’ve watched a different movie right after, and in the back of my brain, I was trying to make my mind up about this one.

Because this is the very definition of artsy movie, to the core. Sharp, pastel colors, some over acting that serves the main concept/idea of the movie… well, judge for yourself, slightly NSFW (not safe for work) trailer here:

When I’ve re-watched the trailer, something struck me – this could very well be made by David Lynch who’s one of my favorite directors of all time. The atmosphere is unique, the story is VERY unique and the message/point of the movie…?

That’s the thing I couldn’t comprehend when I finished it. I knew I felt something, and I knew I liked most of it, but I couldn’t put my finger on what it was. And then it struck me.

I believe these artsy movies always have a scene or two where they give you a key on how to “read” that movie and with this one (to me) the key was that lunch (?) scene where the main protagonist, her sister and her parents are REALLY openly talking about sex, but when the daughter asks about videos or pictures, she’s shamed for it, as it’s considered “indecent”, even though, as she says to her parents (paraphrasing here) “I hear you fucking every night, so why videos or pictures of sex are indecent?” This scene has “unlocked” the movie for me, to a certain extent.

I’m not Japanese but from the stories I hear, it seems like everybody is horny and wants to fuck all the time, but porn and everything about it is shamed upon, censored etc.. And when you realize that, how weird is it that somebody is trying to shame you for watching something they do later that evening, it’s hypocritical and it must feel confusing. And I think the movie’s title isn’t that IT is trying to be “anti” porno, it’s about the hypocrisy of trying to look like you are against it while watching/consuming it yourself.

It’s also trying to say something about a woman’s role in their society, as the main protagonist says several times throughout the movie “I’m a virgin. A virgin, but a whore.” I feel like the director tried to say something about how Japanese men expect their woman to be pure, only serve (read fuck) them, but once they do that, they NEED to be their little toy for them to do whatever they wish. How men are trying to control what women can and can’t do, the expectations they are putting on them. And to be fair, I don’t think that applies to Japanese men/women only, I feel this is more of a global message.

Then again, this is the way I’ve read it, and it might be completely wrong, and maybe it was supposed to be about seeing some women naked, while there are pretty colors around, what do I know?

I feel like even though I did like this movie, the overacting (however necessary) killed some of the “enjoyment”, especially at the end with the cake (which I guarantee you, that scene has some much deeper meaning, I was just too stupid to understand).

I would only recommend this movie to somebody who’s quite adventurous and doesn’t mind movies where the narrative might not be as straightforward as with mainstream movies. And be comfortable with some amount of nudity, that’d definitely help too.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this hell of trip. What did you think of it? Did you see this movie, or it doesn’t sound like your cup of hot cocoa? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

On Body and Soul (2017) Review – The best movie you’ll (probably) never see

Advertisements

I usually don’t include the plot, as I don’t really see the point in reviews to give you a plot of movie you either have seen or are considering seeing (therefore reading this, hopefully) but given the fact this will be an under-seen movie not matter what, I’ll make an exception:

When slaughterhouse workers Endre and Mária discover they share the same dreams – where they meet in a forest as deer and fall in love – they decide to make their dreams come true but it’s difficult in real life.

This Hungarian movie (nominated for Best Foreign Language Film of the Year at 2018 Oscars) is really worth it, even if you consider subtitles to be just really annoying part of a weird, usually different movie you’re not used to. See for yourself, the trailer below:

I know. I’ve done it. I’ve just hit a jackpot where all the keywords like “Endre”, “Maria”, “Hungarian” and “subtitles” will make sure most of you reading this until now click away, washing their eyes in terror and hoping that somebody better invent the goddamn time machine quick, so you can travel back in time a minute before reading this review and stop your past self from reading this.

But that’d be dumb not that wise. This movie is different, and yes, it might be bit on the “artsy” side (yet another keyword, yey! This is going well…) but it’s not self-indulgent. This is just a simple story told slightly differently with killer performances, that are nuanced and feel honest.

On Body and Soul is unique look at relationships, and how easy or difficult they can be, especially if you are not sure how to communicate your feelings, if you’re socially awkward, or if you don’t have anyone else to go to for an advice. It is relatable on a very basic level where (almost) everybody just wants to find somebody to share their happiness, pain, life, you know, the entire package with.

It’s also visually stunning movie, combining some harsh images (people who struggle with blood should maybe consider skipping this one) with poetic images of pure, untainted nature.

I’m not going to lie, I’ve only seen this movie once, over 2 years ago, but it stayed with me until today. Because to me, this is the perfect blend of a movie being “artsy” without having to bore you to death, or where you’d have to ask yourself every 10 minutes “what the fuck am I watching?” The story isn’t complicated at all, it’s told beautifully and only asks you to suspend your disbelief for a tiny bit, after all, why couldn’t 2 people meet within one dream?

I’m going to leave you with this – if you going to watch just ONE Hungarian movie in your entire life, this might a choice you (hopefully) shouldn’t regret.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

And I’ll leave you with this song from the movie that perfectly encapsulates the feel of it (the video with it will make more sense once you’ve seen the movie, trust me on that :-))

Hope you’ve enjoyed this review, let me know what you think!

Until next time,

Luke