Tag Archives: NSFW

Any “not safe for work” related reviews for movies or shows that are for mature audience only.

Dutch Wife in the Desert (1967) Review – A Trip Without a Plane (Or Drugs)

Advertisements

If you haven’t heard about this movie until now, you might know it as Inflatable Sex Doll of the Wastelands, as that is another title this movie is apparently known as in the USA and… yeah, believe it or not, that title actually makes more sense, even though it might be slightly on the spoiler(y) side. I don’t usually do reviews, where I would just copy and paste the summary of the story, as anybody can google that, but with this film, I can’t help it, as I will explain soon.

A private detective is hired to find a woman who has apparently been murdered in a snuff film. It turns out the woman’s not dead, but very much alive, and he gets sucked into a torrid affair with her that leaves him questioning his sense of reality.

Summary of Dutch Wife in the Desert (Source: IMDb.com)

There are two reasons I felt like I needed to include the summary for this film. The first one is I understand this is as indie movie as it get (I mean I couldn’t even find a nice enough poster, that is why I had to use a screenshot I found), so plenty of people won’t be familiar with the story (I certainly wasn’t before watching it). The second, and more important reason is… I still don’t know what I’ve seen and I have watched the entire film!

Dutch Wife in the Desert is truly one hell of a trip, where you can understand the very basics of the story, that there is a detective, that gets hired to investigate murder, that might or might not have happened. But everything else around that is just one wild fever dream so big, even David Lynch would get lost in it. And unlike him (or his films), there didn’t seem to be a rhyme or reason for this… Or, maybe I wasn’t enjoying it as much as I would his movies…?

You might have also heard about this movie that this was “the very first NC-17 rated film to be released” (according to IMDb’s Trivia section) and I am guessing they mean in USA…? I was trying to look for a bit more information, but couldn’t find any. And yes, that means there is some nudity and some sex and even rape, so the rating is justified, even though by today’s standards, the movie seems pretty tame, or respectively, I expected slightly more…? To me, had I not known that piece of trivia, I would have guessed R rating right after finishing the movie, not NC-17.

It’s hard to write about this hallucinogenic trip kind of a movie, as plenty of things you just need to go with. It’s almost the epitome of Guerrilla filmmaking, where you either go with everything that’s happening, or not. And I have gone with plenty of stories/movies prior, I honestly love weird, low budget movies, that are easy (or difficult), straight to the point, “don’t have money for bullshit, let’s cut to the chase” kind of thing, I love those movies. But when they don’t make sense and they leave you wondering what the fuck just happened and you are not really sure what you’ve watched, but to the point you don’t even know whether you’ve followed the story correctly, something is wrong. There is one thing having a movie that’s open to interpretations, that might be on the wilder side, and then there is Dutch Wife in the Desert, where it seems like the director just wanted to shoot some beautiful naked ladies and materialise a really weird dream with no meaning he had that one time.

Overall, if you are into really low budget, indie, “makes you feel like you are tripping on acid” kind of movies, this might be right up your alley, but I am afraid it wasn’t right up mine. Some plus points for the ending, that caught me by surprise, even though I am not sure whether I understood it correctly. I mean, that is one how to describe the entire film – caught me by surprise and not sure whether I understood it correctly.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Pornhub Podcast with Asa Akira (Review) – And now for something completely different…

Advertisements

Alright, let’s just get this out of the way. If you find porn or nudity (even the talk of it) not for you, please feel free to skip this article, I understand it’s not for everyone.

I wanted to do a review of this podcast for a while, as still, even in 2020, I get weird looks when telling other people I do enjoy this podcast, and I genuinely can’t wait for more episodes to be released.

I’ve always found this topic interesting, so that definitely helps with me trying this one and being open minded about it. But the main reason for me writing this review, is to talk about not so much what this podcast is, but what it definitely ISN’T. People have prejudices towards porn, and porn performers, that’s not going to change any time soon. These are some of the most common stereotypes about porn people being:

  • Crazy (daddy issues, psychological traumas, I mean, why else would somebody be doing this?)
  • Drugged at all times (yeah, plenty of drugs, and parties!)
  • Dumb (why else would you be doing this, if you could have great, even though boring 9 – 5 job?)
  • Sick (I mean, they must have ALL THE STD’s!)

And the list goes on and on. How do I know this? From conversation with people and from this podcast, where performers come in and openly discuss pretty much anything with the delightful Asa Akira (more about her a bit later).

Look, there are examples, where some porn stars definitely belong to (more than) one category of those stereotypes, just from listening to this podcast, all of them guests so far basically said they have met somebody like that! But if you actually listen to all the episodes as I have, you’d be shocked.

As most of them are actually just normal people, who are not dumb at all (plenty of them have their own companies, and the way porn shifts towards being your own boss, they need to have more of entrepreneur mindset to be able to capitalise on everything coming their way) sober (surprising amount of performers doesn’t even drink) not crazy (maybe just slightly hornier than the rest of us) and healthier (not only they are getting tested more than your average Tinder hookup, but given most of them still need to look a certain way, they tend to be in a great shape) than most of us.

This is what I’ve found out listening hours and hours of this podcast – just because somebody is slightly more adventurous than your average Joe/Jane about sex, and doesn’t mind being filmed while doing it, that doesn’t necessarily mean… well anything. I feel like some people will hate on them no matter what, and then there will be some percentage, who are just envious, as if they could do what they do, they would, but something is stopping them (usually, it’s shame, or them not feeling comfortable enough with their own body) and that’s why they don’t like them.

Let’s talk about the host – Asa Akira is charismatic and charming person, who you will not mind spending an hour or so of your time with. They probably could not have picked a better person, as she’s smart, witty, actually interested in her guests and what they have to say, she can (and does) say when she fully doesn’t understand something… I mean in all honesty, I just want to be her BFF, as she seems like a great person to grab a (non-alcoholic, as I think she doesn’t drink?) cocktail with, once this whole COVID-19 situation goes by (so in like 2/3 years) and talk to her about random stuff. She seems like a genuinely nice person.

Also, where else can you learn a thing or two about sex? Plus, this is what I love about this podcast – the porn stars will be the first people to remind you something, plenty of people still forget about – PORN IS JUST A FANTASY. Yes, this was never meant to be for “educational” purposes, how some people (still) think about it, not at all. They were conceived and should always stay as “adult fairy tales” where people might get “inspired” about a thing or two, but can’t take it at face value, where “I’ve seen this in a porn, therefore that’s how sex works, right!?” and all the porn stars who have appeared on this podcast will be happy to confirm that too.

Overall, if you want to listen to stories of people, who are definitely not living boring lives, with personified charmed called Asa Akira, give it a try and see if it’s for you. It’s alright if not, no hard feelings or anything else that should be hard and pointed in your direction :-D.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this (unconventional) review? What do you think? Will you give it a shot, or are you blushing red already just reading this? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

In the Realm of the Senses (1976) Review – Well, that was a… movie?

Advertisements

Before reading my review, I highly recommend reading something about Sada Abe – yes, this movie is based on a real life incident, and her life seems exactly the way you’d expect after watching this movie.

I’ve heard a few things about this movie, so I thought I was prepared for it.

I wasn’t.

Forgive me, if my sentences are shorter than usual, but I’m still trying to process what I’ve just watched.

In the Realm of the Senses is not a movie for everyone. It’s definitely on the artsy side of movie-making, where it’s not hard to follow (the story couldn’t be more simpler) but you need to get over all the nudity, sex, devotion, passion… Let’s put it this way, if you are one of those people, who blush easily during a Hollywood “sex scene”, prepare to be as red as communist’s flag on 1st of May, as boy, oh boy… This movie isn’t about anything else than two people being devoted to each other, where both take it too far (but arguably Sada took it way, way further).

The version I’ve seen was 109 minutes, but I guarantee you, if somebody was to cut all the non-sexual scenes from the movie (and I’m almost 100% convinced somebody’s already done that) the movie would still be around 85/90 minutes. That tells you everything you need to know. In a way, it’s fascinating.

So, is this just a porn movie that somehow got theatrical run? I am going to say no, and yes, I know it sounds weird, especially with everything I wrote up until this point, but bear with me. It’d be really easy to discredit this film as nothing but dirty porn movie about nymphomaniac with some mental issues, but that’d discredit everything the movie is trying to convey.

I feel like this is more about what the movie is trying to make you feel, rather than the visuals. Because after a while, you become desensitised to all the nudity and sex, and start noticing how by each act, each new day, the stakes between the couple are getting higher, the passion/devotion these two had for each other, there was something special about that. I’m not saying something healthy, or something we should all be aiming for, dear god no. But when you focus on the story/character of Sada, and her passion to control the love of her life to the point where it results in one really disturbing scene most men would love to never see again in their lifetime, that’s when you either understand the method to the madness, or not. Because at the end of the day, she was extremely sad, somewhat mentally broken character, and the way I read this movie, she was just looking for somebody to help/sympathise with her, somebody she could feel safe with.

I was a bit mesmerised by this movie, I thought Eiko Matsuda gave chilling performance and it’s s shame what happened to the actress after (basically she was shamed and almost banned in Japan, forced to life in France for most of her life) she made this film.

Is this a movie I need to see again? Probably not, but when comes to this I do have a rule, which is to never say never. But it’s definitely not something that you’d just pop in one Saturday afternoon for some quality family time (if yes, what the fuck is wrong with you? :-D)

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

This is it for this controversial movie. Have you seen it? If so, what did you think? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Antiporno (2016) Review – More than meets the eye?

Advertisements

Wow. Where to start with a movie like that…

Antiporno is one of only a few movies I’ve ever seen, where after it was over, I wasn’t sure how to rate it, let alone what to say about it. So I’ve watched a different movie right after, and in the back of my brain, I was trying to make my mind up about this one.

Because this is the very definition of artsy movie, to the core. Sharp, pastel colors, some over acting that serves the main concept/idea of the movie… well, judge for yourself, slightly NSFW (not safe for work) trailer here:

When I’ve re-watched the trailer, something struck me – this could very well be made by David Lynch who’s one of my favorite directors of all time. The atmosphere is unique, the story is VERY unique and the message/point of the movie…?

That’s the thing I couldn’t comprehend when I finished it. I knew I felt something, and I knew I liked most of it, but I couldn’t put my finger on what it was. And then it struck me.

I believe these artsy movies always have a scene or two where they give you a key on how to “read” that movie and with this one (to me) the key was that lunch (?) scene where the main protagonist, her sister and her parents are REALLY openly talking about sex, but when the daughter asks about videos or pictures, she’s shamed for it, as it’s considered “indecent”, even though, as she says to her parents (paraphrasing here) “I hear you fucking every night, so why videos or pictures of sex are indecent?” This scene has “unlocked” the movie for me, to a certain extent.

I’m not Japanese but from the stories I hear, it seems like everybody is horny and wants to fuck all the time, but porn and everything about it is shamed upon, censored etc.. And when you realize that, how weird is it that somebody is trying to shame you for watching something they do later that evening, it’s hypocritical and it must feel confusing. And I think the movie’s title isn’t that IT is trying to be “anti” porno, it’s about the hypocrisy of trying to look like you are against it while watching/consuming it yourself.

It’s also trying to say something about a woman’s role in their society, as the main protagonist says several times throughout the movie “I’m a virgin. A virgin, but a whore.” I feel like the director tried to say something about how Japanese men expect their woman to be pure, only serve (read fuck) them, but once they do that, they NEED to be their little toy for them to do whatever they wish. How men are trying to control what women can and can’t do, the expectations they are putting on them. And to be fair, I don’t think that applies to Japanese men/women only, I feel this is more of a global message.

Then again, this is the way I’ve read it, and it might be completely wrong, and maybe it was supposed to be about seeing some women naked, while there are pretty colors around, what do I know?

I feel like even though I did like this movie, the overacting (however necessary) killed some of the “enjoyment”, especially at the end with the cake (which I guarantee you, that scene has some much deeper meaning, I was just too stupid to understand).

I would only recommend this movie to somebody who’s quite adventurous and doesn’t mind movies where the narrative might not be as straightforward as with mainstream movies. And be comfortable with some amount of nudity, that’d definitely help too.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this hell of trip. What did you think of it? Did you see this movie, or it doesn’t sound like your cup of hot cocoa? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke