All posts by Luke

Movie and TV lover with opinions about everything.

Fall (2022) Review – One of the Best Worst Movies I Have Ever Seen

Advertisements

We live in an age of “content”, even though I despise that term and don’t use it on purpose to describe any movie or a TV show. However, many films are treated as such, especially on streaming services, so you have to sift through a lot of “content” before finding something great to watch. Some movies get great exposure, whilst others fall through the cracks due to so much “content” everywhere. And Fall seems to have amassed almost cult-like status over a very short period of time because of its gripping premise. So I had to see it for myself one evening.

I can see now what the hype was about. Fall is one of those films that can be split into two very uneven halves. The first half is everything that happens before our two characters get stuck on that tower, and the second is everything that happens after they get stuck. Because the first 30/40 minutes, I was annoyed by everybody and the movie itself for being predictable and full of painfully dumb characters… Basically, pick an unflattering adjective, and the chances are, Fall has got you covered. However, they understood the assignment in the second part of this movie, and once they get stuck, the tension feels real. Sure, the film still has some awful dialogue and many predictable moments (even though there was one turn I should have seen coming, but I didn’t; more about it later), but I didn’t care as much because I was on the edge of my seat, often literally.

I didn’t think I had problems with heights, but I discovered I might have. But I would never climb an old TV tower that’s almost 2000 feet long (over 600m for most of the world). As you can presume, those scenes are as tense as it gets. Fall knows how to build these scenes of upcoming danger and hopelessness and throw in anxiety-ridden climbing scenes you will remember for some time. In a weird way, this movie is almost a miracle, as at the beginning, I gave zero fucks about either of our protagonists, but the moment they get stuck… Well, I still didn’t care about either that much, but I was rooting for them (mainly one).

Since I referred to them several times, let’s talk about our protagonists. We follow Grace Caroline Currey and Virginia Gardner, who are roughly in 95% of all scenes of this movie. Sure, we have a random Jeffrey Dean Morgan in here as well, but I swear he must have shot all his scenes in two days maximum, given he is in roughly three minutes altogether. Over time, I found myself liking Grace’s character more despite her not being in charge of her decisions for most of this film. She is, effectively, pushed to action by her friend Hunter, played by Virginia, who brilliantly portrays one of the worst types of person there is – a YouTuber. No, I am joking, of course, but she is this self-centred, Instagram-famous wannabe who fancies herself a bit too much, and the movie wants to give her some reasoning behind that, but nothing about her character worked for me. I found myself rooting less for her and more for Grace’s character almost by default, especially towards the end when Becky (Grace’s character) must act, or everything is lost, without going into spoilers.

But I will hint at something, and that is the above-mentioned plot twist I didn’t see coming. I thought it was clever, and once I thought about everything in my memory, it all made sense, so I take it that if I were to rewatch this movie again, this turn (or twist) would work. But I can’t shake the feeling that the only reason this twist is in this film is to make it easier for our character(s) to stay likeable and not make tough choices. That’s all I will say.

Again, Fall is an interesting film, and I will understand any rating because it all depends on how willing you are to ignore many bad aspects of this film. From the awful dialogue to our protagonists, neither is as likeable (for different reasons), to the ending, which felt rushed. I must mention that, as I love when movies know when to finish, there is nothing wrong with that, and I always appreciate it. But there is such a thing as skipping over a few pages just to show us the ending. For as much as we spend our time with our protagonists, this movie’s resolution felt… sudden. It felt like they suddenly ran out of money, so they just shot something quickly during the final day and didn’t get the chance to go back and do some additional pick-ups. What a weird choice.

Writing this, I still have to emphasise the point that from the moment these two get stuck until this sudden end, this might be one of the most nerve-wracking movies I have ever seen. I would be lying if I said I wasn’t tense throughout most of it, and despite all these flaws I have mentioned above, I was in the moment with them. I felt every wind gush; I felt every (attempted) climb… This movie succeeded where (I believe) it counts the most and delivered on its premise. And that’s the reason my final rating is much higher than you might imagine, given how I spent most of my review “bashing” this film. What can I say? I will forgive any movie much easier if it gives me something unique despite many flaws, and Fall delivered some of the tensest moments of my moviegoing life.

Overall, Fall is a fascinating movie that will test your anxiety. It will also test your patience before our protagonists get trapped; you can believe me there. But if you stick with it and won’t switch it off when it gets too intense, you might go on a journey you won’t forget any time soon. Is Fall a perfect movie? No, by a mile. Is it one of the most entreatingly nerve-wracking movies I have ever seen? Yes. Would I recommend it? I would say yes, but… If you are looking for an unpredictable story or one with likeable characters, you might want to skip this one. But if you don’t expect anything else than one of the tensest experiences of your life, give this movie a chance.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) Review – Of Monsters and Men

Advertisements

As Martin Scorsese gets older, he gets better, and his understanding of life, cinema and things around him seems to reach new heights. Throughout his unbelievably long and successful career, he was always fascinated with morality and bad people, showing them to us so uniquely that many (to this day) believe that he somehow glamorises gangsters and crooks. That couldn’t be far from the truth, and Killers of the Flower Moon is another jewel in that specific jewellery box full of flawed characters, corruption, and murders, but underneath all that, humanity.

This film was something extra from the first minutes; Scorsese’s affinity for old cinema shines through as he mixes the visuals of the days past (4:3 aspect ratio along with title cards instead of dialogue for a few scenes) and then swiftly goes “modern”, showing us stunning visuals, many of which you could frame and put on your wall. But he understands (and it seems like he almost feels) that he has a duty to tell this story “right”. This true story of Native Americans getting rich only to be screwed by white people is as old as America. But, in this story, we have this unique element. The focus is on the marriage of two characters from different worlds, Ernest (Leonardo DiCaprio) and Mollie (Lily Gladstone). He is an older white man who came back from the war; she is a Native American woman who is suspicious of him at first, but eventually, they fall in love and marry each other. And despite his character plotting behind her back to kill her and her entire family, he… loves her? Talk about murky waters.

That is the main crux of this film. Killers of the Flower Moon shows us this naïve, one could almost say stupid, character portrayed by Leonardo and how he is nothing else but a pawn in this game of death chess controlled by his uncle, played by Robert De Niro. Both put on one of the best performances of their careers, especially in De Niro’s case; I don’t think I have seen him at this level for over a decade. He is truly a menacing driving force behind everything that happens in this film, and the way he manipulates every one around him and pretends to be “the best friend” of Native Americans in this movie is chilling. Leonardo also delivers a great performance, but he, by default, needs to shine slightly less, as it’s not his usual larger-than-life performance piece. It’s more nuanced, where you see in this man throughout this movie that deep down, he loves his wife and knows what he is doing to her family is wrong. But he is too weak to stop, to stand up to his uncle and do what he thinks is best. You need Leo firing at all cylinders for this film to hit you because he might be one of the most complex characters ever, as he needs to convince you how someone can claim to love his wife whilst doing everything he’s told against her and her family. I thought Leo nailed it because, in the end, I had no doubts that he wasn’t a great person (the real-life Ernest). But also, I had no doubts about him loving his wife and how his simple mind helped him separate these two things.

But, the main star of this movie and the person you will remember the most is Lily Gladstone. Famously, she was applying for an IT job, as she thought there would never be any big break in her career when she got the email to read for Martin Scorsese via Zoom. Lily puts everything she has and then some into this film and leaves a piece of herself in this movie. Her performance was stellar, from the beginning, where we see her lower her defences to Leo’s charm, throughout her “sickness” scenes where she transformed to the bitter end. Her character had so many memorable and powerful scenes that you will remember her, and I am sure she will be a front-runner for the Oscars next year. And deservedly so. I am happy she finally got her big break and hope to see her in many more movies to come, even though an IT career is nothing to be ashamed of (as someone who works within that sector ;-)).

I also loved the ending, better said, the last two minutes or so. And even though I wouldn’t consider it a spoiler per se, I will not reveal what I am talking about because I wasn’t expecting how this movie finished, so I want you to have the same “surprise”. Looking back at it now, it makes so much sense, given how the movie started and how Marty took everything about this film seriously. There is a fine line between being a “white saviour” and giving voice to the voiceless. I thought this movie (and therefore, Martin Scorsese) never crossed it, and it fulfilled the purpose of this film, highlighting how much this community suffered. And the way he does it throughout the movie is excellent, but the last two minutes just underline it and make it more meaningful.

The only reason I am holding off on the highest rating is simple. I don’t know whether it was the runtime or something else, but something didn’t click with me fully. This movie is so dense I will have to rewatch it, and I wouldn’t be surprised if, during my rewatch, I would appreciate it much more. Killers of the Flower Moon is definitely one of those you can’t “digest” all in one sitting, as the movie is complex, and I think it’s almost mandatory to go back and immerse yourself in this world again to appreciate it fully. Therefore, I wouldn’t even consider this as a critique; this was me possibly missing something, and I know I will rewatch it to formulate my thoughts better. But I already know how much I have enjoyed it, so there is little to no doubt this will go up higher in my rankings upon multiple rewatches.

Overall, Killers of the Flower Moon is one of the most fascinating, raw and beautifully haunting movies Martin Scorsese has ever made. It takes its time to establish everything; it isn’t afraid to show you complex characters whilst relying on your understanding that this movie never justifies anything these people did to the Native Americans. There is a difference between glamorizing and showing you how a person thinks, and Scorsese proved yet again why he is the master of these complex, dark characters. I wish he has many more years left and he gets to make movies he wants to make.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Florida Project (2017) Review – The Vicious Cycle of Poverty

Advertisements

I must admit something some might find weird – I don’t watch documentaries. The reason is not that I would hate them; it’s much simpler than that. I prefer narrative movies where I can escape reality. I know (especially lately) I have been missing out on some excellent documentaries, and maybe, at some point, I will watch some of the major ones, but for now, I will stick with films and TV shows. However, The Florida Project and its blend of both, where it’s definitely a movie but quite a few aspects (most actors were amateurs, the way this movie was shot, the movie’s message), was perfect. I have heard good things about this movie, and now I get why.

Starting with actors, from what I remember and understand, only Willem Dafoe was a professional actor. The rest of the cast were either first-timers for whom this was their first movie (Brooklynn Prince and Bria Vinaite), people who have not made a movie since, or actual guests staying at that resort. That will always add credibility to your movie, but Sean Baker struck gold with the “main three”. Willem shines in this movie, and even though he is “only” a supporting character, he makes an impression, and you almost forget he is one of the best character actors we have today. Both Bria and Brooklynn nailed their performances too. Brooklynn had the hardest job since most (if not all) of this film was through her lens, but she carried it well. And Bria… I have met a few “Bria-like” characters and can confirm how well she nailed this role.

I know many people focus on the contrast of how people can struggle so badly living next to Disney World, often called “the happiest place in the world”. Don’t get me wrong, The Florida Project showcases that contrast well, but I thought this movie truly shined in the display and understanding of how vicious is the cycle of poverty. How expensive it is to be poor, so to speak. And if you have zero to no options left, how quickly things can go from bad to even worse.

Just take one of the sub-plots of this movie. Moonee (Brooklynn’s character) does something that results in her best friend’s mum banning her from seeing her best friend. But she also cuts them off from their “food supply” as she works in some waffle place, and she would often “slip” them (Brooklynn and Bria’s characters) food for free. In most other films, this side plot wouldn’t usually have that much of an impact on the overall story, but here, it’s one of the key reasons why the ending happens. How that one domino fell, and due to that, the rest started to follow.

I also liked how Sean Baker (the director and co-writer of this movie, alongside Chris Bergoch) never tried to judge any of our characters for being in this situation. They give us hints as to how they ended up here, but you never learn anything definitive, and that decision makes it harder for us to judge them and much easier to sympathize with them. I know this will come as a shock to many people, but poor people don’t choose to be poor. There are (usually) more complex issues behind why they ended up in that situation. And The Florida Project never even attempted to judge them. The film doesn’t glamorize poverty either, and this is where the documentary aspect comes in. It genuinely feels like they set up a few cameras over the summer and let them run to capture everything as realistically as possible. I know that is not what happened, but saying this is one of the best compliments I can give to this movie. It felt authentic in all areas, from having life-like characters to showing us how little it takes for things to get even worse.

Also, let’s talk about the ending, albeit briefly and with no spoilers. It crushes you. I am talking about the last two minutes, just to be perfectly clear. Something happens that reflects this divide between these two worlds (poor vs rich), and it leaves you feeling… well, bad. Because you understand everything changes significantly and (most likely) the vicious cycle starts again, but with a new protagonist, in a sense. It’s hard to talk about it without spoilers, but if you saw this movie, I hope you understand what I mean. And that’s why those last two minutes are so meaningful and show you what could have or should have been. It leaves you feeling sad. But that’s not a bad thing. Not all movies need to be happy or end on a happy note, and I appreciate the people behind this movie ending it this way.

Overall, The Florida Project is a fantastic film. It is a very “slice of life” movie, where you follow mostly a few people over the course of a month, maybe slightly more, and it shows you their experience. It also reminds us that children are affected by poverty as well, but they are children, and it’s fascinating to watch how they can cope with it, even though they should not. The Florida Project is one of those excellent films I might be fine with never watching again because when this movie hits you, it hits hard. But it’s 100% a recommended watch.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Pearl (2022) Review – A Murderer Is Born

Advertisements

After I enjoyed X (2022, my review here), I was on the lookout for its sequel, which is actually a prequel filmed simultaneously with X. I wanted to know more about Pearl and wanted to see more of Mia Goth in what many claimed should have been her Oscar nomination. As you can see, I was hyped for this film, and Pearl is as good as X; however, as with its predecessor, I wish I could write I love this movie. I like it very much, but…

Let’s get it straight, Mia Goth is fantastic in this role. I am not sure whether she is “she should have been nominated for the Oscar!” fantastic, but she made this role her own. Pearl shows you how the old, murder-happy lady from X became that way, and it turns out, as always, it’s all in the family. Whether it’s the idea of a strict mother, taking care of your paralysed dad, or the mix of both whilst your own mental health wasn’t the best to begin with, this movie shows us how much (or little) it takes for somebody to snap. And when Pearl snaps, she snaps hard.

I liked the aesthetic of this film. The movie takes place in 1918, and I had no issue believing it. Sure, for the most part, it helps that it mostly takes place on one farm, but everything around it, all the characters, just “fit”. And here, for me, is the biggest proof that you don’t need a multi-million dollar budget to make a half-decent movie; just hire someone as creative as Ti West, who has a vision and seems to understand how to get the absolute maximum out of the little they must have had to shoot both this film and X.

And as with X, I wanted more. That will be my ultimate “one thing” about this movie. Pearl is not a straightforward horror film. You could argue it’s even less of a horror movie than X was, as it mainly serves as this character study of our main protagonist, Pearl. Therefore, this movie is the ultimate definition of a slow burner; it takes its time before it gets going. And although I loved Mia Goth, I wasn’t captivated by all the movie’s length. And when I thought this is where it starts to get fascinating, this is where I will fall in love with this film, the movie ends. I know movie schools teach people: “Always leave your audience wanting more!” but Pearl took it a bit too literally.

I won’t spoil this film, but I will say this. There is a thing or an event we (and Pearl) are waiting for throughout the movie besides the “when will she snap?” And that thing happens (that also has a connection to X), so I thought that this was where we would learn more. Nope. The movie leaves us hanging on this, it is not really a cliffhanger, but I don’t know what else would I call it… Let me put it this way, where this movie stops and ends, I hoped that would be its halfway point. I hoped we would have at least 40/50 minutes left. It’s hard to say more without saying what the movie ends on, but I hope I am not the only one feeling like that.

I understand that I am doing what I hate the most, re-imagining the movie the way I want to see it; why did Ti West not make the movie I wanted? And the thing is, he kind of did because Pearl delivers on the main promise. It gives us more of Mia Goth and reveals how she became the way she did. But, whilst he did it, he kept reminding us that “this one thing is coming” throughout this movie. And once that “thing” happened, that was when I felt like I wanted another at least 30 minutes with Pearl. And I hope we might still get it after he’s done with MaXXXine (?), as I have a feeling that if he made a straight-up sequel to Pearl and picked right where this movie ends, it would have been amazing.

But it bears repeating that’s my only negative thing about Pearl. The rest of this movie is a great slow burn about one special young lady who wanted to be a star. She wanted to escape her life and misery and hoped for something better. Something greater, and when she didn’t get what she had hoped for, she took it the only way she knew how. As the famous line goes: “We all go a little mad sometimes.”

Overall, Pearl is a performance piece for Mia Goth. It’s a movie that will surprise you on multiple occasions with its choices, and it surprised me with its ending. Respectively, it ends almost abruptly just as it started to go somewhere I desperately wanted to see more of. But a few things are clear – we need more of Mia Goth, and we are in need of more people like Ti West. I will be there for MaXXXine, and I can’t wait for what he does next after he’s done with this X/Pearl world. It’s always great to have a fresh, new perspective and voice on the scene.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Little Mermaid (2023) Review – A Very Mixed Bag

Advertisements

Another year, another Disney live-action remake of their beloved animated classic, just so they can keep the copyright on those characters and sell you the same merchandise in new, updated skin. This year, the wise “wheel of all the movies we haven’t remade yet” stopped at The Little Mermaid, and this film made the news instantly when the casting was announced due to Disney making this fictional mermaid black, portrayed by Halle Bailey. Unfortunately, in the year 2023, you can imagine why it made the news, and you can also imagine the “certain people” who were “very upset” (to put it mildly) by this the most. Anyway, enough about racists. I didn’t catch this movie at the cinemas, but I heard “okay-ish” things to be intrigued, and when I finally checked it out myself, it was… overall, I have to put “meh”, but it might be the most complex “meh” of my entire life.

Let’s start with the positives and, by far, the biggest and (quite frankly) the only thing Disney did correctly was to bet their money on Halle Bailey. Not only can you tell she loves the story and is stoked to be a part of this, but this girl will be a star. She has a presence, feels royal (a great choice for a princess), and, most importantly, can sing. And I mean, she can sing where she sends shivers down your spine. Halle might be tiny (IMDb has her height at 5′ 2″ (or for us Europeans, 1.57 m)), but she has got some lungs and voice on her. Every time she sang, this film was worth watching. I can’t judge her acting as much, as she did a perfectly fine job as Ariel, but as far as her singing… she should be a household name at some point.

What I also liked was diving more into Caribbean culture, making this film (or at least parts of it) bright, colourful and vivid. I also enjoyed performances by Daveed Diggs and Melissa McCarthy, who were both much-needed comic reliefs, even though Melissa had to dig deeper into her darker side, playing the main villain and all that, and I thought she did fine.

Now, where this movie lost me was… well, everything else. By far, the biggest issue was the length and with that pacing. I don’t mind longer films, but every film must justify its length. The Little Mermaid had no justification for being 135 minutes. Especially the middle part, where you have this massive talent, and she can’t speak (I know it’s part of the story, and it had to happen, but still) felt out of place, the pacing was slow, and it almost felt like Rob Marshall made some bizarre deal with Disney, like had he managed to stretch it over two hours, he would get a bonus.

Also, when I praised the vivid Caribbean culture above, the end of this film is… dark. The CGI mostly didn’t work for me, and weirdly, The Little Mermaid made me appreciate Avatar: The Way of Water (2022, my review here) much more. You can tell how detailed the underwater scenes in Avatar were and how they seem “smooth” and life-like, unlike this movie, where everything and everyone seemed, for lack of a better word, smudged and slightly distorted.

I briefly need to mention Awkwafina, or, better said, her character Scuttle. I know many people don’t like her, and I am not one of them. But, there is a line where her Scuttle character became just annoying, which is rare nowadays. In most kids’ movies made today, the filmmakers know where the invisible line lies and usually make sure that no side character goes beyond it. But there was definitely too much of Scuttle in this movie. I did like the first couple of scenes, but the more this movie went on, the more forced and less funny those jokes became. Again, this isn’t because Awkwafina voiced this character. I can imagine this character being voiced by anybody else and still being as annoying.

This critique can, in a way, sum up how I feel about this film overall. The Little Mermaid isn’t a flop; it is not a bad movie either. It did a few things very well (especially relying on Halle Bailey), but every other choice the people behind this movie made felt unimaginative at best and lazy at worst. Realistically, the only reason I rate this film slightly above the average is the one and only Halle and her singing, as that was worth it. It’s too bad the entire movie didn’t rise to her quality.

Overall, The Little Mermaid is a perfectly fine movie your kids might love, and you will tolerate it. The beginning gives you hope that this might not be that bad, only for the middle part to bore you to tears and the end to be pretty dark (literally) where you can’t really distinguish much. Unlike many, I have seen the original movie from 1989 a few years ago, so it wasn’t a Disney movie I grew up with, so I don’t have a bias that they would “ruin my childhood” with this remake. However, as far as these life-action Disney remakes go, this one ranks amongst them as “one of them”. For me, most of those were exactly, like The Little Mermaid, pretty average experiences with maybe one or two things that would uplift it. It bears repeating after all the hate she had to endure, Halle Bailey is that someone here. She elevates and carries this monster of a movie on her tiny frame, and it would be purely on her singing; I could see myself cautiously recommending this to anyone.

Rating: 3 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Tár (2022) Review – Paranoia, Guilt and Cate

Advertisements

If you care about the Oscars, you know that the 2023 “Best Leading Actress” category was between Cate Blanchett for this movie and Michelle Yeoh for Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022, my review here). It was Michelle who managed to snatch that Oscar (and deservedly so, in my opinion); however, having now finally watched Tár, I understand why it was close and honestly wouldn’t be mad if it went to Cate, as much as I was happy for Michelle. But Tár relies much more on Cate than Everything Everywhere All at Once on Michelle, as we have several (now Oscar-winning) performances. In Tár, we have some great actors in supporting roles, but as far as making this movie what it was, it was Cate and her alone, not dissimilar to the “isolation” her character feels throughout this movie.

The first thing I noticed about Tár is how cold and detached this movie felt, but the more I delved into it, the more I understood that it was very much on purpose. Cate’s character, Lydia Tár, isn’t the most likeable person to ever exist; she is the exact opposite of that. We quickly sense that something is “up” with her, and the film builds on that feeling. We see her being strict, combative, paranoid, angry, and down, and there might be times we almost feel sorry for her, but the movie never tries to defend her character and everything/anything she did. In this sense, Todd Field‘s direction reminded me of Martin Scorsese, as a few of his movies tiptoe on the fine edge of making you understand an evil character to the point that many people accuse him every once in a while of “glamorising” them. Of course, both Marty and Todd don’t do that whatsoever; you just need to look deeper at those characters and understand the difference between understanding a character doesn’t correlate with sympathising with them.

And Lydia Tár is a brilliant example of this. You might even agree with some things she says throughout this movie, but once you realise what “that thing” is that is haunting her and stopping her from sleeping, I don’t think there will be many who would stand by her. Despite her undisputable talent, she is a flawed person. Many movies here would try to prompt the discussion of whether her talent is what makes her flawed or vice versa (her being a great artist correlates with her having these flaws), but I never got that from this movie. Tár isn’t interested in that because that’s not the point. The point here is for us to understand the fall of this giant and why she had fallen.

As mentioned above, this entire movie rests on Cate’s performance alone. She is in 99% of the scenes, and no matter what she does, you are fascinated, intrigued and maybe a bit scared of her character. Cate portrays her so earnestly and effortlessly that by the end of the movie, you are convinced that Lydia Tár was an actual person (she isn’t) and that Cate was born to play her (she absolutely was). In any other year, she would be the clear frontrunner for the Oscar, but in 2022, Michelle Yeoh ruled supreme.

Besides Cate, the movie has many things to say about our culture, about the state of conversations we seem to be constantly having, like judging historical figures by today’s standards, cancel culture, etc. But it does it in a way I feel it will age well. Plus, Tár is one of those movies that is filled with many “blink and you will miss it” moments; it requires repeating viewings to fully get your head around everything you see, witness and feel. And that is why I can’t give the highest rating because there was something stopping me, and I can’t pinpoint what “it” was. But I strongly believe this movie is one of those that only gets better on repeat viewings, so that should make for a fascinating watch. Plus, due to the epic classical music and Cate Blanchett, it never felt like a chore to watch this film, and it is almost 160 minutes!

Overall, Tár is a fascinating story about a complex character you will google immediately to check for yourself whether or not she is real. The movie convinced me she was real, as everything that happened felt like it could have easily happened. Plus, and I can’t underestimate this, Cate’s performance is one for the books. For most actresses, this would be their career highlight. For Cate, it’s just another year. Tár is a cold, precise movie that will have you question a few things but ultimately will deliver an experience you won’t forget any time soon.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Ahsoka (Season One) Review – Hints of Greatness

Advertisements

I was excited about this TV show; let’s get that straight, which is fascinating, considering how Ahsoka was introduced back in Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008, my review here) and quickly became one of my least favourite Star Wars characters. Luckily, there was significant growth for her character over the entire course of the TV show with the same name (Star Wars: The Clone Wars (2008 – 2020, my review here)) and it made sense for her to start like that, given she was supposed to be the stereotypical “annoying teenager”. Thanks to the Clone Wars, she became one of my favourite characters, possibly even my favourite “newly created” character, so when I learned about this live-action show, I was thrilled. Plus, we have already seen what her life-action character looks like due to Rosario Dawson and her minor role in The Mandalorian (2019 – ?, my reviews here and here) and even The Book of Boba Fett (2021 – ?, my review here). The final result left me optimistic for the upcoming season(s), but it hasn’t landed as well as it should have.

Let’s get the biggest “problem” out of the way here. If you have never seen Star Wars: Rebels (2014 – 2018, my review here), I wouldn’t blame you if you felt lost and almost betrayed, as Ahsoka doesn’t feel like “her own thing/show” often it felt like Star Wars: Rebels, season 4.5, with a special guest star, Ahsoka Tano. Many emotional moments hit you only if you are deep into the Star Wars lore and already know names like Ezra Bridger, Chopper, Kanan Jarrus… If those mean nothing to you, then Ahsoka might be a bit confusing to watch at times, as the show tries to make you care about these characters, but many viewers (I would bet) have never even heard of them. I understand them “making Rebels canon”, but honestly, at times, as much as I enjoyed Rebels, I wished we would have stayed more on some “non-Rebels” characters.

The casting worked for me. I have already mentioned Rosario, but it bears repeating she is perfect as Ahsoka, especially in her later stage in life, where she is wise and mature but still can kick ass or two. I thought David Tennant as Huyang was great and brought much-needed levity to this show; I also liked Natasha Liu Bordizzo as Sabine, who I thought did a great job and had an actual story arc. I did like Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Hera, despite her character being one of those “side” characters we don’t know much about. And let me be clear here; I know of Hera and what she is about, but all my knowledge comes from Rebels. If I were to judge her character from Ahsoka, I would say she had a few great comeback lines and felt like there was something bigger in the store for her. The same can be said about Ray Stevenson. Firstly, may he rest in peace; I was shocked to hear the news of his death. He was an underrated actor I loved ever since I saw him in Rome (2005 – 2007). Secondly, he, quite honestly, might have been the most interesting character we have had in Star Wars since… well, it’s been a long time. He obviously has an agenda and, at first, seems to be “pure evil”, but then you can see not only shades of his performance but his monologues about good and evil and his character looking for something… The writers must have had some plans with his character, so it will suck to see him recast and him not finishing this role. And there was one character I won’t discuss, as we would have to delve into the spoiler territory, who was great, but to repeat myself again, he didn’t have much to do, but obviously, there is a plan for that character for the future season(s)…?

I think you can see where I am going with this. Ahsoka‘s biggest problem was that it had to set up so much it didn’t feel like its own show at times. It also gave us many half-cooked characters, almost as if the writers said: “Well, we don’t have much time, but if you watch it and give us another season or two, believe us, these will be awesome, just trust us!” I get they work within certain borders and limitations, but in this case, it felt strange.

Where the show worked for me was everything related to Ahsoka and her past with her old master, Anakin Skywalker, aka Darth Vader. I won’t go into any major spoilers, but there are episodes dealing heavily with Ahsoka’s past, and those ones were the highlights. When a show called Ahsoka actually focused on her and gave us a better understanding of her perspective on her past and how she has dealt with… well, everything. I also liked the expansion of the Star Wars lore, the whales, and the dimension where you can see the past (as introduced in Rebels) was also great. And, of course, we finally get Grand Admiral Thrawn (Lars Mikkelsen), who is as menacing as he always was. But again, I ask, for people who have never seen Rebels, how impactful was his appearance? We can see how afraid everyone is of him returning, but unless you watched Rebels, you don’t get “why” because you haven’t seen his diabolical mind on full display. As far as villains go, he is, by far, the best “new” villain, hands down. And I hope the upcoming season(s) will do justice to his character; Star Wars could use a sharp, menacing villain.

It’s almost not fair to judge Ahsoka based on the first season, given how much they leaned into the Rebels lore and having to set up those characters. That is why I remain cautiously optimistic about the future season(s) of this show, because there is definitely room for growth and improvement and if the writers deliver on everything they tried to set in this season, Ahsoka should become one of the best Star Wars things we’ve gotten. Now, we just have to sit and wait.

Overall, Ahsoka came, saw and didn’t conquer as much as I would hope she would. The highs of this show are high, especially if you are (like me) caught up on all things Star Wars. But even I, an unapologetic Star Wars fan and defender, thought this should have been better and more focused as this season felt, at times, not coherent. However, the word “hope” is almost associated with Star Wars, so I hope they deliver on everything they set up this season, and we will get a great TV show.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Evil Dead Rise (2023) Review – As Great As Ever!

Advertisements

The Evil Dead franchise might be the most consistent horror franchise there is. Sure, you can argue it’s down to them “only” having five movies, unlike the “big three” (Jason, Freddy and Michael) having at least 8 – 12 movies each, and sure, that is part of it. But I believe the big chunk of it also goes into having your “big bad” being this invisible evil that possesses anyone and everyone, and there is no escaping it. And it’s only up to the filmmakers behind each movie (and the Ash vs Evil Dead show (2015 – 2018)) how they will approach each sequel. Evil Dead Rise might be the most departure ever, as for the first time in this franchise, we are in a big city rather than the usual “cabin in the woods”, so I was a bit scared about that. Surprisingly, it worked beautifully.

This film is one of the prime examples of “they understood the assignment” I have ever seen. The Evil Dead franchise is not just about blood, gore and guts flying everywhere, despite that is what many might think. But no, the big part of why this franchise has survived since the 80s is having a great lead. And ever since the Evil Dead (2013) remake, we all understood that Bruce Campbell is irreplaceable, so why try and give us someone like him? That is why newer movies steered away from having your traditional male protagonist and gave us female leads. But this time, we have (kind of) two, with Alyssa Sutherland and Lily Sullivan playing sisters, one of which gets possessed by the evil and goes “a bit” nuts, as customary in these movies. And I loved every second of it.

This is also the first movie in this franchise that is more about family. Respectively, we follow the two sisters and three kids (technically one kid and two teens) and how they deal with this whole “our mum just became a deadite who wants to kill us” situation. Believe it or not, but that can ruin your entire night. So not only Evil Dead Rise changed the setting, but for the first time ever, we follow (more or less) one family instead of a group of friends who are up against this ancient evil. Both of these major changes not only worked for me but also elevated this sequel, which could have felt empty and unimaginative, into a new, fun territory. I cared about this family; I was rooting for them to survive, and when some made it whilst others didn’t, it felt different than when it’s “just” another teenager who gets killed.

Speaking of kills, that’s something this franchise was never short of. As ever, Evil Dead Rise is full of imaginative, disturbing, gross, over-the-top killing scenes, and I loved it. From the cheese grater scene to the tattoo scene or even the opening lake sequence, everything felt right. This movie never overdid it with cheap jump scares (another plus point in my book) and relies on the good old-fashioned blood, guts, gore and more blood to get a reaction out of you. What helps is Alyssa Sutherland (I don’t think it’s a spoiler to say she turns evil) is phenomenal as “deadite Ellie”, and her reactions, line deliveries (“Mommy’s with the maggots now.“) and overall performance is one of the best in this franchise, I enjoyed her performance and was (strangely) rooting for her, whilst being scared of her.

When you think it can’t get any bloodier, the finale happens. And without spoiling it for anyone, let me simply say that nobody does blood showers like the Evil Dead franchise. The ending convinced me that this movie is bonkers, but my type of bonkers. It’s the fifth movie in this gory franchise, with each being different from the previous one, but somehow, they all have the same “vibe”. Whether it’s more comedic or horror-skewed, whether we are in the cabin in the woods or in the big city or whether we found ourselves in the past or in “today”, you know that once the evil is released, nobody and nowhere is safe. Evil Dead Rise achieved that feeling of urgency whilst giving us worthy protagonists that make us root for them as they will keep fighting, no matter how dire the situation gets. In the horror world, this is unique, and this might be the only “big” franchise I would love to see pop up every couple of years with a new instalment, as long as they keep hiring people who understand what makes these movies great. Lee Cronin (the writer and director) seemed to get it; if he wants to do a sequel or another standalone film in this universe, I will be there.

Overall, Evil Dead Rise is the fifth movie of what might be the bloodiest horror franchise out there, and it still felt fresh. The two major changes (the environment and having a family instead of a group of young people) have worked brilliantly due to a great cast and people behind the camera, who seemed to understand what makes this beautifully twisted and gory world… Well, beautifully twisted and gory. Sure, can I nitpick and find a tiny flaw or two? Yes. But I had a great time, didn’t get bored and was left pumped and wanting more by the end of this movie. The ending, by the way, was so satisfying to watch. What else could I possibly want from a fifth movie in this franchise? If you are a fan of everything Evil Dead, you shouldn’t miss this one.

Rating: 5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke