Category Archives: Movie Reviews

All of my movie reviews…

Cape Fear (1962) Review – Stalking Before the Internet

Advertisements

When comes to older films (and let’s face it, this year Cape Fear will turn 60 years!), you sometimes need to “excuse” certain things. And among one of them is acting. I always say I love any films, so it doesn’t bother me that much. But let’s just say mainly in the acting profession, we’ve had a revolution as I believe a decent actor today is probably better than 95% of actors from the 1950s. I know some people will argue that, and I invite them; I love discussing anything movie-related. Anyway, I also believe that this acting revolution slowly started in the 1960s, and this film is the perfect example.

When you say Cape Fear today, many people would know exactly, what you are talking about, the Martin Scorsese film, right? From 1991, starring creepy Robert De Niro, that Cape Fear? Yeah, I’ve seen it. I would be willing to bet you most people nowadays don’t know that it’s a remake of this film. And why would they, since it is one of the best remakes. Scorsese was going strong, one of the best De Niro performances… but it is a shame (a bit) that people don’t talk about the original version that much, especially when it holds up surprisingly well.

While watching this film, you immediately realise how the times have changed. Robert Mitchum straight-up bullies Gregory Peck‘s character at times, but since he’s got no proof, he needs to be more cautious than ever. And everything slowly builds up throughout the film. And both of these men are excellent in their roles. Especially Mitchum is enjoying his role of… well, you can’t even call him a bad boy/man. Because he is straight-up obsessed with ruining Peck’s (and his family’s) life. I enjoyed his diabolical performance, even though, towards the end, there were scenes where you could argue he was “hamming it up” just a tiny bit. But that doesn’t take anything away from him.

Throughout the film, I thought the fact this film is in black and white adds to the creepiness. To the point, I was surprised that Scorsese’s remake wasn’t also in black and white. There was something about the “scruffy” nature of this film that added to the overall uneasiness of everything. There is this lingering uneasiness throughout the film that culminates in the swamp (as the remake). In a way, it’s a genius move – the film makes you feel uneasy and almost dirty while you watch it, just for its finale to take place in a literal muddy swamp.

While writing about this movie and thinking retrospectively about it, I’ve come to a realisation – modern films don’t do this kind of thing anymore. Sure, they set up things, so they can pay them off later on, but there is something about these older (or classical if you wish) movies that makes them seem like much more thought was put into most of them. That is why I am often willing to see past weaker performances or some things that wouldn’t play well today (whether it’s “casual” racism, attitudes towards women, you name it, old Hollywood got it). But obviously, there are exceptions to every rule.

The only negative thing I would have against this movie is the pacing, especially towards the end. Because for the entire film, we are building up tension, building it up even further and then when the “action” happens in the swamp, it takes some time. And once the tension building is gone, you start to look at the clock to see how much time the movie’s got left. In a sense, it almost felt anti-climatic. But I need to repeat myself – that was only towards the end and, that would be my only complaint. The rest of this film, for me, held up well.

Overall, Cape Fear is almost a perfect film. The performances are (especially for its time) superb, the tension/sense of desperation is palpable, and the movie lets you almost bathe in the uneasy atmosphere it so masterfully creates. If you only know Cape Fear from 1991 and you liked it, give this movie a chance; as I would say, this is almost as good as the remake. One of the rare instances where the remake is as good, maybe even better than the original. But not because the original film would be bad. And that’s what makes it so much more impressive.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Geostorm (2017) Review – I Miss Roland Emmerich

Advertisements

I know what you are thinking. What a clickbaity headline. And honestly, if I hadn’t seen this movie, I would be sceptical myself, because let’s face it – nobody “misses” Roland Emmerich. He exists beyond the boundaries of time and space, and every few years, he emerges with yet another disaster movie to remind us of “people bad”. But Geostorm wishes it was Emmerich so bad. And what’s worse is, he would have made it at least a watchable mess. Without his involvement, this movie is, quite simply, just a mess.

Let’s start from the beginning – the reason I brought up poor Roland into this hot garbage is easy. You could be mistaken that Geostorm was, in fact, made by Roland, as the film contains everything he’s known for and more. An over-the-top idea about how the world can be destroyed, people in power being jerks, and one guy who will hopefully save us all, and that is not a coincidence, as Geostorm was a feature debut for Dean Devlin. Who, you ask? Well, Dean was/is a long time collaborator (with Roland) who has written and produced most of his movies. So it’s even more apparent now why he was tempted to try his hand at directing. Unfortunately, he’s only proven one thing – we should be grateful for having Emmerich in our lives as you can make these disaster movies crazier and joyless…?

The concept (even though that is already from the realm of fantasy rather than sci-fi) was intriguing. The Earth has a “net” that helps it control global warming and mitigate it, sounds fun, and when your premise is “what if that net gets hacked by bad people?” you know you aren’t in for a Nietzschean drama about the meaning of life. You want to see some fun destruction scenes, some relatable characters saying cheesy lines while looking cool. And we have here good people like Gerard ButlerAbbie CornishJim Sturgess or Andy Garcia playing the president. So far, so good, right? Yep. But this is where the fun ends.

It almost felt like Devlin was afraid to step out of the shadow of his… master? Friend? Mentor? Lover? And that’s why he decided to do everything he usually does. But he did it minus the occasional wink or a joke. Ok, I am not saying the movie isn’t trying to be funny; it is. But “trying” is the keyword in that sentence. All the characters are as thin as the paper they were written on. In the case of Butler’s character, I don’t think you could find a paper that thin in the entire world, as he was just a combination of several characters from other films. Let me make myself clear he wasn’t the problem. The material (script) he had at his disposal was. And you could say this to a certain degree for everyone here.

During Geostorm, I’ve invented a new drinking game or put a twist on your old fashioned drinking game if you wish. Before the movie starts, before you even read, what the film is about, write down all the clichés you know on a board or a piece of paper. Take your time and really think about them. And then, crack open your favourite bottle and start the film. And every time you spot one of the clichés in the movie, you take a drink and cross it out. No matter how many clichés you’ve come up with, I would be impressed if the board/the piece of paper didn’t look like a redacted file of an army veteran towards the end. And you might just end up with an alcohol poison. Because holy shit, I don’t think I’ve spotted anything original when the movie starts going, every twist you see coming a mile away. Every turn, you see it turning before the valve is in its place. And again, I wasn’t expecting miracles from a movie called Geostorm, but you can’t even have fun here.

Everything was dumbed down and nonsensical, you are trying hard to grasp for straws, but you are coming up short. For what it’s worth, I thought Abbie Cornish did well enough with the little she had at her disposal. I’ve seen Gerard give a much better performance in pretty much any of the 1.283.498 movies he’s been in since 2008, so I can’t say the same about him. And to be perfectly honest with you, I can’t even remember any great destruction scene from this movie anymore. I will reveal my cards here, I saw this film at the end of November 2021, so it took me a while to write this down, but my memory is pretty great, especially for movies. The fact I can’t remember even one action sequence from an action movie about a hijacked network that’s trying to kill us all says it all.

Overall, Geostorm is one of those films that inadvertently proves how tough it is to make even a mediocre disaster film. And additionally, even if some of his movies are not as great, Roland is the undisputed king of those catastrophic films for a reason. And to be clear, most of his movies aren’t my favourites by any means. But most of them are at least enjoyable enough where you can see what he was trying to do, and more importantly, you can feel he’s almost permitting you to laugh at them. He knows they are not to be taken seriously. Whereas Geostorm at times felt as serious as a heart attack. I would avoid this if I were you.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Luca (2021) Review – What If Little Mermaid Was an Italian Boy?

Advertisements

As I hinted in my Encanto (2021) review, I have seen Luca, and I liked it. Even though it came out way earlier than Encanto, for some reason, it took me a while to get to this film. And that was a shame because I enjoyed it. Not as much as I have enjoyed Encanto, but still…

I promise this entire review I won’t be comparing Luca to Encanto. But I have to do it at least at the start of my review, as not only did both come out in 2021, they are both on the “lighter” side of Pixar films. They both still have deeper themes as we are used to with Pixar movies, however watching both, you will quickly discover they are more light-hearted. And that’s a good thing, considering the last couple of years we’ve all had. And both movies have one more thing in common – they are so stunningly unique.

Luca might be the “brightest” film Pixar has done so far. There was something about the colour scheme that was so vibrant and soothing that was where Luca shined (the pun kind of intended) the most for me. The animators managed to capture Italy stunningly. I’ve never been there (but it’s on my list, and if it weren’t for COVID, it would have been crossed out by now), but I have seen a few Italian movies, and this is how I’ve always imagined Italy to be.

What I also liked was there were not that many Italian stereotypes. Look, there were a few, after all, how else would you make a movie set in Italy without saying things like “spaghetti, pasta”, etc., but the film never felt lazy or too stereotypical. Any other, lesser studio (*cough* Illumination *cough*) would have put ten times more Italian stereotypes and lazy puns within the first 20 minutes than Luca had in the entire film, I guarantee it.

As mentioned before, the story is pretty simple – what if instead of Mermaids, we would have Mermen (I know, officially it is a sea monster, but that’s just mean), and they lived amongst us? And this is where the deeper theme comes in – you could see this as a parallel for coming out, or you could see this as a metaphor for immigrants (us against them subject is present mainly towards the end). I appreciated that Pixar crafted this film in such a way it’s only up to you what you take from it. After all, you don’t have to take anything from it, and you can focus on the story of a little boy who is desperately trying to fit in, and more importantly, trying to learn new things.

That was another aspect of this film; I enjoyed Luca’s natural inclination for learning. I loved how Luca’s curiosity and eagerness to learn was displayed; it felt authentic and brought me back to my childhood when I wanted to know more about anything. Also, I can’t forget to mention the perfect voice casting of Jacob Tremblay as the titular character of Luca. His voice fits perfectly with the main character, and it was impossible not to root for him from the very start.

The only reason I am not rating Luca higher is quite simple – it goes as quickly as it comes. What I mean by that is; since it’s such a light-hearted story, it’s easy to get into it. But when the movie was over, I couldn’t help but feel I wanted a bit more. The primary story conflict got resolved pretty quickly, even the stakes never felt as high… And when the film you are watching is like that, chances are you won’t remember much from the movie after a couple of days. And that is what happened. I still remember the stunning animation, the fact I felt (at times) like I was in Italy, but if you ask me about details, I draw a blank.

And that is not necessarily a bad thing. Sometimes, you need to chill and be transported to someplace magical (like Italy :-)) where there isn’t that much for you to worry about. I suppose, when I re-watch this film, I will be smarter and see how many things still apply. It will be interesting to see whether I’ll feel the same, or maybe I will discover that I’ve underestimated/oversimplified this film, and it actually offers much more. It is a possibility, but for now, all I know is this wasn’t the “top tier” Pixar for me. But we all know that bar is set incredibly high.

Overall, Luca is an almost perfect animated movie. It’s not breaking any new grounds story-wise, but it has the unique power to transport you to Italy. Where you will swear, you are there, alongside Luca, Alberto and Gulia, enjoying pasta, spaghetti and some cool gelato. Yes, be aware, this film will make you hungry. If you want to watch it on an empty stomach, you might be in for torture. The only thing this film had going against it would be the slightly weaker story. But hey, if you have one of those days where all you need is a cute animated movie to watch, then Luca might be for you.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Bacchus Lady (2016) Review – Old People Need Some Love Too

Advertisements

I am not going to lie the only reason I’ve watched this film is the “groundbreaking” Yuh-Jung Youn. As believe it or not, she’s the first Korean actor ever to win an Oscar (she won it for her performance in the movie Minari (2020) that is on my ever-growing list of films to watch). Plus, The Bacchus Lady managed to combine two topics seemingly nobody wants to see/think about – older people struggling financially and having sex. This film combines these two issues into one – what if we made a movie about older people having sex for money BECAUSE they are struggling financially? Yes, it’s true, and apparently, it is a thing in South Korea.

You know I don’t usually post plot synopsis, but in this case, I think it’s a must, as I don’t believe this would become my “most read review ever” by any means because the film is as niche as it gets.

The Bacchus Lady looks into the issue of elderly prostitution in South Korea. So-Young, an elderly lady who provides sex services to the male senior citizens using the pretext of selling Bacchus (an energy drink) to them. When So-Young picks up a Korean-Filipino boy named Min-Ho from the clinic she visits after Min-Ho’s mother stabs the doctor (Min-Ho’s father), she takes care of him while seeking a living through prostitution. From her interactions with her former clients, she finds that the golden age in their silver years may not be that bright after all.

Source: IMDb.com

And that is precisely what the film is about. We follow Yuh-Jung, who is superb in this film and see her “stumbling” upon this kid. And you can tell she knows she shouldn’t just take him. But she is worried for him, and she just wants to help. So she starts to split the little she has with him. Luckily, she’s got some friends who also stand by her (from a one-legged man to a transwoman who is also a prostitute and the one-legged man secretly loves), so we get to see her interactions with the little kid. And her life, struggling to get by, doing what she does.

But believe it or not, this is merely a “B plot”. The main storyline is her working, and us, seeing what she needs to go through. The Bacchus Lady never felt cheap or exploitative. It deals with sex work and Yuh-Jung’s storyline very well. It never goes into details; it gives you “enough” so you don’t get to romanticize anything but never takes it over the top. And more importantly, it shows you something we don’t want to think about – how we treat older people and sex workers. And now, combine these two.

But even though this movie will make you think about these issues, it never feels preachy or over-the-top. It is subtle; it takes its time to tell the story it wants to tell, leaves you with some questions (mainly about Yuh-Jung’s family, I thought that storyline was done very well), but most of all, it leaves you almost wanting more. Which is a weird thing to say, considering this is not a cheery movie by any means. But it deals with every topic it touches with such gentle touch of humanity, it slowly gets to you. Or, at least it got to me.

The only thing I would say “against” this film – sometimes the pacing was a bit off. Not often, but especially towards the end, I could see trimming about ten minutes or so from the film would improve it. But that’s just a tiny nitpick.

Overall, The Bacchus Lady is a movie like no other. Sure, that’s because it primarily deals with a topic like no other film would (at least I don’t remember a mainstream movie about a senior citizen having to be a prostitute to support themselves). If that previous sentence didn’t deter you, I would highly encourage you to search for this movie and watch it. I don’t think it matters if you like it or not, because it’s a film you won’t forget any time soon. It stays with you. And to be clear, Yuh-Jung Youn was absolutely superb in this role. I can’t wait to finally watch Minari.

Rating: 4 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Murder Mystery (2019) Review – As Average as Colour Beige

Advertisements

It’s easy to come at Adam Sandler for making movies like Murder Mystery. But aren’t we missing something obvious? If you think about it, he’s making his living pitching ideas for films, based on one simple thing: “Where haven’t I been yet? I want to travel there, so let’s make a film that fits it; we can worry about the details later on.” And if you look at it like that, he kind of “won” in the game of life, didn’t he?

Murder Mystery seems intriguing enough at first. His paring with Jennifer Aniston works as well as it had worked in Just Go with It (2011), but even that is not enough to lift this movie somewhere higher. The plot of this film, where they try to have a murder mystery going, is appealing at first. Until it gets convoluted, frankly, boring, and something like that shouldn’t happen with such a great cast! If you have Luke EvansGemma Arterton, or Terence Stamp at your disposal and the movie is still just “meh”, something failed.

Is it possible that Sandler became such a big star nobody can tell him no? So anything goes? Because that is how this movie felt for most of the time. I get it, Sandler’s character should be this disruptive, possibly out of his depth guy who means well, but even that could be portrayed less annoyingly. At times it genuinely felt like Sandler was actively trying to harm this movie. And believe it or not, I actually like quite a few of his comedies, and I don’t mind him as an actor. But looking at his filmography, it’s been over a decade since he starred in a comedy that was better than just average. I have always had this feeling that Sandler has a massive amount of energy and comedic wit, which, if channelled properly, could result in something funny. But lately, it seems like he forgot to “transmit” it, or he doesn’t work with people who know how to “use” him…?

I’ve mentioned the stellar cast, so let’s talk about them. Luke Evans is, as always, solid as a rock. He has always been type-casted in these supporting roles, and I always wondered whether he has got something more in him. I believe he does, but I have yet to see it. Gemma Arterton is playing precisely the role this movie requested her to play – sex on legs. And she does it so well, as she is a stunning and charming actress. And Terence Stamp has more of a glorified cameo in this movie than something you could call a proper role.

The film itself isn’t “bad” by any means – it’s paced well enough, the mystery element works to an extent (until it gets too convoluted to surprise you), and it’s not something you’d be suffering through while watching. But believe me, when I say you won’t remember anything from this film in one week. There isn’t anything standing out – not a single performance or action set piece or “incredibly funny” scene, everything kind of… exists here. I think this might be the perfect description of Adam Sandler’s comedy career at this moment, we are all aware of it, but it’s not something that would stand out (unfortunately).

I wish Sandler would feel the need to challenge himself more and step out of his comfort zone. Because we all know every once in a while, he makes a movie like Uncut Gems (2019), where he shines. And not only did he deliver an outstanding performance, but he did it so well most movie fans were genuinely surprised with the fact he wasn’t nominated for an Oscar that year. And that goes back to my theory about him “winning” the life – maybe he simply wants to exist? Maybe he’s content with what he has (and it’s not “little” by any means, he could stop working altogether, and his children’s children would still be sorted out financially) and does the bare minimum to get by? Honestly, I don’t know because I don’t know the guy. But only a few mainstream actors have such an intriguing career as he has.

Overall, Murder Mystery is the perfect definition of a film that “won’t offend anyone”. What that means is – you will watch it, you might chuckle at times, you will kill slightly over an hour and half of your life and won’t feel too “disgusted” with what you’ve just watched. But you won’t also remember it in a couple of days. Is it worth watching it? If you like Sandler’s style of humour and his pairing with Jennifer Aniston and don’t mind the fact this is yet another “taking a vacation while shooting a movie” Sandler joint, then yes, you might enjoy it. If that doesn’t sound like your ideal form of entertainment, you might want to avoid this one.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021) Review – A Near Perfect Marvel Film

Advertisements

I won’t lie – this was one of the Marvel movies that didn’t speak to me enough to see it in the cinema. Part of it was because of the ongoing pandemic, and the other part… I simply didn’t know enough about this character. And this is where I have learned not to doubt the “Marvel gods” as they have done it again. They took a character I didn’t know and made him so intriguing I can’t wait to see more of him and his world. And most importantly, this film might contain the best fight scenes in a Marvel movie to date.

Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings starts as your “stereotypical” wire-fu movie, except much more interesting. The beginning fight sequence, where “the parents” meet, was shot beautifully, and I was fully hooked on the film from that moment. And that feeling stayed with me until the last 20 minutes or so (but more about that later).

I appreciated the shift when comes to… well, everything, to be honest. “Suddenly” we are in San Francisco (not New York or LA), most of the cast is of Asian heritage, and we hear Mandarin a lot in this film. To that, I say bravo, Marvel. It took us a while to finally get a kick-ass superhero of Asian descent, but once we got there, we got there in style, as Shang-Chi is not “just another” MCU film. It’s a film where we get introduced to a different world, culture, protagonists while still having that familiar “Marvel” feeling surrounding this film, for better or worse.

Two aspects made this movie stand out in my eyes – the cast and the action sequences. Let’s start with the action scenes. Ever since the MCU began, one of the biggest complaints the fans had, have been about their action sequences. They were choppy, tough to navigate and were not great, let’s get that straight. And we all know why – because actors are not stunt people, and if they got injured, the production would have to shut down for weeks, possibly months. That is why the studio had to get great stunt teams and then shoot the action around them, so we, the audience, were convinced it’s our favourite superheroes kicking ass, not the stunt people. Well, this movie dared to ask the question: “Yeah, but what if we tried to do the action sequences differently? Like, what if they didn’t suck?” And then the people behind this film went ahead and did it beautifully. Most of the action scenes are coherent; you get a sense of space, where everybody is, and even the cutting is down to a minimum (except the big finale, but we will get there). Just for that alone, this movie deserves all the praise.

But even the best fight scenes can’t compare to the cast of this film. This cast might be the best (non-Avenger) one in the MCU. Because everybody here works together flawlessly. Simu Liu is someone I wasn’t familiar with before, but holy shit, this guy is charismatic and charm personified. He is the perfect protagonist we can all relate to, even if were are not as buffed as he is. He felt like he was born for this role; he played everything from cool to unsure with such ease; I felt safe with him on the screen. I will be honest, I have never understood the hype around Awkwafina until now. True, I have only seen her in a few movies and need to watch more of her, but this movie convinced me. Her character could have easily been the annoying friend whom this movie didn’t need. Easily. But her chemistry with Simu was perfect, and she was actually funny in this film while having a character arc too (albeit at times, it might have seemed too rushed, I thought). Speaking of chemistry – I liked, no loved the fact their chemistry wasn’t romantic but more like brother and sister. We need more “couples” like this one in (not just Marvel) films. Simply because two attractive young people are on the screen together, it doesn’t mean they need to end up together. I honestly hope these two will not “hook up” in future films. And, on top of everything else, Tony Chiu-Wai Leung and Michelle Yeoh were, as always, fantastic. Also, I can’t forget to compliment Meng’er Zhang. Talk about somebody who can kick your ass and look great doing it. Plus, given the ending, I am intrigued by what it’s in “the store” for her character in future films.

So, let’s address my only complaint regarding Shang-Chi. The ending. Without going into heavy spoiler territory, let’s just say there are almost two different endings… storylines…? There is one about our main hero dealing with his family, and then there is the “Marvel” one where we need to have a big spectacle at the end. And instead of those two storylines intertwining with each other, they clash with each other. Particularly the stereotypical “Marvel” ending (fighting a massive, albeit cool CGI monster) could have been dropped without any problems. And it would improve the film. I understand this film is Marvel’s, and they need to “stay on brand”, but this movie would have been that tiny bit better had it stayed grounded just a bit more towards the end. We didn’t need the CGI madness. Dare I say it almost distracted from the story this movie wanted us to follow? Yeah, I dare say that because that’s how it felt. Not everything needs to have a big CGI finale, especially if you have one already brewing and you (the film) were doing fine until then.

But even that is only a tiny complaint, and I can’t stress this enough – I had so much fun with this film. Even though we never actually learned what those ten rings are supposed to be doing. What is their power? We see them used a lot, but the movie treats them as an “anything goes” kind of toy, so it would be good to know their power/limitation. But other than that, this film was a pleasure to watch. Even with the run time of just over two hours, you don’t get bored (until the very end), and the movie is funny when it needs to be. It is also a character-driven action film like no other (possibly ever) we have seen in the MCU.

Overall, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings was a near-perfect Marvel film. I regret not seeing this film at the cinema. But I guarantee you that I will be there for any future movies involving Simu and Awkwafina. I can’t believe I am saying this, but the sequel for this movie can’t come soon enough. Especially with such a vibrant, intriguing and unique world and characters, they have managed to build and establish in this film. I can’t wait to get back. To see what will they do with it, and it’s only my hope that Shang-Chi will be a huge part of the next phase of MCU as he’s got it all, charisma, charm and abs (as every MCU superhero). A really, really close to a perfect score.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

Drop Dead Gorgeous (1999) Review – An Underappreciated Gem

Advertisements

Over the years of watching movies from every genre, decade, country, you name it… I’ve gotten used to the fact that sometimes you “discover” a film only a handful of people talk about. So you watch it and then you wonder, how come it’s not more famous? How come this particular film slipped through the cracks of… well, everything? Not only “slipped through the time”, but even at the box office, this movie flopped hard. And the only reason I can think of is… people didn’t get it at the time?

Drop Dead Gorgeous might, on the surface, look like your run of the mill comedy about a beauty pageant in a small, rural community. But it’s so much more. It pokes fun at everything, including the very fact how these pageants can put so much pressure on the women competing in them, even though at the end of the day, they don’t matter. Plus the mockumentary approach they chose to go with… talk about being ahead of the curve!

I think that is this film’s biggest strength, this (at times) mockumentary approach because it works wonderfully. It’s so clear, what is happening, who is behind the “sudden” death of most of the contenders, but nobody does anything about it. How some town folks are portrayed as being… let’s say simple-minded…? I thought the choices worked brilliantly for this film. But it’s impossible to discuss this movie without admiring the “about to be a big star” cast alongside some well-established ones!

Let’s start with these three “about to be big” names Kirsten DunstBrittany Murphy and Amy Adams. All these actresses had the best ahead of them at the time of the film’s shooting. Well, almost all, as Brittany tragically died in 2009. And this movie serves as a reminder she also could have been great. Just take a look at Amy Adams in this film. She plays the dimwitted character so perfectly; would you have guessed she would be one of the most admired actresses of her generation? If I saw this film back in 1999, I wouldn’t, that’s how good she was in convincing us. Kirsten is the only one out of this cast who is the most down-to-earth and is a great protagonist we can all root for. Her reaction at the end of this film, where something happens, and that something prevents her from competing, is simply priceless and drives the point home even further about the meaninglessness of this competition. And it was in these small moments the film won me over. Yes, some of this comedy stems from being in your face, but then, you have subtle moments that only pay off if you pay attention.

If you weren’t (somehow) impressed with these three ladies, let’s talk about the rest of the cast – Denise RichardsEllen BarkinAllison JanneyKirstie Alley! What I loved about these actresses; they all brought something different to this film. Denise was already a recognisable name and looked stunning. Ellen was great as Kirsten’s mum, same with Kirstie as Denise’s mum, but… Allison Janney yet again steals everything for herself. And proves, we should have been paying attention to her way, way sooner, as she can truly do it all, from playing serious roles to being a sharp-witted and funny character. In a movie like this, that is the definition of an ensemble cast, where everyone gets their chance to shine; she outshines them all, somehow.

And maybe, this was the movie’s problem…? Maybe people thought, given the film is mostly female cast and it’s about pageant show, it won’t be any good…? Well, they were wrong. I honestly hope because of the internet, we could all do our bit to make this movie into a cult classic that could be admired, for what it truly is. A great comedy with little to no flaws that is surprisingly ahead of the curve; when comes to the style of humour. It’s insane to me that a movie like this, with so many great actresses, exists, and people don’t bring it up often (enough).

Overall, Drop Dead Gorgeous is a funny, clever and star-packed movie that I can’t recommend highly enough. My only “complaint” would be it drags a bit too much towards the end, but even that isn’t anything significant that would spoil the rest of the film or my memories of it. If you are looking for a comedy with many great actresses that has something to say without being too condescending about the topic of pageants, look no further. I will 100% re-watch it at some point.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke

The Matrix Resurrections (2021) Review – The Definition of Unnecessary Sequel

Advertisements

Before going into the details about why I think this movie isn’t good at all, let me paint you a scene. My girlfriend had never seen a single Matrix movie in her life. And when we went to see Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021, my review here), the trailer for The Matrix Resurrections was on before that film. And she said she would love to watch the previous ones, so we could go and watch this one in the cinema together. I thought that was a great idea, as it’s been a good few years ever since I’ve seen the original trilogy, so we’ve binged them all in one day. She was mesmerised by every single one of them. She absolutely adored it, and I got reminded how even the hated sequels still hold up (for me at least). And that got me slightly more excited for this sequel as I wasn’t before. The trailers showed us a few cool looking scenes but, to quote Master Yoda, I had a bad feeling about this. Nevertheless, we went to see it two days after binging the trilogy and we both left cinema… disappointed, to put it mildly.

The Matrix Resurrections to me felt like, and I will use a technical term, so please bear with me, a hot fucking mess. Do you like these sequels that come after almost 20 years and every chance they get, they replay a moment from the original movie? While telling you how everything is so different now and yet, everything feels the same but so far up its meta ass; you can’t enjoy yourself? Yeah, I don’t like those either. And that is (unfortunately) what this film is.

The problem with this film, in my eyes, was the overreliance on the original trilogy while trying to be “meta” about it. It reminded me of the member berries from South Park. Except in this instance, they managed to fuck the meta-ness of Deadpool movies. But they did it wrong. In this movie, they try to mask this meta thing by talking about the Matrix as a videogame, not a movie franchise. But everything else is the same. And that’s not clever. Just because you acknowledge, this sequel needs to happen with or without the original cast members because the Warner Bros. says so, that doesn’t make you or your movie sound clever or meta – it just makes your film tedious.

And that was my main issue with The Matrix Resurrections – it didn’t feel warranted. The story ended in 2003 in The Matrix Revolutions. Whether or not you liked that ending, that’s an entirely different discussion, but it did end. But in this sequel, they are brought back by…, no I won’t spoil this movie, because you need to experience it yourself. Let me just say this – there is a reason in this movie why everything happens. What happened after the end of The Matrix Revolutions. But it felt so forced it didn’t feel like resurrection, more like zombification of Matrix. And I say this as somebody who always liked the original trilogy but was never obsessed with those films. So if they somehow “messed with my childhood goddamit!” I would somewhat understand why I didn’t connect with this film in any way. But they didn’t, because these films were never a huge part of my life – I thought they were cool, sci-fi films and especially The Matrix (1999) revolutionised (at the time) both sci-fi and action genre.

Let’s talk about the cast because I have some thoughts. I like our Lord and Saviour Keanu Reeves (as he’s known on the Internet, I don’t create the rules), but even he seemed to be over this film/franchise. As much as it pains me to say this, he almost seemed like he was forced to make this film, or it felt like he had an obligation to an old friend to make it… Something seemed off. And I don’t think I am alone in this, compare his acting here to any of the John Wick movies, and you will see the difference. I understand that this sequel wasn’t “his” (that’s another “clever” idea I don’t want to spoil), so I guess those were the direction he’s received to be more… subtle, maybe disconnected? In all honesty, whatever he got from Lana Wachowski, that wasn’t it.

Yahya Abdul-Mateen II has done the best he could with what he had but Jesus. He is such a charismatic performer and one of the brightest actors of the last couple of years, and even he couldn’t make this “new” character work well enough. The same can be said about Carrie-Anne Moss – she is literally absent for most of the film (well, she isn’t, but Trinity is, but again, I don’t want to spoil anything), so even what they try to do with Trinity’s character in this film doesn’t pay off, because she is hardly in it!

And I could name a few more actors that either play somebody who didn’t return for one reason or another or portray a new (and mostly wacky) character, but I would only be repeating myself. I don’t think I’ve seen a new movie with such a big budget where all the actors in it were either “not great” or “ok, I guess”. But here’s the thing – I honestly don’t blame any one of them – the script is the problem. Because it’s trying to forge a new way by… reminding us of what happened “the previous time, in a much better movie”. And it’s trying to excuse itself by playing it all meta. And that gets old and tiring really fast.

Even the action sequences (the staple of the original trilogy) were forgettable at best and awful at worst. As once all-powerful Neo, he can’t be bothered anymore, so he’s just blocking. A lot. And also, has the Force from Star Wars now? That puzzled me the most – even some hardcore sequel haters of the original trilogy can admit that those films have great action sequences. But in this one, only a few days after I’ve seen it (in the cinema, not at home!) I can’t remember one scene that’d stand out. Everything we see here was done much better by either the original trilogy or films that copied it trilogy years later. And am I going nuts, or does the CGI in the original movie from 1999 look better than this movie from 2021?

Overall, The Matrix Resurrections is a waste of everybody’s talent. For every decent choice this movie makes, they make ten wrong choices. For every line of dialogue that sounds intriguing, 20 lines sound like they were taken from a poor fan-fiction. When my girlfriend and I have walked out of the cinema, she said she was disappointed and would rate this 0/10 (and she rarely is that harsh), and in her words: “It was shit. My hopes and dream were crushed in the first ten minutes. Can never get back those two hours.” I won’t be as harsh as her. Because there were some scenes I liked, but altogether, this felt like it came too late. If this story truly needed to be told, it should have happened way sooner than almost 20 years after it ended. I am open-minded enough to see whether a re-watch would change my mind, but my girlfriend is refusing to even re-watch it. That’s how much she loved the original trilogy and despised this film.

Rating: 2 out of 5.

That’s all for this one! Did you see it? What did you think about it? Let me know!

Until next time,

Luke